Askenazi J, Alexander JH, Koenigsberg DI, Belic N, Lesch M. Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing.
Am J Cardiol 1984;
53:99-104. [PMID:
6691284 DOI:
10.1016/0002-9149(84)90691-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The effects of atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing-induced left bundle branch block (LBBB) on left ventricular (LV) performance were evaluated during cardiac catheterization in 9 randomly selected patients being investigated for chest pain. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm with a normal P-R interval and QRS duration. LV performance was assessed by both hemodynamic and angiographic measurements. The maximal rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt), rate of maximal LV pressure decrease (-dP/dt), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), stroke volume and percent ejection (EF) were measured during right atrial and AV sequential pacing at a constant pacing rate. The average pacing rate was 97 +/- 3 beats/min (mean +/- standard error of the mean). In each patient, both dP/dt and -dP/dt decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) during AV sequential pacing compared with atrial pacing at the same rate, from 1,541 +/- 68 to 1,319 +/- 56 mm Hg/s for dP/dt and from 1,506 +/- 86 to 1,276 +/- 92 for -dP/dt. LVEDP did not change significantly when atrial (17 +/- 3 mm Hg) and AV sequential pacing (16 +/- 2 mm Hg) were compared. Mean LVEDV did not change during atrial (135 +/- 13 ml) or AV sequential pacing (137 +/- 14 ml). In contrast, the LVESV during AV sequential pacing was higher by 15 ml (23%) (from 48 +/- 10 to 63 +/- 12 ml) (p less than 0.001); as a result, the stroke volume was lower by 13 ml (15%) and the EF decreased by 10%, from 66 to 56% (-15%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse