Anticodon-anticodon interactions in solution. Studies of the self-association of yeast or Escherichia coli tRNAAsp and of their interactions with Escherichia coli tRNAVal

General Strategies for RNA X-ray Crystallography

An extremely small proportion of the X-ray crystal structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank are of RNA or RNA-protein complexes. This is due to three main obstacles to the successful determination of RNA structure: (1) low yields of pure, properly folded RNA; (2) difficulty creating crystal contacts due to low sequence diversity; and (3) limited methods for phasing. Various approaches have been developed to address these obstacles, such as native RNA purification, engineered crystallization modules, and incorporation of proteins to assist in phasing. In this review, we will discuss these strategies and provide examples of how they are used in practice.

Mechanism of enhanced mechanical stability of a minimal RNA kissing complex elucidated by nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations

An RNA kissing loop from the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) exhibits unusual mechanical stability despite having only two intermolecular base pairs. Mutations at this junction have been shown to destabilize genome dimerization, with concomitant reductions in viral packaging efficiency and infectivity. Optical tweezers experiments have shown that it requires as much force to break the MMLV kissing-loop complex as is required to unfold an 11-bp RNA hairpin [Li PTX, Bustamante C, Tinoco I (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15847-15852]. Using nonequilibrium all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we have developed a detailed model for the kinetic intermediates of the force-induced dissociation of the MMLV dimerization initiation site kissing loop. Two hundred and eight dissociation events were simulated (approximately 16 μs total simulation time) under conditions of constant applied external force, which we use to construct a Markov state model for kissing-loop dissociation. We find that the complex undergoes a conformational rearrangement, which allows for equal distribution of the applied force among all of the intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which is intrinsically more stable than the sequential unzipping of an ordinary hairpin. Stacking interactions with adjacent, unpaired loop adenines further stabilize the complex by increasing the repair rate of partially broken H-bonds. These stacking interactions are prominently featured in the transition state, which requires additional coordinates orthogonal to the end-to-end extension to be uniquely identified. We propose that these stabilizing features explain the unusual stability of other retroviral kissing-loop complexes such as the HIV dimerization site.

Small aminoacyl transfer centers at GU within a larger RNA

Separate aminoacyl transfer centers related to the small …GUNNN..: NNNU ribozyme seem possible at the frequent GU sequences dispersed throughout an RNA tertiary structure. In fact, such activity is easily detected and varies more than 2 orders in rate, probabably being faster at sites with less structural constraint. Analysis of a particular constrained active site in an rRNA transcript suggests that its difficulty lies not in substrate strand association, but in binding and/or group transfer from the aminoacyl precursor. Efficient aminoacyl transfer requires accurate complementarity between large or small ribozymes and oligoribonucleotide substrates, even when only three or four base pairs link the two. Thus, multi-site active ribozymal superstructures might have coordinated an RNA metabolism, including aiding an early translation apparatus.

RNA loop-loop interactions as dynamic functional motifs

RNA loop-loop interactions are frequently used to trigger initial recognition between two RNA molecules. In this review, we present selected well-documented cases that illustrate the diversity of biological processes using RNA loop-loop recognition properties. The first one is related to natural antisense RNAs that play a variety of regulatory functions in bacteria and their extra-chromosomal elements. The second one concerns the dimerization of HIV-1 genomic RNA, which is responsible for the encapsidation of a diploid RNA genome. The third one concerns RNA interactions involving double-loop interactions. These are used by the bicoid mRNA to form dimers, a property that appears to be important for mRNA localization in drosophila embryo, and by bacteriophage phi29 pRNA which forms hexamers that participate in the translocation of the DNA genome through the portal vertex of the capsid. Despite the high diversity of systems and mechanisms, some common features can be highlighted. (1) Efficient recognition requires rapid bi-molecular binding rates, regardless of the RNA pairing scheme. (2) The initial recognition is favored by particular conformations of the loops enabling a proper presentation of nucleotides (generally a restricted number) that initiate the recognition process. (3) The fate of the initial reversible loop-loop complex is dictated by both functional and structural constraints. RNA structures have evolved either to "freeze" the initial complex, or to convert it into a more stable one, which involves propagation of intermolecular interactions along topologically feasible pathways. Stabilization of the initial complex may also be assisted by proteins and/or formation of additional contacts.

U-turns and regulatory RNAs

Conventional antisense RNAs, such as those controlling plasmid replication and maintenance, inhibit the function of their target RNAs rapidly and efficiently. Novel findings show that a common U-turn loop structure mediates fast RNA pairing in the majority of these RNA controlled systems. Usually, an antisense RNA regulates a single, cognate target RNA only. Recent reports, however, show that antisense RNAs can act as promiscuous regulators that control multiple genes in concert to integrate complex physiological responses in Escherichia coli.

Antisense RNA regulation in prokaryotes: rapid RNA/RNA interaction facilitated by a general U-turn loop structure

Efficient gene control by antisense RNA requires rapid bi-molecular interaction with a cognate target RNA. A comparative analysis revealed that a YUNR motif (Y=pyrimidine, R=purine) is ubiquitous in RNA recognition loops in antisense RNA-regulated gene systems. The (Y)UNR sequence motif specifies two intraloop hydrogen bonds forming U-turn structures in many anticodon-loops and all T-loops of tRNAs, the hammerhead ribozyme and in other conserved RNA loops. This structure creates a sharp bend in the RNA phosphate-backbone and presents the following three to four bases in a solvent-exposed, stacked configuration providing a scaffold for rapid interaction with complementary RNA. Sok antisense RNA from plasmid R1 inhibits translation of the hok mRNA by preventing ribosome entry at the mok Shine & Dalgarno element. The 5' single-stranded region of Sok-RNA recognizes a loop in the hok mRNA. We show here, that the initial pairing between Sok antisense RNA and its target in hok mRNA occurs with an observed second-order rate-constant of 2 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1). Mutations that eliminate the YUNR motif in the target loop of hok mRNA resulted in reduced antisense RNA pairing kinetics, whereas mutations maintaining the YUNR motif were silent. In addition, RNA phosphate-backbone accessibility probing by ethylnitrosourea was consistent with a U-turn structure formation promoted by the YUNR motif. Since the YUNR U-turn motif is present in the recognition units of many antisense/target pairs, the motif is likely to be a generally employed enhancer of RNA pairing rates. This suggestion is consistent with the re-interpretation of the mutational analyses of several antisense control systems including RNAI/RNAII of ColE1, CopA/CopT of R1 and RNA-IN/RNA-OUT of IS10.

HIV-1 A-rich RNA loop mimics the tRNA anticodon structure

Interaction of HIV-1 genomic RNA and human tRNA(Lys)3 initiates viral reverse transcription. An adenosine-rich (A-rich) loop in HIV RNA mediates complex formation between tRNA and viral RNA. We have determined the structure of an A-rich loop oligonucleotide using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The loop structure is stabilized by a noncanonical G-A pair and a U-turn motif, which leads to stacking of the conserved adenosines. The structure has similarity to the tRNA anticodon structure, and suggests possible mechanisms for its role in initiation of reverse transcription.

Stabilities of consecutive A.C, C.C, G.G, U.C, and U.U mismatches in RNA internal loops: Evidence for stable hydrogen-bonded U.U and C.C.+ pairs

The stability and structure of RNA duplexes with consecutive A.C, C.A, C.C, G.G, U.C, C.U, and U.U mismatches were studied by UV melting, CD, and NMR. The results are compared to previous results for GA and AA internal loops [SantaLucia, J., Kierzek, R., & Turner, D. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8813-8819; Peritz, A., Kierzek, R., & Turner, D.H. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 6428-6436)]. The observed order for stability increments of internal loop formation at pH 7 is AG = GA approximately UU greater than GG greater than or equal to CA greater than or equal to AA = CU = UC greater than or equal to CC greater than or equal to AC. The results suggest two classes for internal loops with consecutive mismatches: (1) loops that stabilize duplexes and have strong hydrogen bonding and (2) loops that destabilize duplexes and may not have strong hydrogen bonding. Surprisingly, rCGCUUGCG forms a very stable duplex at pH 7 in 1 M NaCl with a TM of 44.8 degrees C at 1 x 10(-4) M and a delta G degrees 37 of -7.2 kcal/mol. NOE studies of the imino protons indicate hydrogen bonding within the U.U mismatches in a wobble-type structure. Resonances corresponding to the hydrogen-bonded uridines are located at 11.3 and 10.4 ppm. At neutral pH, rCGCCCGCG is one of the least stable duplexes with a TM of 33.2 degrees C and delta G degrees 37 of -5.1 kcal/mol. Upon lowering the pH to 5.5, however, the TM increases by 12 degrees C, and delta G degrees 37 becomes more favorable by 2.5 kcal/mol. The pH dependence of rCGCCCGCG may be due to protonation of the internal loop C's, since no changes in thermodynamic parameters are observed for rCGCUUGCG between pH 7 and 5.5. Furthermore, two broad imino proton resonances are observed at 10.85 and 10.05 ppm for rCGCCCGCG at pH 5.3, but not at pH 6.5. This is also consistent with C.C+ base pairs forming at pH 5.5. rCGCCAGCG and rGGCACGCC have a small pH dependence, with TM increases of 5 and 3 degrees C, respectively, upon lowering the pH from 7 to 5.5. rCGCCUGCG and rCGCUCGCG also show little pH dependence, with TM increases of 0.8 and 1.4 degrees C, respectively, upon lowering the pH to 5.5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Structural elements in RNA

This chapter describes the RNA structural characteristics that have emerged so far. Folded RNA molecules are stabilized by a variety of interactions, the most prevalent of which are stacking and hydrogen bonding between bases. Many interactions among backbone atoms also occur in the structure of tRNA, although they are often ignored when considering RNA structure because they are not as well-characterized as interactions among bases. Backbone interactions include hydrogen bonding and the stacking of sugar or phosphate groups with bases or with other sugar and phosphate groups. The interactions found in a three-dimensional RNA structure can be divided into two categories: secondary interactions and tertiary interactions. This division is useful for several reasons. Secondary structures are routinely determined by a combination of techniques discussed in chapter, whereas tertiary interactions are more difficult to determine. Computer algorithms that generate RNA structures can search completely through possible secondary structures, but the inclusion of tertiary interactions makes a complete search of possible structures impractical for RNA molecules even as small as tRNA. The division of RNA structure into building blocks consisting of secondary or tertiary interactions makes it easier to describe RNA structures. In those cases in which RNA studies are incomplete, the studies of DNA are described with the rationalization that RNA structures may be analogous to DNA structures, or that the techniques used to study DNA could be applied to the analogous RNA structures. The chapter focuses on the aspects of RNA structure that affect the three-dimensional shape of RNA and that affect its ability to interact with other molecules.

Kinetics for reaction of a circularized intervening sequence with CU, UCU, CUCU, and CUCUCU: mechanistic implications from the dependence on temperature and on oligomer and Mg2+ concentrations

The self-splicing intervening sequence from the rRNA precursor in Tetrahymena thermophila produces a covalently closed, circularized form (C IVS). Reaction rates for reverse cyclization (linearization) of C IVS by the covalent addition of the oligoncleotides CU, UCU, CUCU, and CUCUCU have been measured. The dependence of the observed rates on oligomer and Mg2+ concentrations indicates the presence of intermediates that are generated by separate binding steps for both oligomer and Mg2+. Linearization of C IVS by OH- hydrolysis is suppressed in the presence of oligomer, suggesting oligomer binds near the active site. The binding constants derived for CU at 30 degrees C in 1 and 10 mM Mg2+ are 5 X 10(3) and 2.5 X 10(4) M-1, respectively. These are roughly 4 orders of magnitude larger than expected for simple Watson-Crick base pairing. The binding constants derived for UCU, CUCU, and CUCUCU at 30 degrees C in 10 mM Mg2+ are 1.2 X 10(5), 4 X 10(5), and greater than 10(7) M-1, respectively. The free energy increments for binding of UCU and CUCU relative to CU are similar to those expected from a nearest-neighbor model for addition of base pairs. This indicates the factors responsible for the unusually strong binding of CU to C IVS are restricted to two nucleotides.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Adaptation of cell metabolism to environmental changes: regulation of gene expression of transfer RNA and unusual nucleic acid building-blocks]

In the living cell transfer ribonucleic acids (tRNAs) serve for the transfer of information from genes to proteins. In this article evidence will be presented showing that changes of particular tRNA modifications cause alterations in gene expression, when an organism is exposed to a metabolic stress, e.g. limitation of oxygen or nutrients. tRNA modifications seem to be important to adapt cells to environmental changes. These mechanisms of adaptation are considered to have developed as survival strategies in microorganisms especially when oxygen accumulated in the atmosphere.

Anticodon-anticodon interaction induces conformational changes in tRNA: yeast tRNAAsp, a model for tRNA-mRNA recognition

The crystal structure of yeast tRNAAsp enables visualization of an anticodon-anticodon interaction at the molecular level. Except for differences in the base stacking and twist, the overall conformation of the anticodon loop is quite similar to that of yeast tRNAPhe. The anticodon nucleotide triplets, GUC, of two symmetrically related molecules form a minihelix of the RNA type 11. The modified base m1G37 stacks on both sides of the triplets and enforces the continuity with the anticodon stems. Anticodon association induces long-range conformational changes in the region of the dihydrouracil and thymine loops. Experimental evidence includes the variation in the distribution of temperature factors between yeast tRNAPhe and tRNAAsp, the difference in the self-splitting patterns of tRNAAsp in crystal and solution, and the differential accessibility of cytidines to dimethyl sulfate in free and duplex tRNAAsp. These observations are linked to the fragility and disruption of the G.C Watson-Crick base pair at the corner of the molecule formed by the dihydrouracil and thymine loops.

Temperature jump relaxation studies on the interactions between transfer RNAs with complementary anticodons. The effect of modified bases adjacent to the anticodon triplet

We have used the temperature-jump relaxation technique to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the association between the following tRNAs pairs having complementary anticodons: tRNA(Ser) with tRNA(Gly), tRNA(Cys) with tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Trp) with tRNA(Pro). The anticodon sequence of E. coli tRNA(Ser), GGA, is complementary to the U*CC anticodon of E. coli tRNA(Gly(2] (where U* is a still unknown modified uridine base) and A37 is not modified in none of these two tRNAs. E. coli tRNA(Ala) has a VGC anticodon (V is 5-oxyacetic acid uridine) while tRNA(Cys) has the complementary GCA anticodon with a modified adenine on the 3' side, namely 2-methylthio N6-isopentenyl adenine (mS2i6A37) in E. Coli tRNA(Cys) and N6-isopentenyl adenine (i6A37) in yeast tRNA(Cys). The brewer yeast tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CmCA) differs from the wild type E. coli tRNA(Trp) (anticodon CCA) in several positions of the nucleotide sequence. Nevertheless, in the anticodon loop, only two interesting differences are present: A37 is not modified while C34 at the first anticodon position is modified into a ribose 2'-O methyl derivative (Cm). The corresponding complementary tRNA is E.coli tRNA(Pro) with the VGG anticodon. Our results indicate a dominant effect of the nature and sequence of the anticodon bases and their nearest neighbor in the anticodon loop (particularly at position 37 on the 3' side); no detectable influence of modifications in the other tRNA stems has been detected. We found a strong stabilizing effect of the methylthio group on i6A37 as compared to isopentenyl modification of the same residue. We have not been able so far to assess the effect of isopentenyl modification alone in comparison to unmodified A37. The results obtained with the complex yeast tRNA(Trp)-E.coli tRNA(Pro) also suggest that a modification of C34 to Cm34 does not significantly increase the stability of tRNA(Trp) association with its complementary anticodon in tRNA(Pro). The observations are discussed in the light of inter- and intra-strand stacking interactions among the anticodon triplets and with the purine base adjacent to them, and of possible biological implications.

Yeast tRNAAsp tertiary structure in solution and areas of interaction of the tRNA with aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. A comparative study of the yeast phenylalanine system by phosphate alkylation experiments with ethylnitrosourea

Ethylnitrosourea is an alkylating reagent preferentially modifying phosphate groups in nucleic acids. It was used to monitor the tertiary structure, in solution, of yeast tRNAAsp and to determine those phosphate groups in contact with the cognate aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. Experiments involve 3' or 5'-end-labelled tRNA molecules, low yield modification of the free or complexed nucleic acid and specific splitting at the modified phosphate groups. The resulting end-labelled oligonucleotides are resolved on polyacrylamide sequencing gels and data analysed by autoradiography and densitometry. Experiments were conducted in parallel on yeast tRNAAsp and on tRNAPhe. In that way it was possible to compare the solution structure of two elongator tRNAs and to interpret the modification data using the known crystal structures of both tRNAs. Mapping of the phosphates in free tRNAAsp and tRNAPhe allowed the detection of differential reactivities for phosphates 8, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24 and 49: phosphates 18, 19, 23, 24 and 49 are more reactive in tRNAAsp, while phosphates 8, 20 and 22 are more reactive in tRNAPhe. All other phosphates display similar reactivities in both tRNAs, in particular phosphate 60 in the T-loop, which is strongly protected. Most of these data are explained by the crystal structures of the tRNAs. Thermal transitions in tRNAAsp could be followed by chemical modifications of phosphates. Results indicate that the D-arm is more flexible than the T-loop. The phosphates in yeast tRNAAsp in contact with aspartyl-tRNA synthetase are essentially contained in three continuous stretches, including those at the corner of the amino acid accepting and D-arm, at the 5' side of the acceptor stem and in the variable loop. When represented in the three-dimensional structure of the tRNAAsp, it clearly appears that one side of the L-shaped tRNA molecule, that comprising the variable loop, is in contact with aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. In yeast tRNAPhe interacting with phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, the distribution of protected phosphates is different, although phosphates in the anticodon stem and variable loop are involved in both systems. With tRNAPhe, the data cannot be accommodated by the interaction model found for tRNAAsp, but they are consistent with the diagonal side model proposed by Rich & Schimmel (1977). The existence of different interaction schemes between tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, correlated with the oligomeric structure of the enzyme, is proposed.