Stimulus significance and chlorpromazine effects on the expression of avoidance learning in mice

The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation

In recent years, considerable emphasis has been placed upon the putative role of nucleus accumbens dopamine systems in appetitive motivation and positive reinforcement. However, considerable evidence indicates that brain dopamine in general, and nucleus accumbens dopamine in particular, is involved in aspects of aversive motivation. Administration of dopamine antagonists or localized interference with nucleus accumbens dopamine systems has been shown to disrupt active avoidance behavior. In addition, accumbens dopamine release and metabolism is activated by a wide variety of stressful conditions. A review of the literature indicates that there are substantial similarities between the characteristics of dopaminergic involvement in appetitive and aversive motivation. There is conflicting evidence about the role of dopamine in emotion, and little evidence to suggest that the profound and consistent changes in instrumental behavior produced by interference with DA systems are due to direct dopaminergic mediation of positive affective responses such as hedonia. It is suggested that nucleus accumbens dopamine is involved in aspects of sensorimotor functions that are involved in both appetitive and aversive motivation.

Psychoactive drugs and stimulus analysis: III. Adjustment of behavioural measures for drug-induced memory effects and state dependence: the case of chlorpromazine

Chlorpromazine is shown to have a suppressant effect upon stimulus analysis when given intraperitoneally as a 1 mg/kg dose to rats. The drug has no effects upon motor activity at this dose, but does impair short-term memory. These findings are based upon an examination of chlorpromazine in a newly-designed psychoactive drug classification test which allows adjustments to be made for drug-induced memory effects and for the influence of state dependence. The rationale for these adjustments to behavioural measures is presented in detail.

The effects of chlorpromazine and lithium on appetitive discrimination learning in the rat

Rats learned one of two appetitive discrimination tasks varying in terms of cognitive difficulty. Contrary to previous reports showing an impairment in the acquisition of avoidance tasks under the effects of either chlorpromazine (CPZ) or lithium, the results of this experiment indicate that neither drug retards the acquisition of appetitive tasks. Instead, at the highest doses used (2 and 3 mg/kg), CPZ decreased the number of trials required for the difficult task. Rats administered CPZ had longer reaction times than rats administered placebo, and therefore might have achieved criterion earlier because they spent more time in front of and on the discriminanda. The contrary results reported with avoidance tests concerning the effects of CPZ are explained in terms of the anxiety-reducing properties of CPZ, which might reduce drive without impairing cognitive ability.

The effect of lithium chloride on one-trial passive avoidance learning in rats

1 Expression of a one-trial passive avoidance learning response in rats was examined following injections of lithium chloride or sodium chloride before and after initial training and before the first day of testing. Five tests were given at daily intervals, 24 h after training being the time of the first test. 2. Lithium given before the first day of testing impaired response expression on the first and all subsequent days of testing; the rate of extinction was unaffected. 3. Given both before and immediately after initial training, lithium impaired response expression on the first day of testing but slowed down the subsequent rate of extinction, leading eventually to improved performance on the fifth day, as compared with placebo-treated control subjects. 4. The results are interpreted in the light of the hypothesis that lithium impaired the central processing of sensory information.