A Drosophila melanogaster transfer RNA gene cluster at the cytogenetic locus 90BC

Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes

Repeated elements can be widely abundant in eukaryotic genomes, composing more than 50% of the human genome, for example. It is possible to classify repeated sequences into two large families, "tandem repeats" and "dispersed repeats." Each of these two families can be itself divided into subfamilies. Dispersed repeats contain transposons, tRNA genes, and gene paralogues, whereas tandem repeats contain gene tandems, ribosomal DNA repeat arrays, and satellite DNA, itself subdivided into satellites, minisatellites, and microsatellites. Remarkably, the molecular mechanisms that create and propagate dispersed and tandem repeats are specific to each class and usually do not overlap. In the present review, we have chosen in the first section to describe the nature and distribution of dispersed and tandem repeats in eukaryotic genomes in the light of complete (or nearly complete) available genome sequences. In the second part, we focus on the molecular mechanisms responsible for the fast evolution of two specific classes of tandem repeats: minisatellites and microsatellites. Given that a growing number of human neurological disorders involve the expansion of a particular class of microsatellites, called trinucleotide repeats, a large part of the recent experimental work on microsatellites has focused on these particular repeats, and thus we also review the current knowledge in this area. Finally, we propose a unified definition for mini- and microsatellites that takes into account their biological properties and try to point out new directions that should be explored in a near future on our road to understanding the genetics of repeated sequences.

The RNA polymerase III-dependent family of genes in hemiascomycetes: comparative RNomics, decoding strategies, transcription and evolutionary implications

We present the first comprehensive analysis of RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcribed genes in ten yeast genomes. This set includes all tRNA genes (tDNA) and genes coding for SNR6 (U6), SNR52, SCR1 and RPR1 RNA in the nine hemiascomycetes Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces castellii, Candida glabrata, Kluyveromyces waltii, Kluyveromyces lactis, Eremothecium gossypii, Debaryomyces hansenii, Candida albicans, Yarrowia lipolytica and the archiascomycete Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We systematically analysed sequence specificities of tRNA genes, polymorphism, variability of introns, gene redundancy and gene clustering. Analysis of decoding strategies showed that yeasts close to S.cerevisiae use bacterial decoding rules to read the Leu CUN and Arg CGN codons, in contrast to all other known Eukaryotes. In D.hansenii and C.albicans, we identified a novel tDNA-Leu (AAG), reading the Leu CUU/CUC/CUA codons with an unusual G at position 32. A systematic 'p-distance tree' using the 60 variable positions of the tRNA molecule revealed that most tDNAs cluster into amino acid-specific sub-trees, suggesting that, within hemiascomycetes, orthologous tDNAs are more closely related than paralogs. We finally determined the bipartite A- and B-box sequences recognized by TFIIIC. These minimal sequences are nearly conserved throughout hemiascomycetes and were satisfactorily retrieved at appropriate locations in other Pol III genes.

The properties of a tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Drosophila melanogaster support an evolutionary link between pre-mRNA editing and tRNA modification

Pre-mRNA editing involving the conversion of adenosine to inosine is mediated by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADAR1 and ADAR2). ADARs contain multiple double-stranded RNA(dsRNA)-binding domains in addition to an adenosine deaminase domain. An adenosine deaminase acting on tRNAs, scTad1p (also known as scADAT1), cloned from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a deaminase domain related to the ADARs but lacks dsRNA-binding domains. We have identified a gene homologous to scADAT1 in the region of Drosophila melanogaster Adh chromosome II. Recombinant Drosophila ADAT1 (dADAT1) has been expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris and purified. The enzyme has no activity on dsRNA substrates but is a tRNA deaminase with specificity for adenosine 37 of insect alanine tRNA. dADAT1 shows greater similarity to vertebrate ADARs than to yeast Tad1p, supporting the hypothesis of a common evolutionary origin for ADARs and ADATs. dAdat1 transcripts are maternally supplied in the egg. Zygotic expression is widespread initially and later concentrates in the central nervous system.

A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete and topologically independent higher-order domains. In addition to providing a mechanism for chromatin compaction, these higher-order domains are thought to define independent units of gene activity. Implicit in most models for the folding of the chromatin fiber are special nucleoprotein structures, the domain boundaries, which serve to delimit each higher-order chromosomal domain. We have used an "enhancer-blocking assay" to test putative domain boundaries for boundary function in vivo. This assay is based on the notion that in delimiting independent units of gene activity, domain boundaries should be able to restrict the scope of activity of enhancer elements to genes which reside within the same domain. In this case, interposing a boundary between an enhancer and a promoter should block the action of the enhancer. In the experiments reported here, we have used the yolk protein-1 enhancer element and an hsp70 promoter:lacZ fusion gene to test putative boundary DNA segments for enhancer-blocking activity. We have found that several scs-like elements are capable of blocking the action of the yp-1 enhancer when placed between it and the hsp70 promoter. In contrast, a MAR/SAR DNA segment and another spacer DNA segment had no apparent effect on enhancer activity.

A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete and topologically independent higher-order domains. In addition to providing a mechanism for chromatin compaction, these higher-order domains are thought to define independent units of gene activity. Implicit in most models for the folding of the chromatin fiber are special nucleoprotein structures, the domain boundaries, which serve to delimit each higher-order chromosomal domain. We have used an "enhancer-blocking assay" to test putative domain boundaries for boundary function in vivo. This assay is based on the notion that in delimiting independent units of gene activity, domain boundaries should be able to restrict the scope of activity of enhancer elements to genes which reside within the same domain. In this case, interposing a boundary between an enhancer and a promoter should block the action of the enhancer. In the experiments reported here, we have used the yolk protein-1 enhancer element and an hsp70 promoter:lacZ fusion gene to test putative boundary DNA segments for enhancer-blocking activity. We have found that several scs-like elements are capable of blocking the action of the yp-1 enhancer when placed between it and the hsp70 promoter. In contrast, a MAR/SAR DNA segment and another spacer DNA segment had no apparent effect on enhancer activity.

Informational redundancy of tRNA(4Ser) and tRNA(7Ser) genes in Drosophila melanogaster and evidence for intergenic recombination

Variant tRNA genes have been widely observed in multicellular eukaryotes. Recent biochemical studies have shown that some of them are expressed in a tissue- or a stage-specific manner. These findings would thus imply that certain modified tRNAs may be crucial for the development of the organism. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model, we have taken a combined genetic and molecular approach to examine critically the possible biological functions of tRNA(4, 7Ser) genes. We showed that at least 50% of the total templates can be deleted from the genome without inducing abnormal phenotypes such as Minute, or a decrease in viability. In addition, two of the tRNASer variant genes that are unique in sequence are also completely dispensable. This strongly implies that even though they may be expressed in vivo, they play no essential role in the development of the fruitfly. By comparison with some of the corresponding tRNA genes in another sibling species, Drosophila erecta, our results suggest strongly that the variants are products non-reciprocal exchanges among the tRNA(4, 7Ser), genes. Such intergenic recombination events may have a major influence in the concerted evolution of the two gene families.

Nuclear tRNA(Tyr) genes are highly amplified at a single chromosomal site in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana

We have examined the organization of tRNA(Tyr) genes in three ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana, a plant with an extremely small genome of 7 x 10(7) bp. Three tRNA(Tyr) gene-containing EcoRI fragments of 1.5 kb and four fragments of 0.6, 1.7, 2.5 and 3.7 kb were cloned from A. thaliana cv. Columbia (Col-O) DNA and sequenced. All EcoRI fragments except those of 0.6 and 2.5 kb comprise an identical arrangement of two tRNA(Tyr) genes flanked by a tRNA(Ser) gene. The three tRNA genes have the same polarity and are separated by 250 and 370 bp, respectively. The tRNA(Tyr) genes encode the known cytoplasmic tRNA(G psi ATyr). Both genes contain a 12 bp long intervening sequence. Densitometric evaluation of the genomic blot reveals the presence of at least 20 copies, including a few multimers, of the 1.5 kb fragment in Col-O DNA, indicating a multiple amplification of this unit. Southern blots of EcoRI-digested DNA from the other two ecotypes, cv. Landsberg (La-O) and cv. Niederzenz (Nd-O) also show 1.5 kb units as the major hybridizing bands. Several lines of evidence support the idea of a strict tandem arrangement of this 1.5 kb unit: (i) Sequence analysis of the EcoRI inserts of 2.5 and 0.6 kb reveals the loss of an EcoRI site between 1.5 kb units and the introduction of a new EcoRI site in a 1.5 kb dimer. (ii) Complete digestion of Col-O DNA with restriction enzymes which cleave only once within the 1.5 kb unit also produces predominantly 1.5 kb fragments. (iii) Partial digestion with EcoRI shows that the 1.5 kb fragments indeed arise from the regular spacing of the restriction sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Genes, variant genes and pseudogenes of the human tRNA(Val) gene family. Expression and pre-tRNA maturation in vitro

Nine different members of the human tRNA(Val) gene family have been cloned and characterized. Only four of the genes code for one of the known tRNA(Val) isoacceptors. The remaining five genes carry mutations, which in two cases even affect the normal three-dimensional tRNA structure. Each of the genes is transcribed by polymerase III in a HeLa cell nuclear extract, but their transcription efficiencies differ by up to an order of magnitude. Conserved sequences immediately flanking the structural genes that could serve as extragenic control elements were not detected. However, short sequences in the 5' flanking region of two genes show striking similarity with sequences upstream from two Drosophila melanogaster tRNA(Val) genes. Each of the human tRNA(Val) genes has multiple, i.e. two to four, transcription initiation sites. In most cases, transcription termination is caused by oligo(T) sequences downstream from the structural genes. However, the signal sequences ATCTT and CTTCTT also serve as effective polymerase III transcription terminators. The precursors derived from the four tRNA(Val) genes coding for known isoacceptors and those derived from two mutant genes are processed first at their 3' and subsequently at their 5' ends to yield mature tRNAs. The precursor derived from a third mutant gene is incompletely maturated at its 3' end, presumably as a consequence of base-pairing between 5' and 3' flanking sequences. Finally, precursors encoded by the genes that carry mutations affecting the tRNA tertiary structure are completely resistant to 5' and 3' processing.

The nucleotide sequence, localization and transcriptional properties of a tRNALeuCUG gene from Drosophila melanogaster

The nucleotide sequence of a tRNALeuCUG gene from Drosophila melanogaster has been determined and compared with available tRNALeuCUG sequences from other eukaryotes, as well as with the tRNALeuUUG gene of D. melanogaster. The genomic location, determined by in situ hybridization, was found to be at site 66B on chromosome 3L. This localization probably places it within one of the known, but uncharacterized, clusters of tRNA genes in this organism. In addition, the transcriptional behaviour of this tRNALeuCUG gene in various in vitro systems is described and it seems that, although the gene is transcribed in all test systems, the very A + T-rich 5'-flanking sequence of this particular gene may be somewhat inhibitory to transcription in vitro.

The human tRNAVal gene family: organization, nucleotide sequences and homologous transcription of three single-copy genes

At least 13 independent tRNAVal gene loci were detected in the human genome. Three of these genes were isolated and shown to occur only once in the haploid genome. No further functional tRNA genes are located on the isolated clones. Two tRNAVal genes encode the known major and minor tRNAVal isoacceptors, the third may be a pseudogene because a corresponding tRNAVal is not yet known. Comparison of extragenic sequences did not reveal significant homologies, indicating the separation of these genes early in vertebrate evolution. An Alu-type repeat was found in two of the clones within several hundred bp distance from the tDNA. All three genes are transcriptionally active in a HeLa nuclear extract. We show here for the first time that homologous in vitro transcription of mammalian tRNA genes strongly depends on extragenic control regions: interestingly, as a consequence of different flanking regions, the transcription efficiencies vary by an order of magnitude among the genes for the major and the minor tRNAVal and thus reflect the concentrations of these tRNAs in vivo.

Internal promoter elements of transfer RNA genes are preferentially exposed in chromatin

We have examined the chromatin organization of a cluster of transfer RNA genes at the cytogenic locus 90BC on the right arm of the third Drosophila melanogaster chromosome. We find that the internal promoter sequences are preferentially exposed to micrococcal nuclease and DNase I in chromatin. Moreover, these exposed sequences have an unusual single strand nuclease-sensitive conformation.