Pituitary and brain D2 receptor density measured in vitro and in vivo in EEDQ treated male rats

The intrinsic activity of (-)-3-PPP vis-à-vis prolactin-suppressing dopamine D2 receptors in transfected GH4C1 cells is dependent on which secretagogue that is used to provoke prolactin release

The abilities of dopamine (DA) and the partial DA D2 receptor agonist (-)-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine, (-)-3-PPP, to suppress prolactin (PRL) release induced by any of five different PRL secretagogues in GH4C1 cells transfected with the human D2 receptor (short isoform) were investigated. Whereas DA reduced the response to all five secretagogues. (-)-3-PPP reduced the response to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), but not to high medium potassium (K+) or to the potassium channel antagonist tetraethylammonium (TEA). (-)-3-PPP tended to reduce the PRL release induced by the Ca2+ channel agonist BAY K-8644 (BAY); however, this effect of the partial agonist was modest and not significant. Whereas the effects of both DA and (-)-3-PPP on the PRL response to VIP and TRH were counteracted by co-incubation with the D2 antagonist raclopride, the effects of DA on the PRL response to K+, BAY, and TEA were antagonized by co-incubation with either raclopride or (-)-3-PPP. The results show that, at a given receptor density, the intrinsic activity of a partial D2 agonist with respect to D2-mediated suppression of PRL release may vary from agonism to antagonism depending on which intracellular transduction systems that are being concomitantly activated.

An autoradiographic study of the differential effects of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) on striatal and extrastriatal D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors in the rat

The effect of in vivo administration of the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) on striatal and extrastriatal D-1 and D-2 dopamine (DA) receptors was investigated in the rat. N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline treatment reduced specific [3H]SCH 23390 (7-chloro-8-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzaze pin e) binding to D-1 DA receptors in the striatum (42-46% of saline-treated controls), entopeduncular nucleus (20%) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (23%). Similarly, specific [3H]spiperone binding to D-2 DA receptors was decreased in the striatum (28-37% of saline-treated controls). However, [3H]spiperone binding in the substantia nigra pars compacta (67%) was much less affected. In vivo pretreatment with the D-1 DA antagonist SCH 23390 selectively and dose dependently protected [3H]SCH 23390 binding against the effects of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline in the striatal/extrastriatal regions. Pretreatment with the D-2 DA antagonist raclopride or the D-2 DA agonist quinpirole selectively protected [3H]spiperone binding. In contrast, pretreatment with the D-1 DA agonist SKF 38393 (7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) not only protected [3H]-SCH 23390 binding but at very high doses protected striatal [3H]spiperone binding. The differential alkylating effects of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline on striatal vs extrastriatal D-1 and D-2 DA receptors may be related to their post- (striatal DA receptors) and pre-synaptic (extrastriatal DA receptors) localizations, respectively. The present results further demonstrate that in vivo, SCH 23390 and raclopride/quinpirole retain their D-1 and D-2 DA receptor selectivity.

A high dose of EEDQ reduces pituitary dopamine D2 receptor density and the prolactin suppressive potency of agonists

In male rats, a high dose of the alkylating compound N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ, 30 mg/kg s.c., 24 h) caused a reduction of pituitary dopamine D2 receptor density by 27% as measured by means of in vivo radioligand binding (using a single dose of the ligand [3H]spiperone). The same dose of EEDQ reduced the potency, but not the maximal response, of the dopamine D2 receptor agonists R-(-)-N-n-propylnorapomorphine (NPA), (+)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine ((+)-3-PPP), and 6-allyl-2-amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-thiazolo[4,5]azepine (B-HT 920) with respect to suppression of prolactin release after pretreatment with gamma-butyrolactone. The measured reduction in dopamine D2 receptor density after EEDQ was of the same magnitude as the reduction in receptor number predicted from the EEDQ induced shift in the dose-response curve of the full dopamine D2 receptor agonist NPA. The findings are discussed in relation to our previous observation that a somewhat lower dose of EEDQ (20 mg/kg s.c., 24 h) effectively reduces the efficacy of partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists while affecting neither the prolactin response to full dopamine D2 receptor agonists nor the density of pituitary dopamine D2 receptors.

Partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists antagonize prolactin-regulating D2 receptors in a transfected clonal cell line (GH4ZR7)

(-)-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine ((-)-3-PPP) and transdihydrolisuride (terguride, TDHL) are partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists displaying low intrinsic activity at normosensitive postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptors in brain while activating prolactin-regulating dopamine D2 receptors in male rats with an efficacy close to that of full dopamine D2 receptor agonists. In the present study we examined the effects of these partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists on prolactin release in vitro. For this purpose prolactin-producing tumour cells which have been transfected with the dopamine D2 receptor cDNA and hence which express a dopamine D2 receptor (short isoform) that is functionally active with respect to inhibition of adenylate cyclase and prolactin release (GH4ZR7; Albert et al., J. Biol. Chem. (1990) 265, 2098) were used. While the full dopamine D2 receptor agonists, quinpirole, (+)-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine ((+)-3-PPP) and dopamine induced a dose-dependent suppression of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-induced prolactin release from GH4ZR7, both (-)-3-PPP and terguride were inactive. Furthermore, the prolactin-suppressive effects of dopamine and quinpirole were significantly antagonized by pretreatment with (-)-3-PPP and terguride. It is concluded that partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists, which activate male lactotroph dopamine D2 receptors in vivo, may antagonize dopamine D2 receptors on GH4ZR7 cells. There were similar results from an experiment using monolayers of anterior pituitary cells from male rats. Thus, in this in vitro preparation (+)-3-PPP suppressed spontaneous prolactin release while (-)-3-PPP again was inactive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline on the prolactin suppression induced by a series of full and partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists in male rats

The effect of pretreatment with a high dose of the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) (20 mg/kg, 24 h) on the intrinsic activity displayed by a series of full and partial dopamine D2 receptor agonists on prolactin regulating pituitary D2 receptors in male rats was studied. To increase baseline prolactin levels, gamma-butyrolactone in a dose inhibiting brain dopamine neurotransmission was given to all animals. In controls, i.e. rats not given EEDQ, supramaximal doses of all full and partial D2 receptor agonists tested decreased serum prolactin levels with greater than 80%. While the intrinsic activities of the dopamine precursor 1-DOPA and of the full agonists (+)-3-PPP, 5-OH-DPAT, B-HT 920 (talipexole), apomorphine, and NPA (R-(-)-N-n-propylnorapomorphine) were not affected by pretreatment with EEDQ, the effects of supramaximal doses of the partial agonists (-)-HW-165, TDHL (terguride), SDZ208-911, (-)-3-PP) (preclamol), and SDZ 208-912 were reduced to 66%, 74%, 59%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The effect of EEDQ on the intrinsic activity displayed by the various agonists corresponds inversely to the intrinsic efficacy displayed by the drugs in other models of D2 receptor function with one exception only; thus, the prolactin suppressive effect of (-)-3-PPP was more effectively antagonized by EEDQ than would have been predicted from the intrinsic efficacy usually attributed to the drug. Since the dose of EEDQ used in the present study has previously been shown not to decrease D2 receptor density in the pituitary as measured using in vivo radioligand binding, it is suggested that alkylation of D2 receptors may change the conformation of the individual receptor complexes in a way that decreases the responsiveness to partial but not full agonists.