The impact of level 1 pediatric trauma center designation on demographics and financial reimbursement

Effects of Transport to Trauma Centers on Survival Outcomes Among Severe Trauma Patients in Korea: Nationwide Age-Stratified Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed that the prognosis for severe trauma patients is better after transport to trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers. However, the benefit from transport to trauma centers may differ according to age group. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of transport to trauma centers on survival outcomes in different age groups among severe trauma patients in Korea.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study using Korean national emergency medical service (EMS) based severe trauma registry in 2018-2019 was conducted. EMS-treated trauma patients whose injury severity score was above or equal to 16, and who were not out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or death on arrival were included. Patients were classified into 3 groups: pediatrics (age < 19), working age (age 19-65), and elderly (age > 65). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of trauma center transport on outcome after adjusting of age, sex, comorbidity, mechanism of injury, Revised Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score. All analysis was stratified according to the age group, and subgroup analysis for traumatic brain injury was also conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, total of 10,511 patients were included in the study, and the number of patients in each age group were 488 in pediatrics, 6,812 in working age, and 3,211 in elderly, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of trauma center transport on in-hospital mortality from were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.43-1.32) in pediatrics, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90) in working age, 0.71(95% CI, 0.60-0.85) in elderly, respectively. In subgroup analysis of traumatic brain injury, the benefit from trauma center transport was observed only in elderly group.

CONCLUSION

We found out trauma centers showed better clinical outcomes for adult and elderly groups, excluding the pediatric group than non-trauma centers. Further research is warranted to evaluate and develop the response system for pediatric severe trauma patients in Korea.

Pediatric penetrating cervical trauma in HCUP: Associations with hospital length of stay and cost

OBJECTIVE

To describe pediatric penetrating cervical trauma (PCT) and determine factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charges.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) from the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for 2016.

SETTING

Public database.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the HCUP from the KID for 2016 for inpatients ≤18 years of age. Comparisons between PCT and non-PCT patients were made, including hospital LOS and total charges.

RESULTS

There were 1279 patients with neck trauma of which 686 (53.6%) were identified as sustaining PCT. Patients with PCT were older (13.2 vs 11.8 yr, p = .001), and were more likely to be male (65.9% vs 54.8%, p < .001) and African-American (21.9% vs 15.9, p = .01). PCT patients were less likely to have a vascular injury (6.1% vs 20.1%, p < .001) and they were more likely to undergo airway evaluation (8.3% vs 2.2%, p < .001). Within the PCT group, 11.5% had open pharyngeal/esophageal lacerations, 6.1% had open tracheal injuries, 2.0% had open thyroid injuries, and 1.6% had open laryngeal injuries. LOS and total charges were not different between children with and without PCT (mean LOS 6.5 days, mean total charges US$106,000). Linear regression analysis showed significant associations with LOS for age, tracheal open injuries, cervical or vascular injury, and undergoing airway evaluation and/or esophagoscopy. Total charges associations were similar.

CONCLUSION

LOS and total charges were not different in children with PCT and non-PCT, but both were increased when there were more cervical injuries and more related procedures done.

Decreased Intracranial Pressure Monitor Use at Level II Trauma Centers is Associated with Increased Mortality

Previous investigations suggest outcome differences at Level I and Level II trauma centers. We examined use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors at Level I and Level II trauma centers after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its effect on mortality. The 2007 to 2008 National Trauma Databank was reviewed for patients with an indication for ICP monitoring based on Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines. Demographic and clinical outcomes at Level I and Level II centers were compared by regression modeling. Overall, 15,921 patients met inclusion criteria; 11,017 were admitted to a Level I and 4,904 to a Level II trauma center. Patients with TBI admitted to a Level II trauma center had a lower rate of Injury Severity Score greater than 16 (80 vs 82%, P < 0.01) and lower frequency of head Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 3 (80 vs 82%, P < 0.01). After regression modeling, patients with TBI admitted to a Level II trauma center were 31 per cent less likely to receive an ICP monitor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.69; P < 0.01) and had a significantly higher mortality (AOR, 1.12; P < 0.01). Admission to a Level II trauma center after severe TBI is associated with a decreased use of ICP monitoring in patients who meet BTF criteria as well as an increased mortality. These differences should be validated prospectively to narrow these discrepancies in care and outcomes between Level I and Level II centers.

Acute costs and predictors of higher treatment costs for major paediatric trauma in New South Wales, Australia

AIMS

To describe the costs of acute trauma admissions for children aged ≤15 years in trauma centres; to identify predictors of higher treatment costs and quantify differences in actual and state-wide average cost in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

METHOD

Admitted trauma patient data provided by 12 trauma centres was linked with financial data for 2008-2009. Demographic, injury details and injury severity scores (ISS) were obtained from trauma registries. Individual patient costs, Australian Refined Diagnostic Related Groups (AR-DRG) and state-wide average costs were obtained. Actual costs incurred by each hospital were compared with state-wide AR-DRG average costs. Multivariate multiple linear regression identified predictors of cost.

RESULTS

There were 3493 patients with a total cost of AUD$20.2 million. Falls (AUD$6.7 million) and road trauma (AUD$4.4 million) had the highest total expenditure. The reduction in cost between ISS < 9 compared to ISS 9-12 and ISS > 12 was significant (P < 0.0001). The median cost of injury increased with every additional body region injured (P < 0.0001). For each additional day spent in hospital, there was an increased cost of AUD$1898 and patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) cost AUD$7358 more than patients not admitted to ICU. The total costs incurred by trauma centres were AUD$1.4 million above the NSW peer group average cost estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

The high financial cost of paediatric patient treatment highlights the need to ensure prevention remains a priority in Australia. Hospitals tasked with providing trauma care should be appropriately funded and future funding models should consider trauma severity.

The Impact of American College of Surgeons Trauma Center Designation and Outcomes after Early Thoracotomy: A National Trauma Databank Analysis

Trauma centers are designated by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) into four different levels based on resources, volume, and scientific and educational commitment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between ACS center designation and outcomes after early thoracotomy for trauma. The National Trauma Databank (v. 7.0) was used to identify all patients who required early thoracotomy. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were extracted. Patients were categorized according to ACS trauma center designation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of ACS trauma center designation on mortality. From 2002 to 2006, 1834 (77.4%) patients were admitted to a Level I ACS verified trauma center, 474 (20.0%) to a Level II, and 59 (3.6%) to a Level III/IV facility. After adjusting for differences between the groups, there were no significant differences in mortality (overall: 53.3% for Level I, 63.1% for Level II, and 52.5% for Level III/IV, adjusted P = 0.417; or for patients arriving in cardiac arrest: 74.9% vs 87.1% vs 85.0%, P = 0.261). Subgroup analysis did not show any significant difference in survival irrespective of mechanism of injury. Glasgow Coma Scale score # 8, Injury Severity Score >16, no admission systolic blood pressure, time from admission to thoracotomy, and nonteaching hospitals were found to be independent predictors of death. For trauma patients who have sustained injuries requiring early thoracotomy, ACS trauma center designation did not significantly impact mortality. Nonteaching institutions however, were independently associated with poorer outcomes after early thoracotomy. These findings may have important implications in educational commitment of institutions. Further prospective evaluation of these findings is warranted.

The pediatric burn unit: a profit center

BACKGROUND

Establishment of a pediatric burn center represents a major commitment of resources. The impact of a Pediatric Burn Unit on the finances of a children's hospital has never been reported and was the purpose of this study.

METHODS

Burn registry data for patients discharged from our Pediatric Burn Unit from 2000 to 2002 were integrated with financial and administrative data. Reimbursement was determined by calculating expected payments for each patient. The relationship between percent total body surface area (TBSA) burned and profit/loss margin was evaluated using regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, 264 pediatric burn patients were admitted to our burn service. One hundred forty-three (54%) had less than 10% TBSA burned, and their average loss margin was -179.03 dollars per patient. The 121 patients (46%) who had greater than 10% TBSA burned had an average profit margin of +349.68 dollars per patient (P =.22, SE+ 605.03) Patients treated operatively (49; 18%) had a profit margin of +2237.77 dollars per patient, whereas patients treated nonoperatively (215; 81%) had a profit margin of -432.30 dollars per patient (P =.0007, SE +249.65) The overall profit margin was +63.88 dollars per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pediatric burn service covered all hospital fixed costs and made a small profit. Pediatric burn care can be a profit center for children's hospitals. Investment in a Pediatric Burn Program provides adequate financial return for the hospital.

Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care

OBJECTIVES

To describe three levels of hospital-based critical care centers to optimally match services and personnel with community needs, and to recommend essential intensive care unit services and personnel for each critical care level.

PARTICIPANTS

A multidisciplinary writing panel of professionals with expertise in the clinical practice of critical care medicine working under the direction of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM).

DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS

Relevant medical literature was accessed through a systematic Medline search and synthesized by the ACCM writing panel, a multidisciplinary group of critical care experts. Consensus for the final written document was reached through collaboration in meetings and through electronic communication modalities. Literature cited included previously written guidelines from the ACCM, published expert opinion and statements from official organizations, published review articles, and nonrandomized, historical cohort investigations. With this background, the ACCM writing panel described a three-tiered system of intensive care units determined by service-based criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for optimal intensive care unit services and personnel for hospitals with varying resources will facilitate both local and regional delivery of consistent and excellent care to critically ill patients.

Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on patient outcome and hospital performance of preparing for and achieving American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level I trauma verification.

METHODS

The center was a previously designated state regional trauma center located adjacent to a major metropolitan area. Preparation for ACS verification began in early 1996 and was completed in early 1998. Final verification took place in April 1999. Data were analyzed before (1994) and after (1998) the process. There was a marked increase in administrative support with trauma named one of the hospital's six centers of excellence. Two full-time board-certified trauma/critical care surgeons were added to the current six trauma surgeons. Their major focus was trauma care. Trauma support staff was also increased with case managers, a trauma nurse practitioner, additional trauma registrars, and administrative support staff. Education and continuous quality improvement were markedly expanded starting in 1996.

RESULTS

There were 1,098 trauma patients admitted in 1994, and 1,658 in 1998. Overall mortality decreased (1994, 7.38%; 1998, 5.37%; p < 0.05). There was a marked decrease in mortality for severely injured (Injury Severity Score > 30) patients (1994, 44% mortality [38 of 86]; 1998, 27% [22 of 80]; p < 0.04). Average length of stay also decreased (1994, 12.22 days; 1998, 9.87 days; p < 0.02). This yielded an estimated cost savings for 1998 of greater than $4,000 per patient (total saving estimate of $7.4 million).

CONCLUSION

Trauma system improvement as related to achieving ACS Level I verification appeared to have a positive impact on survival and patient care. There were cost savings realized that helped alleviate the added expense of this system improvement. The process of achieving ACS Level I verification is worthwhile and can be cost effective.

Financial burden of trauma care on a university hospital in a developing country

BACKGROUND

Trauma care is expensive and more so for the hospitals not subsidized by the government, as is the case in developing countries. In this study, the burden of trauma care on a typical Level I trauma center in Turkey was investigated.

METHODS

Medical, demographic, and financial records of trauma patients who were hospitalized in the calendar year of 1996 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 347 patients had complete data available for analysis. The mean Injury Severity Score was 13.3+/-0.5. Total hospital charges and charges per patient were $547,391 and $1,577, respectively. There was a positive correlation between the Injury Severity Score and the hospital charges. Although 54.2% of the patients were self-payer and the rest (45.8%) had some form of a health insurance, 5.5% ($30,496) of total hospital charges of these 347 trauma patients could not be collected by the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Trauma care is expensive and reimbursement is not always possible, but the hospital's nonreimbursed money was within tolerable limits, and the overall financial balance of the hospital from the trauma care was on the positive side, even in the absence of government subsidy.

Surgical results of 29 patients with benign tracheobronchial lesions

This study was carried out in order to evaluate the surgical results of benign tracheobronchial diseases. Between July 1988 and March 1996, tracheobronchial surgery was performed on 29 patients with a variety of benign diseases. The primary diseases were post intubation or post tracheostomy tracheal stenosis (n = 12), tuberculous stenosis (n = 7), congenital tracheal stenosis with or without vascular ring (n = 4), tracheobronchial tumour (n = 2), oesophageal tumour (n = 1), and miscellaneous conditions (n = 3). Thirty-one operative procedures included sleeve lobectomy (n = 7), sleeve resection of trachea (n = 17) and bronchus (n = 2), and plastic surgery of trachea (n = 4) and bronchus (n = 1). There was one operative death, which put the mortality rate at 3.4%. There were five postoperative complications in this series (17.2%), including anastomotic disruption of trachea (n = 1), bilateral vocal cord palsy (n = 1), prolonged endotracheal intubation (n = 1) and overgrowth of granulation (n = 2). The complication of anastomotic disruption of trachea was treated by insertion of a tracheal T-tube, and the granulation was treated by bronchoscopic excision. We suggest that tracheobronchoplasty is a safe procedure in carefully selected patients with benign diseases.

Hospital reimbursement for pediatric trauma care

PURPOSE

Despite the proven efficacy of pediatric trauma centers, their continued development is threatened by the perception that their cost exceeds the reimbursement for their services. The authors reviewed actual reimbursement for a group of pediatric trauma patients and compared with that for a group of appendectomy patients chosen to reflect the authors' surgical population at large.

METHODS

The records of 209 consecutively treated trauma patients and 37 age-matched appendectomy patients treated in 1992 and 1993 were reviewed. Trauma patients were divided into two groups: moderate injury (ISS < or = 9; n = 134) and serious injury (ISS > or = 10; n = 75).

RESULTS

Hospital bills for the appendectomy patients were reimbursed at 72% of charges and 112% of costs. Payment was received at a mean of 36 days (range, 9 to 62 days) after discharge. Reimbursement for moderately injured patients was 104% of charges and 137% of costs and was received at a mean of 81 days (range, 3 to 270 days) after discharge. Six months postdischarge, reimbursement for seriously injured patients was 63% of charges and 86% of costs. Reimbursement was slow for some children who sustained severe injury, but as legal actions brought by patient's families were completed, open accounts were settled, and revenue in both groups totaled 76% of charges and 103% of costs 18 months postdischarge.

CONCLUSION

Hospital reimbursement for care at a level I pediatric trauma center exceeds 75% of charges and 100% of costs, no different from the overall rate for the general hospital surgical population. Analysis of reimbursement rates for trauma patients may be time-dependent.

Glutaraldehyde treated autologous pericardium in complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot

Pericardium has been used for decades to facilitate the repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). The impact of glutaraldehyde preserved autologous pericardium when used as a right ventricular outflow tract (RVOFT) patch in TOF was analyzed in 36 consecutive children undergoing complete transventricular repair. In 18 (group I) the pericardium was treated in conventional fashion (harvested and preserved in saline solution). In the other patients, the pericardium was treated in 0.625% glutaraldehyde solution for 20 minutes and then washed in saline prior to being implanted as an RVOFT patch (group II). The perioperative (prior to hospital discharge) as well as the 6-month postoperative Doppler echocardiograms were assessed with 100% follow-up. The studies were evaluated and graded by blinded observers for the presence and severity of an RVOFT dilatation (+0 to +4) relative to the size of the aortic valve annulus. The age of patients in group I and group II (29 months, 34 months) were similar as was the incidence of transannular patching (44%, 41%). Postrepair hemodynamics revealed no significant difference in the right ventricular/left ventricular pressure ratios (42%, 41%) or in the systolic RVOFT pressure (24 mmHg, 29 mmHg). The predischarge echocardiograms showed no outflow tract (OFT) dilation in either group. There was no morbidity or mortality in either group. At approximately 6 months postoperatively (6.2 mo, 5.7 mo), 72% of group I patients had RVOFT diameters that were larger (+1, +2) than the predischarge diameters when reviewed by three observers. In group II there was a single patient with dilatation of the RVOFT and this graded as +1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)