Epidural analgesia as a risk factor for operative delivery

Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries among parturients with congenital uterine anomalies; risk factors and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (VAVD) in a subset of parturients with congenital uterine anomalies.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective database study was conducted at a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Parturients with known congenital uterine anomalies who had vaginal deliveries were enrolled, whereas parturients with failed VAVD, didelphic uterus, and delivery after intrauterine fetal death were excluded. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between parturients who achieved spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and those who delivered via VAVD. The maternal composite outcome was calculated for each group and included one or more of the following: post-partum hemorrhage, hemoglobin drop ≥ 4 gr/dL, blood transfusions, retained placental products, and obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Univariate analysis was performed followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for potential confounders. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

After the application of the exclusion criteria, 332 parturients were found eligible. Of those, 289 (87%) had SVD and 43 (13%) had VAVD. VAVD was more common among primiparous parturients and epidural analgesia users. Parturients with VAVD had higher rates of third-degree perineal tear, postpartum hemorrhage, and blood transfusions. The maternal composite outcome was significantly more prevalent in the VAVD group (44.2% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.01). After controlling for potential confounders, the maternal composite outcome was found to be independently associated with VAVD (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.10-4.60). The neonatal results were overall comparable, except for scalp trauma and Erb's palsy/clavicular fracture, which were more prevalent in the VAVD group.

CONCLUSION

In a special population of parturients with congenital uterine anomalies, VAVD was found to be associated with significantly higher rates of adverse maternal outcomes and perinatal birth trauma. These findings should be presented to parturients during consultations about modes of delivery.

Epidural analgesia for low risk labour determines the rate of instrumental deliveries but not that of caesarean sections

We analysed retrospectively the link between the incidence of epidural analgesia and the frequency distribution of instrumental delivery, caesarean section, labour induction and parity in a selected group of women with a low risk labour profile in all (85) obstetric units in Flanders (Northern Belgium). A group of 104 932 women with presumed low risk labour profile was subjected to analysis. The main outcome measures were the incidence of obstetric intervention in each obstetric unit in relation to the extent of their use of epidural analgesia. There was a wide variation in the rate of epidural analgesia (3-75%), labour induction 'for convenience' (4-48%) and instrumental delivery (4-50%) among the Flemish obstetric units. The incidence of instrumental delivery in a given unit was greatly influenced by the rate of epidural analgesia and labour induction for convenience (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of caesarean section in a given unit was not determined by either the rates of epidural, labour induction, attempted instrumental delivery or the size of the unit.

Forceps delivery and the use of synthetic opioid analgesia during epidural anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To verify whether the use of sufentanil during obstetric epidural anaesthesia (EA) was accompanied by an increase in the rate of instrumental extraction.

STUDY DESIGN

We made a retrospective comparison of deliveries that occurred during two 3-year periods (1993-1995, and 1997-1999), before and after the introduction of sufentanil into our protocol for epidural anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The first period covered 4694 deliveries compared with 5310 in the second; for these periods, the EA rate rose from 48.55 to 63.36% (P=0.0001). The rates of uncomplicated vaginal delivery, forceps delivery and caesarian section over the two periods were 70.24, 12.76 and 17% versus 67.08, 14.41 and 18.51%, respectively: the differences were statistically significant. The indications for the use of forceps did not differ during the two periods. During vaginal delivery, the rate of forceps use as a function of EA administration/non-administration was remarkably constant over the two periods: 25.8% with EA versus 6.2% without EA in the first period compared with 24.9 and 6.2% in the second period. The forceps delivery rate was unaffected by the fact that EA was carried out by an anaesthetist specialised in obstetrics.

CONCLUSION

The addition of sufentanil to our protocol for EA has not altered the practice of instrumental extraction in our department. With EA, the rate of forceps delivery is multiplied by 4, irrespective of the protocol used.

Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively study the intervention rate, duration of labour, malpositions, fetal outcome, maternal satisfaction, voiding complications and adverse events in healthy primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term following epidural analgesia.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study involving 55 patients in the epidural group and 68 in the control pethidine--inhalational entonox group.

RESULTS

There were significantly more obstetric interventions (instrumental deliveries) in the epidural group (p < 0.01). The total duration of labour and the duration of the second stage was prolonged in the epidural group (p < 0.01). There were more malpositions at the second stage of labour in the epidural group (p < 0.02). There were no differences in fetal outcome (Apgar scores and Special Care Nursery admissions). Patients in the epidural group were consistently happier with their method of pain relief (p < 0.01). Two patients required blood patches while another 2 patients had persistent backache post epidural analgesia.

CONCLUSION

Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term led to an increased instrumental delivery rate, prolonged duration of labour, greater rate of malpositions in the second stage, increased oxytocin requirements but with no difference in fetal outcomes but with happier mothers as compared to the control group.

Cost-effectiveness of a delayed pushing policy for patients with epidural anesthesia. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the economic efficiency of a policy of delayed pushing for nulliparous women who have full dilatation while they are under epidural anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness evaluation was based on a randomized controlled trial. Resource use and clinical effectiveness data were collected for 1862 women who were randomly allocated to either a delayed pushing group (n = 936) or an early pushing group (n = 926). Costs (in 1997 Canadian dollars) were collected for each item of resource use. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the robustness of the main results.

RESULTS

Delayed pushing was effective at reducing the number of difficult deliveries (relative risk, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.95). The mean cost of intrapartum care was significantly higher in the delayed pushing group ($625.86 vs $557.64; P <.0005). There were no significant differences in mean costs of postnatal care ($2146.67 vs $2133.54; P =.871) or total hospital care ($2772.53 vs $2691.18; P =.324). The incremental cost per difficult delivery prevented was estimated at $1743.06. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained fairly robust with variations in the values of key parameters incorporated into the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this economic evaluation should inform decision makers determining whether to advocate a policy of delayed pushing for nulliparous women who have full dilatation while they are under epidural anesthesia.

Risk factors for secondary arrest of labor among women >41 weeks' gestation with an unfavorable cervix undergoing membrane sweeping for cervical ripening

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factor(s) for secondary arrest of labor among women with an unfavorable cervix at > 41 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

Prospectively all gravid women with a Bishop score of < or = 4 and no contraindication to a vaginal delivery were candidates for this study. Univariate analysis followed by logistic regression modeling were used to identify variables with a significant association.

RESULTS

Over a 9-month period, 115 women entered into the study. In univariate analysis, variables with a significant association with cesarean delivery: (1) non-Caucasian race (P = 0.007), Bishop score < 7 at hospitalization; P = 0.001, and reason for admission (P = 0.017). Logistic regression analysis yielded OR 4.7 (1.6, 15) non-Caucasian race and 9.5 (3.2, 30.8) Bishop < 7 on admission.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies > 41 weeks with an unfavorable cervix, non-Caucasian race and a failure to achieve a Bishop score of > or = 7 prior to hospitalization were significant risk factors for abdominal delivery.