Effect of long-term administration of an analog of growth hormone-releasing factor on the GH response in rats

Effect of chronic administration of a new potent agonist of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 on linear growth and GH responsiveness in rats

The effects of a repeated or continuous administration of a potent agonistic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH), [Dat1, Thr8, Orn12,21, Abu15, Nle27, Asp28, Agm29] hGH-RH(1-29)(JI-36), on the linear growth and the GH responses to bolus injections of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 were investigated in male rats about 7 weeks old. Body weight and tail length were monitored. Basal serum GH and IGF-I concentrations and GH responses to GH-RH(1-29)NH2 were measured by RIA. Chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 by continuous release from osmotic minipumps at the rate of 0.2 microgram/h or twice daily injections of 0.5 and 5 micrograms/rat for 4 weeks significantly speeded up the growth of rats as measured by the tail length. The acceleration of growth was similar in the 3 groups and was associated with stimulation of IGF-I secretion. The GH response to bolus injection of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 was preserved in all groups and no attentuation of the response occurred in rats treated for 4 weeks with agonist JI-36 as compared with the control group. Our results indicate that chronic administration of GH-RH agonist JI-36 significantly increases the growth rate without affecting somatotroph responsiveness in rats. It is therefore likely that this class of GH-RH agonists may be useful clinically.

Comparison of GH-stimulation by GH-RH(1-29)NH2 and an agmatine29 GH-RH analog, after intravenous, subcutaneous and intranasal administration and after pulmonary inhalation in rats

Many studies have shown that human GH-RH(1-29)NH2 possesses full intrinsic activity of GH-RH(1-44)NH2 in vitro and in vivo. This investigation was performed to evaluate the efficacy of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 given by different routes of administration in stimulating GH release in rats. In each case GH-RH(1-29)NH2 was administered intravenously, subcutaneously, intranasally and by pulmonary inhalation at two different doses to groups of seven males rats. At a dose of 150 micrograms/kg GH-RH(1-29)NH2, the magnitude of GH response was significantly higher for the pulmonary inhalation group (355 +/- 33.2 ng GH/mL) than for the subcutaneous group (246 +/- 36 ng GH/mL) or for the intranasal group (175 +/- 30 ng GH/mL). The group injected intravenously with GH-RH(1-29)NH2 at a dose of 2.5 micrograms/kg showed the highest response, GH levels reaching 877.2 +/- 115 ng/mL. A similar pattern of responses was obtained for the superactive GH-RH(1-29) agmatine29 analog, MZ-3-149, at doses that were 50 times lower. Our results indicate a high bioavailability of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 or analog MZ-3-149 administered by a convenient pulmonary inhalation route. The GH-releasing effect of GH-RH(1-29)NH2 or analog MZ-3-149 delivered by pulmonary inhalation is superior to subcutaneous and intranasal administration.

Effect of hypothalamic administration of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) on feeding behavior in rats

To examine the role and working site of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) in feeding behavior, we first tested the effect of the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of GRF on food intake after 24 h of food deprivation. Cumulative food intake was measured 1, 3 and 6 h after injection. A lower dose of GRF stimulated food intake in a dose dependent manner (3 h; GRF 100 pmol 8.64 +/- 1.06 g vs saline 5.50 +/- 0.60 g, P less than 0.05), while a higher dose (1 nmol, 500 pmol) suppressed food intake (3 h; GRF 1 nmol 2.65 +/- 0.70 g vs saline 5.50 +/- 0.60 g, P less than 0.01). Second, the effect of i.c.v. injection of 100 pmol of GRF on peripheral metabolites was examined. The subsequent levels of plasma insulin, glucagon, glucose and non-esterified fatty acid showed no significant difference from those of saline administration. Third, the effect of microinjection of GRF (5 pmol) into several hypothalamic areas on food intake was examined. Injection into the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMN) stimulated food intake (3 h; GRF 5 pmol 10.32 +/- 1.04 g vs saline 6.92 +/- 0.32 g, P less than 0.05), but no significant effect was observed following injection either into the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or medial preoptic area (MPOA). Finally, we tested the stimulatory effect of GRF on food intake in bilateral VMN lesioned rats. I.c.v. injection in these animals had no more significant effect on food intake than did saline injection in VMN lesioned rats (3 h; GRF 100 pmol 6.27 +/- 0.87 g vs saline 5.34 +/- 0.44 g).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

An evaluation of intravenous, subcutaneous, and in vitro activity of new agmatine analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone hGH-RH (1-29)NH2

The effects of new Agmatine (Agm) analogs of human growth hormone-releasing hormone (GH-RH) were compared to GH-RH (1-29)NH2 and to (D-Ala2)GH-RH(1-29)NH2 after intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration to pentobarbital-anesthetised male rats and in vitro using superfused rat pituitary cell system. After IV administration, the analogs: (D-MeAla2,Nle27)GH-RH(1-28)Agm(JG-75), (desamino-Tyr1,D-Ala2,Nle27)GH-RH(1-28)Agm(JG-77), (D-Ala2,Nle27)GH-RH(1-28)Agm(JG-73) and (D-Ala2)GH-RH(1-29)NH2 showed a potency 2.6-3.9 times greater than GH-RH(1-29)NH2 at 5 min and 1.6-2.7 times higher at 15 min. After SC administration these analogs were 30-74 times more potent than GH-RH(1-29)NH2. The ratio between the IV and SC GH-releasing activity of the analogs ranged from 2 to 5, while GH-RH(1-29)NH2 was about 50 times more active IV than SC. This indicates that 20-50% of the analogs can be absorbed from SC tissues, but only 2% of GH-RH(1-29)NH2. The in vitro activity of the agmatine analogs on GH release closely paralleled their IV potency and was 2.8-3.9 times greater than that of GH-RH(1-29)NH2. No significant difference in potency was found between (D-Ala2)GH-RH(1-29)NH2 and JG-75 after IV administration and in vitro, although JG-75 contained only 28 amino acids. We conclude that the reason for the large discrepancies between the previously reported activities of (D-Ala2)GH-RH(1-29)NH2 was simply due to the different ways of administration of this analog, SC vs IV, and not to species specificity. The replacement of Arg29 by Agmatine in (D-Ala2,Nle27)GH-RH(1-29)NH2 causes a 3 fold increase in SC potency, but the replacement of D-Ala2 with D-MeAla2 reduces the SC, but not the IV and in vitro activity in half.