1
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Gunshot residue (GSR) is a shred of important trace evidence which helps forensic scientists solve a huge range of incidents related to firearms. The identification of the shooter to bullet identification from a gunshot wound help reconstruct a scene of the crime.
Main body
The review of this scientific paper is based on gunshot residue, its composition, and the growing advanced technology which allow us to study about how GSR analysis help to identify and detect residues. Various methods are acquired to identify and analyze organic and inorganic residues present when ammunition is fired. The review highlights the composition of GSR, its collection methods, and analysis part which emphasize on all the methods developed so far. The use of conventional methods including colorimetric and instrumentation-based analysis and advanced technology including electrochemical technique for detecting residues from the last 50 years. Spot tests or chemical tests were performed but they degrade the sample and can sometimes cause hindrance with some other nearby material present at the crime scene. Instrumentation techniques including AAS, ICP-MS, SEM, SEM-EDX, GC, HPLC, etc. are discussed in detail. Mostly advanced electrochemical methods developed are for inorganic gunshot residues (IGSR), but some researchers worked on both residues. Also, the fabricated electrochemical cells are replaced by a single strip-based technique for easy detection. So, to combat these issues, various scientists are moving towards sensor-based methods for rapid and reliable detection. These methods are more user-friendly, sensitive, and cost-effective and provide rapid detection results.
Conclusions
This review results in the composition of GSR, its collection methods, and analysis using sophisticated methods that emphasize all the methods developed so far and it also culminates the merits and demerits of all detection methods.
Collapse
|
2
|
Trends in Gunshot Residue Detection by Electrochemical Methods for Forensic Purpose. JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s41664-020-00152-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
3
|
Chávez Reyes L, Elgueta López C, Briceño Barrios A, Garrido Soto C, Ibáñez C, Jamett Díaz F. Development and application of a new nose hairs sample collection device for GSR Particles by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). Forensic Sci Int 2018; 290:42-48. [PMID: 30015278 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
When a firearm is discharged, a gaseous cloud containing characteristic particles of gunshot residue (GSR) are released forward and behind at high speed, depositing on clothing, hands, face and hair, as well as being inhaled and therefore retained in the nostrils of the person who fired the weapon. GSRs have characteristic sizes and morphologies and consist of a combination of lead, antimony and barium, as well as other elements. Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) is a widely accepted technique for the analysis of these residues; however, little has been reported on samples taken from the nostrils of the suspect that discharged the shot. The analysis of residues found on hands has been more frequent. This article presents a device (Nasal Stub) developed by us for the non-invasive collection of GSR particles from the nostrils and a platform also developed by us to contain these devices that is compatible with SEM-EDS. To evaluate the effectiveness of our Nasal Stub to collect GSR particles from nose hairs, four types of firearms of different calibers were utilized. Nasal samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 20h after firing. The results show that the nasal device was able to recover GSR particles from nose hairs for all the weapons used, even, in some cases, over 20h after firing. It was concluded that Nasal Stub and its methodology proposed for the analysis of nasal GSR from nose hairs by SEM-EDS was effective and that it can complement other traditional analyses of GSR particles, increasing the amount of evidentiary support for the forensic analysis presented in a tribunal or court.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Chávez Reyes
- Laboratorio de Criminalística Regional La Serena (LACRIM), Policía de Investigaciones de Chile, Chile.
| | - César Elgueta López
- Laboratorio de Criminalística Regional La Serena (LACRIM), Policía de Investigaciones de Chile, Chile.
| | - Ana Briceño Barrios
- Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Chile.
| | - Carlos Garrido Soto
- Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Chile.
| | - Cristian Ibáñez
- Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Chile.
| | - Fabiola Jamett Díaz
- Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maitre M, Kirkbride K, Horder M, Roux C, Beavis A. Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A review. Forensic Sci Int 2017; 270:1-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Aliste M, Chávez LG. Analysis of gunshot residues as trace in nasal mucus by GFAAS. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 261:14-8. [PMID: 26874050 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
When a gun is fired, the majority of gunshot residues are deposited on the shooter's hands. But these residues disappear through contact with surfaces or washing. Therefore, the maximum time frame to find GSR on a suspect's hands is 8h. The mucus, inside of a nostril, forms a surface layer where they are trapped foreign particles. In this way, mucus inside of a gunshot suspect's nostrils could act like an adhesive medium to stick on it gaseous particles from a gunshot. In this study, the presence of GSR in nasal mucus and its residence time is examined. A new procedure for the sampling of possible gunshot residue accumulated in the nasal mucus is designed. Samples are taken with cotton swabs moistened with a solution of EDTA and, after an acid digestion, are analysed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. In addition, samples of hands are taken for comparison purposes. GSR recovery has been successful. The concentration of GSR in nasal mucus is found to be lower than on the hands, but with a longer residence time. Thus, it is possible to expand the sampling time of a suspect also, as nasal mucus cannot be contaminated by handling weapons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Aliste
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia E-30100, Spain.
| | - Luis Guillermo Chávez
- Policía de Investigaciones de Chile (PDI), Laboratorio de Criminalística Regional La Serena, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O’Mahony AM, Samek IA, Sattayasamitsathit S, Wang J. Orthogonal Identification of Gunshot Residue with Complementary Detection Principles of Voltammetry, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy: Sample, Screen, and Confirm. Anal Chem 2014; 86:8031-6. [DOI: 10.1021/ac5016112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife M. O’Mahony
- Department
of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
| | - Izabela A. Samek
- Department
of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
| | - Sirilak Sattayasamitsathit
- Department
of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
| | - Joseph Wang
- Department
of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Mahony AM, Wang J. Electrochemical Detection of Gunshot Residue for Forensic Analysis: A Review. ELECTROANAL 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/elan.201300054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
8
|
Bueno J, Sikirzhytski V, Lednev IK. Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Gunshot Residue Offering Great Potential for Caliber Differentiation. Anal Chem 2012; 84:4334-9. [DOI: 10.1021/ac203429x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Bueno
- Department
of Chemistry, University at Albany, SUNY, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222,
United States
| | - Vitali Sikirzhytski
- Department
of Chemistry, University at Albany, SUNY, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222,
United States
| | - Igor K. Lednev
- Department
of Chemistry, University at Albany, SUNY, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222,
United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Vuki M, Shiu KK, Galik M, O'Mahony AM, Wang J. Simultaneous electrochemical measurement of metal and organic propellant constituents of gunshot residues. Analyst 2012; 137:3265-70. [DOI: 10.1039/c2an35379b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
|
14
|
|
15
|
Espinoza EO, Thornton JI. Characterization of smokeless gunpowder by means of diphenylamine stabilizer and its nitrated derivatives. Anal Chim Acta 1994. [DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(94)85116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
16
|
Characterization of Smokeless Powder Flakes from Fired Cartridge Cases and from Discharge Patterns on Clothing. J Forensic Sci 1992. [DOI: 10.1520/jfs13289j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
17
|
Sample Collection, Preparation, and Quantitation in the Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary Electrophoresis of Gunshot Residues. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1992. [DOI: 10.1080/10826079208018849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
|