Psychosocial factors and smoking as risk factors in lung carcinoma

Psychic vulnerability and the associated risk for cancer

BACKGROUND

Psychic vulnerability has been associated with a number of physical symptoms and diseases. This study was designed to estimate the incidence of cancer in a random sample of persons in the general Danish population in relation to a personality characteristic measured by the Test of Psychic Vulnerability.

METHODS

The authors examined the cancer incidence in a cohort of 5136 randomly sampled persons age > 25 years living in Copenhagen County, Denmark. The responses to questionnaires and the results of examinations, including the Test of Psychic Vulnerability, were collected during 1982-1984 and during 1991-1992. The observed numbers of cancers were compared with the numbers that would have been expected if the cohort members had experienced the same risk of cancer as the population of Copenhagen County. Regression analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model to adjust for well-known risk factors for cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 403 cancers were observed, and 412.02 were expected, yielding a standardized incidence ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.88-1.19). The authors did not observe a significant increase in the risk of site specific cancers. The risk for cancer was not influenced by the type of vulnerability in a multivariate analysis (hazards ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.85-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found no increased risk for cancer among psychically vulnerable persons compared with nonvulnerable persons; however, the results indicate that behavior and certain life-style factors may be determined by personality, which, in turn, may determine the risk for cancer.

Occupational life course and lung cancer risk in men. Findings from a socio-epidemiological analysis of job-changing histories in a case-control study

Psychosocial factors in general, and the social and psychological conditions of work and occupation in particular, have attracted little attention to the epidemiological investigation into the occupational-related causes of lung cancer. There is some evidence available concerning the impact of loss events--including job losses--on cancer development. During our research presented in this article, we examined job changes and job transitions in the occupational biography of men with regard to their circumstances in terms of (in-)voluntariness both as individual events and the job-changing histories of individuals. We expected the job-changing histories of lung cancer cases to be more involuntary than those of population controls, and vice versa. Our sample contains 391 male case-control pairs. Cases are defined as newly-diagnosed men of German nationality with a histologically- or cytologically-confirmed diagnosis of primary lung cancer. Population controls were drawn randomly from the municipality records of residents and individuals matched to cases 1:1 by age and region. Occupational histories were reconstructed, and information about other classical and suspected risk factors was collected during standardized interviews by trained interviewers. We categorized the reported reasons for job changes, and classified them with respect to voluntariness on a seven-stepped rating scale from -3 'very involuntary' to +3 'very voluntary', defining relations within the empirically established categories. The job-changing histories of individuals are described by using the average score of voluntariness. We measured the degree of voluntariness for the occupational history: (1) by the rounded average score; and (2) by the quintiles of the average score. On the basis of individuals matched odds ratios (OR) estimates are derived for the score of voluntariness unadjusted and adjusted for smoking, asbestos exposure and socio-economic group by conditional logistic regression. The investigation into job-changing histories using the average score of voluntariness lead to similar results for both measuring methods for the total study group. When the rounded score was used, job-changing histories which were assessed as 'very involuntary' and 'involuntary' (score -3 and -2) showed an elevated odds ratio of adjusted 1.41 (95%-CI: 0.57; 3.48), and when they were assessed as 'moderately involuntary' (score -1) the adjusted odds ratio was 1.59 (95%-CI: 1.02; 2.48), as compared with job-changing histories assessed as neutral (score 0). When the degree of voluntariness was measured by quintiles, the first quintile (score -3- < -0.6) showed an elevated risk of adjusted OR 1.36 (95%-CI: 0.79; 2.36) as compared to the third quintile (score -0.2- < -0.1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)