Studies on the role of amino acid residues 31 through 46 of ribosomal protein S4 in the mechanism of 30 S ribosome assembly

Specific contacts between protein S4 and ribosomal RNA are required at multiple stages of ribosome assembly

Assembly of bacterial 30S ribosomal subunits requires structural rearrangements to both its 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein components. Ribosomal protein S4 nucleates 30S assembly and associates rapidly with the 5' domain of the 16S rRNA. In vitro, transformation of initial S4-rRNA complexes to long-lived, mature complexes involves refolding of 16S helix 18, which forms part of the decoding center. Here we use targeted mutagenesis of Geobacillus stearothermophilus S4 to show that remodeling of S4-rRNA complexes is perturbed by ram alleles associated with reduced translational accuracy. Gel mobility shift assays, SHAPE chemical probing, and in vivo complementation show that the S4 N-terminal extension is required for RNA binding and viability. Alanine substitutions in Y47 and L51 that interact with 16S helix 18 decrease S4 affinity and destabilize the helix 18 pseudoknot. These changes to the protein-RNA interface correlate with no growth (L51A) or cold-sensitive growth, 30S assembly defects, and accumulation of 17S pre-rRNA (Y47A). A third mutation, R200A, over-stabilizes the helix 18 pseudoknot yet results in temperature-sensitive growth, indicating that complex stability is finely tuned by natural selection. Our results show that early S4-RNA interactions guide rRNA folding and impact late steps of 30S assembly.

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit

Ribosomes are large macromolecular complexes responsible for cellular protein synthesis. The smallest known cytoplasmic ribosome is found in prokaryotic cells; these ribosomes are about 2.5 MDa and contain more than 4000 nucleotides of RNA and greater than 50 proteins. These components are distributed into two asymmetric subunits. Recent advances in structural studies of ribosomes and ribosomal subunits have revealed intimate details of the interactions within fully assembled particles. In contrast, many details of how these massive ribonucleoprotein complexes assemble remain elusive. The goal of this review is to discuss some crucial aspects of 30S ribosomal subunit assembly.

Messenger RNA recognition by fragments of ribosomal protein S4

Ribosomal protein S4 from Escherichia coli binds a large domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA and also a pseudoknot structure in the alpha operon mRNA, where it represses its own synthesis. No similarity between the two RNA binding sites has been detected. To find out whether separate protein regions are responsible for rRNA and mRNA recognition, proteins with N-terminal or C-terminal deletions have been overexpressed and purified. Protein-mRNA interactions were detected by (i) a nitrocellulose filter binding assay, (ii) inhibition of primer extension by reverse transcriptase, and (iii) a gel shift assay. Circular dichroism spectra were taken to determine whether the proteins adopted stable secondary structures. From these studies it is concluded that amino acids 48-104 make specific contacts with the mRNA, although residues 105-177 (out of 205) are required to observe the same toeprint pattern as full-length protein and may stabilize a specific portion of the mRNA structure. These results parallel ribosomal RNA binding properties of similar fragments (Conrad, R. C., and Craven, G. R. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 10331-10343, and references therein). It appears that the same protein domain is responsible for both mRNA and rRNA binding activities.

Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies to Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S3

The antigenic structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S3 has been investigated by use of monoclonal antibodies. Six S3-specific monoclonal antibodies secreted by mouse hybridomas have been identified by immunoblotting of two-dimensional ribosomal protein separation gels. By using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we have divided these monoclonal antibodies into three mutual inhibition groups, members of which are directed to three distinct regions of the S3 molecule. The independence of these monoclonal antibody-defined regions was confirmed by the failure of pairs of monoclonal antibodies from two inhibition groups to block the binding of biotinylated monoclonal antibodies of the third group. To determine the regions recognized by these monoclonal antibodies, chemically cleaved S3 peptides were fractionated by gel filtration and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The fractionated peptides were coated on plates and examined for specific interaction with monoclonal antibody by enzyme immunoassay. In this manner, two epitopes have been mapped at the ends of the S3 molecule: one, in the last 22 residues, is recognized by three monoclonal antibodies; and the second, in the first 21 residues, is defined by two monoclonal antibodies. The third S3 epitope, recognized by a single monoclonal antibody, has been localized in a central segment of about 90 residues by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. These epitope-mapped monoclonal antibodies are valuable probes for studying S3 structure in situ.

S4-16 S ribosomal RNA complex. Binding constant measurements and specific recognition of a 460-nucleotide region

The region of the Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA recognized by the ribosomal protein S4 has been defined by assaying a set of 13 16 S rRNA fragments for S4 binding. The fragments were prepared by transcription in vitro, and binding constants were measured in three ways: retention of labeled RNA fragments on nitrocellulose filters by S4; co-sedimentation of labeled S4 with RNA fragments in sucrose gradients; and the distribution of labeled S4 between two RNAs of different sizes in a sucrose gradient. All three methods gave similar relative binding strengths for a variety of 16 S rRNA and non-specific (23 S rRNA) sequences, with the exception of two of the largest 16 S rRNA fragments; these gave smaller association constants in the filter retention assay than in the other methods. We found that specific complexes of S4 with these larger RNAs do not bind well to filters, leaving non-specific complexes to dominate the assay. Specific complexes with RNAs less than or equal to 891 nucleotides were retained efficiently by S4 on filters, and gave reliable binding constants. All 16 S rRNA fragments containing nucleotides 39 to 500 bound S4 with the same affinity as intact 16 S rRNA, while all fragments with endpoints within 39 to 500 bound at least tenfold more weakly. This sequence must be able to fold independently of the rest of the rRNA. Comparison of this minimal 462-nucleotide S4 binding site with S4 footprinting results suggests that S4 binding might alter the conformations of RNA neighboring the 39 to 500 region in the intact 16 S rRNA. Specific S4-rRNA binding is not sensitive to KCl concentration, but a more normal salt dependence is seen in K2SO4 (delta logK/delta log[K+] approximately -3.3). This duplicates the behavior of the specific S4-alpha mRNA translational repression complex, arguing that S4 recognizes both the mRNA and rRNA substrates by the same mechanism. Mg2+ is not required to form the specific rRNA complex, at least under conditions which stabilize RNA structure (0.35 M-KCl, 5 degrees C).

Interaction of proteins S16, S17 and S20 with 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have used rapid chemical probing methods to examine the effect of assembly of ribosomal proteins S16, S17 and S20 on the reactivity of individual residues of 16 S rRNA. Protein S17 strongly protects a compact region of the RNA between positions 245 and 281, a site previously assigned to binding of S20. Protein S20 also protects many of these same positions, albeit more weakly than S17. Strong S20-dependent protections are seen elsewhere in the 5' domain, most notably at positions 108, and in the 160-200 and 330 loop regions. Enenpectedly, S20 also causes protection of several bases in the 1430-1450 region, in the 3' minor domain. In the presence of the primary binding proteins S4, S8 and S20, we observe a variety of effects that result from assembly of the secondary binding protein S16. Most strongly protected are nucleotides around positions 50, 120, 300 to 330 and 360 in the 5' domain, and positions 606 to 630 in the central domain. In addition, numerous nucleotides in the 5' and central domains exhibit enhanced reactivity in response to S16. Interestingly, the strength of the S20-dependent effects in the 1430-1450 region is attenuated in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20, and restored in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20 + S16. Finally, the previously observed rearrangement of the 300 region stem-loop that occurs during assembly is shown to be an S16-dependent event. We discuss these findings with respect to assignment of RNA binding sites for these proteins, and in regard to the co-operativity of ribosome assembly.

Affinities of ribosomal protein S20 and C-terminal deletion mutants for 16S rRNA and S20 mRNA

We have measured the binding of E. coli ribosomal protein S20 and a number of C-terminal deletion mutants to 16S rRNA and in vitro transcribed S20 mRNA. Mutant S20s of interest were synthesized in vitro from the appropriate plasmid templates by coupled transcription and translation. The affinity of S20 produced in vitro for 16S rRNA is 1.2 x 10(7) (M-1) in a gel filtration assay. Removal of as few as 6 residues from the C terminus of S20 results in a sharp loss of binding activity, suggesting the presence of critical residues in this region. Analysis of the amino acid sequence of S20 indicates that these residues may constitute part of a segment of alpha helix. Although S20 is known to autoregulate its own synthesis, we were unable to demonstrate any measurable affinity of S20 for its own mRNA.

A cyanogen bromide fragment of S4 that specifically rebinds 16S RNA

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 was subjected to cyanogen bromide cleavage and was found to generate a complete cleavage product capable of rebinding 16S rRNA. This fragment, consisting of residues 1-103, was found to bind with an apparent association constant of 11 microM-1. This fragment was used in place of S4 in an in vitro reconstitution experiment. Although the particles formed had a protein composition not significantly different from reconstituted 30S ribosomal subunits, their sedimentation behavior was more like that of particles reconstituted without S4. These results indicate to us that, although residues 104-203 of S4 are involved in the assembly of the 30S ribosome, they are not necessary for the binding of S4 to 16S RNA. Taken with previous results, the domain of S4 involved in specific binding of 16S RNA can be confined to residues 47-103.

Localization of the binding site for protein S4 on 16 S ribosomal RNA by chemical and enzymatic probing and primer extension

We have examined the effect of binding ribosomal protein S4 to 16 S rRNA on the susceptibility of the RNA to a variety of chemical and enzymatic probes. We have used dimethyl sulfate to probe unpaired adenines (at N-1) and cytosines (at N-3), kethoxal to probe unpaired guanines (at N-1 and N-2) and cobra venom (V1) ribonuclease as a probe of base-paired regions of 16 S rRNA. Sites of attack by the probes were identified by primer extension using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides. Comparison of probing results for naked and S4-bound rRNA shows: Protein S4 protects a relatively compact region of the 5' domain of 16 S rRNA from chemical and enzymatic attack. This region is bounded by nucleotides 27 to 47 and 394 to 556, and has a secondary structure characterized by the junction of five helical elements. Phylogenetically conserved irregular features (bulged nucleotides, internal loops and flanking unpaired nucleotides) and helical phosphodiester bonds of four of the helices are specifically protected in the S4-RNA complex. We conclude that this is the major, and possibly sole region of contact between 16 S rRNA and S4. Many of the S4-dependent changes mimic those observed on assembly of 16 S rRNA into 30 S ribosomal subunits. Binding of S4 causes enhanced chemical reactivity coupled with protection from V1 nuclease outside the S4 junction region in the 530, 720 and 1140 loops. We interpret these results as indicative of loss of structure, and suggest that S4 binding causes disruption of adventitious pairing in these regions, possibly by stabilizing the geometry of the RNA such that these interactions are prevented from forming.

Preparative ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography of bacterial ribosomal proteins

We have developed analytical and preparative ion-exchange HPLC methods for the separation of bacterial ribosomal proteins. Proteins separated by the TSK SP-5-PW column were identified with reverse-phase HPLC and gel electrophoresis. The 21 proteins of the small ribosomal subunit were resolved into 18 peaks, and the 32 large ribosomal subunit proteins produced 25 distinct peaks. All peaks containing more than one protein were resolved using reverse-phase HPLC. Peak volumes were typically a few milliliters. Separation times were 90 min for analytical and 5 h for preparative columns. Preparative-scale sample loads ranged from 100 to 400 mg. Overall recovery efficiency for 30S and 50S subunit proteins was approximately 100%. 30S ribosomal subunit proteins purified by this method were shown to be fully capable of participating in vitro reassembly to form intact, active ribosomal subunits.

Chemical and functional characterization of an altered form of ribosomal protein S4 derived from a strain of E. coli defective in auto-regulation of the alpha operon

We have isolated a mutant form of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4. This mutant is temperature sensitive and apparently fails to autogenously regulate the gene products of the alpha operon, which consists of the genes for proteins S13, S11, S4, L17, and the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (1). We have shown that this mutation results in the production of an S4 protein with a molecular weight approximately 4,000 daltons less than the wild-type protein. Our chemical analyses demonstrate that the mutant protein is missing its C-terminal section consisting of residues 170-203. However, our studies to determine the capacity of this mutant protein to bind 16S RNA show that this protein is unimpaired in RNA binding function. This observation suggests that the functional domain of protein S4 responsible for translational regulation of the S4 gene products requires more of the protein than the 16S RNA binding domain.

Studies on the kinetic sequence of in vitro ribosome assembly using cibacron blue F3GA as a general assembly inhibitor

We have found that all E. coli ribosomal proteins strongly bind to an agarose affinity column derivatized with the dye Cibacron Blue F3GA. We have also shown that the capacity to bind the dye is lost when the proteins are organized within the structure of the ribosome or are members of pre-formed protein-RNA complexes. We conclude that the binding of ribosomal proteins to this dye involves specific protein-RNA recognition sites. These observations led us to discover that Cibacron Blue can be used to inhibit in vitro ribosome assembly at any stage of the assembly process. This has allowed us to determine a kinetic order of ribosome assembly.

The use of hydroxylamine cleavage to produce a fragment of ribosomal protein S4 which retains the capacity to specifically bind 16S ribosomal RNA

In previous reports we have described the isolation of fragments of 30S ribosomal protein S4 using a number of different enzymatic and chemical cleavage techniques. These experiments were designed to determine the region of the protein responsible for 16S RNA recognition. We report here the isolation of two fragments produced by the hydroxylamine cleavage of the asparaginyl-glycyl peptide bond between positions 124 and 125. The purified fragments were chemically identified and tested for RNA binding capacity. The fragment consisting of residues 1-124 retains RNA binding activity and the fragment 125-203 is totally without RNA binding function. These results and previous results strongly suggest that the domain of protein S4 responsible for 16S RNA specific association is within the region consisting of residues 46-124.

Evidence that E. coli ribosomal protein S13 has two separable functional domains involved in 16S RNA recognition and protein S19 binding

We have found that E. coli ribosomal protein S13 recognizes multiple sites on 16S RNA. However, when protein S19 is included with a mixture of proteins S4, S7, S8, S16/S17 and S20, the S13 binds to the complex with measurably greater strength and with a stoichiometry of 1.5 copies per particle. This suggests that the protein may have two functional domains. We have tested this idea by cleaving the protein into two polypeptides. It was found that one of the fragments, composed of amino acid residues 84-117, retained the capacity to bind 16S RNA at multiple sites. Protein S19 had no affect on the strength or stoichiometry of the binding of this fragment. These data suggest that S13 has a C-terminal domain primarily responsible for RNA recognition and possibly that the N-terminal region is important for association with protein S19.

Specific ribosomal RNA recognition by a fragment of E. coli ribosomal protein S4 missing the C-terminal 36 amino acid residues

We have previously investigated the role of the N-terminal region of ribosomal protein S4 to participate in 30S ribosome assembly and function (1-3). In this report we extend these studies to the two fragments produced by the chemical cleavage of protein S4 at the tryptophan residue 167. We find that the carboxyl terminal fragment (168-203) does not bind 16S RNA nor does it participate in assembly with the other 20 proteins from the 30S ribosome. In contrast, the larger fragment (1-167), does bind 16S RNA specifically. If the S4-fragment (1-167) is used to replace protein S4 in the complete 30S assembly reaction, all 20 of the other 30S proteins are incorporated. We conclude that the carboxyl terminal section of the protein S4 is not directly involved in binding 16S RNA or in the assembly of any of the other 30S proteins.

Location of protein S4 on the small ribosomal subunit of E. coli and B. stearothermophilus with protein- and hapten-specific antibodies

In spite of considerable effort there is still serious disagreement in the literature about the question of whether epitopes of ribosomal protein S4 are accessible for antibody binding on the intact small ribosomal subunit. We have attempted to resolve this issue using three independent approaches: (i) a re-investigation of the exposure and the location of epitopes of ribosomal protein S4 on the surface of the 30S subunit and 30S core particles of the E. coli ribosome, including rigorous controls of antibody specificity, (ii) a similar investigation of protein S4 from Bacillus stearothermophilus and (iii) the labelling of residue Cys-31 of E. coli S4 with a fluorescein derivative the accessibility of which towards a fluorescein-specific antibody was demonstrated directly by fluorimetry. In each of the three cases the antigen (E. coli S4, B. stearothermophilus S4 or fluorescein) was found to reside on the small lobe.

Shape and compactness of the isolated ribosomal 16 S RNA and its complexes with ribosomal proteins

X-ray scattering, neutron scattering and velocity sedimentation techniques were used for studies of ribosomal 16 S RNA in the isolated state and in different complexes with ribosomal proteins. The neutron scattering curve of the ribosomal 30 S subparticle in 42% 2H2O where the protein component is contrast-matched, was taken as a standard of comparison characterizing the dimensions and shape of the 16 S RNA in situ. The following deductions result from the comparisons. The shape of the isolated 16 S RNA at a sufficient Mg2+ concentration (e.g., in the reconstruction buffer) is similar to that of the 16 S RNA in situ, i.e. in the 30 S particle, but it is somewhat less compact. The 16 S RNA in the complex with protein S4 has a shape and compactness similar to those of the isolated 16 S RNA. The 16 S RNA in the complex with four core proteins, namely S4, S7, S8 and S15, has a shape and compactness similar to those of the isolated 16 S RNA. The six ribosomal proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S16 and S17 are necessary and sufficient for the 16 S RNA to acquire a compactness similar to that within the 30 S particle. The general conclusion is that the overall specific folding of the 16 S RNA is governed and maintained by its own intramolecular interactions, but the additional folding-up (about one-fourth of the linear size of the whole molecule) or the stabilization of the final compactness requires some ribosomal proteins.

Polynucleotide . ribosomal-protein complexes and their decoding properties

Polyadenylic acid, polycytidylic acid, polyuridylic acid or phage MS2 RNA, immobilized on Sepharose, form a complex with Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins. Regardless of their particular nucleotide composition, all four polynucleotides bind an invariable set of proteins consisting of S1, S3, S4, S5, S9, S13, L2 and L17. We found that these polynucleotide . protein complexes bind tRNA. Furthermore, it was possible to show that the poly(A) . protein and poly(U) . protein complexes select efficiently their cognate tRNAs, tRNALys and tRNAPhe respectively. This important functional property of the polynucleotide . protein complexes suggests that these ribosomal proteins belong in the ribosome to a functional domain responsible for the decoding of mRNA.

Ribosomal protein S1 associates with Escherichia coli ribosomal 30-S subunit by means of protein-protein interactions

Ribosomal proteins S1 when associated with the 30-S subunit does not interact with 16-S RNA but its binding is determined mostly by protein-protein interactions. These conclusions are based on the following data. 1. Ultraviolet irradiation (lambda = 254 nm) of the 30-S subunit does not result in the covalent cross-linking of S1 with 16-S RNA at irradiation doses up to 150 quanta/nucleotide, whereas the irradiation under the same conditions of S1 . polynucleotide complexes [S1 . poly(U), S1 . poly(A) and S1 . Q beta phage RNA] induces effective formation of polynucleotide-protein cross-links. 2. Mild treatment of 30-S subunits lacking S-1 with RNase A or with cobra venom endonuclease results in removal of 10--20% of the total nucleotide material but does not affect their sedimentation characteristics of their S1 binding capacity. 3. The association of S1 with S1-depleted 30-S subunits is insensitive to aurintricarboxylic acid, which is known as a strong inhibitor of complex formation between S1 and polynucleotides. 4. Mild trypsin treatment of S1-depleted 30-S subunits greatly reduces their S1 binding capacity.