Vacuolar myositis with expression of both MHC class I and class II antigens on skeletal muscle fibers

The pattern of MHC class I expression in muscle biopsies from patients with myositis and other neuromuscular disorders

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic muscle biopsies are routinely immunostained for major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) protein. In this study we analysed the prevalence and patterns of MHC-I immunostaining in biopsies from patients with different types of myopathies and neurogenic disorders.

METHODS

All 357 diagnostic muscle biopsies processed at the Johns Hopkins Neuromuscular Pathology Laboratory from August 2013 to January 2017 were immunostained for MHC-I. The prevalence and patterns of MHC-I immunostaining were compared between patients with histologically normal muscle biopsies (n = 31), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs; n = 170), non-inflammatory myopathies (n = 60) and neurogenic disorders (n = 96).

RESULTS

MHC-I immunostaining was abnormal in most patients with DM (98%), sporadic IBM (sIBM; 100%), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM; 100%) and polymyositis (77%). In contrast, MHC-I immunostaining was less frequently present in non-inflammatory myopathies (32%) or neurogenic disorders (30%). Overall, abnormal MHC-I immunostaining had a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.82 for diagnosing IIMs. A focal MHC-I staining pattern was associated with IMNM, whereas a global pattern was more prevalent in sIBM and a perifascicular pattern was significantly more common in dermatomyositis. Among 18 DM biopsies without perifascicular atrophy, 50% had a perifascicular MHC-I staining pattern. Sarcoplasmic upregulation staining was more common than sarcolemmal staining across all groups.

CONCLUSION

MHC-I immunostaining was useful to distinguish IIMs from non-inflammatory myopathies or neurogenic disorders. Of note, a perifascicular MHC-I staining pattern was present only in those with DM, including half of those without perifascicular atrophy; many of these biopsies may not otherwise have been diagnostic for DM.

Role of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules in autoimmune myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent work has continued to clarify the role of major histocompatibility complex class I in the pathogenesis of autoimmune myositis. In the past year, several new observations have been made in this area. This review describes these findings and discusses their relevance to the pathogenesis of autoimmune myositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed earlier observations of the up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens in myositis. In particular, a recent study has strengthened the conclusion that major histocompatibility complex class I expression is highly specific to inflammatory myopathies and may be of diagnostic value. Two new studies have indicated that endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathway (the endoplasmic reticulum overload [NF-kB] and unfolded protein response [GRP78]) are highly activated in patients with myositis. One study using transgenic mice has further indicated that abnormal accumulation of major histocompatibility complex class I in the endoplasmic reticulum of muscle may be responsible for the initiation of this endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Furthermore, studies of normal muscle cells have shown that endoplasmic reticulum stress also plays an important role in skeletal muscle development. Investigations of autoantigen expression in myositis biopsies have revealed that regenerating muscle cells express high levels of autoantigens and major histocompatibility complex class I, indicating that these cells are the targets of cytotoxic T-cell attack and may participate in the initiation of a myositis-specific autoimmune response.

SUMMARY

Defining the role of major histocompatibility complex class I in autoimmune myositis may be useful not only for diagnosis of this group of diseases but also for therapeutic opportunities for these difficult disorders.

Skeletal muscle fibers express major histocompatibility complex class II antigens independently of inflammatory infiltrates in inflammatory myopathies

The aim of our study was to address the question of whether muscle fibers express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II in inflammatory myopathies. For this purpose we performed a systematic study of MHC class II antigen expression on muscle fiber membranes in muscle tissue from polymyositis and dermatomyositis patients in various stages of disease activity. Thirty-two patients with classical clinical signs of myositis were divided into subgroups depending on duration of clinical signs of myositis and presence or absence of inflammatory infiltrates in muscle tissue. Immunohistochemistry as well as double-immunofluorescence stainings were used to identify the presence of MHC class II in muscle tissue. MHC class I was included for comparison. Quantification of positive staining was performed using an image analysis system in addition to evaluation by manual microscopic scoring and laser confocal microscopy. It was demonstrated that a significant proportion of skeletal muscle fibers in inflammatory myopathies express MHC class II as well as MHC class I and that MHC antigen expression is independent of the inflammatory cell infiltration. Furthermore, there were no differences in staining pattern between polymyositis and dermatomyositis patients. Our results indicate that MHC class II and MHC class I molecules may be involved in initiating and maintaining the pathological condition in myositis rather than only being a consequence of a preceding local inflammation.

Immunological capabilities of skeletal muscle cells

Muscle is the target of immunological injury in several muscle diseases. It is important therefore to understand the immunological capabilities of muscle cells themselves. Although it is conventional to discuss the effects of the immune system on other cells, tissues or organs, the system's boundaries cannot be sharply drawn, and in an increasing number of ways, the immunological capabilities of non-immune tissues are recognized as determining the course of immune-inflammatory processes. Muscle cells have an inherent ability to express and respond to a variety of immunologically relevant surface molecules, cytokines, and chemokines under inflammatory conditions. The ability of muscle cells to process and present antigens to the immune cells is currently debated; thus, this review is aimed at examining the immunological capabilities of skeletal muscle cells in vitro and in vivo.

Major histocompatibility complex class II molecule expression on muscle cells is regulated by differentiation: implications for the immunopathogenesis of muscle autoimmune diseases

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules are expressed on myoblasts after interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) treatment, suggesting a muscle cell involvement in antigen presentation in inflammatory myopathies. However, they were not observed on normal or pathological myofibers. This discrepancy might be related to different responsiveness of developmentally differentiated muscle cells to IFN-gamma. Myoblasts expressed class II transcripts and proteins after IFN-gamma, while myotubes and innervated contracting muscle cells did not show staining for class II molecules. At all cell stages no loss of IFN-gamma receptor was detected indicating that myofiber maturation blocks their capacity to express MHC class II molecules. This suggests that completely differentiated myofibers cannot participate in class II restricted immunological reactions.

Immunohistochemical characteristics of polymyositis in patients with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy and HTLV-I carriers

The immunohistochemical characteristics of polymyositis in patients with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy (HAM) and HTLV-I carriers were studied. Infiltrating cells were predominantly T cells and were not different from in the control group. All specimens contained positively staining muscle fibers for MHC class I antigens, but class II antigens were also expressed in some muscle fibers in 1 patient with HTLV-I-negative polymyositis, 3 patients with HTLV-I-positive polymyositis, and all 5 HAM patients with polymyositis. Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule was lowest in the HAM patients. These findings may suggest a different immune environment in polymyositis with HAM.