The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section

Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation.

METHODS

A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CINAHL, Scopus, and African Index Medicus databases for studies describing labor curves, assessing their effectiveness in improving birth outcomes, or assessing their accuracy as screening or diagnostic tools. Original research articles and systematic reviews were included. We excluded studies investigating adverse birth outcomes retrospectively, and those investigating the effect of analgesia-related interventions on labor progression. Study eligibility was assessed, and data were extracted from included studies using a piloted charting form. The findings are presented according to descriptive summaries created for the included studies.

RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle-income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.

Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

No. 155-Guidelines for Vaginal Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidelines for the provision of a trial of labour (TOL) after Caesarean section.

OUTCOME

Fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality associated with vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) and repeat Caesarean section.

EVIDENCE

MEDLINE database was searched for articles published from January 1, 1995, to February 28, 2004, using the key words "vaginal birth after Caesarean (Cesarean) section." The quality of evidence is described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam.

RECOMMENDATIONS

VALIDATION: These guidelines were approved by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics and Executive Committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Lower uterine segment thickness to prevent uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcomes: a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

Choice of delivery route after previous cesarean delivery can be difficult because both trial of labor after cesarean delivery and elective repeat cesarean delivery are associated with risks. The major risk that is associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture that requires emergency laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the occurrence of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery when lower uterine segment thickness measurement is included in the decision-making process about the route of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

In 4 tertiary-care centers, we prospectively recruited women between 34 and 38 weeks of gestation who were contemplating a vaginal birth after a previous single low-transverse cesarean delivery. Lower uterine segment thickness was measured by ultrasound imaging and integrated in the decision of delivery route. According to lower uterine segment thickness, women were classified in 3 risk categories for uterine rupture: high risk (<2.0 mm), intermediate risk (2.0-2.4 mm), and low risk (≥2.5 mm). Our primary outcome was symptomatic uterine rupture, which was defined as requiring urgent laparotomy. We calculated that 942 women who were undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery should be included to be able to show a risk of uterine rupture <0.8%.

RESULTS

We recruited 1856 women, of whom 1849 (99%) had a complete follow-up data. Lower uterine segment thickness was <2.0 mm in 194 women (11%), 2.0-2.4 mm in 217 women (12%), and ≥2.5 mm in 1438 women (78%). Rate of trial of labor was 9%, 42%, and 61% in the 3 categories, respectively (P<.0001). Of 984 trials of labor, there were no symptomatic uterine ruptures, which is a rate that was lower than the 0.8% expected rate (P=.0001).

CONCLUSION

The inclusion of lower uterine segment thickness measurement in the decision of the route of delivery allows a low risk of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Role of partogram in high risk pregnancies: an experience at a tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

Cervical dilatation documented on partogram indicates expected rate of progress of labour and deviations from alert line indicates abnormal progress of labour. Its early detection and timely intervention can reduce fetomaternal morbidity.

PURPOSE

To study the role of partogram in the management of labouring mothers with high risk pregnancies at a tertiary care centre.

METHOD

Four hundred primigravidas with high risk pregnancies in active labour (with cervical dilatation ≥ 4 cm) were studied, divided into two groups as Partogram and no Partogram group and each group consisted of 200 patients. In Partogram group, progress of labour was documented on modified WHO partograph along with the notes on progress sheet of case record file while by standard notes only in no Partogram group. Cases included were pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, cholestasis, hypothyroidism, history of previous one LSCS for trial of labour, postdated pregnancy. Management of labour was standardised using set protocols of intrapartum care followed by analysis of duration of labour, rate of intervention, maternal and perinatal outcomes in both group.

RESULT

Though percentage of normal vaginal delivery was higher in Partogram group (71.5 %) than no Partogram group (68 %), no statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding mean duration of active phase of first and second stage of labour, rate of operative vaginal deliveries (partogram 12 % and no partogram 12.5 %) and of caesarean section (Partogram 16.5 %, no Partogram 18.5 %) and perinatal outcome.

CONCLUSION

In this study, partogram had no significant impact on duration of labour, rate of operative interventions and perinatal outcome following its use in the labour management of high risk pregnancies.

The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize the labor of women attempting trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who experience uterine rupture.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis of a nested case-control study of women attempting TOLAC. Women experiencing uterine rupture (cases) were compared to 2 reference groups: successful TOLAC and failed TOLAC. Interval-censored regression was used to estimate the median time to progress 1 cm in dilation and the total time from 4-10 cm.

RESULTS

A total of 115 cases were compared to 341 successful TOLAC and 120 failed TOLAC. The time to progress 1 cm was similar between groups until 7-cm dilation. After 7 cm, cases of uterine rupture required longer to progress than successful TOLAC (median [95th percentile] time from 7-8 cm: 0.38 [1.91] vs 0.16 [0.79] hours; from 8-9 cm: 0.28 [1.10] vs 0.10 [0.39] hours). Women with a uterine rupture had labor curves similar to those with a failed TOLAC.

CONCLUSION

Women with labor dystocia in the active phase of labor should be closely monitored for uterine rupture in TOLAC.

Can a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be a normal labor and birth? Lessons from midwifery applied to trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery

Women who undergo a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery (TOLAC) have special needs prenatally and during the intrapartum period. Counseling about the choice of TOLAC versus an elective repeat cesarean delivery involves complex statistical concepts. Prenatal counseling that is patient centered, individualized, and presented in a way that addresses the health literacy and health numeracy of the recipient encompasses best practices that support patient decision making. Evidence-based practices during labor that support vaginal birth and increase patient satisfaction are of special value for this population.

Could the central part of the partograph, the cervicograph be improved?

AIMS

Since partographs were introduced into obstetric practice, more than 50 years ago, the appearance of cervicographs as their central section has not been significantly changed. The aims of this article are to assess whether the current characteristics of cervicographs represent the optimal solution with regard to the rules for plotting data and to suggest what that optimal solution might be.

METHODS

The literature was searched for papers containing reproductions of cervicographs to review their characteristics. According to the general rules for plotting data, values of three most important characteristics of cervicographs were defined.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the majority of available cervicographs are: a dilatation scale smallest division 1 cm, a time scale smallest division 1 h and 1 cm/h dilatation rate line inclination less than 45 degrees. The optimal characteristics of cervicographs are: a dilatation scale smallest division 2 cm, a time scale smallest division 5 min and 1 cm/h dilatation rate line inclination of 45 degrees.

CONCLUSION

The scale divisions on the proposed cervicograph form are in predefined relation to the accuracy of the measurements made. This enables improved portrayal of labour.

Value of partogram in vaginal birth after caesarean section

A prospective partographic study of labour in 102 women with one previous lower uterine segment caesarean section in the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria, was carried out to assess the predictive value of partogram on the outcome of labour in vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBACS). The outcomes measured were the duration of labour, cervical dilatation rate (CDR), and average cervical dilatation rate (ACDR). The data obtained were analysed using Z-test and tests of validity. A successful vaginal delivery rate of 72.5% was achieved. The cervical dilatation rate, average cervical dilatation rate and the alert line were found to be significant predictors of the outcome of labour in VBACS. These findings have important implications in establishing policies for monitoring labour in VBACS.

Essai de travail en cas de césarienne antérieure

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to relate the evolution of obstetrical management of delivery in women who had previously undergone cesarean delivery and to search the studies supporting the choice of the mode of delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We identified relevant studies through a computer search in the Medline database.

RESULTS

After a period from 1980 to 2000 when the vaginal delivery had been increasingly recommended, a growth in the use of the planned cesarean delivery was observed. Recent studies report more evidence that uterine rupture is the result of trial of labor and that adverse perinatal outcomes are associated with uterine rupture. The risk of uterine rupture is increased with labor induction. The use of prostaglandins appears to be implicated in a significant increase of uterine rupture, and subsequently might be contraindicated in this situation. The use of oxytocin induced labor appears to increase the risk of uterine rupture. However, the level of adverse perinatal outcomes is low. The choice of the mode of delivery should take into account the likelihood of a further pregnancy, due to the increased risk of placental pathologic conditions depending on the number of repeated cesarean sections.

CONCLUSION

An optimal decision for the mode of delivery should be shared with the pregnant women and all these factors should be taken into consideration.

Guidelines for Vaginal Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence-based guidelines for the provision of a trial of labour (TOL) after Caesarean section.

OUTCOME

Fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality associated with vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) and repeat Caesarean section.

EVIDENCE

MEDLINE database was searched for articles published from January 1, 1995, to February 28, 2004, using the key words "vaginal birth after Caesarean (Cesarean) section". The quality of evidence is described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Provided there are no contraindications, a woman with 1 previous transverse low-segment Caesarean section should be offered a trial of labour (TOL) with appropriate discussion of perinatal risks and benefits. The process of informed consent with appropriate documentation should be an important part of the birth plan in a woman with a previous Caesarean section (II-2B). 2. The intention of a woman undergoing a TOL after Caesarean section should be clearly stated, and documentation of the previous uterine scar should be clearly marked on the prenatal record (II-2B). 3. For a safe labour after Caesarean section, a woman should deliver in a hospital where a timely Caesarean section is possible. The woman and her health care provider must be aware of the hospital resources and the availability of obstetric, anesthetic, pediatric, and operating-room staff (II-2A). 4. Each hospital should have a written policy in place regarding the notification and (or) consultation for the physicians responsible for a possible timely Caesarean section (III-B). 5. In the case of a TOL after Caesarean, an approximate time frame of 30 minutes should be considered adequate in the set-up of an urgent laparotomy (III-C). 6. Continuous electronic monitoring of women attempting a TOL after Caesarean section is recommended (II-2A). 7. Suspected uterine rupture requires urgent attention and expedited laparotomy to attempt to decrease maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality (II-2A). 8. Oxytocin augmentation is not contraindicated in women undergoing a TOL after Caesarean section (11-2A). 9. Medical induction of labour with oxytocin may be associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture and should be used carefully after appropriate counselling (II-2B). 10. Medical induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture and should not be used except in rare circumstances and after appropriate counselling (II-2B). 11. Prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol) is associated with a high risk of uterine rupture and should not be used as part of a TOL after Caesarean section (II-2A). 12. A foley catheter may be safely used to ripen the cervix in a woman planning a TOL after Caesarean section (II-2A). 13. The available data suggest that a trial of labour in women with more than 1 previous Caesarean section is likely to be successful but is associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture (II-2B). 14. Multiple gestation is not a contraindication to TOL after Caesarean section (II-2B). 15. Diabetes mellitus is not a contraindication to TOL after Caesarean section (II-2B). 16. Suspected fetal macrosomia is not a contraindication to TOL after Caesarean section (II-2B). 17. Women delivering within 18 to 24 months of a Caesarean section should be counselled about an increased risk of uterine rupture in labour (II-2B). 18. Postdatism is not a contraindication to TOL after Caesarean section (II-2B). 19. Every effort should be made to obtain the previous Caesarean section operative report to determine the type of uterine incision used. In situations where the scar is unknown, information concerning the circumstances of the delivery is helpful in determining the likelihood of a low transverse incision. If the likelihood of a low transverse incision is high, a TOL after Caesarean section can be offered (II-2B).

VALIDATION

These guidelines were approved by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics and Executive Committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of uterine rupture and its complications as the result of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed was searched from 1989 to 2001, with the terms "VBAC, uterine rupture," "trial of labor, uterine rupture," "cesarean delivery, uterine rupture," and "scarred uterus, rupture." For inclusion, reports had to contain data from at least 100 patients with trials of labor that included a description of adverse outcomes. Duplicate reporting from a single institution was excluded. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

Seventy-two of the 361 articles (20%) that were identified met the inclusion criteria. A 6.2 per 1000 trial of labor rate of uterine rupture (total=880 uterine ruptures in 142,075 trials of labor) was determined. For every 1000 trials of labor the uterine rupture-related complication rate was 1.8 for packed red blood cell transfusion, 1.5 for pathologic fetal acidosis (cord pH<7.00), 0.9 for hysterectomy, 0.8 for genitourinary injury, 0.4 for perinatal death, and 0.02 for maternal death. The perinatal mortality rate was significantly lower among studies from the United States versus other countries (0.3 vs 0.6; odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94) and in series that exceeded 1000 patients (0.2 vs 1.7; odds ratio, 7.34; 95% CI, 3.94-13.69).

CONCLUSION

Although relatively uncommon, uterine rupture is associated with several adverse outcomes, depending on the time of the publication and the site and size of the population that was studied.

Dystocia among women with symptomatic uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze cervical dilatation patterns among women with uterine rupture by means of a mathematic model and to use the results to determine optimal intervention criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a case-control review that compared a case patient group of 19 women with uterine rupture during labor with control groups with either no previous cesarean deliveries, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, or failure of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. The mathematic model quantified dilatation and adjusted for conditions specific to each patient. Case patients were compared with matched control subjects by means of paired t tests, analysis of variance, odds ratios, and conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Dystocia was present in 31.6% to 47.4% of patients with uterine rupture, versus 2.6% to 13.2% of the control group with no previous cesarean deliveries (P< or =.001). The incidence of an arrest disorder among patients with uterine rupture was similar to that seen in the control group with failure of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. However, the interval from diagnosis to rupture or cesarean delivery was 5.5 +/- 3.3 hours among case patients with uterine rupture and 1.5 +/- 1.3 hours in the control group with failure of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

When cervical dilatation was lower than the 10th percentile and was arrested for > or =2 hours, cesarean delivery would have prevented 42.1% of the cases of uterine rupture and resulted in excess 2.6% and 7.9% cesarean delivery rates among women with no previous cesarean deliveries and women with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, respectively.