Early indicators of bladder carcinogenesis produced by non-genotoxic agents

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Ascorbyl Palmitate, Ascorbyl Dipalmitate, Ascorbyl Stearate, Erythorbic Acid, and sodium Erythorbate

Ascorbyl Palmitate, Ascorbyl Dipalmitate, Ascorbyl Stearate, Erythorbic Acid, and Sodium Erythorbate are related ingredients that function as antioxidants in cosmetic formulations. Ascorbyl Palmitate, Ascorbyl Dipalmitate, and Ascorbyl Stearate are esters and diesters of ascorbic acid with long-chain fatty acids. Erythorbic Acid is a stereoisomer of ascorbic acid and Sodium Erythorbate is the sodium salt of Erythorbic Acid. Although all of these ingredients are used, uses of Ascorbyl Palmitate and Erythorbic Acid predominate, with combined uses in over a thousand cosmetic formulations at low concentrations. Ascorbyl Palmitate is used at concentrations between 0.01 and 0.2% , and Erythorbic Acid is used at concentrations of 0.5-1% . Ascorbyl Palmitate has vitamin C activity approximately equal to that of L-ascorbic acid, whereas Erythorbic Acid has only 5% activity. The esters are likely to penetrate the skin readily, but the acid and its salt are not likely to penetrate. These ingredients exhibit low acute oral toxicity in animals. In chronic feeding studies, decreased body weight gain, the formation of oxalate stones in the bladder, and hyperplasia were seen in rats fed high levels of Ascorbyl Palmitate. Ascorbyl Palmitate (10%) and Ascorbyl Dipalmitate (100%) were not irritating to the intact skin of albino rabbits. Ascorbic Acid (30 % ) itself caused barely perceptible erythema and Sodium Erythorbate powder caused no irritation to the intact and abraded skin of rabbits. In animal studies, Ascorbic acid was not a sensitizer, and Erythorbic Acid (10%) applied topically to porcine skin reduced ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced phototoxicity. In clinical studies, Ascorbyl Palmitate caused no dermal irritation or sensitization. These ingredients are minimally irritating to the eye. Sodium Erythorbate did not cause fetal or maternal toxicity or developmental toxicity in rats and mice fed high levels. Although these ingredients were generally negative in a wide range of genotoxicity tests, Erythorbic Acid and Sodium Erythorbate did produce isolated positive genotoxicity test results. As antioxidants, these ingredients have been studied in animals after initiation with various carcinogens. In some cases reductions in tumor incidence were seen, in others no effect was noted. In no case did treatment with these ingredients increase tumor incidence. The highest use concentrations of Erythorbic Acid and Sodium Erythorbate are in oxidative hair dyes, where they are completely consumed in the chemical reaction that takes place at mixing. The fatty acid esters of ascorbic acid are used at lower concentrations in leave-on formulations. In consideration of these uses and based on the available safety test data, Ascorbyl Palmitate, Ascorbyl Dipalmitate, Ascorbyl Stearate, Erythorbic Acid, and Sodium Erythorbate are safe for use as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use.

Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: an assessment of evidence derived from laboratory animals

No carcinogenic activity was observed when snuff was inserted into the cheek pouch of the hamster or spread over the oral mucosa. This negative result was obtained in a number of experiments whether snuff was applied once only and left in place for several months or inserted repeatedly for up to 2 years. In the rat, a few tumours were observed when snuff was inserted into the artificial lip canal. The insertion appeared to cause a considerable reaction in the surrounding tissue so it is plausible to assume that trauma plays an important role in the development of these tumours. An extract of snuff applied to the oral mucosa of the rat did not produce any tumours, but an extract enriched by the addition of 10 times the naturally-occurring amounts of NNN and NNK produced a few benign tumours at the site of application. A higher incidence of tumours was produced when an equivalent amount of an aqueous solution of these two nitrosamines was applied directly to the oral mucosa, suggesting, according to the authors, that snuff inhibits the carcinogenic activity of TSNAs. Initiation/promotion studies were carried out on snuff in the rat in order to explore further its carcinogenic potential. The results were consistent with the conclusion that snuff does not possess any promotional activity. No increase in tumour incidence was observed in mice when snuff was given in the diet at concentrations of 25% gradually decreasing to 5% in a 14 month study. A negative result was also obtained in the rat given snuff at a concentration of 5% for 18 months. In hamsters given snuff at a concentration of 20% for 2 years, forestomach tumours occurred. A comparable incidence of this type of tumour occurred in animals given 20% cellulose. The result of this study does not provide valid evidence of carcinogenicity. HSV and snuff applied orally in the hamster produced a high incidence of squamous cell carcinomas. The sustained high level of squamous cell hyperplasia generated by the experimental design could account for the development of these tumours. Despite the defects in some of the earlier studies, the sum total of this experimental work suggests that snuff is not carcinogenic to the oral mucosa of the hamster or the rat. It is also unlikely to cause tumours in other tissues in these species. These results give some degree of reassurance that snuff is not likely to be carcinogenic to the human oral mucosa. The interaction of snuff and HSV viruses is, at the moment, questionable and requires further investigation.

Subchronic oral toxicity study with regular and enzymatically depolymerized sodium carboxymethylcellulose in rats

Enzymatically depolymerized sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC-ENZ) is a new functional food ingredient which has a lower molecular weight and viscosity than regular sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). Both compounds are known not to be absorbed to a significant extent, and the human safety of CMC as a thickening agent and stabilizer in food is well established. In the present study, the subchronic oral toxicity of CMC-ENZ was examined and compared with that of CMC in Wistar rats. Seven groups of 20 rats/sex were fed diets with 0 (controls), 2.5, 5 and 10% CMC and 2.5, 5 and 10% CMC-ENZ for a 3-month period. There was only one death that was unrelated to the treatment. Water intake, urine production and urinary sodium excretion increased with increasing doses of CMC and CMC-ENZ due to their sodium content of about 7-8%. The treatment-related occurrence of diarrhoea and caecal enlargement in the mid- and high-dose groups, a slight increase of plasma alkaline phosphatase, and increased urinary calcium and citrate excretions were considered to be generic effects that typically are observed in rodent studies with low digestible carbohydrates. The increased occurrence of nephrocalcinosis and hyperplasia of the urothelial epithelium in some of the treated groups was interpreted as an indirect consequence of a more alkaline urine coupled with an increased calcium excretion. As the frequency and severity of all these changes did not differ between corresponding CMC and CMC-ENZ dose groups, it is concluded that the two products have a similar toxicological profile.

Mechanistically-based human hazard assessment of peroxisome proliferator-induced hepatocarcinogenesis

In this review we have evaluated the relationship between peroxisome proliferation and hepatocarcinogenesis. To do so, we identified all chemicals known to produce peroxisome proliferation and selected those for which there are data (on peroxisome proliferation and hepatocarcinogenesis) which meet certain criteria chosen to facilitate comparison of these phenomena. The summarised data and definition of the methodology used has been collected in appendices. These comparisons enabled us to evaluate the relationship between these phenomena using reliable data. As there is a good correlation between them, we further explored the mechanisms of action that have been proposed (direct genotoxic activity, production of hydrogen peroxide, cell proliferation and receptor activation). The relationship between these events in other species, including humans, was also reviewed and finally an overview of the assessment of human hazard is presented in section IX. Some of the first chemicals which were shown to produce peroxisome proliferation were also hepatocarcinogens whose carcinogenicity could not be readily explained by genotoxic activity. This raised the suggestion that the unusual phenomenon of peroxisome proliferation was intricately linked to the carcinogenic activity of these agents. Three questions have exercised the attention of regulatory, industrial and academic toxicology since then; are chemicals which elicit peroxisome proliferation in the liver actually a coherent class of chemical carcinogens?; does the early biological phenomenon of peroxisome proliferation have real predictive value for and mechanistic association with rodent carcinogenesis?; and what hazard/risk do these agents pose to humans that may be exposed to them? Whether peroxisome proliferators are indeed a discrete class of rodent carcinogens would appear to be the single, most important question. If so, then the assumptions and procedures relevant to human hazard and risk assessment should be applied to the class and should be essentially generic; if not, each chemical should be considered independently. Our critical analysis of the published data for over 70 agents which have been shown to possess intrinsic ability to induce peroxisome proliferation in the livers of rodents has led to the conclusion that there exists a strong correlation between peroxisome proliferation as n early effect in the liver and hepatocarcinogenicity in chronic exposure studies. An almost perfect correlation was observed between the induction of peroxisomes in the rodent liver and the eventual appearance of tumours following chronic exposure The few exceptions to this were largely explainable (section II).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)