Predictability of psychic outcome for exercise training and exercise training including relaxation therapy after myocardial infarction

The Effects of Mind-Body Interventions on Sleep Quality: A Systematic Review

Study Objectives. To evaluate the effect of mind-body interventions (MBI) on sleep. Methods. We reviewed randomized controlled MBI trials on adults (through 2013) with at least one sleep outcome measure. We searched eleven electronic databases and excluded studies on interventions not considering mind-body medicine. Studies were categorized by type of MBI, whether sleep was primary or secondary outcome measure and outcome type. Results. 1323 abstracts were screened, and 112 papers were included. Overall, 67 (60%) of studies reported a beneficial effect on at least one sleep outcome measure. Of the most common interventions, 13/23 studies using meditation, 21/30 using movement MBI, and 14/25 using relaxation reported at least some improvements in sleep. There were clear risks of bias for many studies reviewed, especially when sleep was not the main focus. Conclusions. MBI should be considered as a treatment option for patients with sleep disturbance. The benefit of MBI needs to be better documented with objective outcomes as well as the mechanism of benefit elucidated. There is some evidence that MBI have a positive benefit on sleep quality. Since sleep has a direct impact on many other health outcomes, future MBI trials should consider including sleep outcome measurements.

Relaxation therapies for the management of primary hypertension in adults

BACKGROUND

Lifestyle interventions are often recommended as initial treatment for mild hypertension, but the efficacy of relaxation therapies is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of relaxation therapies on cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure in people with elevated blood pressure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, ISI Proceedings, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials and reference lists of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) included in the review.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

RCTs of a parallel design comparing relaxation therapies with no active treatment, or sham therapy; follow-up >/=8 weeks; participants over 18 years, with raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) >/=140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >/=85 mmHg); SBP and DBP reported at end of follow-up.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

participants were pregnant; participants received antihypertensive medication which changed during the trial.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Random effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

29 RCTs, with eight weeks to five years follow-up, met our inclusion criteria; four were excluded from the primary meta-analysis because of inadequate outcome data. The remaining 25 trials assessed 1,198 participants, but adequate randomisation was confirmed in only seven trials and concealment of allocation in only one. Only one trial reported deaths, heart attacks and strokes (one of each). Meta-analysis indicated that relaxation resulted in small, statistically significant reductions in SBP (mean difference: -5.5 mmHg, 95% CI: -8.2 to -2.8, I2 =72%) and DBP (mean difference: -3.5 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.3 to -1.6, I2 =75%) compared to control. The substantial heterogeneity between trials was not explained by duration of follow-up, type of control, type of relaxation therapy or baseline blood pressure. The nine trials that reported blinding of outcome assessors found a non-significant net reduction in blood pressure (SBP mean difference: -3.2 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.7 to 1.4, I(2) =69%) associated with relaxation. The 15 trials comparing relaxation with sham therapy likewise found a non-significant reduction in blood pressure (SBP mean difference: -3.5 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.1 to 0.2, I(2) =63%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In view of the poor quality of included trials and unexplained variation between trials, the evidence in favour of causal association between relaxation and blood pressure reduction is weak. Some of the apparent benefit of relaxation was probably due to aspects of treatment unrelated to relaxation.

Stress management in cardiac patients: a preliminary study of the predictors of improvement in quality of life

The effects on quality of life of a 12-wk relaxation-based stress management programme emphasizing improvements in self-confidence and control was assessed in seventy-eight patients following myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty. Measures of psychological state, functional mobility level, social activity and chest pain were obtained before and after treatment and at 6 month follow-up. Fifty-one (66%) of patients completed the programme. Significant reductions in anxiety and depression and improvements in psychological general well-being, activities of daily living, social activity, quality of interactions and satisfaction with sexual relationships were observed posttreatment, and these were largely maintained at follow-up. Reductions in chest pain and improvements in spouse ratings of psychological state were also recorded. Similar responses were measured in myocardial infarction and surgery patients. Predictors of outcome in three aspects of quality of life, anxiety, activities of daily living and social activity, were assessed. Improvements in these three domains were independent of one another, and their predictors were also different. Reductions in anxiety were associated with neurotic dispositions and openness to new experience, while improvements in activities of daily living were predicted by work status, age and time since infarction or surgery. Implications for the use of stress management in cardiac rehabilitation are discussed.