Lipoprotein particle analysis comparing simvastatin and fenofibrate

Fenofibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a review of the data as they relate to the new suprabioavailable tablet formulation

BACKGROUND

The fibric acid derivative fenofibrate is indicated as an adjunct to dietary modification in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia, Fredrickson classification) to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein (apo) B, and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A. It is also indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (types IV and V hyperlipidemia). Initially approved in the United States in a micronized capsule formulation, fenofibrate is now available in a new "suprabioavailable" tablet formulation that has increased bioavailability, achieving equivalent plasma concentrations at lower doses. The 67- and 200-mg micronized capsules can be considered equivalent to the 54- and 160-mg suprabioavailable tablets, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties, clinical usefulness, and safety profile of fenofibrate in the management of dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Recent studies, abstracts, reviews, and consensus statements published in the English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2002), and PharmaProjects (1990-January 2002) using the search terms fenofibrate, fibrates, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate is well absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma levels attained in 6 to 8 hours. The absolute bioavailability of fenofibrate cannot be determined due to its being virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection; however, after oral administration of a single dose of radiolabeled fenofibrate, approximately 60% of the dose appeared in urine, primarily as fenofibric acid and its glucuronated conjugate, and approximately 25% was excreted in the feces. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.89 L/kg in healthy volunteers, and protein binding is approximately 99% in healthy and hyperlipidemic patients. Neither fenofibrate nor fenofibric acid appears to undergo significant oxidative metabolism in vivo. Fenofibric acid has a half-life of 20 hours. Fenofibrate is effective in lowering TG levels and increasing HDL-C levels. Its LDL-C-lowering effect is greater than that of gemfibrozil. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates, including gastrointestinal symptoms, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, myositis, and rash. Fenofibrate therapy has been associated with increases in serum aminotransferase levels, and clinical monitoring of these markers of liver function should be performed regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate is effective in reducing levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C, and increasing levels of HDL-C in patients with dyslipidemias. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Its use is accompanied by a low incidence of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities. Fenofibrate protects against coronary heart disease not only through its effects on lipid parameters but also by producing alterations in LDL structure and, possibly, alterations in the various hemostatic parameters. Its uricosuric property may prove to be a useful adjunctive attribute.

Micronized fenofibrate: a new fibric acid hypolipidemic agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in the management of hyperlipidemias.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1974-October 1998), Current Contents search, additional references from article bibliographies, and the package insert from the manufacturer were used to identify data for evaluation. Studies evaluating fenofibrate (peer-reviewed publications, package insert data) were considered for inclusion. Abstracts and data on file with the manufacturer were not considered for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language literature was reviewed to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, and tolerability of fenofibrate. Data from animals and in vitro systems were included only when necessary to explain the drug's pharmacology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Micronized fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 1998 for the treatment of types IV and V hyperlipidemia. Data from the peer-reviewed literature also support the use of fenofibrate in types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias. Micronized fenofibrate 67-201 mg/d is useful as monotherapy or as an adjunct to other hypolipidemics and dietary therapy. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, regular formulation fenofibrate 300-400 mg/d lowered serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations by 24-55%, total cholesterol by 9-25%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations by 6-35%, and raised high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations by 8-38%. Few comparative data exist regarding fenofibrate versus clofibrate and gemfibrozil. In noncomparative and comparative clinical trials, fenofibrate appeared to be well tolerated. The most common causally related adverse events were digestive, musculoskeletal, and dermatologic in nature. Concurrent use of fenofibrate and a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A inhibitor may increase the risk of myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis, although recent data suggest that concurrent use of fenofibrate with low-dose simvastatin or pravastatin is safe. Fenofibrate may enhance the effect of oral anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate reduces serum TG, total cholesterol, and LDL-C, and raises HDL-C to clinically relevant degrees. Its spectrum of activity appears to exceed that recommended for types IV and V hyperlipidemia to encompass types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias as well. To this extent, it may be considered a broader-spectrum fibrate than is indicated by its FDA approval. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates and require routine monitoring (clinical, liver function). Long-term safety data are readily available from drug registries in many countries where the product has been available for nearly two decades. Cost-effectiveness studies comparing fenofibrate with other hypolipidemics demonstrate benefits of fenofibrate over simvastatin in types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia. The need for dosage titration of the micronized preparation from 67 mg/d upward to a final dose of 200 mg/d is also not supported by peer-reviewed literature (except in the case of renal impairment). Although preliminary data on plaque regression are encouraging, published clinical studies evaluating the impact of fenofibrate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are awaited. Micronized fenofibrate is worthy of formulary inclusion.

Treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: fluvastatin versus bezafibrate

The effects of fluvastatin and bezafibrate on lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins (apo) were investigated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. After 8 weeks of strictly controlled (computer-based assessment) dietary stabilization, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > or = 160 mg/dL; triglycerides < or = 300 mg/dL) were enrolled into a 6-week placebo phase. Altogether, 131 patients were randomized to receive either fluvastatin at 40 mg once daily (n = 64; mean age 53 years) or bezafibrate at 400 mg once daily (n = 67; mean age 52 years) for 12 weeks. Compliance with the diet was monitored (3-day food records) after 6 and 12 weeks. Fluvastatin led to significant reductions in LDL-C (-23%), total cholesterol (-17%), LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (-24%) and apo B (-19%). Fluvastatin significantly increased LpA-I (+8%) and apo E (+20%). Bezafibrate produced significant reductions in LDL-C (-17%), total cholesterol (-13%), LDL-C/HDL-C (-24%), triglycerides (-28%), apo B (-15%), and LpA-I (-10%) and significantly increased HDL-C (+12%), apo A-I (+9%), apo A-II (+30%), apo E (+14%), and Lp(a) (+3%). No clinically notable increases in levels of liver enzymes or creatine phosphokinase were observed with either treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. There was a low incidence of adverse events that tended to be mild and included headache, muscular pain, angina, and dyspepsia. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups, and no significant differences in dietary behavior were observed. In conclusion, fluvastatin is a well tolerated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. Effects of fluvastatin on LpA-I occur irrespective of changes in HDL-C.

Effect of gemfibrozil on high density lipoprotein subspecies in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Relations to lipolytic enzymes and to the cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity

Twenty patients (18 men, 2 women) with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) were randomized to receive either gemfibrozil 1200 mg daily or placebo for 3 months in a double-blind study. The effect of gemfibrozil on plasma HDL subfraction distribution was studied with sequential and density gradient ultracentrifugation and in gradient gel electrophoresis. The concentrations of apo A-I, apo A-II, Lp A-I and Lp A-I:A-II particles were measured. Postheparin plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) activities and plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activities were also determined. Gemfibrozil increased the concentration of HDL cholesterol (P < 0.01), which was due to the rise of HDL3 cholesterol (+16%), while in the placebo group these values remained unchanged. Gemfibrozil increased the concentrations of apo A-I(+12.6%, NS), apo A-II (+28.2%, P < 0.01) and Lp A-I:A-II particles (+21.6%, P < 0.06) but there were no changes in the placebo group. Neither gemfibrozil nor placebo had any effect on the concentration of Lp A-I particles. As determined by density-gradient ultracentrifugation, gemfibrozil increased the concentration of cholesterol in the most dense HDL fractions (mean density 1.193 g/ml, +22%, P < 0.05 and mean density 1.158 g/ml, +19.3%, P < 0.05). In gradient gel electrophoresis, the gemfibrozil-induced elevations of the cholesterol and protein were most pronounced in the HDL3a (8.8-8.2 nm) region. Gemfibrozil increased LPL and HL activities by 14.7% (P < 0.05) and by 18.8% (P < 0.01), respectively, while in the placebo group LPL and HL activities remained unchanged. Plasma CETP activity was also increased during gemfibrozil treatment while in the placebo group it remained unchanged. We conclude that gemfibrozil causes multiple changes in plasma HDL metabolism. The gemfibrozil-induced elevation of HDL3 and dense HDL subpopulations may reflect the concerted action of LPL, HL and CETP on plasma HDL metabolism.

[Comparison of the efficacy between simvastatin and gemfibrozil in primary hypercholesterolemia]

The efficacy on plasma lipids, apo A1 and B of a HMG Co A Reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, and a fibrate derivative, gemfibrozil, were compared in 136 hypercholesterolemic patients. The study was randomized, double-blinded and the active drug was given after a 4 week period of placebo. Gemfibrozil (n = 69) was given at 900 mg q.p.m. during the entire study. The primary dose of simvastatin was 10 mg q.p.m. during the first 6-weeks of treatment. At the end of this period, the dose was doubled if the cholesterol level was above 2 g/l (5,16 mmol/l). The same modification was carried out 12 weeks after the beginning active drug treatment with the same criteria. The baselines of total cholesterol were 3.24 +/- 0.69 g/l (8.38 +/- 1.78 mmol/l) 3.21 +/- 0.72 g/l (8.31 +/- 1.87 mmol/l) for patients with simvastatin and those with gemfibrozil respectively. So, at the end of active treatment, 64% of patients in the simvastatin group (n = 67) received 40 mg q.p.m. After 18 weeks of treatment, 89% of patients treated with Simvastatin and 37% with gemfibrozil had more than 20% reduction in LDL cholesterol. Simvastatin was more efficient on total cholesterol, LDL-C and apo B. The increase of HDL-C is similar in both groups of patients. In contrast, the level of triglycerides was further decreased by gemfibrozil. The tolerance was good in the two groups of patients and no difference in the frequency of side effects was observed.