In vitro methylation of bacteriophage lambda DNA by wild type (dam+) and mutant (damh) forms of the phage T2 DNA adenine methylase

Transition from nonspecific to specific DNA interactions along the substrate-recognition pathway of dam methyltransferase

DNA methyltransferases methylate target bases within specific nucleotide sequences. Three structures are described for bacteriophage T4 DNA-adenine methyltransferase (T4Dam) in ternary complexes with partially and fully specific DNA and a methyl-donor analog. We also report the effects of substitutions in the related Escherichia coli DNA methyltransferase (EcoDam), altering residues corresponding to those involved in specific interaction with the canonical GATC target sequence in T4Dam. We have identified two types of protein-DNA interactions: discriminatory contacts, which stabilize the transition state and accelerate methylation of the cognate site, and antidiscriminatory contacts, which do not significantly affect methylation of the cognate site but disfavor activity at noncognate sites. These structures illustrate the transition in enzyme-DNA interaction from nonspecific to specific interaction, suggesting that there is a temporal order for formation of specific contacts.

Methylation by a mutant T2 DNA [N(6)-adenine] methyltransferase expands the usage of RecA-assisted endonuclease (RARE) cleavage

Properties of a mutant bacteriophage T2 DNA [N:(6)-adenine] methyltransferase (T2 Dam MTase) have been investigated for its potential utilization in RecA-assisted restriction endonuclease (RARE) cleavage. Steady-state kinetic analyses with oligonucleotide duplexes revealed that, compared to wild-type T4 Dam, both wild-type T2 Dam and mutant T2 Dam P126S had a 1.5-fold higher k(cat) in methylating canonical GATC sites. Additionally, T2 Dam P126S showed increased efficiencies in methylation of non-canonical GAY sites relative to the wild-type enzymes. In agreement with these steady-state kinetic data, when bacteriophage lambda DNA was used as a substrate, maximal protection from restriction nuclease cleavage in vitro was achieved on the sequences GATC, GATN and GACY, while protection of GACR sequences was less efficient. Collectively, our data suggest that T2 Dam P126S can modify 28 recognition sequences. The feasibility of using the mutant enzyme in RARE cleavage with BCL:I and ECO:RV endonucleases has been shown on phage lambda DNA and with BCL:I and DPN:II endonucleases on yeast chromosomal DNA embedded in agarose.

Comparative studies of the phage T2 and T4 DNA (N6-adenine)methyltransferases: amino acid changes that affect catalytic activity

The bacteriophage T2 and T4 dam genes code for a DNA (N6-adenine)methyltransferase (MTase). Nonglucosylated, hydroxymethylcytosine-containing T2gt- virion DNA has a higher level of methylation than T4gt- virion DNA does. To investigate the basis for this difference, we compared the intracellular enzyme levels following phage infection as well as the in vitro intrinsic methylation capabilities of purified T2 and T4 Dam MTases. Results from Western blotting (immunoblotting) showed that the same amounts of MTase protein were produced after infection with T2 and T4. Kinetic analyses with purified homogeneous enzymes showed that the two MTases had similar Km values for the methyl donor, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, and for substrate DNA. In contrast, they had different k(cat) values (twofold higher for T2 Dam MTase). We suggest that this difference can account for the ability of T2 Dam to methylate viral DNA in vivo to a higher level than does T4 Dam. Since the T2 and T4 MTases differ at only three amino acid residues (at positions 20 [T4, Ser; T2, Pro], 26 [T4, Asn; T2, Asp], and 188 [T4, Asp; T2, Glu]), we have produced hybrid proteins to determine which residue(s) is responsible for increased catalytic activity. The results of these analyses showed that the residues at positions 20 and 26 are responsible for the different k(cat) values of the two MTases for both canonical and noncanonical sites. Moreover, a single substitution of either residue 20 or 26 was sufficient to increase the k(cat) of T4 Dam.

Phage T4 DNA [N6-adenine]methyltransferase. Overexpression, purification, and characterization

The bacteriophage T4 dam gene, encoding the Dam DNA [N6-adenine]methyltransferase (MTase), has been subcloned into the plasmid expression vector, pJW2. In this construct, designated pINT4dam, transcription is from the regulatable phage lambda pR and pL promoters, arranged in tandem. A two-step purification scheme using DEAE-cellulose and phosphocellulose columns in series, followed by hydroxyapatite chromatography, was developed to purify the enzyme to near homogeneity. The yield of purified protein was 2 mg/g of cell paste. The MTase has an s20,w of 3.0 S and a Stokes radius of 23 A and exists in solution as a monomer. The Km for the methyl donor, S-adenosylmethionine, is 0.1 x 10(-6) M, and the Km for substrate nonglucosylated, unmethylated T4 gt- dam DNA is 1.1 x 10(-12) M. The products of DNA methylation, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine and methylated DNA, are competitive inhibitors of the reaction; Ki values of 2.4 x 10(-6) M and 4.6 x 10(-12) M, respectively, were observed. T4 Dam methylates the palindromic tetranucleotide, GATC, designated the canonical sequence. However, at high MTase:DNA ratios, T4 Dam can methylate some noncanonical sequences belonging to GAY (where Y represents cytosine or thymine).

Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases

Restriction endonucleases have site-specific interactions with DNA that can often be inhibited by site-specific DNA methylation and other site-specific DNA modifications. However, such inhibition cannot generally be predicted. The empirically acquired data on these effects are tabulated for over 320 restriction endonucleases. In addition, a table of known site-specific DNA modification methyltransferases and their specificities is presented along with EMBL database accession numbers for cloned genes.

Overexpression of the wild-type gene coding for Escherichia coli DNA adenine methylase (dam)

The gene coding for Escherichia coli dam methylase was isolated from a dam+ K12 strain by the PCR method. The gene was subcloned into an overexpression vector under the control of the strong lambda PL promoter. The resultant construct produced the dam methylase at about 20% of total cellular protein. Purification of the protein was achieved with two chromatography columns and yielded 6 mg of pure methylase per gram cell paste. The methylase readily methylates the synthetic dodecamer GACTGATCAGTC containing its recognition sequence (underlined). It also methylates a synthetic dodecamer containing the EcoRV recognition sequence GATATC. However, methyl transfer is to the second adenine in the EcoRV sequence.

Specificity of restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases a review (Edition 3)

The properties and sources of all known class-I, class-II and class-III restriction endonucleases (ENases) and DNA modification methyltransferases (MTases) are listed and newly subclassified according to their sequence specificity. In addition, the enzymes are distinguished in a novel manner according to sequence specificity, cleavage position and methylation sensitivity. Furthermore, new nomenclature rules are proposed for unambiguously defined enzyme names. In the various Tables, the enzymes are cross-indexed alphabetically according to their names (Table I), classified according to their recognition sequence homologies (Table II), and characterized within Table II by the cleavage and methylation positions, the number of recognition sites on the DNA of the bacteriophages lambda, phi X174, and M13mp7, the viruses Ad2 and SV40, the plasmids pBR322 and pBR328, and the microorganisms from which they originate. Other tabulated properties of the ENases include relaxed specificities (integrated within Table II), the structure of the generated fragment ends (Table III), interconversion of restriction sites (Table IV) and the sensitivity to different kinds of DNA methylation (Table V). Table VI shows the influence of class-II MTases on the activity of class-II ENases with at least partially overlapping recognition sequences. Table VII lists all class-II restriction endonucleases and MTases which are commercially available. The information given in Table V focuses on the influence of methylation of the recognition sequences on the activity of ENases. This information might be useful for the design of cloning experiments especially in Escherichia coli containing M.EcodamI and M.EcodcmI [H16, M21, U3] or for studying the level and distribution of site-specific methylation in cellular DNA, e.g., 5'- (M)CpG-3' in mammals, 5'-(M)CpNpG-3' in plants or 5'-GpA(M)pTpC-3' in enterobacteria [B29, E4, M30, V4, V13, W24]. In Table IV a cross index for the interconversion of two- and four-nt 5'-protruding ends into new recognition sequences is complied. This was obtained by the fill-in reaction with the Klenow (large) fragment of the E. coli DNA polymerase I (PolIk), or additional nuclease S1 treatment followed by ligation of the modified fragment termini [P3]. Interconversion of restriction sites generates novel cloning sites without the need of linkers. This should improve the flexibility of genetic engineering experiments [K56, P3].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The bacteriophage T2 and T4 DNA-[N6-adenine] methyltransferase (Dam) sequence specificities are not identical

Bacteriophages T2 and T4 encode DNA-[N6-adenine] methyltransferases (Dam) which differ from each other by only three amino acids. The canonical recognition sequence for these enzymes in both cytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine-containing DNA is GATC; at a lower efficiency they also recognize some non-canonical sites in sequences derived from GAY (where Y is cytosine or thymine). We found that T4 Dam fails to methylate certain GATA and GATT sequences which are methylated by T2 Dam. This indicates that T2 Dam and T4 Dam do not have identical sequence specificities. We analyzed DNA sequence data files obtained from GenBank, containing about 30% of the T4 genome, to estimate the overall frequency of occurrence of GATC, as well as non-canonical sites derived from GAY. The observed N6methyladenine (m6A) content of T4 DNA, methylated exclusively at GATC (by Escherichia coli Dam), was found to be in good agreement with this estimate. Although GATC is fully methylated in virion DNA, only a small percentage of the non-canonical sequences are methylated.

Single amino acid changes that alter the DNA sequence specificity of the DNA-[N6-adenine] methyltransferase (Dam) of bacteriophage T4

Bacteriophage T4 codes for a DNA-[N6-adenine] methyltransferase (Dam) which recognizes primarily the sequence GATC in both cytosine- and hydroxymethylcytosine-containing DNA. Hypermethylating mutants, damh, exhibit a relaxation in sequence specificity, that is, they are readily able to methylate non-canonical sites. We have determined that the damh mutation produces a single amino acid change (Pro126 to Ser126) in a region of homology (III) shared by three DNA-adenine methyltransferases; viz, T4 Dam, Escherichia coli Dam, and the DpnII modification enzyme of Streptococcus pneumoniae. We also describe another mutant, damc, which methylates GATC in cytosine-containing DNA, but not in hydroxymethylcytosine-containing DNA. This mutation also alters a single amino acid (Phe127 to Val127). These results implicate homology region III as a domain involved in DNA sequence recognition. The effect of several different amino acids at residue 126 was examined by creating a polypeptide chain terminating codon at that position and comparing the methylation capability of partially purified enzymes produced in the presence of various suppressors. No enzyme activity is detected when phenylalanine, glutamic acid, or histidine is inserted at position 126. However, insertion of alanine, cysteine, or glycine at residue 126 produces enzymatic activity similar to Damh.

The DNA [adenine-N6]methyltransferase (Dam) of bacteriophage T4

A functional bacteriophage T4 dam+ gene, which specifies a DNA [adenine-N6]methyltransferase (Dam), was cloned on a 1.8-kb HindIII fragment [Schlagman and Hattman, Gene 22 (1983) 139-156]. Sequence analysis [Macdonald and Mosig, EMBO J. 3 (1984) 2863-2871] revealed two overlapping in-phase open reading frames (ORFs). The 5' proximal ORF initiates translation at an AUG and encodes a 30-kDa polypeptide, whereas the downstream ORF initiates translation at a GUG and encodes a 26-kDa polypeptide. Analysis of BAL 31 deletions in our original dam+ clone has verified that at least one of these overlapping ORFs, in fact, encodes T4 Dam. To investigate where T4 Dam translation is initiated, we have constructed plasmids in which a tac or lambda PL promoter is placed 5' to either the longer ORF or just the shorter ORF. Only clones which contain a promoter in front of the longer ORF produce active T4 Dam. This indicates that the 26-kDa polypeptide alone cannot be T4 Dam. Additional experiments suggest that only the 30-kDa polypeptide is required for enzyme activity and that the shorter ORF is not translated in plasmid-carrying cells. We also present evidence that T4 Dam is capable of methylating 5'-GATC-3', GATm5C, and GAThmC sequences; non-canonical sites (e.g., GACC) are also methylated, but much less efficiently.

Molecular cloning, sequencing, and mapping of the bacteriophage T2 dam gene

Bacteriophage T2 codes for a DNA-(adenine-N6)methyltransferase (Dam), which is able to methylate both cytosine- and hydroxymethylcytosine-containing DNAs to a greater extent than the corresponding methyltransferase encoded by bacteriophage T4. We have cloned and sequenced the T2 dam gene and compared it with the T4 dam gene. In the Dam coding region, there are 22 nucleotide differences, 4 of which result in three coding differences (2 are in the same codon). Two of the amino acid alterations are located in a region of homology that is shared by T2 and T4 Dam, Escherichia coli Dam, and the modification enzyme of Streptococcus pneumoniae, all of which methylate the sequence 5' GATC 3'. The T2 dam and T4 dam promoters are not identical and appear to have slightly different efficiencies; when fused to the E. coli lacZ gene, the T4 promoter produces about twofold more beta-galactosidase activity than does the T2 promoter. In our first attempt to isolate T2 dam, a truncated gene was cloned on a 1.67-kilobase XbaI fragment. This construct produces a chimeric protein composed of the first 163 amino acids of T2 Dam followed by 83 amino acids coded by the pUC18 vector. Surprisingly, the chimera has Dam activity, but only on cytosine-containing DNA. Genetic and physical analyses place the T2 dam gene at the same respective map location as the T4 dam gene. However, relative to T4, T2 contains an insertion of 536 base pairs 5' to the dam gene. Southern blot hybridization and computer analysis failed to reveal any homology between this insert and either T4 or E. coli DNA.

Bacteriophage T2 and T4, dam+ and damh and Eco dam+ methylation: preference at different sites

We present a method for determining preference for methylation at minor methylation sites. The target DNA sequence is first subjected to computer-assisted analysis to predict which restriction endonuclease(s) will generate fragments that will contain only one or two likely minor methylation site(s). The target DNA is then methylated in vitro with a radioactive methyl-group donor and subjected to digestion by the chosen restriction enzyme(s). The amount of radioactivity in the various fragments is determined, after separating them using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. We documented the effect of nearby bases on the methylation preference and the relative preference for methylation at some specific minor methylation sites.

Advantages to mutagenesis techniques generating populations containing the complete spectrum of single codon changes

The limitations of current mutagenesis techniques are analyzed in terms of the number and kinds of codon changes they make and in terms of the population size needed to produce all single or multiple amino acid variants. It is shown how a technique that can alter a single codon of a gene, producing all possible variant codons without affecting the rest of the gene, has certain advantages, if it can be used at each place in the gene in one experiment. Such a technique has advantages when the goals are to understand: (1) how specific structural alterations in a mutant protein cause it to function in a different but specific way, (2) how to predict which amino acids in a protein contact or interact with each other, and (3) why a protein is more or less sensitive to mutational disruption, depending upon the specific mutation. This is because it would generate the maximum number of (1) mutant proteins with different functions, (2) intracistronic suppressor for any starting mutation, and (3) random amino acid substitutions at random places. Furthermore, such a technique could produce useful variants more quickly and on a smaller scale than either evolution or current methods.

Specificity of restriction endonucleases and methylases--a review

The properties and sources of all known restriction endonucleases and methylases are listed. The enzymes are cross-indexed (Table I), classified according to their recognition sequence homologies (Table II), and characterized within Table II by the cleavage and methylation positions, the number of recognition sites on the double-stranded DNA of the bacteriophages lambda, phi X174 and M13mp7, the viruses Ad2 and SV40, the plasmids pBR322 and pBR328, and the microorganisms from which they originate. Other tabulated properties of the restriction endonucleases include relaxed specificities (integrated into Table II), the structure of the generated fragment ends (Table III), and the sensitivity to different kinds of DNA methylation (Table V). In Table IV the conversion of two- and four-base 5'-protruding ends into new recognition sequences is compiled which is obtained by the fill-in reaction with Klenow fragment of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I or additional nuclease S1 treatment followed by ligation of the modified fragment termini [P3]. Interconversion of restriction sites generates novel cloning sites without the need of linkers. This should improve the flexibility of genetic engineering experiments. Table VI classifies the restriction methylases according to the nature of the methylated base(s) within their recognition sequences. This table also comprises restriction endonucleases which are known to be inhibited or activated by the modified nucleotides. The detailed sequences of those overlapping restriction sites are also included which become resistant to cleavage after the sequential action of corresponding restriction methylases and endonucleases [N11, M21]. By this approach large DNA fragments can be generated which is helpful in the construction of genomic libraries. The data given in both Tables IV and VI allow the design of novel sequence specificities. These procedures complement the creation of universal cleavage specificities applying class IIS enzymes and bivalent DNA adapter molecules [P17, S82].

Common evolutionary origin of the phage T4 dam and host Escherichia coli dam DNA-adenine methyltransferase genes

We compared the known DNA nucleotide and encoded amino acid sequences of the Escherichia coli and bacteriophage T4 dam (DNA-adenine methyltransferase) genes. Despite the absence of any DNA sequence homology, there were four regions (11 to 33 residues long) of amino acid sequence homology containing 45 to 64% identity. These results suggest that the genes for these two enzymes have a common evolutionary origin.

Recognition sequences of restriction endonucleases and methylases--a review

The properties and sources of all known endonucleases and methylases acting site-specifically on DNA are listed. The enzymes are crossindexed (Table I), classified according to homologies within their recognition sequences (Table II), and characterized within Table II by the cleavage and methylation positions, the number of recognition sites on the DNA of the bacteriophages lambda, phi X174 and M13mp7, the viruses Ad2 and SV40, the plasmids pBR322 and pBR328 and the microorganisms from which they originate. Other tabulated properties of the restriction endonucleases include relaxed specificities (Table III), the structure of the restriction fragment ends (Table IV), and the sensitivity to different kinds of DNA methylation (Table V). Table VI classifies the methylases according to the nature of the methylated base(s) within their recognition sequences. This table also comprises those restriction endonucleases, which are known to be inhibited by the modified nucleotides. Furthermore, this review includes a restriction map of bacteriophage lambda DNA based on sequence data. Table VII lists the exact nucleotide positions of the cleavage sites, the length of the generated fragments ordered according to size, and the effects of the Escherichia coli dam- and dcmI-coded methylases M X Eco dam and M X Eco dcmI on the particular recognition sites.

Molecular cloning of a functional dam+ gene coding for phage T4 DNA adenine methylase

Phages T2 and T4 induce synthesis of a DNA-adenine methylase which is coded for by a phage gene, dam+. These enzymes methylate adenine residues in specific sequences which include G-A-T-C, the methylation site of the host Escherichia coli dam+ methylase. Methylation of G-A-T-C to G-m6A-T-C protects the site against cleavage by the MboI restriction nuclease. We have taken advantage of this property to enrich and screen for transformants which contain a cloned, functional T4 dam+ gene. These recombinant molecules consist of a 1.85-kb HindIII fragment inserted into the plasmid pBR322; both orientations of the fragment express the methylase gene, suggesting that transcription is from a T4 promoter. We have tested the 1.85-kb insert for sensitivity to a variety of restriction nucleases and have found single sites for EcoRI, BalI, XbaI, and at least two sites for BstNI (EcoRII). The relative positions of these restriction sites have also been determined. Physical mapping was carried out by Southern blot hybridization with 32P-labeled (nick-translated clone) probe. These experiments showed that the insert corresponds to a HindIII fragment located on the physical map of T4 between positions 16.2 and 18.1 kb from the T4rIIA-rIIB junction. E. coli dam- possesses several phenotypic differences from the wild-type dam+ parent, including an increased sensitivity to 2-aminopurine (2-AP). We found that T4 dam+ clones could relieve dam- cells of their increased sensitivity to 2-AP.