Differential inhibition of estrogen and antiestrogen binding to the estrogen receptor by diethylpyrocarbonate

Molecular forms of the estrogen receptor in breast cancer

Estrogen receptors (ERs) of which two isoforms have been identified (alpha and beta) are subjected to phosphorylation, glycozylation, ubiquitination and other post-transcriptional conformational changes giving rise to a very high molecular heterogeneity. Partial proteolysis of these receptors, as well as their high tendency to associate within oligomeric structures, reinforces this property. Investigations demonstrated that this heterogeneity is not a biochemical artefact suggesting some biological relevance. Our purpose was to review this topic, especially with regard to ERalpha from breast cancers.

The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site

The accumulated knowledge on the binding of estradiol (E2) and its analogs and the results of affinity-labeling studies have been reviewed and are used herein to derive a binding site model for the estrogen receptor (ER). Estradiol is nonpolar and hydrophobic, except at its molecular termini. Most of its skeletal flexibility resides in the B-ring, and it probably binds in a low-energy conformation. The phenolic OH group in the A-ring contributes about 1.9 kcal/mol to the binding free energy and probably acts primarily as a hydrogen bond donor. The 17 beta-hydroxyl group in the D-ring contributes approximately 0.6 kcal/mol to the binding and probably acts as a hydrogen bond acceptor, either directly or via a water molecule. There also seems to be a degree of flexibility in the region of the receptor that encompasses the D-ring. The aromatic ring contributes about 1.5 kcal/mol, probably through weak polar interactions with receptor residues that contact the beta-face of the steroid. The receptor seems to surround the ligand, so that all four rings contribute significantly to binding. Small hydrophobic substituents enhance binding affinity at positions 4, 12 beta, 14, and 16 alpha; whereas, larger hydrophobic substituents are tolerated at positions 7 alpha, 11 beta, and 17 alpha. In general, the ER is intolerant of polar substituents. Based on E2 analogs bearing affinity-labeling groups, cysteine residues might be present in the binding site in the area of C-4, C-17 alpha, and C-17 beta, and a lysine residue might be located near C-16. Models that represent the limits of deformability of the ligand binding site, the position of preformed pockets, and space occupied by the receptor are presented. The various elements in this model for the binding of steroidal estrogens by the estrogen receptor are consistent with evidence emerging from the crystal structures of related nuclear hormone receptor ligand complexes.

Tamoxifen aziridine labeling of the estrogen receptor-potential utility in detecting biologically aggressive breast tumors

Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) is a helpful predictor of response to endocrine therapy and disease free survival in breast cancer patients. The presence of variant estrogen receptors has been demonstrated at the RNA/DNA level and might represent an escape of tumors from hormonal control mechanisms. However, the demonstration that the corresponding peptides do exist is a real challenge. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of covalently bound [3H]tamoxifen aziridine ([3H]TAZ) to ER demonstrates a specific, multiband peptide pattern recognized by anti-ER monoclonal antibodies (anti-ER Mo Abs). The native 66 kDa ER form identified through its hormone binding domain by the H-222 Mo Ab was the most prominent one followed by 50, 35, and 28 kDa forms on fluorography. Such patterns from early human breast tumors were compared to the ones of more advanced disease, namely large primary breast cancers, metastatic lymph nodes, and soft tissue relapses: in these cases, molecular forms of 43 and 35 kDa were identified with a remarkable consistency. The 43 kDa peptide was more frequently identified by the H-226 Mo Ab (which maps a region near the DNA binding domain)-albeit with low labeling intensity as compared to H-222 Mo Ab. In addition, the 43 kDa peptide was inversely correlated to ER levels. This altered ER or related peptide could potentially be a marker of biologically aggressive breast tumors.

Importance of A/B and C domains of the estrogen receptor for its adsorption to hydroxylapatite

Regulatory properties of estrogen receptor (ER) result from the existence of functional domains within its primary structure. Thus, A/B and C domains which are rich in tyrosyl residues control gene expression while the E domain confers estrogen binding capacity. Hydroxylapatite (HAP) is known to adsorb ER. Scatchard plot analysis of [3H]estradiol binding patterns of HAP batches to which cytosolic ER had been adsorbed revealed that AB and/or C domains are mainly responsible for this property. Thus, treatment of these batches with the tyrosine reagent tetranitromethane (TNM) led to a dramatic release of adsorbed receptors. This did not occur with ER preparations devoid of exposed ABC domains obtained by selective immunoextraction with H-226 anti-ER monoclonal antibody prior to HAP assay. KC1 treatment (500 mM) of HAP batches also led to a release of bound receptors especially those devoid of exposed ABC domains. Such binding characteristics were also found with full length and truncated ERs produced in yeast: the full length receptor strongly interacted with HAP while the truncated receptor devoid of AB and C domains displayed only a weak adsorption. Additional investigation revealed that estradiol binding to cytosolic ER does not modify its reactivity towards TNM.

A model for the determination of the 3D-spatial distribution of the functions of the hormone-binding domain of receptors that bind 3-keto-4-ene steroids

A method of comparing the hydrophobic clusters of proteins (hydrophobic cluster analysis, HCA) has revealed that the 3D-folding pattern of the hormone-binding domain (HBD) of steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) may have an unexpectedly high degree of analogy with the known 3D-crystal structures of proteins belonging to the serine proteinase inhibitor (SERPIN) superfamily, e.g. alpha 1-antitrypsin and ovalbumin. The present paper briefly reviews some of the biochemical evidence that supports the structural validity of the SERPIN model and shows how the model can be used to establish hypothetical 3D-locations for functions attributed to different amino-acids or peptide sequences of the HBD: i.e. heat-shock protein binding, transcription activation, phosphorylation, steroid binding, but also ATP-binding. Indeed, the model has enabled the identification of a Rossmann-fold in SHRs that might bind ATP. Visualization of all these functions should help to interpret the chain of concerted events induced by steroid binding.

Differential interactions of estrogens and antiestrogens at the 17 beta-hydroxy or counterpart function with the estrogen receptor

The action of diethylpyrocarbonate on lamb uterine estrogen receptor produced an homogeneous population of the receptor (approximately 55%) which still bound triarylethylene antiestrogens such as 4-hydroxytamoxifen with a high affinity but bound classical potent estrogens such as estradiol or diethylstilbestrol with a very low affinity. To specify the structural features of the ligands involved in the decrease of ligand affinity upon modification of the estrogen receptor, we determined the relative affinity constants of 17 steroidal estrogens or antiestrogens (deriving from estradiol by a 7 alpha- or 11 beta-substitution) and 14 nonsteroidal estrogens or antiestrogens (all including the 1,2-trans-diphenylethylene structure of diethylstilbestrol) for native and diethylpyrocarbonate-modified estrogen receptors. Then the ratio of the relative affinity constant for the native receptor to that for the modified receptor (rho) was calculated for each ligand, to compare the variation in the affinity of the ligand upon modification of the receptor to that of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (rho = 1). The results showed that the strong decrease of ligand affinity upon modification of the receptor displayed by classical estrogens (rho greater than or equal to 200) is strictly dependent on the presence of the 17 beta-hydroxyl group in steroidal compounds or its alpha-4- and beta-4-counterparts in diethylstilbestrol-related compounds. However, for the 7 alpha- or 11 beta-derivatives of estradiol displaying potent antiestrogenic properties, the relative decrease in affinity was much more limited (rho less than or equal to 19). For 11 beta-derivatives displaying a relative estrogenic activity weaker than that of estradiol itself, an average decrease in affinity was observed (23 less than or equal to rho less than or equal to 62). With the diethylstilbestrol-related compounds, bearing or not the alpha-4-hydroxyl and/or the beta-4-hydroxy functions and showing either weak relative estrogenic or antiestrogenic properties, the relative variation in affinity was weak (0.6 less than or equal to rho less than or equal to 24). These results indicate that the interaction of 7 alpha- or 11 beta-substituted steroidal antiestrogens and of 1,2-trans-diphenylethylene or triphenylethylene derivatives, displaying either weak relative estrogenic or antiestrogenic properties with the receptor, differs at the 17 beta-hydroxy or at the alpha-4-/beta-4-hydroxy functions from that of potent estrogens. They suggest that the strong decrease in the relative affinity of ligands upon receptor modification may reflect the high efficiency of the ligands to activate the receptor properly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)