Boberg KM, Smith-Kielland I, Stabursvik A, Stokke O. Difference in cytotoxicity of (22R)-cholest-5-ene-3 beta,7 alpha,22-triol and (22R)-cholest-5-ene-3 beta,7 beta,22-triol is not explained by different patterns of metabolites.
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY 1989;
33:1087-9. [PMID:
2615353 DOI:
10.1016/0022-4731(89)90413-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Ehrlich ascites tumor cells in suspension culture were incubated with the plant-derived sterol isomers (22R)-cholest-5-ene-3 beta,7 alpha,22-triol and (22R)-cholest-5-ene-3 beta,7 beta,22-triol. Both sterols were 7-dehydroxylated by the neoplastic cells, and the product was identified as (22R)-22-hydroxycholesta-4,6-dien-3-one. At sub-toxic sterol concentrations the conversion of the 7 alpha-hydroxy compound was about 5 times higher than that of the 7 beta-isomer. At higher sterol concentrations the 7 beta-hydroxy compound caused growth inhibition of the Ehrlich ascites cells, whereas the 7 alpha-hydroxylated sterol was ineffective. The rate of 7 alpha-dehydroxylation was, however, too low to be considered a likely pathway for detoxification. No other lipid-extractable products were detected, and no water-soluble products with influence on cell proliferation were present. Thus, the cytotoxicity is probably attributed to a property of the 7 beta-hydroxyl group of the (22R)-cholest-5-ene-3 beta,7 beta,22-triol.
Collapse