Androgen receptor in sexual differentiation

Androgen Receptor Signaling in Bladder Cancer

Emerging preclinical findings have indicated that steroid hormone receptor signaling plays an important role in bladder cancer outgrowth. In particular, androgen-mediated androgen receptor signals have been shown to correlate with the promotion of tumor development and progression, which may clearly explain some sex-specific differences in bladder cancer. This review summarizes and discusses the available data, suggesting the involvement of androgens and/or the androgen receptor pathways in urothelial carcinogenesis as well as tumor growth. While the precise mechanisms of the functions of the androgen receptor in urothelial cells remain far from being fully understood, current evidence may offer chemopreventive or therapeutic options, using androgen deprivation therapy, in patients with bladder cancer.

Photoperiod-dependent capability of androgen aromatization and the role of estrogens in the bank vole testis visualized by means of immunohistochemistry

Detection of steroid hormone receptors within a target tissue is important for an understanding of their crucial role in regulating of steroids' action. In the light of recent knowledge on the role of estrogens in male gonads the efforts were undertaken to clarify and discuss a role of androgen receptors, aromatase and estrogen receptors (ER) in mediating testosterone and/or estradiol action in testicular cells of bank voles that were kept under short or long light cycles. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraplast embedded sections of the bank vole testes. First, androgen receptors were immunolocalized in testicular somatic cells while germ cell did not express any immunoreaction. Moreover, the ability to convert androgens to estrogens by various testicular cells was documented; aromatase immunoexpression was found in testis sections, not only in Leydig cells and Sertoli cells but also in germ cells. Finally, the expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) was observed in Leydig cells whereas the presence of estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) was detected in Sertoli and germ cells, namely spermatocytes and spermatids. The cellular distribution of androgen receptors appeared to be light -and age-dependent in adults; immunoexpression of aromatase and ERbeta was found to be both age -and photoperiod-dependent in germ cells.

Immunolocalization of androgen receptors in testicular cells during postnatal development of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus, S.)

Determination of the cellular distribution of the androgen receptors within the testis is of great importance for an understanding of their essential role in mediating of androgen action in the male gonad. In bank voles, which are seasonally breeding rodents, photoperiod is one of the most important factors inducing profound changes in the morphology and hormonal activity of the testes. Immunolocalization of androgen receptors was found in all somatic cells such as Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, and peritubular-myoid cells, however, distribution of the androgen receptors in various cell types depended on age of animals. Intensity of immunoreactivity was noticed as age and photoperiod-dependent. Males reared under different light regimes showed a significant correlation between the length of light and sexual maturation. Therefore, morphology of the testis from young and adult bank voles was also presented.

Immunocytochemical demonstration of androgen receptors in Leydig cells of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus, Schreber): an in vitro study

Androgen receptors of the bank vole Leydig cells in vitro were immunostained using a polyclonal antibody against androgen receptors followed by streptavidine-peroxidase complex or rhodamine-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG visualization. The immunocytochemical studies revealed localization of androgen receptors in the whole cytoplasm or in the perinuclear area of the cells. Addition of dehydroepiandrosterone into the culture medium resulted in nuclear localization of the androgen receptors. Long (18L : 6D) and short (6L : 18D) photoperiods as well as the age of animals were taken into account. The concentration of androgen receptors was changed dependent on age and status of reproduction.

Up-regulation of the levels of androgen receptor and its mRNA by androgens in smooth-muscle cells from rat penis

Smooth-muscle cells cultured from the penis of sexually immature (I-PSMC) and adult (A-PSMC) rats express similar high levels of the androgen receptor (AR) mRNA. This contrasts with the marked in vivo decline of both AR mRNA and androgen binding in the penile smooth muscle of adult rats, which appears to be responsible for the cessation of androgen-dependent penile growth upon sexual maturation. PSMC is therefore a good model to study putative down-regulators of AR expression as a function of cell proliferation in the smooth muscle of androgen-responsive vascular tissue. In order to determine whether AR protein levels in PSMC correlate with AR mRNA levels, the immunocytochemical detection of ARs and their androgen binding capacity were compared between I- and A-PSMC. The number of ARs and their protein half-lives suggested similar levels of translation of the AR mRNA in both cell lines. The effect of the synthetic analog methyltrienolone (R-1881) on androgen binding was studied in contact-inhibited androgen-deprived PSMC. In contrast to the postulated role of androgens as down-regulators of AR expression in rat penis, ARs were up-regulated in A-PSMC by R-1881. Contact inhibition of A-PSMC combined with serum depletion and androgen deprivation down-regulated AR mRNA levels, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) counteracted this effect. These results suggest that the loss in A-PSMC of the age-dependent down-regulation of ARs observed in vivo in adult corpora cavernosa smooth muscle is related to the in vitro resumption of cell proliferation and that DHT acts directly on the penile smooth muscle as a positive modulator of AR levels.

Isoelectric focusing and 2D electrophoresis of the human androgen receptor

Nuclear androgen receptors from cultured genital skin fibroblasts were analyzed by non-denaturing isoelectric focusing (IEF) in ultrathin polyacrylamide gels before and after photoaffinity labeling with [3H]methyltrienolone. Both reversibly and covalently labeled receptors focused at pH 5.28 +/- 0.20 when extracted from nuclei with high salt. Lowering of the salt concentration yielded, in both cases, a second species which focused at pH 7.16. This species became predominant when nuclei were sonicated in IEF sample buffer containing no salt, even after extensive nucleic acid digestion. Low salt cytosols from both prostate and foreskin focused as a single peak of pI: 4.93 +/- 0.31 which remained unchanged when KCl was added to the cytosol up to a concentration of 0.6 M. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of photoaffinity labeled receptors revealed labeled proteins with Mw 90-95 kDa. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of photoaffinity labeled nuclear receptors, extracted in low or high salt, showed that the two isoforms (pI 5.28 and 7.16) contain the same steroid-binding subunit with Mw 90-95 kDa. Nuclear receptors from 4 patients with the receptor positive form of the Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS, Rc+) were analyzed by non-denaturing IEF: a single species was observed, focusing at pH 6.0 whether in high or low salt conditions. These results indicate that the nuclear androgen receptor is an acidic protein with pI 5.28 and Mw 90-95 kDa under maximum protein dissociation conditions. When extracted under low salt conditions, it can be isolated in a neutral form (pI 7.16) suggesting its association with a nuclear protein. Receptors of (CAIS, Rc+) patients have an abnormal charge and show no pI shift upon lowering of the salt concentration suggesting that this shift could be a significant step in the mechanism of action of androgens.

Location of androgen receptor in human skin

The distribution of androgen receptor (AR) in human skin was studied by an immunohistochemical method using a polyclonal antibody against the human AR. Skin samples of preputial skin and male and female nongenital skin were examined. The possible correlation of AR location to acne was studied in skin biopsies from skin areas affected or unaffected by acne. In preputial skin, AR was expressed in epidermal cells as well as in fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells of blood vessels in the dermal area. AR was found located also in the flat fibroblast-like cells of Pacinian corpuscles. In nongenital skin, AR was also expressed in the basal cells and glandular cells of sebaceous glands, in the outer root sheath of hair follicles, and in eccrine sweat glands. The presence of AR in different cell types in the skin reflects the numerous direct effects androgens may have on this target tissue. The distribution of AR was similar in male and female skin.

The 56 kDa androgen-binding protein in human genital skin fibroblasts: its relation to the human androgen receptor

We have recently described in genital skin fibroblasts (GSF) a relatively abundant 56 kDa protein with androgen-binding activity. This protein is missing in GSF of most patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAI). The protein has many characteristics compatible with the androgen receptor; it has in fact been tentatively considered as a precursor or degradation form of the prototypic (approximately 100 kDa) human androgen receptor. We have prepared an antiserum to this protein, which allowed us to detect it as a direct product by in vitro translation of mRNA from GSF. It is thus very unlikely to be a degradation product of a larger precursor. Furthermore, covalent photolytic labeling of this protein with the androgen analogue [3H]mibolerone revealed a much lower affinity for this protein than is known for the androgen receptor. Finally, the GSF of two exceptional patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome due to negligible androgen receptor-binding activity express this protein normally, as determined on two-dimensional gels by Western blot analysis with the antiserum and by photolytic covalent labeling with androgen analogues. These data indicate that the protein is not a precursor or a degradation product of the receptor; nor is it androgen-induced. They are more compatible with the idea that the protein is another member of the steroid/thyroid/retinoic acid receptor supergene family, perhaps as an unorthodox product of the human androgen receptor gene.