The use of reciprocating peritoneal dialysis with a subcutaneous peritoneal catheter in end-stage renal failure in diabetes mellitus

Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis: principles and applications

Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD) is a technique of renal replacement therapy (RRT) dating back to the 1960s. Its essential features are a fixed intraperitoneal volume and rapid, continuous movement of dialysis solution into and out of the peritoneal cavity. Inlet and outlet catheters and a means of generating a large volume of sterile dialysate are required. External regeneration of dialysate via conventional hemodialysis (HD) equipment or sorbent technology mitigates the need for large volumes of sterile fluid and makes the technique feasible. Clearance depends on the peritoneal mass transfer coefficient, rate of dialysate flow, and efficiency of external regeneration. Studies to date all demonstrate small solute clearances three to eight times greater than conventional automated peritoneal dialysis (PD). Catheter design is crucial to the clinical success of the technique and will be discussed. Potential applications include daily home dialysis, treatment of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit (ICU), and ultrafiltration of ascites. Clinical experience with the latter will be presented in detail.

Clinical experience with continuous flow and flow-through peritoneal dialysis

Concern over the inherent inefficiency of solute removal by conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) has led to renewed interest in continuous flow PD (CFPD). We present clinical data from two experiences with CFPD. In the first, two catheters were used to recirculate a fixed intraperitoneal volume through an external circuit comprised of a standard hemodialysis system. The second patient had a dual-lumen PD catheter and was studied during two sessions of flow-through PD (FTPD) using sterile PD solution. Urea clearances with both techniques were around 30 ml/min, which is consistent with data reported in the literature. Significant streaming of dialysate from port to port within the peritoneal cavity limited clearances. CFPD offers a potentially safe and effective alternative to daily or nightly home hemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: tissue penetration and surface exposure

Both theory and clinical studies demonstrate that drug concentrations in the peritoneal cavity can greatly exceed concentrations in the plasma following intraperitoneal administration. This regional advantage has been associated with clinical activity, including surgically documented complete responses in ovarian cancer patients with persistent or recurrent disease following systemic therapy, and has produced a survival advantage in a recent phase III trial. Two pharmacokinetic problems appear to limit the effectiveness of intraperitoneal therapy: poor tumor penetration by the drug and incomplete irrigation of serosal surfaces by the drug-containing solution. We have examined these problems in the context of a very simple, spatially distributed model. If D is the diffusivity of the drug in a tissue adjacent to the peritoneal cavity and k is the rate constant for removal of the drug from the tissue by capillary blood, the model predicts that (for slowly reacting drugs) the characteristic penetration distance is (D/k)1/2 and the apparent permeability of the surface of a peritoneal structure is (Dk)1/2. The permeability-area product used in classical pharmacokinetic calculations for the peritoneal cavity as a whole is the sum of the products of the tissue-specific permeabilities and the relevant superficial surface areas. Since the model is mechanistic, it provides insight into the expected effect of procedures such as pharmacologic manipulation or physical mixing. We observe that large changes in tissue penetration may be difficult to achieve but that we have very little information on the transport characteristics within tumors in this setting or their response to vasoactive drugs. Enhanced mixing is likely to offer significant potential for improved therapy; however, procedures easily applicable to the clinical setting have not been adequately investigated and should be given high priority. Clinical studies indicate that an increase in irrigated area may be achieved in many patients by individualizing the dialysate volume and consideration of patient position.