Failure of X-rays to mutate class II histocompatibility loci in Balb/c mouse spermatogonia

Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XI. The doubling dose estimates from the mid-1950s to the present and the conceptual change to the use of human data on spontaneous mutation rates and mouse data on induced mutation rates for doubling dose calculations

This paper provides an overview of the concept of doubling dose, changes in the database employed for calculating it over the past 30 years and recent advances in this area. The doubling dose is estimated as a ratio of the average rates of spontaneous and induced mutations in a defined set of genes. The reciprocal of the doubling dose is the relative mutation risk per unit dose and is one of the quantities used in estimating genetic risks of radiation exposures. Most of the doubling dose estimates used thus far have been based on mouse data on spontaneous and induced rates of mutations. Initially restricted to mutations in defined genes (with particular focus on the seven genes at which induced recessive mutations were studied in different laboratories), the doubling dose concept was subsequently expanded to include other endpoints of genetic damage. At least during the past 20 years, the magnitude of the doubling dose has remained unchanged at approximately 1 Gy for chronic low LET radiation exposures. One of the assumptions underlying the use of the doubling dose based on mouse data for predicting genetic risks in humans, namely, that the spontaneous rates of mutations in mouse and human genes are similar, is incorrect; this is because of the fact that, unlike in the mouse, the mutation rate in humans differs between the two sexes (being higher in males than in females) and increases with paternal age. Further, an additional source of uncertainty in spontaneous mutation rate estimates in mice has been uncovered. This is related to the non-inclusion of mutations which arise as germinal mosaics and which result in clusters of identical mutations in the following generation. In view of these reasons, it is suggested that a prudent way forward is to revert to the use of human data on spontaneous mutation rates and mouse data on induced mutation rates for doubling dose calculations as was first done in the 1972 BEIR report of the US National Academy of Sciences. The advantages of this procedure are the following: (i) estimates of spontaneous mutation rates in humans, which are usually presented as sex-averaged rates, automatically include sex differences and paternal age-effects; (ii) since human geneticists count all mutations that arise anew irrespective of whether they are part of a cluster or not, had clusters occurred, they would have been included in mutation rate calculations and (iii) one stays close to the aim of risk estimation, namely, estimation of the risk of genetic diseases in humans. On the basis of detailed analyses of the pertinent data, it is now estimated that the average spontaneous mutation rate of human genes (n=135 genes) is: (2.95+/-0.64)x10(-6) per gene and the average induced mutation rate of mouse genes (n=34) is: (0.36+/-0.10)x10(-5) per gene per Gy for chronic low LET radiation. The resultant doubling dose is (0.82+/-0.29) Gy. The standard error of the doubling dose estimate incorporates sampling variability across loci for estimates of spontaneous and induced mutation rates as well as variability in induced mutation rates in individual mouse experiments on radiation-induced mutations. We suggest the use of a rounded doubling dose value of 1 Gy for estimating genetic risks of radiation. Although this value is the same as that used previously, its conceptual basis is different and the present estimate is based on more extensive data than has so far been the case.

Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. X. The potential "disease phenotypes" of radiation-induced genetic damage in humans: perspectives from human molecular biology and radiation genetics

Estimates of genetic risks of radiation exposure of humans are traditionally expressed as expected increases in the frequencies of genetic diseases (single-gene, chromosomal and multifactorial) over and above those of naturally-occurring ones in the population. An important assumption in expressing risks in this manner is that gonadal radiation exposures can cause an increase in the frequency of mutations and that this would result in an increase in the frequency of genetic diseases under study. However, despite compelling evidence for radiation-induced mutations in experimental systems, no increases in the frequencies of genetic diseases of concern or other adverse effects (i.e., those which are not formally classified as genetic diseases), have been found in human studies involving parents who have sustained radiation exposures. The known differences between spontaneous mutations that underlie naturally-occurring single-gene diseases and radiation-induced mutations studied in experimental systems now permit us to address and resolve these issues to some extent. The fact that spontaneous mutations (among which are point mutations and DNA deletions generally restricted to the gene) originate through a number of different mechanisms and that the latter are intimately related to the DNA organization of the genes, are now well-documented. Further, spontaneous mutations include those that cause diseases through loss of function as well as gain of function of genes. In contrast, most radiation-induced mutations studied in experimental systems (although identified through the phenotypes of the marker genes) are predominantly multigene deletions which cause loss of function; the recoverability of an induced deletion in a livebirth seems dependent on whether the gene and the genomic region in which it is located can tolerate heterozygosity for the deletion and yet be compatible with viability. In retrospect, the successful mutation test systems (such as the mouse specific locus test) used in radiation studies have involved genes which are non-essential for survival and are also located in genomic regions, likewise non-essential for survival. In contrast, most of the human genes at which induced mutations have been looked for, do not seem to have these attributes. The inference therefore is that the failure to find induced germline mutations in humans is not due to the resistance of human genes to induced mutations but due to the structural and functional constraints associated with their recoverability in livebirths. Since the risk of inducible genetic diseases in humans is estimated using rates of "recovered" mutations in mice, there is a need to introduce appropriate correction factors to bridge the gap between these rates and the rates at which mutations causing diseases are potentially recoverable in humans. Since the whole genome is the "target" for radiation-induced genetic damage, the failure to find increases in the frequencies of specific single-gene diseases of societal concern does not imply that there are no genetic risks of radiation exposures: the problem lies in delineating the phenotypes of recoverable genetic damage that are recognizable in livebirths. Data from studies of naturally-occurring microdeletion syndromes in humans and those from mouse radiation studies are instructive in this regard. They (i) support the view that growth retardation, mental retardation and multisystem developmental abnormalities are likely to be among the quantitatively more important adverse effects of radiation-induced genetic damage than mutations in a few selected genes and (ii) underscore the need to expand the focus in risk estimation from known genetic diseases (as has been the case thus far) to include these induced adverse developmental effects although most of these are not formally classified as "genetic diseases". (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. II. Nature of radiation-induced mutations in experimental mammalian in vivo systems

This paper reviews data on the nature of spontaneous and radiation-induced mutations in the mouse. The data are from studies using a variety of endpoints scorable at the morphological or the biochemical level and include pre-selected as well as unselected loci at which mutations can lead to recessive or dominant phenotypes. The loci used in the morphological recessive specific-locus tests permit the recovery of a wide spectrum of induced changes. Important variables that affect the nature of radiation-induced mutations (assessed primarily using tests for viability of homozygotes) include: germ cell stage, type of irradiation and the locus. Most of the results pertain to irradiated stem cell spermatogonia. The data on morphological specific-locus mutations show that overall, more than two-thirds of the X- or gamma-ray-induced mutations are lethal when homozygous. This proportion may be lower for those that occur spontaneously, but the numbers of tested mutants are small. For spontaneous mutations, there is evidence for the occurrence of mosaics and for proviral insertions. Most or all tested induced enzyme activity variants, dominant visibles (recovered in specific-locus experiments) and dominant skeletal mutations are lethal when homozygous and this is true of 50% of dominant cataract mutations, but again, the numbers of tested mutants are small. Electrophoretic mobility variants, which are known to be due to base-pair changes, are seldom induced by irradiation. At the histocompatibility loci, no radiation-induced mutations have been recovered, presumably because deletions are incompatible with survival even in heterozygotes. All these findings are consistent with the view that in mouse germ cells, most radiation-induced mutations are DNA deletions. Some mutations (in the morphological specific-locus tests) which had previously been inferred to be deletions on the basis of genetic analyses have now been shown to be DNA deletions by molecular methods. However, the possibility cannot be excluded that at least a small proportion of induced mutations may be intragenic changes. The data on the rates of induction of recessive lethals and of dominant skeletal and dominant cataract mutations (and proportions of the latter two which are homozygous lethal) can be used to estimate the proportions of recessive lethals which are expressed as skeletal abnormalities or cataracts. These calculations show that about 10% of recessive lethals manifest themselves as skeletal and less than 0.2% as cataract mutations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Study of an H-2Kd mutant strain: C.B6-H-2dm4

A new H-2 mutant involving the H-2d haplotype is described--C.B6-H-2dm4 (dm4). This mutant strain carries a gain and loss mutation which maps to the Kd gene of the H-2 complex. Serological testing comparing the mutant and the parental BALB/cKh strain failed to detect any difference between the two strains and no antibodies could be produced, although a reciprocal mixed lymphocyte reaction was observed between mutant and parent.

Some comparisons between induced and spontaneous mutation rates in mouse sperm and spermatogonia

The induction of histocompatibility gene mutations in BALB/cKh mouse sperm was determined following doses of 0, 350, or 350 + 300 rad (24 h apart) of 250 kV X-rays. The mutation rate is significantly lower than predicted on the basis of the seven-locus test and is not significantly different from the very low rate of H-loci in BALB/cKh spermatogonia. Furthermore, selection and repair are important in determining mutation rates per viable progeny of H-loci during both spermatogenesis and gestation.