Interaction of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

Late consolidation of rRNA structure during co-transcriptional assembly in E. coli by time-resolved DMS footprinting

The production of new ribosomes requires proper folding of the rRNA and the addition of more than 50 ribosomal proteins. The structures of some assembly intermediates have been determined by cryo-electron microscopy, yet these structures do not provide information on the folding dynamics of the rRNA. To visualize the changes in rRNA structure during ribosome assembly in E. coli cells, transcripts were pulse-labeled with 4-thiouridine and the structure of newly made rRNA probed at various times by dimethyl sulfate modification and mutational profiling sequencing (4U-DMS-MaPseq). The in-cell DMS modification patterns revealed that many long-range rRNA tertiary interactions and protein binding sites through the 16S and 23S rRNA remain partially unfolded 1.5 min after transcription. By contrast, the active sites were continually shielded from DMS modification, suggesting that these critical regions are guarded by cellular factors throughout assembly. Later, bases near the peptidyl tRNA site exhibited specific rearrangements consistent with the binding and release of assembly factors. Time-dependent structure-probing in cells suggests that many tertiary interactions throughout the new ribosomal subunits remain mobile or unfolded until the late stages of subunit maturation.

Characteristic Features of Protein Interaction with Single- and Double-Stranded RNA

The review discusses differences between the specific protein interactions with single- and double-stranded RNA molecules using the data on the structure of RNA-protein complexes. Proteins interacting with the single-stranded RNAs form contacts with RNA bases, which ensures recognition of specific nucleotide sequences. Formation of such contacts with the double-stranded RNAs is hindered, so that the proteins recognize unique conformations of the RNA spatial structure and interact mainly with the RNA sugar-phosphate backbone.

Autonomous synthesis and assembly of a ribosomal subunit on a chip

Ribosome biogenesis is an efficient and complex assembly process that has not been reconstructed outside a living cell so far, yet is the most critical step for establishing a self-replicating artificial cell. We recreated the biogenesis of Escherichia coli's small ribosomal subunit by synthesizing and capturing all its ribosomal proteins and RNA on a chip. Surface confinement provided favorable conditions for autonomous stepwise assembly of new subunits, spatially segregated from original intact ribosomes. Our real-time fluorescence measurements revealed hierarchal assembly, cooperative interactions, unstable intermediates, and specific binding to large ribosomal subunits. Using only synthetic genes, our methodology is a crucial step toward creation of a self-replicating artificial cell and a general strategy for the mechanistic investigation of diverse multicomponent macromolecular machines.

Crystal structure of the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus: structure of the proteins and their interactions with 16 S RNA

We present a detailed analysis of the protein structures in the 30 S ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus, and their interactions with 16 S RNA based on a crystal structure at 3.05 A resolution. With 20 different polypeptide chains, the 30 S subunit adds significantly to our data base of RNA structure and protein-RNA interactions. In addition to globular domains, many of the proteins have long, extended regions, either in the termini or in internal loops, which make extensive contact to the RNA component and are involved in stabilizing RNA tertiary structure. Many ribosomal proteins share similar alpha+beta sandwich folds, but we show that the topology of this domain varies considerably, as do the ways in which the proteins interact with RNA. Analysis of the protein-RNA interactions in the context of ribosomal assembly shows that the primary binders are globular proteins that bind at RNA multihelix junctions, whereas proteins with long extensions assemble later. We attempt to correlate the structure with a large body of biochemical and genetic data on the 30 S subunit.

Central domain assembly: thermodynamics and kinetics of S6 and S18 binding to an S15-RNA complex

The 30 S ribosomal subunit assembles in vitro through the hierarchical binding of 21 ribosomal proteins to 16 S rRNA. The central domain of 16 S rRNA becomes the platform of the 30 S subunit upon binding of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S11, S15, S18 and S21. The assembly of the platform is nucleated by binding of S15 to 16 S rRNA, followed by the cooperative binding of S6 and S18. The prior binding of S6 and S18 is required for binding of S11 and S21. We have studied the mechanism of the cooperative binding of S6 and S18 to the S15-rRNA complex by isothermal titration calorimetry and gel mobility shift assays with rRNA and proteins from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. S6 and S18 form a stable heterodimer in solution with an apparent dissociation constant of 8.7 nM at 40 degrees C. The S6:S18 heterodimer binds to the S15-rRNA complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 2.7 nM at 40 degrees C. Consistent with previous studies using rRNA and proteins from Escherichia coli, we observed no binding of S6 or S18 in the absence of the other protein or S15. The presence of S15 increases the affinity of S6:S18 for the RNA by at least four orders of magnitude. The kinetics of S6:S18 binding to the S15-rRNA complex are slow, with an apparent bimolecular rate constant of 8.0 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1) and an apparent unimolecular dissociation rate of 1.6 x 10(-4) s(-1). These results, which are consistent with a model in which S6 and S18 bind as a heterodimer to the S15-rRNA complex, provide a mechanistic framework to describe the previously observed S15-mediated cooperative binding of S6 and S18 in the ordered assembly of a multi-protein ribonucleoprotein complex.

Role of conserved nucleotides in building the 16 S rRNA binding site for ribosomal protein S15

Ribosomal protein S15 recognizes a highly conserved target on 16 S rRNA, which consists of two distinct binding regions. Here, we used extensive site-directed mutagenesis on a Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA fragment containing the S15 binding site, to investigate the role of conserved nucleotides in protein recognition and to evaluate the relative contribution of the two sites. The effect of mutations on S15 recognition was studied by measuring the relative binding affinity, RNA probing and footprinting. The crystallographic structure of the Thermus thermophilus complex allowed molecular modelling of the E. coli complex and facilitated interpretation of biochemical data. Binding is essentially driven by site 1, which includes a three-way junction constrained by a conserved base triple and cross-strand stacking. Recognition is based mainly on shape complementarity, and the role of conserved nucleotides is to maintain a unique backbone geometry. The wild-type base triple is absolutely required for protein interaction, while changes in the conserved surrounding nucleotides are partially tolerated. Site 2, which provides functional groups in a conserved G-U/G-C motif, contributes only modestly to the stability of the interaction. Binding to this motif is dependent on binding at site 1 and is allowed only if the two sites are in the correct relative orientation. Non-conserved bulged nucleotides as well as a conserved purine interior loop, although not directly involved in recognition, are used to provide an appropriate flexibility between the two sites. In addition, correct binding at the two sites triggers conformational adjustments in the purine interior loop and in a distal region, which are known to be involved for subsequent binding of proteins S6 and S18. Thus, the role of site 1 is to anchor S15 to the rRNA, while binding at site 2 is aimed to induce a cascade of events required for subunit assembly.

Structure of the S15,S6,S18-rRNA complex: assembly of the 30S ribosome central domain

The crystal structure of a 70-kilodalton ribonucleoprotein complex from the central domain of the Thermus thermophilus 30S ribosomal subunit was solved at 2.6 angstrom resolution. The complex consists of a 104-nucleotide RNA fragment composed of two three-helix junctions that lie at the end of a central helix, and the ribosomal proteins S15, S6, and S18. S15 binds the ribosomal RNA early in the assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit, stabilizing a conformational reorganization of the two three-helix junctions that creates the RNA fold necessary for subsequent binding of S6 and S18. The structure of the complex demonstrates the central role of S15-induced reorganization of central domain RNA for the subsequent steps of ribosome assembly.

Domain III of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 25 S ribosomal RNA: its role in binding of ribosomal protein L25 and 60 S subunit formation

Domain III of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 25 S rRNA contains the recognition site for the primary rRNA-binding ribosomal protein L25, which belongs to the functionally conserved EL23/L25 family of ribosomal proteins. The EL23/L25 binding region is very complex, consisting of several irregular helices held together by long-distance secondary and tertiary interactions. Moreover, it contains the eukaryote-specific V9 (D7a) expansion segment. Functional characterisation of the structural elements of this site by a detailed in vitro and in vivo mutational analysis indicates the presence of two separate regions that are directly involved in L25 binding. In particular, mutation of either of two conserved nucleotides in the loop of helix 49 significantly reduces in vitro L25 binding, thus strongly supporting their role as attachment sites for the r-protein. Two other helices appear to be primarily required for the correct folding of the binding site. Mutations that abolish in vitro binding of L25 block accumulation of 25 S rRNA in vivo because they stall pre-rRNA processing at the level of its immediate precursor, the 27 S(B) pre-rRNA. Surprisingly, several mutations that do not significantly affect L25 binding in vitro cause the same lethal defect in 27 S(B) pre-rRNA processing. Deletion of the V9 expansion segment also leads to under-accumulation of mature 25 S rRNA and a twofold reduction in growth rate. We conclude that an intact domain III, including the V9 expansion segment, is essential for normal processing and assembly of 25 S rRNA.

Structure of a bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit at 5.5 A resolution

The 30S ribosomal subunit binds messenger RNA and the anticodon stem-loop of transfer RNA during protein synthesis. A crystallographic analysis of the structure of the subunit from the bacterium Thermus thermophilus is presented. At a resolution of 5.5 A, the phosphate backbone of the ribosomal RNA is visible, as are the alpha-helices of the ribosomal proteins, enabling double-helical regions of RNA to be identified throughout the subunit, all seven of the small-subunit proteins of known crystal structure to be positioned in the electron density map, and the fold of the entire central domain of the small-subunit ribosomal RNA to be determined.

NMR structure determination of the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 from Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA

Many cellular processes involve the preferential interaction of an RNA molecule with a specific protein. A detailed analysis of the individual protein and RNA components of these interactions can provide unique insights into the structural features important for protein-RNA recognition. Ribosomal protein S8 of Escherichia coli plays a key role in 30 S ribosomal subunit assembly through its interaction with 16 S rRNA. The binding site for protein S8 comprises a portion of helix 21, nucleotides G588 to G604 and C634 to C651. This region forms a base-paired helix that is interrupted by a non-Watson-Crick segment composed of nine phylogenetically conserved nucleotides. We have investigated the detailed structure of the conserved segment and the interaction of this region with metal ions using NMR spectroscopy. Twenty-four of the 40 calculated structures converged to similar conformations and were grouped into two families. The main difference between the families is the orientation of the base of U641. The rms deviation between the heavy-atoms of the ten lowest-energy structures is 1.24 A. The orientations of the G597.C643 base-pair and A595.(A596.U644) base-triple within the conserved core have been defined and appear to extend the proximal segment of helix 21 into the phylogenetically conserved core. The base of A642 terminates this helix by stacking against C643 and the base of U641 forms hydrogen bonds with core nucleotides. The conserved core also contains a Mg2+-binding site that promotes stabilization of the secondary and tertiary structure elements of the core. A model for the interaction of S8 with its RNA-binding site is proposed.

Structural studies of ribosomal proteins

Crystal and solution structures of fourteen ribosomal proteins from thermophilic bacteria have been determined during the last decade. This paper reviews structural studies of ribosomal proteins from Thermus thermophilus carried out at the Institute of Protein Research (Pushchino, Russia) in collaboration with the University of Lund (Lund, Sweden) and the Center of Structural Biochemistry (Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden). New experimental data on the crystal structure of the ribosomal protein L30 from T. thermophilus are also included.

Crystal structure of ribosomal protein S8 from Thermus thermophilus reveals a high degree of structural conservation of a specific RNA binding site

S8 is one of the core ribosomal proteins. It binds to 16 S RNA with high affinity and independently of other ribosomal proteins. It also acts as a translational repressor in Escherichia coli by binding to its own mRNA. The structure of Thermus thermophilus S8 has been determined by the method of multiple isomorphous replacement at 2.9 A resolution and refined to a crystallographic R-factor of 16.2% (Rfree 27.5%). The two domains of the structure have an alpha/beta fold and are connected by a long protruding loop. The two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the crystal interact through an extensive hydrophobic core and form a tightly associated dimer, while symmetry-related molecules form a joint beta-sheet of mixed type. This type of protein-protein interaction could be realized within the ribosomal assembly. A comparison of the structures of T. thermophilus and Bacillus stearothermophilus S8 shows that the interdomain loop is eight residues longer in the former and reveals high structural conservation of an extensive region, located in the C-terminal domain. From mutational studies this region was proposed earlier to be involved in specific interaction with RNA. On the basis of these data and on the comparison of the two structures of S8, it is proposed that the three-dimensional structure of specific RNA binding sites in ribosomal proteins is highly conserved among different species.

In vitro assembly of a ribonucleoprotein particle corresponding to the platform domain of the 30S ribosomal subunit

A fragment of the 16S RNA of Thermus thermophilus corresponding to the central domain (nucleotides 547-895) has been prepared by transcription in vitro. Incubation of this fragment with the total 30S ribosomal proteins has resulted in the formation of a compact 12S ribonucleoprotein particle. This particle contained five T. thermophilus proteins corresponding to Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S11, S15, and possibly S18, all of which were previously shown to interact with the central domain of the 16S RNA and to be localized in the platform (side bulge) of the 30S ribosomal subunit. When examined by electron microscopy, isolated particles have an appearance that is similar in size and shape to the corresponding morphological features of the 30S subunit. We conclude that the central domain of the 16S RNA can independently and specifically assemble with a defined subset of ribosomal proteins into a compact ribonucleoprotein particle corresponding to the platform (side bulge) of the 30S subunit.

Structural features of the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA defined using NMR spectroscopy

Ribosomal protein S8 of Escherichia coli plays a key role in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly through its interaction with 16S rRNA. S8 also participates in the translational regulation of ribosomal protein expression through its interaction with spc operon mRNA. The binding site for protein S8 within the 16S rRNA encompasses nucleotides G588 to G604 and C634 to C651 and is composed of two base paired helical regions that flank a phylogenetically conserved core element containing nine residues. We have investigated the structure of the rRNA binding site for S8 both in the free state and in the presence of protein using NMR spectroscopy. The integrity of the two helical segments has been verified, and the presence of G597 x C643 and A596 x U644 base pairs within the conserved core, predicted from comparative analysis, have been confirmed. In addition, we have identified a base triple within the core that is composed of residues A595 x (A596 x U644). The NMR data suggest that S8-RNA interaction is accomplished without significant changes in the RNA. Nonetheless, S8 binding promotes formation of the U598 x A640 base pair and appears to stabilize the G597 x C643 and A596 x U644 base pairs.

Structural evidence for specific S8-RNA and S8-protein interactions within the 30S ribosomal subunit: ribosomal protein S8 from Bacillus stearothermophilus at 1.9 A resolution

BACKGROUND

Prokaryotic ribosomal protein S8 is an important RNA-binding protein that occupies a central position within the small ribosomal subunit. It interacts extensively with 16S rRNA and is crucial for the correct folding of the central domain of the rRNA. S8 also controls the synthesis of several ribosomal proteins by binding to mRNA. It binds specifically to very similar sites in the two RNA molecules.

RESULTS

S8 is divided into two tightly associated domains and contains three regions that are proposed to interact with other ribosomal components: two potential RNA-binding sites, and a hydrophobic patch that may interact with a complementary hydrophobic region of S5. The N-terminal domain fold is found in several proteins including two that bind double-stranded DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

These multiple RNA-binding sites are consistent with the role of S8 in organizing the central domain and agree with the latest models of the 16S RNA which show that the S8 location coincides with a region of complicated nucleic-acid structure. The presence in a wide variety of proteins of a region homologous to the N-terminal domain supports the idea that ribosomal proteins must represent some of the earliest protein molecules.

Mutational analysis of the pseudoknot structure of the S15 translational operator from Escherichia coli

Expression of rpsO, the gene encoding the small ribosomal protein S15, is autoregulated at the translational level by S15, which binds to its mRNA in a region overlapping the ribosome-binding site. By measuring the effect of mutations on the expression of a translational rpsO-lacZ fusion and the S15 binding affinity for the translational operator, the formation of a pseudoknot in the operator site in vivo is fully demonstrated and appears to be a prerequisite for S15 binding. The mutational analysis suggests also that specific determinants for S15 binding are located in very limited regions of the structure formed by the pseudoknot. It is deduced that a specific pseudoknot conformation is a key element for autoregulation.

Role of conserved nucleotides in building the 16S rRNA binding site of E. coli ribosomal protein S8

Ribosomal protein S8 specifically recognizes a helical and irregular region of 16S rRNA that is highly evolutionary constrained. Despite its restricted size, the precise conformation of this region remains a question of debate. Here, we used chemical probing to analyze the structural consequences of mutations in this RNA region. These data, combined with computer modelling and previously published data on protein binding were used to investigate the conformation of the RNA binding site. The experimental data confirm the model in which adenines A595, A640 and A642 bulge out in the deep groove. In addition to the already proposed non canonical U598-U641 interaction, the structure is stabilized by stacking interactions (between A595 and A640) and an array of hydrogen bonds involving bases and the sugar phosphate backbone. Mutations that alter the ability to form these interdependent interactions result in a local destabilization or reorganization. The specificity of recognition by protein S8 is provided by the irregular and distorted backbone and the two bulged adenines 640 and 642 in the deep groove. The third adenine (A595) is not a direct recognition site but must adopt a bulged position. The U598-U641 pair should not be directly in contact with the protein.

The binding site for ribosomal protein S8 in 16S rRNA and spc mRNA from Escherichia coli: minimum structural requirements and the effects of single bulged bases on S8-RNA interaction

Through specific interactions with rRNA and mRNA, ribosomal protein S8 of Escherichia coli plays a central role in both assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit and translational regulation of spc operon expression. To better understand S8-RNA association, we have measured the affinity of S8 for a number of variants of its rRNA and mRNA binding sites prepared by in vitro transcription or chemical synthesis. With the aid of site-directed deletions, we demonstrate that an imperfect, 33-nucleotide helical stem encompassing nucleotides 588-603 and 635-651 possesses all of the structural information necessary for specific binding of S8 to the 16S rRNA. This segment consists of two short duplexes that enclose a conserved, asymmetric internal loop which contains features crucial for protein recognition. The S8 binding site in spc operon mRNA is very similar in both primary and secondary structure to that in 16S rRNA except for the presence of two single bulged bases in one of the duplex segments. In addition, the apparent association constant for the S8-mRNA interaction is approximately fivefold less than that for the S8-rRNA interaction. We show that the difference in affinity can be attributed to the effects of the bulged bases. Deletion of the bulged bases from the mRNA site increases its affinity for S8 to a level similar to that of the rRNA, whereas insertion of single-base bulges at equivalent positions within the rRNA site reduces its affinity for S8 to a value typical of the mRNA. Single-base bulges in the proximity of essential recognition features are therefore capable of modulating the strength of protein-RNA interactions.

Structural dynamics of translating ribosomes: 16S ribosomal RNA bases that may move twice during translocation

Recent footprinting, sedimentation and neutron-scattering results obtained in vivo or on pre-translocation and post-translocation ribosomal complexes are integrated with cross-linking and immunoelectron microscopy information. It is proposed that the 30S subunit pulses during translocation and that its pre- and post-translocation structures are not necessarily identical. Accordingly, translocation is characterized by three consecutive conformational states of the 30S and 50S subunits. State 1 (the pre-translocation state) lasts until the elongation factor EF-G.GTP complex binds to the ribosome or adopts the GTPase conformation. State 2 (the translocation state, or the peak or plateau of the pulse) follows and lasts until EF-G adopts a subsequent conformation or is released from the ribosome. State 3 (the post-translocation state) ensues and lasts until A (aminoacyl) site binding of aminoacyl-tRNA. In state 2, 16S RNA hairpins 26 and 33-33A, located in the platform and the head of the 30S subunit, respectively, become kinked or twisted, and residue A1503, near the decoding site, becomes exposed. A platform twist is associated with P (peptide) to E (exit) site tRNA movements and a head twist with pivoting of the peptidyl-tRNA elbow from the A to the P site, around a (retractable?) S19 domain. These twists result in an unlocking of the platform and the head from the 50S subunit. Exposure of A1503 is tentatively associated with movements of mRNA or tRNA anticodon stem-loops. These twisted or otherwise-exposed residues readopt their previous setting upon completion of translocation, i.e. states 1 and 3 of 16S RNA differ more from state 2 than from each other.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Minimal 16S rRNA binding site and role of conserved nucleotides in Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 recognition

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 was previously shown to bind a 16S rRNA fragment (nucleotides 584-756) with the same affinity as the complete 16S rRNA, and to shield an irregular helical region (region C) [Mougel, M., Eyermann, F., Westhof, E., Romby, P., Expert-Bezançon, Ebel, J. P., Ehresmann, B. & Ehresmann, C. (1987). J. Mol. Biol. 198, 91-107]. Region C was postulated to display characteristic features: three bulged adenines (A595, A640 and A642), a non-canonical U598-U641 pair surrounded by two G.C pairs. In order to delineate the minimal RNA binding site, deletions were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis and short RNA fragments were synthesized. Their ability to bind S8 was assayed by filter binding. Our results show that the RNA binding site can be restricted to a short helical stem (588-605/633-651) containing region C. The second part of the work focused on region C and on the role of conserved nucleotides as potential determinants of S8 recognition. Single and double mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis in fragment 584-756, and their effect on S8 binding was measured. It was found that the three bulged positions are essential and that adenines are required at positions 640 and 642. U598 is also crucial and the highly conserved G597.C643 pair cannot be inverted. These conserved nucleotides are either directly involved in the recognition process as direct contacts or required to maintain a specific conformation. The strong evolutionary pressure and the small number of positive mutants stress the high stringency of the recognition process.

The complete amino acid sequence of ribosomal protein S8 from Thermus thermophilus

Protein S8 from Thermus thermophilus consists of 138 amino acids of M(r) 15,840. Its primary structure was established using peptide sequences from two different digests. Protein S8 from T. thermophilus shares a high percentage of identity with protein S8 from Thermus aquaticus. There are some consensus sequences between proteins S8 from eubacteria, archebacteria, chloroplasts, and cyanelles.

Mutagenesis of ribosomal protein S8 from Escherichia coli: defects in regulation of the spc operon

The structural features of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 that are involved in translational regulation of spc operon expression and, therefore, in its interaction with RNA have been investigated by use of a genetic approach. The rpsH gene, which encodes protein S8, was first inserted into an expression vector under the control of the lac promoter and subsequently mutagenized with methoxylamine or nitrous acid. A screening procedure based on the regulatory role of S8 was used to identify mutants that were potentially defective in their ability to associate with spc operon mRNA and, by inference, 16S mRNA. In this way, we isolated 39 variants of the S8 gene containing alterations at 34 different sites, including 37 that led to single amino acid substitutions and 2 that generated premature termination codons. As the mutations were distributed throughout the polypeptide chain, our results indicate that amino acid residues important for the structural integrity of the RNA-binding domain are not localized to a single segment. Nonetheless, the majority were located within three short sequences at the N terminus, middle, and C terminus that are phylogenetically conserved among all known eubacterial and chloroplast versions of this protein. We conclude that these sites encompass the main structural determinants required for the interaction of protein S8 with RNA.

Assembly of the Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit reveals protein-dependent folding of the 16S rRNA domains

Protein-nucleic acid interactions involved in the assembly process of the Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit were quantitatively analyzed by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. The in vitro reconstituted ribonucleoprotein (core) particles were characterized by their morphology, mass, and radii of gyration. During the assembly of the 30S subunit, the 16S rRNA underwent significant conformational changes that were governed by the cooperative interactions of the ribosomal proteins. The sequential association of the first 12 proteins with the 16S rRNA resulted in the formation of core particles containing up to three mass centers at distinct stages of the assembly process. These globular mass centers may correspond to the three major domains (5', central, and 3') of the 16S rRNA. Through the subsequent interactions of the late assembly proteins with the 16S rRNA, two of the three domains merge, yielding the basic structural traits of the native 30S subunit. The fine morphological features of the native 30S subunit became distinctly resolved only after the addition of the full complement of proteins. The fully reconstituted 30S subunits are active in polyphenylalanine synthesis assays. Visualization of the assembly mechanism of the E. coli 30S ribosomal subunit revealed domain-specific folding of the 16S rRNA through the formation of distinct intermediate core particles hitherto not observed.

RNA-protein interactions in the Escherichia coli ribosome

Over the last two decades essentially three different approaches have been used to study the topography of RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. These are: (a) the analysis of binding sites for individual ribosomal proteins or groups of proteins on the RNA; (b) the determination of protein footprint sites on the RNA by the application of higher order structure analytical techniques; and (c) the localisation of RNA-protein cross-link sites on the RNA. This article compares and contrasts the types of data that the three different approaches provide, and gives a brief and highly simplified summary of the results that have been obtained for both the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA from E coli.

Protein-induced conformational changes in 16 S ribosomal RNA during the initial assembly steps of the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal subunit

The mechanism of 16 S ribosomal RNA folding into its compact form in the native 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli was studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy. This approach made it possible to visualize and quantitatively analyze the conformational changes induced in 16 S rRNA under various ionic conditions and to characterize the interactions of ribosomal proteins S4, S8, S15, S20, S17 and S7, the six proteins known to bind to 16 S rRNA in the initial assembly steps. 16 S rRNA and the reconstituted RNA-protein core particles were characterized by their mass, morphology, radii of gyration (RG), and the extent and stability of 16 S rRNA secondary structure. The stepwise binding of S4, S8 and S15 led to a corresponding increase of mass and was accompanied by increased folding of 16 S rRNA in the core particles, as evident from the electron micrographs and from the decrease of RG values from 114 A and 91 A. Although the binding of S20, S17 and S7 continued the trend of mass increase, the RG values of these core particles showed a variable trend. While there was a slight increase in the RG value of the S20 core particles to 94 A, the RG value remained unchanged (94 A) with the further addition of S17. With subsequent addition of S7 to the core particles, the RG values showed an increase to 108 A. Association with S7 led to the formation of a globular mass cluster with a diameter of about 115 A and a mass of about 300 kDa. The rest of the mass (about 330 kDa) remained loosely coiled, giving the core particle a "medusa-like" appearance. Morphology of the 16 S rRNA and 16 S rRNA-protein core particles, even those with all six proteins, does not resemble the native 30 S subunit, contrary to what has been reported by others. The circular dichroism spectra of the 16 S rRNA-protein complexes and of free 16 S rRNA indicate a similarity of RNA secondary structure in the core particles with the first four proteins, S4, S8, S15, S20. The circular dichroism melting profiles of these core particles show only insignificant variations, implying no obvious changes in the distribution or the stability of the helical segments of 16 S rRNA. However, subsequent binding of proteins S17 and S7 affected both the extent and the thermal stability of 16 S rRNA secondary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

RNA-protein interactions in 30S ribosomal subunits: folding and function of 16S rRNA

Chemical probing methods have been used to "footprint" 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) at each step during the in vitro assembly of twenty 30S subunit ribosomal proteins. These experiments yield information about the location of each protein relative to the structure of 16S rRNA and provide the basis for derivation of a detailed model for the three-dimensional folding of 16S rRNA. Several lines of evidence suggest that protein-dependent conformational changes in 16S rRNA play an important part in the cooperativity of ribosome assembly and in fine-tuning of the conformation and dynamics of 16S rRNA in the 30S subunit.

Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have derived a model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA, using interactive computer graphic methods. It is based on (1) the secondary structure derived from comparative sequence analysis, (2) the three-dimensional co-ordinates for the centers of mass of the 30 S subunit proteins, and (3) the locations of sites in 16 S rRNA that interact with specific ribosomal proteins, from footprinting and crosslinking studies. We present a detailed description of the derivation of the model. About 75% of the RNA chain is sufficiently constrained to provide a useful model. This contains most of the universally conserved core of the molecule. In all but a few instances, protected and crosslinked sites can be placed within or very close to their cognate proteins, while obeying stereochemical rules. The overall shape of the model and locations of specific regions of the RNA correspond well to data derived from electron micrographs of 30 S subunits, although such data were not used to construct the model. Phylogenetic variations in the structure are readily accommodated; as an example, we have modeled the 950-nucleotide mammalian mitochondrial 12 S rRNA by superimposing it on the E. coli structure. The three major RNA domains, as defined by secondary structure, appear to exist as autonomous structural units in three dimensions, for the most part. There is an extensive interface between the 5' and central domains, whereas the 3' major domain has relatively little apparent contact with the rest of the structure. The 5', central and 3' major domains form structures that resemble the body, platform and head, respectively, seen in electron micrographs of 30 S subunits. We discuss possible roles for the ribosomal proteins in stabilizing specific structural features of the RNA during ribosome assembly. The decoding site, as deduced from footprinting and crosslinking studies involving the tRNA anticodon stem-loop, is well-localized. Bases protected from chemical probing by the anticodon stem-loop line the cleft of the subunit. The conserved loop at position 530, which contains some of the bases protected by A site-bound tRNA, is remote (approx. 80 A) from the decoding site. Protection of these bases by the anticodon stem-loop is thus unlikely to be due to direct contact.

Interaction of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S8 with its binding sites in ribosomal RNA and messenger RNA

The ability of ribosomal protein S8 from Escherichia coli to interact with 12 variants of its 16 S rRNA binding site, as well as with a regulatory sequence within spc operon mRNA, has been assessed. Single-site alterations were introduced into the appropriate segment of the E. coli 16 S rRNA gene by mutagenesis in vitro. Their effects on S8-rRNA interaction were measured via a filter-binding assay, utilizing S8 binding sites transcribed in vitro from the altered 16 S rRNA gene fragments. Of the 12 rRNA mutants, six were unable to bind S8. Significantly, five of these occur within a small, phylogenetically conserved internal loop, defined by nucleotides 596-597 and 641-643, suggesting that this structure plays a major role in S8-16 S rRNA recognition. The reduced affinity of S8 for its binding site in these cases was closely correlated with growth defects that resulted from expression of the same mutations in vivo. Alterations at other positions in the S8 binding site had little influence on complex formation or cell growth, as long as they did not disrupt rRNA secondary structure. The specific interaction of S8 with a segment of the spc operon mRNA containing a putative site of translational feedback regulation was demonstrated using appropriate in vitro transcripts in conjunction with the filter-binding assay. The apparent association constant for the S8-mRNA interaction was determined to be approximately 5 x 10(6) M-1, about five times lower than for the interaction of S8 with wild-type 16 S rRNA. The structure of the regulatory binding site, determined by sequence analysis of spc operon mRNA protected by S8 from RNase digestion, was found to contain all of the characteristic features of the 16 S rRNA binding site, demonstrating that the protein associates with structurally similar domains in both RNAs.

Translational regulation of the spc operon in Escherichia coli. Identification and structural analysis of the target site for S8 repressor protein

The spc ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli is feedback-regulated by ribosomal protein S8, a translational repressor. We have analyzed the region of the spc mRNA that is responsible for this regulation. First, we have established that the S8 target site on the mRNA is near the translation start site of the third gene encoding ribosomal protein L5 in the operon. This was done by constructing hybrid plasmids carrying spc operon ribosomal protein genes under lac transcriptional control, as well as their deletion derivatives, and carrying out both in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis experiments. Next, the secondary structure of this region was studied by analyzing 5' end-labeled RNA synthesized from the phage SP6 promoter using structure-specific nucleases. A secondary structure model consistent with the results was deduced with the aid of a computer prediction of RNA folding. In addition, we cloned and sequenced the corresponding region from Salmonella typhimurium, Proteus vulgaris and Serratia marcescens and found five "compensating" substitutions that support some of the deduced helical structures of mRNA. None of the base changes was inconsistent with the deduced secondary structure model. Finally, site-directed mutagenesis experiments have identified bases important for regulation, including two base-paired sites representing each of two helical regions. This has led to the conclusion that some specific nucleotide residues located between these two helical regions are directly involved in S8 recognition, and that the function of the two helical regions is to maintain the proper orientation of these nucleotide residues. Comparison of the structure of the S8 target site on the spc mRNA with the known S8 binding site on rRNA has revealed a striking similarity in both primary and secondary structures. In particular, primary sequences of rRNA conserved among distantly related bacterial species in this region is found to be identical with the sequences at the corresponding positions in mRNA. These results suggest that the same structural features of the S8 repressor protein are involved in the interaction with both 16 S rRNA and the mRNA target site.

Prediction of three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA

A model for the tertiary structure of 23S, 16S and 5S ribosomal RNA molecules interacting with three tRNA molecules is presented using the secondary structure models common to E. coli, Z. mays chloroplast, and mammalian mitochondria. This ribosomal RNA model is represented by phosphorus atoms which are separated by 5.9 A in the standard A-form double helix conformation. The accumulated proximity data summarized in Table 1 were used to deduce the most reasonable assembly of helices separated from each other by at least 6.2 A. Straight-line approximation for single strands was adopted to describe the maximum allowed distance between helices. The model of a ribosome binding three tRNA molecules by Nierhaus (1984), the stereochemical model of codon-anticodon interaction by Sundaralingam et al. (1975) and the ribosomal transpeptidation model, forming an alpha-helical nascent polypeptide, by Lim & Spirin (1986), were incorporated in this model. The distribution of chemically modified nucleotides, cross-linked sites, invariant and missing regions in mammalian mitochondrial rRNAs are indicated on the model.

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 with 16 S rRNA

We have examined the effects of assembly of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 on the reactivities of residues in 16 S rRNA towards chemical probes. The results show that S6, S18 and S11 interact with the 690-720 and 790 loop regions of 16 S rRNA in a highly co-operative manner, that is consistent with the previously defined assembly map relationships among these proteins. The results also indicate that these proteins, one of which (S18) has previously been implicated as a component of the ribosomal P-site, interact with residues near some of the recently defined P-site (class II tRNA protection) nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. In addition, assembly of protein S12 has been found to result in the protection of residues in both the 530 stem/loop and the 900 stem regions; the latter group is closely juxtaposed to a segment of 16 S rRNA recently shown to be protected from chemical probes by streptomycin. Interestingly, both S5 and S12 appear to protect, to differing degrees, a well-defined set of residues in the 900 stem/loop and 5'-terminal regions. These observations are discussed in terms of the effects of S5 and S12 on streptomycin binding, and in terms of the class III tRNA protection found in the 900 stem of 16 S rRNA. Altogether these results show that many of the small subunit proteins, which have previously been shown to be functionally important, appear to be associated with functionally implicated segments of 16 S rRNA.

The E. coli 16S rRNA binding site of ribosomal protein S15: higher-order structure in the absence and in the presence of the protein

We have investigated in detail the secondary and tertiary structures of E. coli 16S rRNA binding site of protein S15 using a variety of enzymatic and chemical probes. RNase T1 and nuclease S1 were used to probe unpaired nucleotides and RNase V1 to monitor base-paired or stacked nucleotides. Bases were probed with dimethylsulfate (at A(N-1), C(N-3) and G(N-7)), with 1-cyclohexyl-3 (2-(1-methylmorpholino)-ethyl)-carboiimide-p- toluenesulfonate (at U(N-3) and G(N-1)) and with diethylpyrocarbonate (at A(N-7)). The RNA region corresponding to nucleotides 652 to 753 was tested within: (1) the complete 16S rRNA molecule; (2) a 16S rRNA fragment corresponding to nucleotides 578 to 756 obtained by transcription in vitro; (3) the S15-16S rRNA complex; (4) the S15-fragment complex. Cleavage and modification sites were detected by primer extension with reverse transcriptase. Our results show that: (1) The synthetized fragment folds into the same overall secondary structure as in the complete 16S rRNA, with the exception of the large asymmetrical internal loop (nucleotides 673-676/714-733) which is fully accessible in the fragment while it appears conformationally heterogeneous in the 16S rRNA; (2) the reactivity patterns of the S15-16S rRNA and S15-fragment complexes are identical; (3) the protein protects defined RNA regions, located in the large interior loop and in the 3'-end strand of helix [655-672]-[734-751]; (4) the protein also causes enhanced chemical reactivity and enzyme accessibility interpreted as resulting from a local conformational rearrangement, induced by S15 binding.

Interaction of ribosomal proteins, S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have constructed complexes of ribosomal proteins S8, S15, S8 + S15 and S8 + S15 + S6 + S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA, and probed the RNA moiety with a set of structure-specific chemical and enzymatic probes. Our results show the following effects of assembly of proteins on the reactivity of specific nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. (1) In agreement with earlier work, S8 protects nucleotides in and around the 588-606/632-651 stem from attack by chemical probes; this is supported by protection in and around these same regions from nucleases. In addition, we observe protection of positions 573-575, 583, 812, 858-861 and 865. Several S8-dependent enhancements of reactivity are found, indicating that assembly of this protein is accompanied by conformational changes in 16 S rRNA. These results imply that protein S8 influences a much larger region of the central domain than was previously suspected. (2) Protein S15 protects nucleotides in the 655-672/734-751 stem, in agreement with previous findings. We also find S15-dependent protection of nucleotides in the 724-730 region. Assembly of S15 causes several enhancements of reactivity, the most striking of which are found at G664, A665, G674, and A718. (3) The effects of proteins S6 and S18 are dependent on the simultaneous presence of both proteins, and on the presence of protein S15. S6 + S18-dependent protections are located in the 673-730 and 777-803 regions. We observed some variability in our results with these proteins, depending on the ratio of protein to RNA used, and in different trials using enzymatic probes, possibly due to the limited solubility of protein S18. Consistently reproducible was protection of nucleotides in the 664-676 and 715-729 regions. Among the latter are three of the nucleotides (G664, G674 and A718) that are strongly enhanced by assembly of protein S15. This result suggests that an S15-induced conformational change involving these nucleotides may play a role in the co-operative assembly of proteins S6 and S18.

Protein binding sites on Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA; RNA regions that are protected by proteins S7, S9 and S19, and by proteins S8, S15 and S17

Selected groups of isolated 14C-labelled proteins from E. coli 30S ribosomal subunits were reconstituted with 32P-labelled 16S RNA, and the reconstituted complexes were partially digested with ribonuclease A. RNA fragments protected by the proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and subjected to sequence analysis. Complexes containing proteins S7 and S19 protected an RNA region comprising helices 29 to 32, part of helix 41, and helices 42 and 43 of the 16S RNA secondary structure. Addition of protein S9 had no effect. When compared with previous data for proteins S7, S9, S14 and S19, these results suggest that S14 interacts with helix 33, and that S9 and S14 together interact with the loop-end of helix 41. Complexes containing proteins S8, S15 and S17 protected helices 7 to 10 as well as the "S8-S15 binding site" (helices 20, 22 and parts of helices 21 and 23). When protein S15 was omitted, S8 and S18 showed protection of part of helix 44 in addition to the latter regions. The results are discussed in terms of our model for the detailed arrangement of proteins and RNA in the 30S subunit.

Crosslinking of ribosomal protein S18 to 16 S RNA in E.coli ribosomal 30 S subunits by the use of a reversible crosslinking agent: trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)

We have previously developed [(1987) Biochemistry 26, 5200-5208] the use of trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) to induce reversible RNA-protein crosslinks in the ribosomal 30 S subunit. Protein S18 and, to a lesser extent, proteins S13/S14, S11, S4 and S3 could be crosslinked to the 16 S rRNA. The aim of the present work was to identify the crosslinking sites of protein S18. Three sites could be detected: a major one located in region 825-858, and two others located in regions 434-500 and 233-297. This result is discussed in the light of current knowledge of the topographical localization of S18 in the 30 S subunit and of its relation with function.

A detailed model of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA in situ in the 30 S subunit

A large body of intra-RNA and RNA-protein crosslinking data, obtained in this laboratory, was used to fold the phylogenetically and experimentally established secondary structure of Escherichia coli 16 S RNA into a three-dimensional model. All the crosslinks were induced in intact 30 S subunits (or in some cases in growing E. coli cells), and the sites of crosslinking were precisely localized on the RNA by oligonucleotide analysis. The RNA-protein crosslinking data (including 28 sites, and involving 13 of the 21 30S ribosomal were used to relate the RNA structure to the distribution of the proteins as determined by neutron scattering. The three-dimensional model of the 16 S RNA has overall dimensions of 220 A x 140 A x 90 A, in good agreement with electron microscopic estimates for the 30 S subunit. The shape of the model is also recognizably the same as that seen in electron micrographs, and the positions in the model of bases localized on the 30 S subunit by immunoelectron microscopy (the 5' and 3' termini, the m7G and m6(2)A residues, and C-1400) correspond closely to their experimentally observed positions. The distances between the RNA-protein crosslink sites in the model correlate well with the distances between protein centres of mass obtained by neutron scattering, only two out of 66 distances falling outside the expected tolerance limits. These two distances both involve protein S13, a protein noted for its anomalous behaviour. A comparison with other experimental information not specifically used in deriving the model shows that it fits well with published data on RNA-protein binding sites, mutation sites on the RNA causing resistance to antibiotics, tertiary interactions in the RNA, and a potential secondary structural "switch". Of the sites on 16 S RNA that have been found to be accessible to chemical modification in the 30 S subunit, 87% are at obviously exposed positions in the model. In contrast, 70% of the sites corresponding to positions that have ribose 2'-O-methylations in the eukaryotic 18 S RNA from Xenopus laevis are at non-exposed (i.e. internal) positions in the model. All nine of the modified bases in the E. coli 16 S RNA itself show a remarkable distribution, in that they form a "necklace" in one plane around the "throat" of the subunit. Insertions in eukaryotic 18 S RNA, and corresponding deletions in chloroplast or mammalian mitochondrial ribosomal RNA relative to E. coli 16 S RNA represent distinct sub-domains in the structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of mutation on the downfield proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of the 5S RNA of Escherichia coli

The imino proton spectra of several mutants of the 5S RNA of Escherichia coli are compared with that of the wild type. Three of the variants discussed are point mutations, and the fourth is a deletion mutant lacking bases 11-69 of the parent sequence, all obtained by site-directed mutagenesis techniques. The spectroscopic effects of mutation are limited in all cases, and the differences between normal and mutant spectra can be used to make or confirm the assignments of resonances. Several new assignments in the 5S spectrum are reported. Spectroscopic differences due to sequence differences permit the products of single genes within the 5S gene family to be distinguished and their fates followed by NMR.

Protein binding sites on Escherichia coli 16S RNA; RNA regions that are protected by proteins S7, S14 and S19 in the presence or absence of protein S9

14C-labelled proteins from E. coli 30S ribosomal subunits were isolated by HPLC, and selected groups of these proteins were reconstituted with 32P-labelled 16S RNA. The isolated reconstituted particles were partially digested with ribonuclease A, and the RNA fragments protected by the proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and subjected to sequence analysis. Protein S7 alone gave no protected fragments, but S7 together with S14 and S19 protected an RNA region comprising the sequences 936-965, 972-1030, 1208-1262 and 1285-1379 of the 16S RNA. Addition of increasing amounts of protein S9 to the S7/S14/S19 particle resulted in a parallel increase in the protection of the hairpin loop between bases 1262 and 1285. The results are discussed in terms of the three-dimensional folding of 16S RNA in the 30S subunit.

Localization of the binding site for protein S4 on 16 S ribosomal RNA by chemical and enzymatic probing and primer extension

We have examined the effect of binding ribosomal protein S4 to 16 S rRNA on the susceptibility of the RNA to a variety of chemical and enzymatic probes. We have used dimethyl sulfate to probe unpaired adenines (at N-1) and cytosines (at N-3), kethoxal to probe unpaired guanines (at N-1 and N-2) and cobra venom (V1) ribonuclease as a probe of base-paired regions of 16 S rRNA. Sites of attack by the probes were identified by primer extension using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides. Comparison of probing results for naked and S4-bound rRNA shows: Protein S4 protects a relatively compact region of the 5' domain of 16 S rRNA from chemical and enzymatic attack. This region is bounded by nucleotides 27 to 47 and 394 to 556, and has a secondary structure characterized by the junction of five helical elements. Phylogenetically conserved irregular features (bulged nucleotides, internal loops and flanking unpaired nucleotides) and helical phosphodiester bonds of four of the helices are specifically protected in the S4-RNA complex. We conclude that this is the major, and possibly sole region of contact between 16 S rRNA and S4. Many of the S4-dependent changes mimic those observed on assembly of 16 S rRNA into 30 S ribosomal subunits. Binding of S4 causes enhanced chemical reactivity coupled with protection from V1 nuclease outside the S4 junction region in the 530, 720 and 1140 loops. We interpret these results as indicative of loss of structure, and suggest that S4 binding causes disruption of adventitious pairing in these regions, possibly by stabilizing the geometry of the RNA such that these interactions are prevented from forming.

Interconversion of active and inactive 30 S ribosomal subunits is accompanied by a conformational change in the decoding region of 16 S rRNA

Zamir, Elson and their co-workers have shown that 30 S ribosomal subunits are reversibly inactivated by depletion of monovalent or divalent cations. We have re-investigated the conformation of 16 S rRNA in the active and inactive forms of the 30 S subunit, using a strategy that is designed to eliminate reversible ion-dependent conformational effects that are unrelated to the heat-dependent Zamir-Elson transition. A combination of structure-specific chemical probes enables us to monitor the accessibility of pyrimidines at N-3 and purines at N-1 and N-7. Chemically modified bases are identified by end-labeling followed by analine-induced strand scission (in some cases preceded by hybrid selection), or by primer extension using synthetic DNA oligomers. These studies show the following: The transition from the active to the inactive state cannot be described as a simple loosening or unfolding of native structure, such as that which is observed under conditions of more severe ion depletion. Instead, it has the appearance of a reciprocal interconversion between two differently structured states; some bases become more reactive toward the probes, whilst others become less reactive as a result of inactivation. Changes in reactivity are almost exclusively confined to the "decoding site" centered at positions 1400 and 1500, but significant differences are also detected at U723 and G791 in the central domain. This may reflect possible structural and functional interactions between the central and 3' regions of 16 S rRNA. The inactive form also shows significantly decreased reactivity at positions 1533 to 1538 (the Shine-Dalgarno region), in agreement with earlier findings. The principal changes in reactivity involve the universally conserved nucleotides G926, C1395, A1398 and G1401. The three purines show reciprocal behavior at their N-1 versus N-7 positions. G926 loses its reactivity at N-1, but becomes highly reactive at N-7 as a result of the transition of the inactive state. In contrast, A1398 and G1401 become reactive at N-1, but lose their hyper-reactivity at N-7. The possible structural and functional implications of these findings are discussed.

Site-directed mutagenesis of the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 within 16S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

Twelve specific alterations have been introduced into the binding site for ribosomal protein S8 in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Appropriate rDNA segments were first cloned into bacteriophage M13 vectors and subjected to bisulfite and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis in vitro. Subsequently, the mutagenized sequences were placed within the rrnB operon of plasmid pNO1301 and the mutant plasmids were used to transform E. coli recipients. The growth rates of cells containing the mutant plasmids were determined and compared with that of cells containing the wild-type plasmid. Only those mutations which occurred at highly conserved positions, or were expected to disrupt the secondary structure of the binding site, increased the doubling time appreciably. The most striking changes in growth rate resulted from mutations that altered a small internal loop within the S8 binding site. This structure is phylogenetically conserved in prokaryotic 16S rRNAs and may play a direct role in S8-16S rRNA recognition and interaction.

Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits using primer extension

We have investigated in detail the higher-order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA, both in its naked form and in 30 S ribosomal subunits. Each base in the 16 S rRNA chain has been probed using kethoxal (which reacts with guanine at N1 and N2), dimethylsulfate (which reacts with adenine at N1 and cytosine at N3) and 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)-carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate (which reacts with uracil at N3 and guanine at N1). The sites of reaction were identified by primer extension with reverse transcriptase using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide primers. These results provide a detailed and rigorous experimental test of a model for 16 S rRNA secondary structure, which was derived mainly from comparative sequence analysis. Our data also provide information relevant to tertiary and quaternary structure of 16 S rRNA. Data obtained with naked 16 S rRNA show reasonably close agreement with the proposed model, and data obtained with 30 S subunits show nearly complete agreement. Apart from an apparent overall "tightening" of the structure (in which many weakly reactive bases become unreactive), assembly of the proteins with 16 S rRNA to form 30 S subunits brings about numerous local structural rearrangements, resulting in specific enhancements as well as protections. In many instances, the ribosomal proteins appear to "tune" the 16 S rRNA structure to bring it into accordance with the phylogenetically predicted model, even though the RNA on its own often seems to prefer a different structure in certain regions of the molecule. Extensive protection of conserved, unpaired adenines upon formation of 30 S subunits suggests that they play a special role in the assembly process, possibly providing signals for protein recognition.

Involvement of bases 787-795 of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA in ribosomal subunit association

A nine-base DNA oligomer [d(GTATCTAAT)] was used to probe the accessibility and function of bases in the region 787-795 of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Hybridization of the cDNA [d(GTATCTAAT)] to 16S rRNA in situ was carried out by binding the probe to intact 30S ribosomal subunits. Nitrocellulose filter binding showed that cDNA hybridization saturated with increasing probe concentration, suggesting that the probe was binding to a discrete site or sites. RNase H digestion of the rRNA under the DNA . rRNA hybrid and sequencing of the resultant RNA fragments verified that the cDNA probe bound specifically to the 787-795 region. Hybridization experiments using the cDNA probe showed that bases in the 787-795 region of 16S rRNA are exposed on the surface of 30S subunits. The functional role of bases 787-795 was then tested by assaying various ribosomal activities with the cDNA in place. Results of these functional assays demonstrate that this 16S rRNA region is directly involved in the association of 30S and 50S subunits.

Effects of site-directed mutations in the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA upon ribosomal protein binding, RNA processing and 30 S subunit assembly

Using a multicopy plasmid encoding the Escherichia coli rrnB ribosomal RNA operon and the techniques of in vitro site-directed mutagenesis, we have introduced several small alterations into the central domain of 16 S rRNA, which encompasses nucleotides 560 to 890. Four of the rRNAs studied contained deletions and one contained an insertion. The altered small ribosomal subunit rRNAs were used to investigate relationships among 16 S rRNA processing, protein-16 S rRNA interactions and assembly of the 30 S ribosomal subunit. Analysis of plasmid-coded transcripts from maxicells revealed that products from wild-type 16 S rRNA genes were fully processed and assembled into mature 30 S subunits. Under the same conditions, the processing and assembly of transcripts derived from the mutant plasmids were severely impaired. In some instances, the mutations completely blocked both processes, while in other cases rRNA maturation and ribosome assembly were retarded, but not eliminated completely. In all cases, the mutations led to the accumulation of the 17 S precursor to 16 S rRNA. The mutant 17 S rRNAs were purified and incubated with various combinations of E. coli ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18, which are known to bind to the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Ribonuclease digestion of the resulting protein-17 S rRNA complexes and fractionation of the products permitted detection of three distinct protein-RNA fragment complexes which contained S8, S8 + S15, or S6 + S8 + S15 + S18. Whereas wild-type 17 S rRNA was able to form all three of these complexes, deletion of nucleotides 693 to 721 or 822 to 874 abolished the interaction of S6 and S18, and removal of nucleotides 659 to 718 prevented the binding of S6, S15 and S18. In contrast, elimination of residue 614, or the presence of a 16-base insertion between nucleotides 614 and 615, had no significant effect on the binding of any of the four proteins tested. Together, our results demonstrate that 16 S rRNA maturation and 30 S subunit assembly are tightly coupled, and show that, in at least some cases, defects in these processes can be correlated with the inability of particular ribosomal proteins to associate with altered rRNA molecules. Moreover, we have confirmed the essentiality of certain rRNA sequences for the formation and/or stabilization of these protein-rRNA interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)