Echinomycin, a bis-intercalating agent, induces C-->T mutations via cytosine deamination

Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis

Living organisms are continuously exposed to a myriad of DNA damaging agents that can impact health and modulate disease-states. However, robust DNA repair and damage-bypass mechanisms faithfully protect the DNA by either removing or tolerating the damage to ensure an overall survival. Deviations in this fine-tuning are known to destabilize cellular metabolic homeostasis, as exemplified in diverse cancers where disruption or deregulation of DNA repair pathways results in genome instability. Because routinely used biological, physical and chemical agents impact human health, testing their genotoxicity and regulating their use have become important. In this introductory review, we will delineate mechanisms of DNA damage and the counteracting repair/tolerance pathways to provide insights into the molecular basis of genotoxicity in cells that lays the foundation for subsequent articles in this issue. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:235-263, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Bisulfite-induced cytosine deamination rates in E. coli SSB:DNA complexes

E. coli single-stranded binding protein (SSB) has been examined for its ability to modulate bisulfite-induced cytosine deamination rates in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). We used a lacZ alpha-complementation reversion assay to detect C-->U rates at a single codon in M13mp2 DNA, whether in free ssDNA or in an SSB:ssDNA complex. When incubated at 37 degrees C, the average bisulfite-induced reversion rate constant was four-fold less in SSB:ssDNA complexes than in ssDNA, at a single codon. Across a 250 base pair target and over 23 scorable C-->U sites, the forward rate constant was 4.9-fold less in SSB:ssDNA complexes than in ssDNA alone. After treatment with N-uracil glycosylase, ssDNA incubated with bisulfite had reversion frequencies at the background rate of ssDNA incubated without bisulfite, indicating that virtually all mutations scored were due to C-->U events. The decrease in cytosine deamination rates occurred both in a single codon and over a 250 bp target, indicating that interactions between SSB and ssDNA reduce bisulfite-catalyzed mutations. The structural role of SSB is well recognized in multiple cellular processes; SSB can also function to minimize bisulfite-induced ssDNA mutations.

CC to TT mutation in the mitochondrial DNA of normal skin: relationship to ultraviolet light exposure

We have previously reported that ultraviolet (UV)-specific (CC to TT) mutations in p53 gene can be detected in normal skin. This, however, cannot be used as a cumulative marker of UV exposure, since cells with the p53 mutation acquire a clonal growth advantage. Moreover, a large skin biopsy is necessary for each assay. In order to circumvent these problems, we have measured mitochondrial (Mt) DNA mutations; there are more than 1000 copies of the Mt genome per cell, and Mt genes are not directly involved in cell growth. We have established a sensitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay capable of detecting one CC to TT mutation in Mt DNA among 10(7) wild-type genes using a mismatch allele-specific primer. With this assay, we found no mutation-positive samples from internal non-exposed tissue (stomach, colon, and blood) (0/50). In contrast, 17 out of 111 skin samples were positive: the mutation frequency in positive samples was around 10(7)-10(-6) (10-100 copies of mutant in 10(8) wild-type Mt DNA). In normal skin tissue, the prevalence of positive samples was higher in those from exposed sites (13/51) than in those from less-exposed sites (1/26) (p<0.05). However, a quantitative correlation between sunlight exposure and the accumulation of mutations was not found. We conclude that the UV exposure-associated CC to TT mutation in Mt DNA can be detected in normal skin, but that further studies are required to develop this as a quantitative marker for UV exposure.

Characterization of the pUC19-lacZC141 reversion system for assaying chemical mutagenesis

pUC19-lacZC141 DNA contains a proline codon at positions 141 to 143, where an alanine codon normally appears in the original lacZ gene. pUC19-lacZC141 DNA was produced using site-directed mutagenesis. After transfection of pUC19-lacZC141 DNA into lacZ hosts, the transformants produce white colonies on an agar plate containing X-gal and IPTG. lacZ+ revertants can be identified by their dark- and light-blue colony color against a background of non-mutant white colonies, indicating restoration of beta-galactosidase activity. N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) were used to characterize the pUC19-lacZC141 DNA reversion assay. Mutagenesis resulting from methylated DNA was examined in Escherichia coli strains JM109, BMH71-18mutS, and SURE, which differ in their repair systems for DNA damage. In JM109 and BMH71-18mutS, mostly G:C-->A:T transitions and some G:C-->C:G or G:C-->T:A transversions were observed. E. coli SURE produced, in addition, frameshift mutations (approximately 10%). The DNA sequence analysis of 174 induced mutants indicated that the major effect of methylation is on single base-pair substitutions with a slight effect on deletion frameshifts. All mutations are consistent with miscoding of guanine or cytosine adducts or lesions. Transitions account for 158 of 165 (96%) induced base substitutions. Approximately 93% of the base-substitution mutations occurred at the expected positions 141 to 143 in the lacZ gene. The pUC19-lacZC141 assay was sufficiently sensitive to allow the detection of mutations in lacZ- hosts with different repair mechanisms. The pUC19-lacZC141 DNA reversion system will permit the assaying of other chemicals not otherwise amenable to mutagenesis studies.

Methylation inhibitors can increase the rate of cytosine deamination by (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase

The target cytosines of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA show increased rates of C-->T transition mutations compared to non-target cytosines. These mutations are induced either by the spontaneous deamination of 5-mC-->T generating inefficiently repaired G:T rather than G:U mismatches, or by the enzyme-induced C-->U deamination which occurs under conditions of reduced levels of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy). We tested whether various inhibitors of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases analogous to AdoMet and AdoHcy would affect the rate of enzyme-induced deamination of the target cytosine by M.HpaII and M.SssI. Interestingly, we found two compounds, sinefungin and 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine, that increased the rate of deamination 10(3)-fold in the presence and 10(4)-fold in the absence of AdoMet and AdoHcy. We have therefore identified the first mutagenic compounds specific for the target sites of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases. A number of analogs of AdoMet and AdoHcy have been considered as possible antiviral, anticancer, antifungal and antiparasitic agents. Our findings show that chemotherapeutic agents with affinities to the cofactor binding pocket of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase should be tested for their potential mutagenic effects.

Induction of tandem-base change mutations

Four databases with sequence changes for 12000 mutations in mammalian and bacterial cells were searched for genotoxic agents inducing tandem mutations, in which two adjacent base pairs are changed. Ultraviolet light induces about one CC > TT per 10-20 mutations, and other tandem-base changes at about half that frequency. There is strong evidence that cis-diammine dichloroplatinum (II) induces tandems. These results suggest that tandem-base changes are induced by agents that damage two adjacent base pairs in DNA. Tandems, particularly CC > TT, can be used as indicators of exposure to ultraviolet light, as in genes in skin cells exposed to sunlight. Oxidizing agents such as superoxide and ionizing radiation do not induce a significant level of tandem-base changes (such as CC > TT) in double-strand DNA, so such mutations are not a useful indicator of exposure to mutagens of this type. All conclusions are equally valid for bacterial and mammalian cells.