Activation of H-meromyosin ATPase by polymers of actin and carboxymethylated actin

Mechanism of actin polymerization by myosin subfragment-1 probed by dynamic light scattering

Monomeric actin (G-actin) polymerizes spontaneously into helical filaments in the presence of inorganic salts. The slowest, rate-limiting step of the polymerization process is formation of actin trimers, the smallest oligomers that serve as nuclei for fast filament growth (filament elongation) by monomer addition at the filament ends. In low ionic-strength solutions, actin can be polymerized by myosin subfragment-1 (S1). In early works it has been suggested that G-actin-S1 1:1 complexes (GS) assemble into filaments according to the nucleation-filament elongation scheme. Subsequent studies indicated that one S1 molecule can bind two actin monomers, and that oligomerization of the initial complexes is a fast reaction. This has led to suggest an alternative mechanism, with a ternary G(2)S complex and its oligomers being predominant intermediates of S1-induced assembly of G-actin into filaments. We used dynamic light scattering to analyze the initial steps of S1-induced polymerization of actin. Our results suggest formation of GS complexes and their oligomers in the presence of S1 equimolar to or in excess over actin. We confirm formation of G(2)S complexes as intermediates of S1-induced polymerization in the presence of actin in excess over S1.

Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility

The effects of crosslinking of monomeric and polymeric actin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and glutaraldehyde on the interaction with heavy meromyosin (HMM) in solution and on the sliding movement on glass-attached HMM were examined. The Vmax values of actin-activated HMM ATPase decreased in the following order: intact actin = EDC F-actin greater than DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than EDC G-actin. The affinity of actin for HMM in the presence of ATP decreased in the following order: DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than intact actin greater than EDC F-actin greater than EDC G-actin. However, sliding movement was inhibited only in the case of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked F and G-actin and EDC-crosslinked G-actin. Interestingly, after copolymerization of "non-motile" glutaraldehyde or EDC-crosslinked monomers with "motile" monomers of intact actin sliding of the copolymers was observed and its rate was independent of the type of crosslinked monomer, i.e. of the manner of their interaction with HMM. These data strongly indicate that inhibition of the sliding of actin by crosslinking cannot be explained entirely by changes in the Vmax value or affinity for myosin heads. We conclude that movement is generated by interaction of myosin with segments of F-actin containing a number of intact monomers, and the mechanism of inhibition involves an effect of the crosslinkers on the structure of F-actin itself.

Interaction of phalloidin with chemically modified actin

Modification of Tyr-69 with tetranitromethane impairs the polymerizability of actin in accordance with the previous report [Lehrer, S. S. and Elzinga, M. (1972) Fed. Proc. 31, 502]. Phalloidin induces this chemically modified actin to form the same characteristic helical thread-like structure as normal F-actin. The filaments bind myosin heads and activate the myosin ATPase activity as effectively as normal F-actin. When a dansyl group is introduced at the same point [Chantler, P. D. and Gratzer, W. B. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 60, 67-72], phalloidin still induces the polymerization. The filaments bind myosin heads and activate the myosin ATPase activity. These results indicate that Tyr-69 is not directly involved in either an actin-actin binding site or the myosin binding site on actin. Moreover, the results suggest that phalloidin binds to actin monomer in the presence of salt and its binding induces a conformational change in actin which is essential for polymerization, or that actin monomer fluctuates between in unpolymerizable and polymerizable form while phalloidin binds to actin only in the polymerizable form and its binding locks the conformation which causes the irreversible polymerization of actin. Modification of Tyr-53 with 5-diazonium-(1H)tetrazole blocks actin polymerization [Bender, N., Fasold, H., Kenmoku, A., Middelhoff, G. and Volk, K. E. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 64, 215-218]. Phalloidin is unable to induce the polymerization of this modified actin nor does it bind to it. Phalloidin does not induce the polymerization of the trypsin-digested actin core. These results indicate that the site at which phalloidin binds is involved in polymerization and the probable conformational change involved in polymerization may be modulated through this site.

Influence of an actin-modulating protein from smooth muscle on actin-myosin interaction

The actin-modulating protein from pig stomach smooth muscle (PSAM) which reduces the average filament length has two opposite effects on the interaction of actin with skeletal muscle myosin: (1) stimulation of both the Mg2+-ATPase activity and superprecipitation at low KCl concentrations, and (2) inhibition of these two interrelated processes at an ionic strength close to physiological. Both stimulation and inhibition were Ca2+-dependent, reflecting the requirement for Ca2+ for the interaction of the modulator with actin. With acto-subfragment-1, only inhibition of the actin-activated ATPase was observed. Possible implications of these effects for studies on the regulation of smooth muscle contraction are discussed.

Crystalline actin tubes. I. Is the conformation of the lanthanide-induced actin tube monomer more like F-actin than G-actin?

Actin, isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle, forms highly-ordered aggregates when it binds six moles of the lanthanide ion, Gd3+. In the presence of 0.1 M KCl, these aggregates are referred to as actin tubes. The monomer contained in the repeating subunit of these tubes possess a number of functional characteristics which include: (i) binding to myosin or subfragment-1 of myosin; (ii) rapid conversion into filamentous Gd-actin which can activate myosin ATPase activity; (iii) a slow rate of exchange of the bound nucleotide; (iv) a slow rate of exchange of the metal cation; (v) a resistance to digestion by proteolytic enzymes. Additionally, the monomer of the Gd-actin tube structures appears to stoichiometrically bind ATP and exhibit a lower minimum protein concentration for tube formation than is needed for the formation of F-actin. The properties listed above suggest that the actin monomer, which comprises the Gd-actin tubes, bears little resemblance to either the G-actin monomer or the recently-described actin monomer conformation that exists under conditions that favour polymerization. The data suggest that the actin molecules which comprise the Gd-actin tube structures contain sites which bind myosin, nucleotide and metal cations and that these sites are similar to the sites on F-actin.

Effect of crosslinking by glutaraldehyde on interaction of F-actin with heavy meromyosin

Crosslinking of F-actin by a bifunctional reagent glutaraldehyde resulted in a marked decrease of viscosity and length of F-actin filaments. The extent and rate of superprecipitation of actomyosin reconstituted from the modified actin were lower than those of unmodified actin-myosin complex, but activation of heavy meromyosin ATPase by the crosslinked actin was higher than by unmodified one. Heavy meromyosin ATPase activated by the crosslinked actin was distinctly less dependent on KCl concentration than that activated by unmodified actin. Turbidity of the modified acto-heavy meromyosin in the presence of ATP exceeded the sum of turbidities of actin and heavy meromyosin, whereas in the case of unmodified acto-heavy meromyosin the turbidity was comparable to that for noninteracting system. The difference in activation of heavy meromyosin. ATPase by the cross-linked and unmodified actin, clearly seen at room temperature, significantly diminished when temperature was lowered to 0 degrees C.

Effects of specific chemical modification of actin

G-actin has been nitrated with tetranitromethane in conditions that lead to the modification of one tyrosine residue. The reactive residue was found by earlier workers to be Tyr-69. The nitrated actin is conformationally similar to native G-actin, as judged by sedimentation velocity and circular dichroism analysis. A small proportion only is in the form of covalently linked dimers and trimers. The nitrated G-actin will polymerise to form filaments, indistinguishable in the electron microscope from those of native F-actin, but the polymerisation process is slower. Reduction of the nitrophenol group to the corresponding aminophenol leaves the properties of the protein in respect of polymerisation unchanged. When a dansyl group is introduced at the same point, however, the ability of the actin to polymerise is lost. The nitrated actin and its reduced counterpart will also bind heavy meromyosin, and the characteristic arrowhead formation of the bound molecules along the filaments can be seen in the electron microscope. Neither of the modified F-actins, however, significantly activates or inhibits the myosin ATPase activity. The fluorescence of nitrated actin is strongly quenched through the presence of the nitrophenol chromophore. In soluble complexes with heavy meromyosin the fluorescence is indistinguishable from the sum of the separate contributions of the two protein components. There is thus no measurable excitation transfer between any tryptophan residues on the myosin heads, such as that inferred to be present in the ATPase site, and the nitrotyrosine in position 69 of the actin sequence. Implications of this observation are considered in relation to the different interaction sites in myosin and in actin. The activation of heavy meromyosin ATPase by copolymers containing actin and nitroactin in different proportions has been measured, and is not proportional to the fraction of native actin. The results are consistent with the view that the function of actomyosin depends on the interaction of the myosin heads with more than one actin subunit.