Microtubule dynamics determine chromosome lagging and transport of acentric fragments

Mechanisms driving acentric chromosome transmission

The kinetochore-microtubule association is a core, conserved event that drives chromosome transmission during mitosis. Failure to establish this association on even a single chromosome results in aneuploidy leading to cell death or the development of cancer. However, although many chromosomes lacking centromeres, termed acentrics, fail to segregate, studies in a number of systems reveal robust alternative mechanisms that can drive segregation and successful poleward transport of acentrics. In contrast to the canonical mechanism that relies on end-on microtubule attachments to kinetochores, mechanisms of acentric transmission largely fall into three categories: direct attachments to other chromosomes, kinetochore-independent lateral attachments to microtubules, and long-range tether-based attachments. Here, we review these "non-canonical" methods of acentric chromosome transmission. Just as the discovery and exploration of cell cycle checkpoints provided insight into both the origins of cancer and new therapies, identifying mechanisms and structures specifically involved in acentric segregation may have a significant impact on basic and applied cancer research.

The chromokinesin Klp3a and microtubules facilitate acentric chromosome segregation

Although chromosome fragments lacking a centromere would be expected to show severe defects in their segregation during anaphase, they do exhibit poleward movement by an unclear mechanism. Karg et al. now show how microtubules and the chromokinesin Klp3a can work together to successfully segregate chromosome fragments to daughter nuclei.

Although poleward segregation of acentric chromosomes is well documented, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that microtubules play a key role in poleward movement of acentric chromosome fragments generated in Drosophila melanogaster neuroblasts. Acentrics segregate with either telomeres leading or lagging in equal frequency and are preferentially associated with peripheral bundled microtubules. In addition, laser ablation studies demonstrate that segregating acentrics are mechanically associated with microtubules. Finally, we show that successful acentric segregation requires the chromokinesin Klp3a. Reduced Klp3a function results in disorganized interpolar microtubules and shortened spindles. Normally, acentric poleward segregation occurs at the periphery of the spindle in association with interpolar microtubules. In klp3a mutants, acentrics fail to localize and segregate along the peripheral interpolar microtubules and are abnormally positioned in the spindle interior. These studies demonstrate an unsuspected role for interpolar microtubules in driving acentric segregation.

Classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer

Abnormal chromosome segregation at mitosis is one way by which neoplastic cells accumulate the many genetic abnormalities required for tumour development. In this paper, a straightforward morphology-based classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer is suggested. This classification distinguishes between abnormalities in spindle symmetry (spindle multipolarity, size-asymmetry of ana-telophase poles) and abnormalities in sister chromatid segregation (chromosome bridges, chromatid bridges, chromosome lagging, acentric fragment lagging). Often, these categories of errors must be combined to accurately describe the events in a single abnormal mitotic cell. The suggested categories can to some extent be distinguished by standard chromatin staining. However, labelling of abnormal mitotic figures by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence enhances the accuracy of classification and also allows visualisation of the segregation of individual chromosomes, making it possible to detect non-disjunction also in the absence of gross alterations in mitotic morphology. Further characterisation of the molecular alterations leading to abnormal chromosome segregation together with the current developments in nano-level and real-time imaging will undoubtedly lead to an improved understanding of chromosome dynamics in cancer cells. Any morphology-based classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer must therefore be taken as provisional, anticipating a satisfactory integration of morphology and molecular biology.

Microtubule-associated proteins and their essential roles during mitosis

Microtubules play essential roles during mitosis, including chromosome capture, congression, and segregation. In addition, microtubules are also required for successful cytokinesis. At the heart of these processes is the ability of microtubules to do work, a property that derives from their intrinsic dynamic behavior. However, if microtubule dynamics were not properly regulated, it is certain that microtubules alone could not accomplish any of these tasks. In vivo, the regulation of microtubule dynamics is the responsibility of microtubule-associated proteins. Among these, we can distinguish several classes according to their function: (1) promotion and stabilization of microtubule polymerization, (2) destabilization or severance of microtubules, (3) functioning as linkers between various structures, or (4) motility-related functions. Here we discuss how the various properties of microtubule-associated proteins can be used to assemble an efficient mitotic apparatus capable of ensuring the bona fide transmission of the genetic information in animal cells.

The force for poleward chromosome motion in Haemanthus cells acts along the length of the chromosome during metaphase but only at the kinetochore during anaphase

The force for poleward chromosome motion during mitosis is thought to act, in all higher organisms, exclusively through the kinetochore. We have used time-lapse. video-enhanced, differential interference contrast light microscopy to determine the behavior of kinetochore-free "acentric" chromosome fragments and "monocentric" chromosomes containing one kinetochore, created at various stages of mitosis in living higher plant (Haemanthus) cells by laser microsurgery. Acentric fragments and monocentric chromosomes generated during spindle formation and metaphase both moved towards the closest spindle pole at a rate (approximately 1.0 microm/min) similar to the poleward motion of anaphase chromosomes. This poleward transport of chromosome fragments ceased near the onset of anaphase and was replaced. near midanaphase, by another force that now transported the fragments to the spindle equator at 1.5-2.0 microm/min. These fragments then remained near the spindle midzone until phragmoplast development, at which time they were again transported randomly poleward but now at approximately 3 microm/min. This behavior of acentric chromosome fragments on anastral plant spindles differs from that reported for the astral spindles of vertebrate cells, and demonstrates that in forming plant spindles, a force for poleward chromosome motion is generated independent of the kinetochore. The data further suggest that the three stages of non-kinetochore chromosome transport we observed are all mediated by the spindle microtubules. Finally, our findings reveal that there are fundamental differences between the transport properties of forming mitotic spindles in plants and vertebrates.

Micronuclei induced in round spermatids of mice after stem-cell treatment with chloral hydrate: evaluations with centromeric DNA probes and kinetochore antibodies

The chromosomal effects of chloral hydrate (CH) on germ cells of male mice were investigated using two methods to detect and characterize spermatid micronuclei (SMN); (a) anti-kinetochore immunofluorescence (SMN-CREST) and (b) multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization with DNA probes for centromeric DNA and repetitive sequences on chromosome X (SMN-FISH). B6C3F1 mice received single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of 82.7, 165.4, or 413.5 mg/kg and round spermatids were sampled at three time intervals representing cells treated in late meiosis, early meiosis, or as spermatogonial stem cells. No increases in the frequencies of SMN were detected for cells treated during meiosis using either SMN-CREST or SMN-FISH methods. After spermatogonial stem-cell treatment, however, elevated frequencies of SMN were detected by both methods. With SMN-FISH, dose trends were observed both in the frequencies of spermatids containing micronuclei and in the frequency of spermatids carrying centromeric label. These findings corroborate the recent report by Allen and colleagues [Allen JW et al.(1994): Mutat. Res. 323:81-88] that CH treatment of spermatogenic stem cells induced SMN. Furthermore, our findings suggest that chromosomal malsegregation or loss may occur in spermatids long after CH treatment of stem cells. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanism of action of the CH effect on stem cells and to determine whether similar effects are induced in human males treated with CH.

Micronuclei in mice treated with monocrotaline with and without phenobarbital pretreatment

Monocrotaline is a very potent toxin, producing significant effects of pneumotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and teratogenicity, as well as carcinogenicity. In addition, the compound has been clearly shown to be mutagenic after metabolic activation. The goal of the experiments reported here was to confirm the reported clastogenesis induced by this agent in vivo and to evaluate the impact of modulation of metabolic activity by phenobarbital, a potent P-450 inducer (both Phase I and Phase II enzymes). The method used in addressing this problem relied on a new technique for monitoring clastogenesis in vivo, i.e., the acridine orange micronucleus assay method originally exploited by Hayashi et al. [1990]. The result of our experiments confirmed monocrotaline to be an effective clastogen in vivo, using the acridine orange method of assessment. The peak in induction of micronuclei occurred on the second day following intraperitoneal administration of the drug. Administration of phenobarbital prior to monocrotaline did appear to modulate the micronucleus induction. At 30 mg/kg bw monocrotaline, the pretreatment with phenobarbital appears to increase the intensity of monocrotaline clastogenesis, while the effect at higher doses (60 and 125 mg/kg bw) is a reduction in potency, presumably reflecting increased importance of Phase II metabolism for monocrotaline at these doses. Thus the study reported here confirms the potent in vivo clastogenesis of monocrotaline, and provides evidence for a dose-related shift in mechanism for the phenomenon.

Non-random distribution of abnormal mitoses in heteroploid cell lines

We have performed absorption-cytometric DNA measurements of the DNA contents of the G0/G1, G2, metaphase, and telophase cells of the heteroploid MCa-11 and HL-60 lines, as well as the WCHE-5 line which has a narrowly restricted number of chromosomes. We found that morphologically unbalanced mitoses occurred much more frequently in telophase-cell pairs of the heteroploid MCa-11 and HL-60 lines than in those of the chromosomally stable WCHE-5 line. Furthermore, the morphologically unbalanced mitoses represented unequal segregation of DNA into each of the daughter telophase nuclei. Such mitotic segregation errors (MSE) occurred almost exclusively in telophase cells with DNA contents which were above, or below, the DNA content of the modal telophase population. The net effect of these non-random, unblanced divisions of heteroploid cells with non-modal DNA contents is to produce one daughter cell with a DNA content that tends to return to the modal DNA content peak.