Uterine rupture in pregnancy reviewed

Antepartum unscarred uterine rupture caused by placenta percreta: a case report and literature review

The main risk for uterine rupture is the presence of a uterine scar due to prior cesarean delivery or other uterine surgery. However, rupture in an unscarred uterus is extremely rare, and risk factors include multiple gestations, trauma, congenital anomalies, use of uterotonics and placenta accreta spectrum.

Placenta accreta spectrum, also known as morbidly adherent placenta, is becoming increasingly common and is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

We report a case of unscarred uterine rupture due to placenta percreta in a multiparous woman that required emergency peripartum hysterectomy.

Diagnosis and Management of Uterine Rupture in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

 Uterine rupture is associated with clinically significant uterine bleeding, fetal distress, expulsion or protrusion of the fetus, placenta or both into the abdominal cavity requiring prompt cesarean delivery and uterine repair or hysterectomy. Previous cesarean section is the most common risk factor. The most consistent early indicator of it is the onset of prolonged and profound fetal bradycardia.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we present six cases of uterine rupture highlighting risk factors, and challenges in diagnosis and management, along with a review of the literature.

METHOD

A retrospective case series identified eight cases during the five-year study period. All cases from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022 were reviewed. Cases with multiple previous cesarean sections were excluded.

RESULT

Six cases meeting the study criteria were included in our case series. Uterine rupture was a rare occurrence with a prevalence of nine in 31,315 births representing 0.03% of deliveries. No maternal mortality or need for hysterectomy occurred in our study. Fifty percent of uterine ruptures were associated with stillbirths. The most common risk factor was a previous cesarean section in 83.3%. The most common presenting sign was non-reassuring fetal status patterns in 66.6%. A single case had a silent rupture.

CONCLUSION

Signs and symptoms of uterine rupture are nonspecific making diagnosis challenging. Delay in definitive management causes significant fetal morbidity and mortality. For best outcomes, vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section needs close monitoring in appropriately prepared units with the ability to perform immediate cesarean delivery and provide advanced neonatal support.

Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after abdominal vs. laparoscopic myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether abdominal (open) vs. laparoscopic myomectomy affects the obstetrical outcomes of subsequent pregnancies.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university medical center. The study population included women who had a documented birth following a myomectomy at our institution between the years 1997 and 2018. The obstetrical characteristics and immediate perinatal outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy following open vs. laparoscopic myomectomy were collected and compared. Data were retrieved from patients' medical records via the institutional computerized database. Cases that lacked detailed surgery and delivery reports were excluded. Data were analyzed using a chi-square test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables. A p-value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 57 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 66.6% (38/57) had an open and 33.3% (19/57) had a laparoscopic myomectomy. Women who underwent an open myomectomy had a higher rate of cesarean birth than those in the laparoscopic group (89.5 vs. 42.1%, p < .001). No cases of severe maternal or perinatal complications, uterine ruptures, or placental abruptions were identified in either study group. No other significant differences were noted between the two types of myomectomy.

CONCLUSION

Open myomectomy is associated with a higher rate of cesarean delivery than laparoscopic. No severe adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected in either study group.

Mode of delivery of women with Swyer syndrome in a German case series

OBJECTIVES

For women with Swyer Syndrome, a 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis, full term pregnancies are possible after oocyte donation. According to literature, mode of delivery is almost always by Caesarean section for various reasons. Medical indications are multiple pregnancies and related complications, preeclampsia, an androgynous shaped pelvis and failed induction of labor. Elective Caesarean sections were performed based on maternal request and medical recommendation.

METHODS

Following careful examination and shared decision making, we planned a spontaneous delivery with a patient with Swyer syndrome and tested the different hypotheses regarding anatomical and functional features according to literature. In addition, deliveries of women with Swyer Syndrome were analyzed in a German multicenter case series.

RESULTS

A total of seven women with Swyer syndrome with a total of 10 pregnancies were identified, who later gave birth to twelve live-born children. Seven out of 10 births were performed by elective and non-elective Caesarean section, three births took place vaginally.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the risk of Caesarean section delivery has increased, but spontaneous delivery can be attempted in the event of inconspicuous findings.

Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with PGE2: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As uterine rupture may affect as many as 11/1000 women with 1 prior cesarean birth and 5/10.000 women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction, we intended to estimate the prevalence of such rare outcome when PGE2 is used for cervical ripening and labor induction.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane library up to September 1st 2020. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies, as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on singleton viable pregnancies receiving PGE2 for cervical ripening and labor induction were reviewed. Prevalence of uterine rupture was meta-analyzed with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation among women with 1 prior low transverse cesarean section and women with unscarred uterus.

RESULTS

We reviewed 956 full text articles to include 69 studies. The pooled prevalence rate of uterine rupture is estimated to range between 2 and 9 out of 1000 women with 1 prior low transverse cesarean (5/1000; 95%CI 2-9/1000, 122/9000). The prevalence of uterine rupture among women with unscarred uterus is extremely low, reaching at most 0.7/100.000 (<1/100.000.000; 95%CI <1/100.000.000-0.7/100.000, 8/17.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Uterine rupture is a rare event during cervical ripening and labor induction with PGE2.

Optimal Isthmocele Management: Hysteroscopic, Laparoscopic, or Combination

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature on the hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair of isthmocele.

DATA SOURCES

A thorough search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190668).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies from the last 20 years that addressed isthmocele repair were collected. Both authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. All prospective and retrospective studies of more than 10 women were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 666 articles (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart) (see Supplemental Fig.). We excluded duplicates, case reports, reviews, video articles, and technique articles. We also excluded studies describing only laparotomy or vaginal repair as these were not in the scope of this review. A total of 31 articles met the inclusion criteria, 21 for hysteroscopic resection and 13 for laparoscopic or combined repair (4 articles tested both modalities and appear in both Tables 1 and 2).For abnormal uterine bleeding, hysteroscopic remodeling relived symptoms in 60% to 100% of cases and laparoscopy in 78% to 94%. Secondary infertility was not evaluated in all studies. After hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment, 46% to 100% and 37.5% to 90% of those who wished to conceive became pregnant, after the procedure, respectively. Pain and dysmenorrhea seem to be uncommon. All studies that tested improvement of pain had fewer than 10 women. However, between 66% and 100% of women who complain of pain or dysmenorrhea will note a marked improvement to full resolution.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an isthmocele or cesarean scar defect are usually asymptomatic. For symptomatic women, a repair is a valid option. For those with residual myometrial thickness >2 to 3 mm, hysteroscopic remodeling is the modality of choice with an improvement in abnormal uterine bleeding, secondary infertility, and pain. Women with a residual myometrial thickness <2- to 3-mm laparoscopic repair with simultaneous hysteroscopic guidance show similar results. Because available data are limited, no cutoff for the correct choice between hysteroscopy and laparoscopy can be concluded. We recommend 2.5 mm as the cutoff value based on common practice and expert opinion, although no significance between hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment was shown.

Spontaneous Rupture in a Non-Laboring Uterus at 20 Weeks: A Case Report

Patient: Female, 31-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Uterine rupture secondary to placenta percreta

Symptoms: Acute abdomen

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Laparotomy and subtotal hysterectomy

Specialty: Obstetrics and Gynecology

[Uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus: A report of 10 cases]

INTRODUCTION

Uterine rupture in the healthy uterus is a rare obstetrical complication, not much suspected and with badly identified risk factors. Thus, there exists frequent delay for treatment and therefore fetal-maternal important morbidity and mortality. This article describes clinical signs and symptoms, management, and maternal and neonatal prognosis of uterine rupture.

METHODS

Descriptive retrospective study within 13 maternity hospitals, reporting 10 series of cases of uterine rupture on gravid healthy uterus during the third trimester of pregnancy.

RESULT

The incidence was 2.8/100,000 births. Surgical treatment was conservative in 9 out of 10 cases, the maternal prognosis was good with no maternal deaths and 6 out of 7 patients had at least one subsequent pregnancy. The fetal prognosis was more reserved, with 2 fetal or neonatal deaths and 1 with motor disability. 6/6 patients (100%) had at least one iterative Caesarean section during the following pregnancies with healthy fetuses.

CONCLUSION

In this series of 10 cases over 25years, maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality were significant, in agreement with the literature. Maternal prognosis remained favorable. When surgical treatment is conservative a subsequent pregnancy is possible and an iterative cesarean section must be performed.

Uterine rupture at 28 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy - a case report

There are many reasons for sterility, and uterine malformations are of the greatest concern. Among uterine disorders, myomas play a significant role and are present in 27% of infertile women. The occurrence of myomas is frequent - 20-40% in women of reproductive age. Thus, for those infertile patients surgical treatment may be needed to preserve an opportunity to conceive. This case report refers to an uterine rupture at 28 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy (3 months before conceiving). The myomectomy was conducted correctly and two layers of sutures on the myometrium were performed. The purpose of the myomectomy in a young woman should be well considered. In cases of infertility, removal of the lesions is usually necessary to give the patient a chance of pregnancy. At the same time, the risk of uterine rupture is increased. There are some suggestions referring to myomectomy to reduce the risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy. It seems that the method of sewing the uterine closure is crucial. For example, multilayer uterine stitches, preservation of the endometrial cavity, and avoidance of using electrosurgery to prevent devascularization (to avoid haematoma formation) should be taken into consideration to prevent weakness of the wall of the uterus. Uterine scars differ histologically and biochemically.

Placenta Percreta and Uterine Rupture in the First Trimester of Pregnancy

Spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy is uncommon and difficult to diagnose. Although extremely rare, it is important to consider the occurrence of placenta percreta as differential diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic abdomen at the beginning of pregnancy. We describe below a case of uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy related to placenta percreta.

Concurrent intraoperative uterine rupture and placenta accreta. Do preoperative chronic hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and placental abruption provide warning to this rare occurrence?

Uterine and placental pathology can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the parturient and infant. When presenting alone, placental abruption, uterine rupture, or placenta accreta can result in significant peripartum hemorrhage, requiring aggressive surgical and anesthetic management; however, the presence of multiple concurrent uterine and placental pathologies can result in significant morbidity and mortality. We present the anesthetic management of a parturient who underwent an urgent cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal tracing in the setting of chronic hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and chorioamnionitis who was subsequently found to have placental abruption, uterine rupture, and placenta accreta.

A case of scarred uterine rupture at 11 weeks of gestation having a uterine scar places induced by in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Having a uterine scar places a woman at increased risk of complications, such as Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), uterine rupture, placenta previa, and placenta accreta, in subsequent pregnancies. We report a case of uterine rupture at 11 weeks of gestation in a woman with a previous Cesarean section. A 43-year-old woman with a history of abdominal myomectomy and Cesarean section had her pregnancy induced by in vitro fertilization with donor eggs. The exact location of the gestational sac was identified on her first day of hospitalization, and her pregnancy was suspected to be a CSP. The following day, the patient complained of sudden lower abdominal pain. A uterine scar rupture was diagnosed, and an emergency surgery was required. It may be that first-trimester screening could allow the early recognition of patients at risk for these perinatal complications.

Uterine rupture in a primigravid patient, an uncommon but severe obstetrical event: a case report

BACKGROUND

A spontaneous rupture of the unscarred uterus in a primigravid patient is extremely rare and is associated with high perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 34-year-old white primigravid woman, 31 + 3 weeks of gestation, presented with pre-eclampsia and developed a sudden acute abdomen. An emergency laparotomy was performed and a uterine rupture was found as the cause of the event. A stillborn girl was born.

CONCLUSION

A rupture of the pregnant uterus should always be considered in a pregnant woman presenting with abdominal pain, even in a primigravid patient.

Pregnancy, Delivery, and Neonatal Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer in Patient with Previous Cesarean Scar

Background

What role should previous cesarean section play in affecting clinical pregnancy outcomes and avoiding the complications of in vitro fertilization? In this article, we focus on elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) versus double-embryo transfer (DET) and assess the clinical efficacy and safety of eSET in patients who have a previous cesarean scar.

Material/Methods

The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of 130 patients who had a previous cesarean scar and received in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) were retrospectively analyzed. The number of transferred embryos was chosen depending on patients’ desire after acknowledging all benefits and risks, including eSET (eSET group, n=56) and DET (DET group, n=74). A total of 101 patients with previous vaginal delivery receiving IVF-ET in the same period were included as a control group.

Results

The pregnancy rates, multiple birth rates, abortion rates, ectopic pregnancy rates, gestational age at delivery, preterm birth rates, neonatal birth weight, and take-home baby rates were similar between the previous cesarean section group and the previous vaginal delivery group. A previous cesarean section scar did not affect embryo implantation and pregnancy outcomes in IVF. In the eSET and DET groups of previous cesarean section patients, the embryo implantation rates, pregnancy rates, abortion rates, and take-home baby rates were similar. However, the rate of multiple pregnancies reached 50% in the DET group, which led to more preterm births and lower birth weight.

Conclusions

Elective single-embryo transfer is a well-accepted strategy to avoid multiple pregnancies and improve the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy in IVF patients with a previous cesarean section.

Escalating placenta invasiveness: repeated placenta accreta at the limit of viability

Placenta percreta is an obstetric condition in which the placenta invades through the myometrium. This is the most severe form of placenta accreta and may result in spontaneous uterine rupture, a rare complication that threatens the life of both mother and fetus. In this case report, we describe a 32-year-old woman in her fourth pregnancy, diagnosed with repeated placenta accreta, which was eventually complicated by spontaneous uterine rupture at 24 weeks’ gestation. This patient had a history of abnormal placentation in prior pregnancies and previous uterine injuries. This case demonstrates a pattern of escalating placental invasiveness, and raises questions regarding the process of abnormal placentation and the manifestation of uterine rupture in scarred uteri.

Uterine Rupture: A Seven Year Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India

Objective:

To identify the obstetric risk factors, incidence, and causes of uterine rupture, management modalities, and the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in one of the largest tertiary level women care hospital in Delhi.

Materials and Methods:

A 7-year retrospective analysis of 47 cases of uterine rupture was done. The charts of these patients were analyzed and the data regarding demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, risk factors, management, operative findings, maternal and fetal outcomes, and postoperative complications was studied.

Results:

The incidence of rupture was one in 1,633 deliveries (0.061%). The vast majority of patients had prior low transverse cesarean section (84.8%). The clinical presentation of the patients with rupture of the unscarred uterus was more dramatic with extensive tears compared to rupture with scarred uterus. The estimated blood loss ranged from 1,200 to 1,500 cc. Hemoperitoneum was identified in 95.7% of the patient and 83% of the patient underwent repair of rent with or without simultaneous tubal ligation. Subtotal hysterectomy was performed in five cases. There were no maternal deaths in our series. However, there were 32 cases of intrauterine fetal demise and five cases of stillbirths.

Conclusions:

Uterine rupture is a major contributor to maternal morbidity and neonatal mortality. Four major easily identifiable risk factors including history of prior cesarean section, grand multiparity, obstructed labor, and fetal malpresentations constitute 90% of cases of uterine rupture. Identification of these high risk women, prompt diagnosis, immediate transfer, and optimal management needs to be overemphasized to avoid adverse fetomaternal complications.

Acute uterine rupture in spontaneous term labour in a healthy primigravida: case report and review of the literature

Uterine rupture is an obstetric complication with potential catastrophic fetal and maternal consequences, if not detected early and managed promptly. We report a case of a 32-year-old primigravida in spontaneous labour at term who had unprovoked acute uterine rupture. Operative findings at emergency caesarean section were a live female infant weighing 3150 g requiring resuscitation, massive haemoperitoneum, and large right vertical posterolateral uterine rupture at the upper segment, extending to the ovarian pedicle and down to the vagina vault.

Maternal and fetal morbidity associated with uterine rupture of the unscarred uterus

OBJECTIVE

We sought to report obstetric and neonatal characteristics and outcomes following primary uterine rupture in a large contemporary obstetric cohort and to compare outcomes between those with primary uterine rupture vs those with uterine rupture of a scarred uterus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective case-control study. Cases were defined as women with uterine rupture of an unscarred uterus. Controls were women with uterine rupture of a scarred uterus. Demographics, labor characteristics, and obstetric, maternal, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Primary rupture case outcomes were also compared by mode of delivery.

RESULTS

There were 126 controls and 20 primary uterine rupture cases. Primary uterine rupture cases had more previous live births than controls (3.6 vs 1.9; P < .001). Cases were more likely to have received oxytocin augmentation (80% vs 37%; P < .001). Vaginal delivery was more common among cases (45% vs 9%; P < .001). Composite maternal morbidity was higher among primary uterine rupture mothers (65% vs 20%; P < .001). Cases had a higher mean estimated blood loss (2644 vs 981 mL; P < .001) and higher rate of blood transfusion (68% vs 17%; P < .001). Women with primary uterine rupture were more likely to undergo hysterectomy (35% vs 2.4%; P < .001). Rates of major composite adverse neonatal neurologic outcomes including intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, seizures, and death were higher in cases (40% vs 12%; P = .001). Primary uterine rupture cases delivering vaginally were more likely to ultimately undergo hysterectomy than those delivering by cesarean (63% vs 9%; P = .017).

CONCLUSION

Although rare, primary uterine rupture is particularly morbid. Clinicians must remain vigilant, particularly in the setting of heavy vaginal bleeding and severe pain.

Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery

OBJECTIVES

Uterine rupture is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication of pregnancy that requires rapid diagnosis. Classically, its signs and symptoms combine pain, fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities, and vaginal bleeding. The purpose of this study is to identify these signs and symptoms as well as the immediate complications of complete and incomplete (partial) ruptures of the uterine wall, whether or not they follow a previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of case records from two university hospital maternity units, from 1987 to 2008.

RESULTS

In a total of 97,028 births during the study period, we identified 52 uterine ruptures (0.05%): 25 complete and 27 partial. Most (89%) occurred in women with a previous cesarean delivery. In complete ruptures, FHR abnormalities were the most frequent sign (82%), while the complete triad of FHR abnormalities-pain-vaginal bleeding was present in only 9%. The signs and symptoms of partial ruptures were very different; these were asymptomatic in half the cases (48%). Neonatal mortality reached 13.6% among the complete ruptures; 27 and 40% of these newborns had pH<6.80 and pH<7.0, respectively. Among the incomplete ruptures, only 7.7% of the newborns had a pH<7.0 and there were no deaths.

CONCLUSION

Although complete rupture of the uterus has a severe neonatal prognosis, the complete set of standard symptoms is present in less than 10% of cases. FHR abnormalities are by far the most frequent sign.

Early second trimester uterine scar rupture

Spontaneous uterine scar rupture can be lethal in pregnant women. A spontaneous uterine scar rupture in the early mid-trimester is rare and difficult to diagnose. This is a case of a 30-year-old woman (G2P1L1) at 19 weeks of gestation and having undergone a previous caesarean section presented with acute abdomen in shock. Laparotomy revealed a uterine scar rupture, which was resutured after evacuation of products of conception. This case merits that the uterine rupture should be considered as a differential diagnosis in pregnant women presenting with acute abdomen. In this case, although there was uterine rupture in the second trimester and a complete placental separation, fetus was alive which is quite unusual in patients presenting with rupture uterus.

Placenta percreta: rare presentation of haemorrhage in the second trimester

A 25-year-old woman, third gravid, with previous two miscarriages presented to the emergency at 17 weeks 2 days of gestation with complaints of pain in the abdomen for 1 day and decreased urine output for 2 days. She was in shock. There was no history of bleeding per vaginum, trauma, surgical procedure or medical illness. Her obstetrical history was marked by a spontaneous second trimester miscarriage at 24 weeks that was followed by fever for 1 week. Ultrasound revealed an extra uterine fetus with sac en caul secondary to uterine rupture. She was resuscitated and taken up for emergency salvage laparotomy. The ragged fundal rent was excised and uterine reconstruction was performed. Histology revealed placenta percreta. The patient had a rapid recovery.

A Case Series of Uterine Rupture: Lessons to be Learned for Future Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we try to discuss risk factors and diagnostic difficulties for uterine rupture.

METHODS

Case series of 12 cases of uterine rupture observed in the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in the UK, with an average yearly birth rate of 6,000 deliveries, over a 6-year period.

RESULTS

In the present case series, there was no maternal mortality, and uterine rupture was a rare occurrence (12 in 36,000 births). Uterine rupture is associated with clinically significant uterine bleeding, fetal distress, expulsion or protrusion of the fetus, placenta or both into the abdominal cavity, and the need for prompt cesarean delivery and uterine repair or hysterectomy. The risk factors for rupture include previous cesarean sections, multiparity, malpresentation and obstructed labor, uterine anomalies, and use of prostaglandins for induction of labor. Previous cesarean section is, however, the most commonly associated risk factor. The most consistent early indicator of uterine rupture is the onset of a prolonged, persistent, and profound fetal bradycardia.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, we suggest that the signs and symptoms of uterine rupture are typically nonspecific, which makes diagnosis difficult. Delay in definitive therapy causes significant fetal morbidity. The inconsistent signs and the short time in prompting definitive treatment of uterine rupture make it a challenging event. For the best outcome, vaginal birth after previous cesarean section needs to be looked after in an appropriately staffed and equipped unit for an immediate cesarean delivery and advanced neonatal support.

A two-year review of uterine rupture in a regional hospital

BACKGROUND

Uterine rupture causes high maternal and neonatal mortality in many rural setting in the world. Further studies might provide specific interventions to reduce the high prevalence.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency, causes, clinical presentation, management and outcome of uterine rupture

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Upper West Regional Hospital, Wa, Ghana.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

METHOD

A descriptive study of cases of ruptured uterus in the Regional Hospital from 1st January, 2007 to 31st December 2008 was done. A structured questionnaire was developed to collate data from various registers for analysis.

RESULTS

Total deliveries were 5085 with 4172(82%) spontaneous vaginal delivery and 911(17.9%) caesarean sections. Uterine rupture occurred in 41 cases for a ratio of 1:124 Grand multipara with five or more deliveries represented 41.5% while those with two prior successful deliveries represented 31.7%. The mean parity was 3.8 (SD 2.3) under antenatal care, 85.4% had at least four visits. Severe anaemia 28(68.3%) and abdominal tenderness 27(65.8%) were the most frequent clinical presentation while the use of local herbal concoction with suspected uterotonic activity 24(58.5%), fetopelvic disproportion 4 (9.8%) and malpresentation 5(12.1%) were the most significant causes. Major complications were: neonatal deaths 34(82.9%), maternal mortality 4(9.8%) and wound infections 15 (36.6%). Subtotal hysterectomy 10(24.4%) and total hysterectomy 18(43.8%) were preferred to uterine repair 12(23.3%) and 87.8% required at least two units of blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

skilled attendance with accessible emergency obstetric care and focused antenatal care are key elements for the prevention and management of uterine rupture.

Placenta percreta-induced uterine rupture diagnosed by laparoscopy in the first trimester

Spontaneous uterine rupture is lethal in pregnant women. Placenta percreta-induced spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester is extremely rare and difficult to diagnose. A 35-year-old pregnant woman, with a history of 2 vaginal deliveries and 2 spontaneous abortions treated by dilatation and curettage, was admitted to the emergency department because of sudden severe abdominal pain; the gestational age as calculated by sonography was 14 weeks. Diagnostic laparoscopy was considered for surgical abdomen and fluid collection that was noted in sonography. During laparoscopy, uterine rupture with massive bleeding was detected; therefore, total abdominal hysterectomy was performed. The patient was discharged without any complications. Pathological analysis of the uterine specimen revealed placenta percreta to be the cause of the rupture. Uterine rupture should be considered in the differential diagnosis in all pregnant women who present with acute abdomen, show fluid collection in the peritoneal cavity. In addition, we recommend laparoscopy for the investigation of acute abdomen with unclear diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy.

A Description of the Management and Outcomes of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Birth in the Homebirth Setting

Our objective was to describe the outcomes of intended home birth among 57 women with a previous cesarean birth. Data were drawn from a larger prospective study of intended homebirth in nurse-midwifery practice. Available data included demographics, perinatal risk information, and outcomes of prenatal, intrapartum, postpartum, and neonatal care. The hospital course was reviewed for those transferred to the hospital setting. Fifty-three of 57 women (93%) had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 1 had a vacuum-assisted birth, and 3 (5.3%) had a repeat cesarean birth. Thirty-one of 32 (97%) women who had a previous vaginal birth after cesarean birth (VBAC) had a successful VBAC; 22 of 25 (88%) women without a history of VBAC successfully delivered vaginally. Fifty (87.7%) of these women delivered in the home setting, whereas 7 (12.3%) delivered in the hospital setting. None of the women experienced uterine rupture or dehiscence. One infant was stillborn. This event was attributed to a postdates pregnancy with meconium. Certified nurse-midwives with homebirth practices must be knowledgeable about the risks for mother and baby, screen clientele appropriately, and be able to counsel patients with regard to potential adverse outcomes. Given what is presently known, VBAC is not recommended in the homebirth setting. It is imperative in the light of current evidence and practice climate to advocate for the availability of certified nurse-midwife services and woman-centered care in the hospital setting.

Eight years' experience of uterine rupture cases

Ruptured uterus is a serious obstetric emergency with a high maternal and perinatal mortality. It is a preventable and common obstetric problem in developing countries. The objective of this study was to review the incidence, methods of diagnosis and maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture. Case notes were reviewed for all patients with a ruptured uterus at Yüzüncü Yil University Medical Faculty Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology from January 1995 to August 2003. Relevant data relating to the clinical characteristics of labour, operative procedures, maternal and perinatal outcome were assessed. There were 20 cases of ruptured uteri. The incidence was 0.40%. When patients referred from other hospitals were excluded, the revised ratio was 0.12%. There were 13 (65%) complete and seven (35%) incomplete ruptures. Nine (45%) cases occurred in patients with scarred uteri. Ten (50%) cases were grand multiparous. Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was performed in five (25%) cases, total abdominal hysterectomy was performed in two (10%) cases and the remaining 13 (65%) cases had uterine rupture repair. There were two (10%) maternal deaths. Both of them were referred from other hospitals. There were seven (35%) perinatal deaths attributable to uterine rupture. Occurrence of uterine rupture is significantly associated with grand multiparity, scarred uterus, lack of antenatal care, unsupervised labour at home and low socioeconomic status of the patients. These factors are largely preventable.

Outcome of ruptured uterus at University Teaching Hospital Aleppo, Syria

A 10-year review of ruptured gravid uterus at the University Teaching Hospital, Aleppo, Syria showed an incidence of one ruptured uterus in 565 deliveries. This is an average figure compared with published studies but is still high compared with developed countries. Sixty-four per cent of the cases of ruptured uterus had no antenatal care. It is no surprise therefore that maternal and fetal mortality was highest amongst the unbooked labouring women. In survivors the morbidity was also higher. Ruptured uterus is therefore a major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity in Syria. The overall hospital maternal and perinatal mortalities for the period under review were 4.3% and 2.6% respectively. The main risk factor identified is scarring from previous caesarean sections. Other risk factors are discussed.

Uterine rupture during pregnancy and delivery among women attending the Al-Tthawra Hospital in Sana'a City Yemen Republic

BACKGROUND

About 20 percent of the population in developing countries is composed of women of reproductive age. These women face one of the catastrophic risks of pregnancy "uterine rupture". Studies conducted in the developing world give strong evidence that uterine rupture is a major health problem in these countries with the rate being high in rural areas.

AIM

The purpose of the study was to estimate the incidence and determine the risk factors and outcome of uterine rupture among women using the referral hospital Al-thawra in Sana'a City, Yemen republic and to extrapolate the data to the whole of Yemen.

METHODS

The data was collected retrospectively; by interviewing, examining and following up all the cases of uterine rupture coming to the hospital during a period of 9 months between September 1996 and May 1997. A descriptive analysis and distribution frequency of the commonest causes of uterine rupture in 37 cases are presented taking into account medical, reproductive, health services provided and sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

Incidence of uterine rupture in Yemen was found to be (0.63), obstructed labor 83 %, contracted pelvis 19 %, previous surgery in 48 %, Oxytocine infusion in 42 %. Grand-multiparty was in 65 % and maternal age over 35 years in 50 %. Antenatal care was only in 34 %.

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of malpresentation, cephalopelvic disproportion, previous uterine surgery accompanied by the high percentage of use of Oxytocin in this study highlights very clearly the role of this medication in increasing the risk of uterine rupture in Yemen.

Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To determine mode of delivery and occurrence of uterine rupture in women with a previous caesarean section (CS) in the Netherlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 1-year period 38 hospitals in the Netherlands registered prospectively mode of delivery, use of prostaglandins or oxytocin and occurrence of uterine rupture in all women with a previous CS.

RESULTS

There were 4569 women with a previous CS. Trial of labour (TOL) was attempted in 71.7%, of whom 76.0% delivered vaginally. The vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC)-rate was 54.4%. Forty-nine uterine ruptures occurred (1.1%), of which 48 occurred during a TOL (1.5%). There were four perinatal deaths (1.2/1000 TOL) and 3 hysterectomies (0.9/1000 TOL) related to the rupture. Use of prostaglandin E2 alone or combined with oxytocin was significantly associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture (OR 6.8, 95% CI 3.2-14.3, OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.6-14.6, respectively). The same held for augmentation with oxytocin (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04-5.0).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of TOL was 76%, resulting in a VBAC rate of 54%. Uterine rupture occurred in 1.5% during a TOL, with a risk of perinatal death of 1.2 per 1000. The risk of uterine rupture increased significantly when labour was induced with prostaglandins alone or combined with oxytocin or when labour was augmented with oxytocin.

Rupture of the Primigravid Uterus: A Review of the Literature

Uterine rupture is a catastrophic obstetric complication, associated with high rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common risk factor is previous uterine surgery, and most cases of uterine rupture occur in women with a previous cesarean delivery. Traditionally, the primigravid uterus has been considered almost immune to spontaneous rupture. In fact, although spontaneous rupture of the primigravid uterus is indeed a very rare event, a number of such cases have been reported recently. Prompt recognition of uterine rupture and expeditious recourse to laparotomy are critical in influencing perinatal and maternal morbidity. Not all uterine ruptures present with the typical clinical picture of abdominal pain, hypovolemia, vaginal bleeding, and fetal compromise. Therefore, it is important to maintain a high index of suspicion for uterine rupture in women presenting with some, or all, of these features, regardless of parity. Here we provide a systematic review of cases of spontaneous uterine rupture in primigravid women reported in the literature to date. Clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, common etiological factors, complication rates, and appropriate management of this rare obstetric event are discussed.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to recall that uterine rupture in a primigravida is a rare event, without typical signs and symptoms, and explain that the morbidity and mortality of the mother and child is directly related to a high index of suspicion and prompt treatment by the clinician.

Analysis of uterine rupture in a tertiary center in Eastern Nepal: Lessons for obstetric care

AIM

To determine the etiologic factors, clinical presentation, management and fetomaternal outcome in cases of rupture of the gravid uterus and propose preventive measures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of cases of uterine rupture was carried out at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal, between February 1999 and January 2004.

RESULTS

There were 126 cases of uterine rupture with incidence of one in 112 deliveries. Twenty-five patients (19.8%) had a cesarean scar. Obstructed labor was the common antecedent factor in the unscarred group (46.5%) and use of oxytocics accounted for maximum ruptures (44%) in the scarred category. Patients with an unscarred uterus presented with hypotension and intrauterine death (89.1%), while abdominal tenderness (76%) and fetal distress (64%) were common modes of presentation in the scarred category. Complete rupture was seen in 84.9% of patients. Lateral wall ruptures (71.3%) necessitating hysterectomy (75.2%) were seen in the unscarred group. Anterior ruptures (92%) and repair (84%) were common in the scarred category. Maternal mortality was 13.5% and perinatal mortality 83.3%; these were both higher in the unscarred uterus.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of uterine rupture is high in Eastern Nepal and rupture of the unscarred uterus carries graver risks. Regular antenatal care, hospital deliveries and vigilance during labor with quick referral to a well-equipped center will reduce the incidence of this condition.