Competitive exclusion between axons dependent on a single trophic substance: a mathematical analysis

Terminal Schwann cell and vacant site mediated synapse elimination at developing neuromuscular junctions

Synapses undergo transition from polyinnervation by multiple axons to single innervation a few weeks after birth. Synaptic activity of axons and interaxonal competition are thought to drive this developmental synapse elimination and tested as key parameters in quantitative models for further understanding. Recent studies of muscle synapses (endplates) show that there are also terminal Schwann cells (tSCs), glial cells associated with motor neurons and their functions, and vacant sites (or vacancies) devoid of tSCs and axons proposing tSCs as key effectors of synapse elimination. However, there is no quantitative model that considers roles of tSCs including vacancies. Here we develop a stochastic model of tSC and vacancy mediated synapse elimination. It employs their areas on individual endplates quantified by electron microscopy-based analyses assuming that vacancies form randomly and are taken over by adjacent axons or tSCs. The model reliably reproduced synapse elimination whereas equal or random probability models, similar to classical interaxonal competition models, did not. Furthermore, the model showed that synapse elimination is accelerated by enhanced synaptic activity of one axon and also by increased areas of vacancies and tSCs suggesting that the areas are important structural correlates of the rate of synapse elimination.

Competition in neurite outgrowth and the development of nerve connections

During the development of the nervous system, neurons form their characteristic morphologies and become assembled into synaptically connected networks. In both neuronal morphogenesis and the development of nerve connections, competition plays an important role. Although the notion of competition is commonly used in neurobiology, there is little understanding of the nature of the competitive process and the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms. In this chapter, we review a model of competition between outgrowing neurites, as well as various models of competition that have been proposed for the refinement of connections that takes place in the development of the neuromuscular and visual systems. We describe in detail a model that links competition in the development of nerve connections with the underlying actions and biochemistry of neurotrophic factors.

Mathematical analysis of competition between sensory ganglion cells for neurotrophic factor in the skin

A model is presented of competition between sensory axons for trophic molecules (e.g. a neurotrophin such as NGF), produced in a region of skin small enough to permit their free diffusion throughout it; e.g., a touch dome, or a vibrissal follicle hair sinus. The variables specified are the number of high affinity trophic factor receptors per axon terminal and the concentration of trophic factor in the extracellular space. Previous models of this class predicted the loss of all the axons innervating the region except the one requiring least trophic factor for its maintenance, even with high rates of trophic factor production. In the present model, we have imposed upper limits to axonal growth, thereby introducing new equilibria, and we show by a global analysis using LaSalle's theorem, and also by local analysis, that several axons can then coexist if the rate of production of trophic molecules is sufficiently high.

Neuronal cell death, nerve growth factor and neurotrophic models: 50 years on

Viktor Hamburger has just died at the age of 100. It is 50 years since he and Rita Levi-Montalcini laid the foundations for the study of naturally occurring cell death and of neurotrophic factors in the nervous system. In a period of less than 10 years, from 1949 to 1958, Hamburger and Levi-Montalcini made the following seminal discoveries: that neuron cell death occurs in dorsal root ganglia, sympathetic ganglia and the cervical column of motoneurons; that the predictions arising from this observation, namely that survival is dependent on the supply of a trophic factor, could be substantiated by studying the effects of a sarcoma on the proliferation of ganglionic processes both in vivo and in vitro; and that the proliferation of these processes could be used as an assay system to isolate the factor. This work provides a short review mostly of the early history of this subject in the context of the Hamburger/Levi-Montalcini paradigm. This acts as an introduction to a consideration of models that have been proposed to account for how the different sources of growth factors provide for the survival of neurons during development. It is suggested that what has been called the 'social-control' model provides the most parsimonious quantitative description of the contribution of trophic factors to neuronal survival, a concept for which we are in debt to Viktor Hamburger and Rita Levi-Montalcini.

Development of nerve connections under the control of neurotrophic factors: parallels with consumer-resource systems in population biology

The development of connections between neurons and their target cells involves competition between axons for target-derived neurotrophic factors. Although the notion of competition is commonly used in neurobiology, the process is not well understood, and only a few formal models exist. In population biology, in contrast, the concept of competition is well developed and has been studied by means of many formal models of consumer-resource systems. Here we show that a recently formulated model of axonal competition can be rewritten as a general consumer-resource system. This allows neurobiological phenomena to be interpreted in population biological terms and, conversely, results from population biology to be applied to neurobiology. Using findings from population biology, we have studied two extensions of our axonal competition model. In the first extension, the spatial dimension of the target is explicitly taken into account. We show that distance between axons on their target mitigates competition and permits the coexistence of axons. The model can account for the fact that in many types of neurons a positive correlation exists between the size of the dendritic tree and the number of innervating axons surviving into adulthood. In the second extension, axons are allowed to respond to more than one neurotrophic factor. We show that this permits competitive exclusion among axons of one type, while at the same time there is coexistence with axons of another type innervating the same target. The model offers an explanation for the innervation pattern found on cerebellar Purkinje cells, where climbing fibres compete with each other until only a single one remains, which coexists with parallel fibre input to the same Purkinje cell.

Activity-driven synapse elimination leads paradoxically to domination by inactive neurons

In early postnatal life, multiple motor axons converge at individual neuromuscular junctions. However, during the first few weeks after birth, a competitive mechanism eliminates all the inputs but one. This phenomenon, known as synapse elimination, is thought to result from competition based on interaxonal differences in patterns or levels of activity (for review, see Lichtman,1995). Surprisingly, experimental data support two opposite views of the role of activity: that active axons have a competitive advantage (Ribchester and Taxt, 1983; Ridge and Betz, 1984; Balice-Gordon and Lichtman, 1994) and that inactive axons have a competitive advantage (Callaway et al., 1987, 1989). To understand this paradox, we have formulated a mathematical model of activity-mediated synapse elimination. We assume that the total amount of transmitter released, rather than the frequency of release, mediates synaptic competition. We further assume that the total synaptic area that a neuron can support is metabolically constrained by its activity level and size. This model resolves the paradox by showing that a competitive advantage of higher frequency axons early in development is overcome at later stages by greater synaptic efficacy of axons firing at a lower rate. This model both provides results consistent with experiments in which activity has been manipulated and an explanation for the origin of the size principle (Henneman, 1985).

Competition for neurotrophic factor in the development of nerve connections

The development of nerve connections is thought to involve competition among axons for survival promoting factors, or neurotrophins, which are released by the cells that are innervated by the axons. Although the notion of competition is widely used within neurobiology, there is little understanding of the nature of the competitive process and the underlying mechanisms. We present a new theoretical model to analyse competition in the development of nerve connections. According to the model, the precise manner in which neurotrophins regulate the growth of axons, in particular the growth of the amount of neurotrophin receptor, determines what patterns of target innervation can develop. The regulation of neurotrophin receptors is also involved in the degeneration and regeneration of connections. Competition in our model can be influenced by factors dependent on and independent of neuronal electrical activity. Our results point to the need to measure directly the specific form of the regulation by neurotrophins of their receptors.