Analysis of 523 mandibular fractures

One miniplate versus two miniplates in the fixation of mandibular angle fractures. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes after using one miniplate fixation in the external oblique ridge versus two miniplate fixation for mandibular angle fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library database was performed (last search date: 04 February 2022) according to the PRISMA guidelines. The research question was addressed using the PICO criteria. Only comparative studies between the two techniques were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, comprising a total of 1667 patients, 846 undergoing one miniplate fixation and 854 undergoing two miniplate fixation for mandibular angle fractures were identified. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR]= 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.69] - [1.28], p = 0.68, I²=0.00%), post-operative malocclusion (OR= 0.97, 95% CI: [0.53] - [1.18], p = 0.25, I²=0.00%), post-operative neurosensory dysfunction (OR= 0.67, 95% CI: [0.37] - [1.22], p = 0.19, I²=73.93%), pseudoarthrosis formation (OR=0.90, 95% CI: [0.58] - [(1.39], p = 0.63, I²=0.00%). Wound dehiscence was marginally less common in the one miniplate group (OR=0.52, 95% CI: [0.28] - [0.98], p = 0.04, I²=54.34%). The probability of scarring formation (OR=0.13, 95% CI: [0.05] - [0.32], p = 0.00, I²=0.00%) and hardware failure (OR=0.36, 95% CI [0.21] - [0.62], p = 0.00, I²=29.33%) were statistically significantly higher in the two miniplates arm.

CONCLUSION

One miniplate fixation and two miniplates fixation of mandibular angle fractures have similar results regarding post operative infection, malocclusion, neurosensory dysfunction and pseudoarthrosis formation while wound dehiscence, hardware failure and scarring seem to be more common when two miniplates are used as a fixation technique.

A four year retrospective study of 1,062 patients presenting with maxillofacial emergencies at a specialist paediatric hospital

AIMS

To examine the nature of maxillofacial injuries that presented to the Birmingham Children's Hospital according to aetiology, incidence and characteristics of patients.

METHODS

The maxillofacial unit at Diana Princess of Wales Birmingham Children's Hospital serves a catchment area of 5.2 million. We examined all children who presented with maxillofacial trauma from 2002 to 2006. Details including characteristics of patients and aetiology and nature of injury, were entered prospectively into a database.

RESULTS

The total number of patients who presented was 1062. The ratio of boys to girls was 2:1. The main reason for attendance was a fall (70%). 149 (17%) patients presented after interpersonal violence. Soft tissue injuries accounted for 70% of injuries and 14% presented with a maxillofacial fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the range and mechanism of presenting injuries have not changed within the time frame. Despite public perception of increasing interpersonal violence, this was not reflected in our series of patients.

Prevalence of dental trauma in 6000 patients with facial injuries: implications for prevention

OBJECTIVE

In contrast to epidemiologic studies on facial injuries reporting on dental trauma, facial bone fractures with dentoalveolar injuries, or soft tissue injuries individually, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall place of dental trauma in facial injuries. This was a retrospective investigation of the impact of sport, work, violence, traffic, household, and play accidents in the relationships among dental trauma, facial trauma, and other concomitant trauma. Finally, preventive considerations are discussed.

STUDY DESIGN

Six thousand patients registered at the University Hospital of Innsbruck's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during a period of 6 years 4 months were admitted for dental trauma, facial trauma, or both. Records were analyzed for cause of injury, age, gender, monthly distribution, frequency, type of injury, and frequency of dental trauma in relation to facial injuries and concomitant injuries.

RESULTS

The incidence of dental injuries with respect to the total number of facial injuries was as follows: 57.8% in play and household accidents, 50.1% in sports accidents, 38.6% in accidents at work, 35.8% in acts of violence, 34.2% in traffic accidents, and 31% in unspecified accidents. The overall incidence revealed was 48.25%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the fact that in the mosaic of traumatic injuries, the frequencies of tooth trauma and its sequelae are underestimated and that such trauma and sequelae occur without a predictable pattern of intensity and extensiveness. Preventive approaches are the sole way to minimize the number of these injuries. Substantial progress made in treating facial and dental trauma in the last 2 decades only improves functional and esthetic outcomes among the population that has suffered dental injury.

Accuracy of the tongue blade test in patients with suspected mandibular fracture

The inter-observer reliability and accuracy of the tongue blade test (TBT) for the identification of patients with mandibular fracture was prospectively evaluated using radiographic diagnosis as the gold standard. A consecutive sample of 110 patients presenting to the emergency department of a teaching county hospital was studied. Patients with uninterpretable x-rays, known diagnosis of mandibular fracture, or inability to cooperate for the test were excluded. Bilateral ability to crack a wooden tongue blade held between the teeth was scored as a negative test. Fifty-three patients had mandibular fractures. In the study group, the TBT had a sensitivity of 95.7%; a specificity of 63.5%; a positive predictive value of 66.2%; a negative predictive value of 95.2%; and an accuracy of 77.3%. The TBT provided contributory evidence useful in screening patients for mandibular fracture.

The diagnosis and initial management of the fractured mandible

Mandibular fractures are the second most common facial fracture. The usual causes are interpersonal violence and motor vehicle accidents (MVA). Nearly all cases present to an emergency department for initial management. They are rarely life-threatening injuries and must assume low priority in the initial assessment and management of the severely traumatized patient. Following any resuscitation and exclusion of other significant injuries, a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of the facial injuries should be undertaken including assessment of the fractured mandible. Initial therapy should be directed at temporary immobilization and pharmacologic treatment, followed by referral for appropriate definitive care.

An analysis of mandibular fractures in Dundee, Scotland (1977 to 1985)

A retrospective study was undertaken to assess mandibular fractures presenting over the period 1977-1985 in Dundee, Scotland. The data collected included age, sex, aetiology, month in which injury occurred, anatomical site of fracture, associated maxillofacial trauma and treatment modalities. The majority of fractures were sustained by males in the age group 20 to 29 years. Assault was the major cause of trauma followed by falls and road traffic accidents. The posterior body region was found to be the most common fracture site in the mandible. The level of such trauma has more than doubled, since a similar study was undertaken between the years 1961 to 1970.

Sports-related maxillofacial fractures in a hospital material

Sports-related maxillofacial fractures were analysed in 80 patients, accounting for 5.6% of all patients with facial bone fractures, treated during the 5-year period 1981-1985. 55% of the patients had 1 or more mandibular fractures and 45% had midface fractures. 6% of the patients had multiple injuries. The most common causes of injury were collision and fall. Soccer and ice hockey turned out to be the most hazardous sports, although sports-related maxillofacial fractures were less severe than those related to other causes. The need for oral and facial protection among athletes involved in contact sports is discussed.

The impact-absorbing effects of facial fractures in closed-head injuries. An analysis of 210 patients

A series of 210 patients with facial fractures sufficiently severe to require cranial computerized tomography (CT) to evaluate suspected closed-head injury (CHI) was studied. The injuries were separated into five grades of severity based on neurological examination, including cranial CT. The injuries were also grouped into three categories based on facial regional involvement, using chi-square contingency table analysis. The data demonstrated that patients with upper facial fractures were at greatest risk for serious CHI. Injuries to both the mandibular and the midfacial regions with no upper facial involvement more frequently resulted in mild CHI with a modest likelihood of no neurological deficits. Trauma to only the mandibular region or to only the midfacial region was least likely to involve CHI.

Management of comminuted mandibular war injuries with multiple circumferential wires

The use of multiple circumferential wires to stabilize shattered mandibular body or symphysis fractures due to war injuries is described. The technique provides favorable conditions for bone healing by decreasing the interfragmental space, reducing the risk of infection, and limiting the possibility of sequestration or resorption.

How We Manage Mandibular Fractures

In brief: Mandibular fractures occasionally are sports-related injuries. Diagnosis is based on clinical signs and symptoms and is confirmed with various radiographic views of the mandible. The nature of the fracture and the presence or absence of teeth determine the type of treatment used. Treatment modalities include temporary stabilization with subsequent open or closed reduction using one of a variety of techniques. Rigid internal fixation of fractures-a recently developed technique-may eliminate the need for prolonged immobilization of the jaw and permit early function of the jaw.

Experimental fractures of monkey mandibles

Forty vervet monkey half mandibles, 20 with unerupted third molars and 20 with erupted third molars, were partially embedded in acrylic and loaded in an Instron tensiometer. Mandibles with unerupted third molars fractured at 15.8 +/- 2.5 kg while those having erupted third molars fractured at 26.4 +/- 4.2 kg. Mandibles having unerupted third molars were shown to be significantly weaker than the mandibles with erupted third molar (t = 8.45, P less than 0.001).