Use of distal splenorenal shunt in children referred for liver transplant evaluation

Pediatric Transplant Interventions

The field of pediatric organ transplantation has grown significantly in recent decades, with interventional radiology (IR) playing an essential role in managing pre and post-transplant complications. Pediatric transplant patients face unique challenges compared to adults, including donor-recipient size mismatch, and complications of a growing child with changing physiology. Interventional radiologists play a major role in pediatric renal and liver transplant. IR interventions begin early in the child's pretransplant journey, with diagnostic procedures such as biopsies, angiograms, and cholangiograms. These procedures are essential for understanding the etiology of organ failure and identifying potential transplant candidates. Minimally invasive therapeutic procedures may serve as bridges to transplant and may include vascular access optimization for hemodialysis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) creation, and tumor embolization or ablation. After transplant, image-guided biopsies for the surveillance of graft rejection and treatment of vascular or luminal stenoses, pseudoaneurysms, and anastomotic leaks can maintain the function and longevity of the transplant organ. Careful consideration must be given to patient size and evolving anatomy, radiation exposure, and the need for deeper sedation for pediatric patients. Despite these challenges, the integration of IR in pediatric transplant care has proven beneficial, offering minimally invasive alternatives to surgery, faster recovery times, and improved outcomes.

Cystic fibrosis and portal hypertension: Distal splenorenal shunt can prevent the need for future liver transplant

BACKGROUND

The management of portal hypertension (PHT) in children with well compensated cirrhosis and cystic fibrosis (CF) is controversial. We present our experience with distal splenorenal shunting (DSRS) for the treatment of PHT as an alternative to liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2017, 5 CF children underwent a DSRS at a pediatric hepatobiliary and transplantation referral center. LT (n = 9) was reserved for patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Statistical analysis was done using the paired t-test (p < 0.05 considered significant).

RESULTS

Mean PELD/MELD score was significantly lower for DSRS patients than LT (3 ± 6 vs 28 ± 4, p < 0.001). All 5 DSRS patients had grade III-IV varices. One bled prior to surgery. After DSRS, spleen size decreased significantly from 8.4 ± 1.5 cm to 4.4 ± 1.8 cm (p = 0.019). Mean platelet count remained stable (87.8 ± 48 to 91.8 ± 35, p = 0.9). There were no postoperative complications. No DSRS patient experienced variceal bleeding following shunt creation. Liver function tests remained stable in the DSRS group, and no patient required a liver transplant (median follow up 4.65 years, range 1.24-7.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cystic fibrosis who have well-compensated cirrhosis and symptomatic portal hypertension can be palliated with distal splenorenal shunting and do not need liver transplants. These patients can undergo shunting with minimal morbidity.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case series with no comparison group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medical and surgical management of portal hypertension in children

The treatment of portal hypertension in children has undergone considerable evolution in the past decade. The treatment offered depends on the cause of the hypertension and the underlying health of the liver. The diagnosis of portal hypertension often can be made by the history and physical examination. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the presence of splenic enlargement is pathognomonic for portal hypertension. Bleeding and hypersplenism are the principal symptoms. Treatment of bleeding starts with confirming the diagnosis with esophageal and gastric endoscopy. The patient is admitted to an intensive care unit and started on intravenous octreotide. Banding or sclerosis of esophageal varices will result in cessation of the bleeding but not a permanent cure. A careful investigation for the cause of the portal hypertension should be done. This includes imaging studies of intra-abdominal arteries and veins, a liver biopsy, and liver function tests, including coagulation studies. For patients with extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, early consideration should be given to surgical treatment with a meso-Rex bypass. Patients with liver disease should be treated for the underlying disorder and undergo regular endoscopic monitoring for recurrence of varices. Patients with well-compensated cirrhosis should be considered for selective surgical shunting, and those with advanced disease for liver transplantation. The benefit of long-term beta blockers in children has not been proven by clinical trials.

Esophageal variceal bleeding secondary to portal hypertension: endoscopic sclerotherapy as the first-step treatment

BACKGROUND

Variceal bleeding from the esophagus is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in children with portal hypertension (PHT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 69 PHT cases (41 intrahepatic, 28 extrahepatic) have been evaluated in our department since 1990. According to the Child-Pugh classification, 49 cases were in class A, 16 cases were in class B, and 4 cases were in class C at admission. In our protocol, endoscopic sclerotherapy is performed in all patients, and the diagnosis is achieved directly by diagnostic laparoscopy and fine-needle liver biopsy. The procedure is applied under general anesthesia, and 1% aethoxysclerol (polidocanol) is injected paravariceally and intravariceally with the use of a flexible endoscope.

RESULTS

The Sugiura procedure was performed in nine patients who presented with recurrent bleeding episodes despite the strict sclerotherapy protocol. Liver transplantation was performed in two patients who were in Child class C. The total mortality rate in this series was 7% (5/69).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic sclerotherapy, as presented herein, decreases the need for additional surgical interventions in children with PHT.

Liver transplantation. The pediatric challenge

Successful liver transplantation in a child is often a hard-won victory, requiring all the combined expertise of a dedicated pediatric transplant team. This article outlines the considerable challenges still facing pediatric liver transplant physicians and surgeons. In looking to the future, where should priorities lie to enhance the success already achieved? First, solutions to the donor shortage must be sought aggressively by increasing the use of from split-liver transplants, judicious application of living-donor programs, and increasing the donation rate, perhaps by innovative means. The major immunologic barriers, to successful xenotransplantation make it unlikely that this option will be tenable in the near future. Second, current immunosuppression is nonspecific, toxic, and unable to be individually adjusted to the patient's immune response. The goal of achieving donor-specific tolerance will require new consideration of induction protocols. Developing a clinically applicable method to measure the recipient's immunoreactivity is of paramount importance, for future studies of new immunosuppressive strategies and to address the immediate concern of long-term over-immunosuppression. The inclusion of pediatric patients in new protocols will require the ongoing insistence of pediatric transplant investigators. Third, the current immunosuppressive drugs have a long-term morbidity and mortality of their own. These long-term effects are particularly important in children who may well have decades of exposure to these therapies. There is now some understanding of their long-term renal toxicity and the risk of malignancy. New drugs may obviate renal toxicity, whereas the risk of malignancy is inherent in any nonspecific immunosuppressive regimen. Although progress is being made in preventing and recognizing PTLD, this entity remains an important ongoing concern. The global effect of long-term immunosuppression on the child's growth, development, and intellectual potential is unknown. Of particular concern is the potential for neurotoxicity from the calcineurin inhibitors. Fourth, recurrent disease and new diseases, perhaps potentiated by immunosuppressive drugs, must be considered. Already the recurrence of autoimmune disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis have been documented in pediatric patients. Now, a new lesion, a nonspecific hepatitis, sometimes with positive autoimmune markers, that may progress to cirrhosis has been recognized. It is not known whether this entity is an unusual form of rejection, an unrecognized viral infection, or a response to immunosuppressive drugs themselves. Finally, pediatric transplant recipients, like any other children, must be protected and nourished physically and mentally if they are to fulfill their potential. After liver transplantation the child's growth, intellectual functioning, and psychologic adaptation may all require special attention from parents, teachers, and physicians alike. There is limited understanding of how the enormous physical intervention of a liver transplantation affects a child's cognitive and psychologic function as the child progresses through life. The persons caring for these children have the difficult responsibility of providing services to evaluate these essential measures of children's health over the long term and to intervene if necessary. Part of the transplant physician's our duty to protect and advocate for children is to fight for equal access to health care. In most of the developing world, economic pressures make it impossible to consider liver transplantation a health care priority. In the United States and in other countries with the medical infrastructure to support liver transplantation, however, health care professionals must strive to be sure that the policies governing candidacy for transplantation and allocation of organs are applied justly and uniformly to all children whose lives are threatened by liver disease. In the current regulatory climate that increasingly takes medical decisions out of the hands of physicians, pediatricians must be even more prepared to protect the unique and often complicated needs of children both before and after transplantation. Only in this way can the challenges of the present and the future be met.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in infancy and childhood

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is an alarming problem in children. Although many causes of GI bleeding are common to children and adults, the frequency of specific causes differs greatly, and some lesions, such as necrotizing enterocolitis or allergic colitis, are unique to children. This article reviews the spectrum of GI bleeding in infants and children. The causes, diagnostic evaluation, and management are discussed, and differences with adult medicine are highlighted.

Experience with the Rex shunt (mesenterico-left portal bypass) in children with extrahepatic portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EPVT) in children can lead to severe bleeding from gastrointestinal varices, ascites, thrombocytopenia from hypersplenism, and other coagulation disorders. The authors have used the superior mesenteric vein to intrahepatic left portal vein (Rex) shunt in 5 children with symptomatic EPVT and report their results with this novel technique.

METHODS

Children with symptomatic portal hypertension were screened for the underlying cause. All children with essentially normal livers and obstruction of the extrahepatic portal vein were considered for the Rex shunt. Evaluation included liver function tests, liver biopsy, and radiological evaluation of the intrahepatic vascular anatomy.

RESULTS

Five patients between the ages of 2.8 and 10.5 years underwent evaluation for portal hypertension secondary to extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Three patients had idiopathic extra hepatic portal vein thrombosis with cavernous transformation, 1 had thrombosis after a living-related liver transplant, and 1 had compression and obstruction of the main portal vein from enlarged lymph nodes after treatment of systemic histoplasmosis. All patients were symptomatic. Three patients had intermittent bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices, and all 5 had relative degrees of hypersplenism with enlarged spleens and thrombocytopenia (11,000 to 77,000). Three patients had significant leukopenia. Results of imaging studies suggested that 3 patients had inadequate intrahepatic portal veins for shunting, but all patients at exploration underwent successful shunting. There were no serious intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications included ascites in 2 patients that resolved within 1 month. There were no early shunt thromboses. The median postoperative length of stay was 7 days. Clinical follow-up ranged from 7 to 21 months. Gastrointestinal bleeding did not recur in any patient, and ascites resolved in all. Spleen size decreased significantly (P < .01) from 9.4 +/- 4.0 cm to 5.0 +/- 3.7 cm below the left costal margin. Mean platelet count and white blood cell count rose after shunting from 79 +/- 42 to 176 +/- 73 (P < .02) and 5.4 +/- 2.3 to 7.5 +/- 3.9 (P = .06), respectively. All shunts were studied at 1 and 7 days, and 3 and 6 months after the procedure. Shunt patency was documented in all cases. Subsequently, shunt blockage occurred in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rex shunt has proven to be an effective method of resolving portal hypertension caused by EPVT including thrombosis after living donor transplantation. This shunt is preferable to other surgical procedures because it eliminates portal hypertension and its sequelae by restoring normal portal flow to the liver.

Portal hypertension in children

This chapter reviews the common causes of portal hypertension in children. It specifies how the treatment strategy for portal hypertension in patients without significant hepatic dysfunction differs from the management of children with cirrhosis. It describes the application of newer treatment modalities such as TIPS and partial splenic embolization in children and reviews the current recommendations for surgical intervention in these patients.

Portosystemic shunting for paediatric portal hypertension

The records of 22 patients who received portosystemic shunting for portal hypertension from 1985 to 1995 inclusive at the Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children (RAHC) were retrospectively reviewed. There were 11 girls and 11 boys. The average age at operation was 8 years, 3 months (range, 2 years, 3 months to 16 years, 7 months). The aetiology was idiopathic portal cavernomatous transformation (n = 9), billiary atresia (n = 4), cystic fibrosis (n = 3), documented neonatal portal vein thrombosis (n = 3), congenital hepatic fibrosis (n = 2), and portal vein obstruction after liver transplant (n = 1). The major presenting problem was upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Two patients had recurrent melaena from Roux-en-Y jejunal loop and caecal varices, respectively. Before receiving shunts, 12 patients had endoscopic sclerotherapy, 1 had gastric transection, and 2 had gastric varices oversewn. Portal pressure at preoperative splenoportogram averaged 28 mm Hg (range, 20 to 41). Urgent shunts were performed on 13 patients. Two disadvantaged patients had prophylactic shunts for severe hypersplenism. The types of shunts used were reversed splenorenal (n = 13), splenoadrenal (n = 6), inferior mesenteric renal (n = 1), portocaval (n = 1), inferior mesenteric caval (n = 1), and superior and inferior mesenteric caval (n = 1). In all, 22 patients had 23 shunts. The patency rate was 96% on 6 months to 10 years follow-up (average, 5.8 years). No spleen was lost. There were 2 late deaths. Two cystic fibrosis patients and one child with extrahepatic portal hypertension experienced post-shunt encephalopathy. Three patients rebled in the early postoperative period despite a patent shunt. Two patients subsequently received liver transplantation without any additional difficulties. Thus, portosystemic shunting using a method appropriate for the patient is a reliable option for treating children with portal hypertension in whom variceal sclerotherapy is inappropriate or has failed.

Selective distal splenorenal shunts for intractable variceal bleeding in pediatric portal hypertension

The treatment of portal hypertension in the pediatric population has undergone an evolution toward less invasive methods of care. With the advent of endoscopic sclerotherapy, surgery is less common in the acute care of these patients. Few reports deal with the role of portosystemic shunting in the emergent management of variceal hemorrhage in children. To address this issue, the authors studied the medical records of all pediatric patients at their institution who underwent placement of a shunt for portal hypertension during the last 10 years. Nine patients underwent a total of 10 emergent or semiurgent shunting procedures. Seven were boys and two were girls. Six patients had portal hypertension as a result of intrahepatic disease. Two had extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. Five children had abnormal hepatic function. The median age at the time of the procedure was 9 years. The indication for surgical shunting in all cases was gastrointestinal hemorrhage not responsive to sclerotherapy. Eight patients underwent emergent distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS), and two underwent a nonselective mesocaval shunt, with one undergoing both. Postoperatively all patients had cessation of bleeding. Operative mortality was zero. Early complications included ascites (3), small bowel obstruction (1), and hepatorenal syndrome (1). The child who underwent a nonselective shunt procedure had encephalopathy. Two DSRS thrombosed, requiring reexploration; eight shunts remained patent. Three patients eventually had orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) because of progressive hepatic failure. Two children died; neither death was shunt related.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)