Sequential immunopathologic study of oral lichen planus treated with tretinoin and etretinate

Pimecrolimus 1% cream for oral erosive lichen planus: a 6-week randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study with a 6-week open-label extension to assess efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of topical pimecrolimus 1% cream in the treatment of oral erosive lichen planus.

DESIGN

A 6-week randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase followed by a 6-week open-label phase.

SETTING

Outpatients of the Department of Dermatology, University of Utah.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one patients with oral erosive lichen planus were randomized and treated with either pimecrolimus 1% cream or vehicle cream.

INTERVENTION

Pimecrolimus 1% cream, or its vehicle, were applied twice daily for 6 weeks to each side of the mouth with a 2×2 inch gauze pad folded in half and placed directly on the erosive lesion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Efficacy was based on clinical evaluation of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of the overall severity of the disease, erythema, measurement of the size of any target erosion in millimetres, and assessment of spontaneous pain. Blood levels of pimecrolimus were monitored in all subjects on day 0 and repeated on day 7.

RESULTS

Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle cream in reducing mean IGA, pain, and erosion size. For the vehicle group that entered the open-label phase, pimecrolimus 1% cream improved the mean IGA, pain, erosion size, and erythema. Pimecrolimus levels were detected in nine out of 10 of the pimecrolimus-treated subjects. These levels were consistently low. The pimecrolimus cream was well-tolerated. No clinically relevant, drug-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Pimecrolimus 1% cream was superior to vehicle in reducing pain, erythema, decreasing erosion size, and improving overall severity of disease when compared with vehicle treatment.

A randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of different concentrations of isotretinoin in the management of lichen planus

The aim of our 10-year study was to test the effectiveness of topical therapy based on 0.18% isotretinoin, comparing it with that most frequently used, i.e. at 0.05% concentration. Seventy patients with an established diagnosis of oral lichen planus were involved in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the drug was administered topically at 0.05% and 0.18% concentrations. The drug at the higher concentration, according to the same protocol, was administered to the patients who did not benefit from the therapy at the lower concentration. None of the cases of reticular lichen planus showed clinical or histological improvement. In contrast, the atrophic-erosive forms showed a significant improvement, both clinical and histological: in 26 patients (at 0.18% concentration) and in nine patients (at 0.05% concentration), the symptoms, as well as the erosions or ulcers observed, disappeared. The disappearance of dysplasic phenomena was observed at 0.18% concentration. Topical application of the drug was accompanied by an increase in soreness and pain, as well as greater sensitivity to hot foods. However, these side effects were transitory, and considered acceptable by the patients. The proposed therapeutic protocol was effective towards highly active atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus with dysplasic phenomena, which is the form of the disease at higher risk of malignant evolution.

The effectiveness of 1% pimecrolimus cream in the treatment of oral erosive lichen planus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, relative safety, and tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream in the treatment of oral erosive lichen planus (OELP).

METHODS

Twenty patients with OELP were randomized into equal groups; group 1 applied 1% pimecrolimus cream twice daily to their oral lesions for 4 weeks, whereas group 2 applied a placebo cream. Photographs of the lesions were taken and analyzed for areas of ulceration, erythema, and reticulation. Discomfort scores were also assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Blood samples were taken at baseline and at study completion; a complete blood count with differential and comprehensive metabolic panel was ordered. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.

RESULTS

The experimental group showed a decrease in ulceration (alpha = 0.068) and erythema (alpha = 0.005) at the mid-point with continued reduction of erythema at the final (alpha = 0.075) time measurement. The control group demonstrated an increase in reticulation at the mid-point (alpha = 0.017) and final (alpha = 0.007) time measurement. The VAS scores for the experimental group decreased during the study (alpha = 0.022). Blood levels were within the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

The OELP lesion size in the 1% pimecrolimus group decreased and the pimecrolimus cream was found to significantly reduce the patient's pain scores. Further study of 1% pimecrolimus as therapy for OELP is warranted since it was shown to be effective, relatively safe, and well tolerated by patients within the limits of this short-term study.

Oral lichen planus: a preliminary clinical study on treatment with tazarotene

OBJECTIVE

The rationale for using tazarotene in oral lichen planus (OLP) is its regulatory action on the growth and differentiation of keratinocytes and on inflammation. This randomized, placebo-controlled study addresses evaluation of the effects of topic tazarotene in the treatment of OLP.

DESIGN

The degree of lesions before and after treatment scored by a 6-score scale in six cases treated with tazarotene was statistically compared with those of six controls treated with placebo.

SUBJECTS

Twelve patients with hyperkeratosic OLP were randomly allocated to treatment with tazarotene gel 0.1% b.i.d. or with placebo for eight consecutive weeks.

METHODS

The statistical comparison was executed by means of Wilcoxon analysis for paired data.

RESULTS

Patients treated with tazarotene presented a significant reduction of their lesions as compared with the control group. Among transitory side-effects, burning sensation and taste abnormalities were observed.

CONCLUSION

Topical tazarotene may be a valuable therapeutic tool in the treatment of hyperkeratotic OLP.

Management of oral lichen planus

Lichen planus is a relatively common disorder of the stratified squamous epithelia. Most dental and medical practitioners see patients with lichen planus, but not all are recognized as having the disease. Patients with lichen planus may have concomitant involvement of the disease in multiple sites. Oral lichen planus lesions usually have a distinctive clinical morphology and characteristic distribution, but oral lichen planus may also present a confusing array of patterns and forms, and other disorders may clinically mimic oral lichen planus. The etiopathogenesis of lichen planus appears to be complex, with interactions between genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Much has now been clarified about the etiopathogenic mechanisms involved and interesting new associations, such as with liver disease, have emerged. The management of lichen planus is still not totally satisfactory in all cases and there is as yet no definitive treatment that results in long term remission, but there have been advances in the control of the condition. Amongst the many treatments available, high potency topical corticosteroids remain the most reliably effective, though topical cyclosporine, topical tacrolimus, or systemic corticosteroids may be indicated in patients whose condition is unresponsive to topical corticosteroids.

The management of oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature regarding the medical treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed on-line Medline data searches were carried out for the years 1966-1998 to identify reports on therapy of OLP.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Single case reports or open trials were included if they covered new therapeutic approaches or suggested significant modifications of known treatment modalities. Review papers were limited to those dealing with the topic.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Every paper was critically examined. Because of the great heterogeneity of the response criteria, many data could not be directly compared. Stronger weight was given to therapies that have proven to be effective under placebo-controlled research protocols. Attention was also drawn to potential and effective adverse effects of every drug used.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the various medications advocated for the treatment of OLP, several lack conclusive findings from adequately controlled trials. Mainly high-potency topical corticosteroids in an adhesive medium appear at present the safest and most efficacious. Adjuvant agents as antimycotics may be useful in topical steroid treatment. Systemic corticosteroids may be occasionally indicated for severe recalcitrant erosive OLP or for diffuse mucocutaneous involvement. Topical cyclosporine should be considered in steroid-unresponsive cases considering that its efficacy in OLP could be related to a systemic effect and its high cost. Classical PUVA therapy seems to have too many side effects; topical application of psoralen is promising but still experimental. Topically and systemically delivered retinoids combined with topical corticosteroids could improve the efficacy of these agents whereas complete remission is difficult to achieve with retinoids alone and they frequently cause adverse effects. Finally, there are only few data concerning the long-term effect of the medical treatments upon the course of OLP and we do not know if therapy influences the malignant evolution of OLP.

Efficacy of topical mesalazine compared with clobetasol propionate in treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVE

To compare topically applied mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) to topically applied clobetasol propionate in the treatment of patients suffering from symptomatic oral lichen planus.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled longitudinal investigation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five out-patients suffering from oral lichen planus and referred to the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine of the University of Milan, Italy, during the period January to August 1997. Patients were randomly allocated (Group A and Group B) to treatment with mesalazine 5% or clobetasol propionate 0.05%. The drugs were topically applied twice daily for 4 weeks. Discomfort and pain were evaluated by the patient before and after treatment using a Visual Analogue Scale from zero (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). Results were statistically evaluated by a Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The two pharmacological regimens obtained partial and complete absence of symptoms. In particular, the mesalazine tested group disclosed 57% complete absence of symptoms, 21.3% partial response and 9% no response. No statistically relevant difference has been detected between the two regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this preliminary study, if confirmed by further investigations, suggest that mesalazine might be considered an alternative to clobetasol propionate for treatment of symptomatic oral lichen planus.

Problems and abnormalities found on routine clinical head and neck examination

During the initial examination of a patient, the orthodontist may encounter various findings that will, for the most part, be normal or variants of normal. Most pathological conditions encountered will be derived from structures normally found in the anatomic locations examined. Knowledge of the anatomy and common pathological entities based on location can prove helpful when abnormalities are encountered. This article describes anatomic locations and their contents in and around the oral cavity and discusses pathological processes commonly encountered in these locations. Syndromes involved with various abnormalities also are briefly mentioned. The intent of this article is to give the clinician a working knowledge of commonly occurring pathological entities.

Update on oral lichen planus: etiopathogenesis and management

Lichen planus (LP) is a relatively common disorder of the stratified squamous epithelia, which is, in many ways, an enigma. This paper is the consensus outcome of a workshop held in Switzerland in 1995, involving a selection of clinicians and scientists with an interest in the condition and its management. The oral (OLP) eruptions usually have a distinct clinical morphology and characteristic distribution, but OLP may also present a confusing array of patterns and forms, and other disorders may clinically simulate OLP. Lesions may affect other mucosae and/or skin. Lichen planus is probably of multifactorial origin, sometimes induced by drugs or dental materials, often idiopathic, and with an immunopathogenesis involving T-cells in particular. The etiopathogenesis appears to be complex, with interactions between and among genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, but much has now been clarified about the mechanisms involved, and interesting new associations, such as with liver disease, have emerged. The management of lichen planus is still not totally satisfactory, and there is as yet no definitive treatment, but there have been advances in the control of the condition. There is no curative treatment available; immunomodulation, however, can control the condition. Based on the observed increased risk of malignant development, OLP patients should be offered regular follow-up examination from two to four times annually and asked to report any changes in their lesions and/or symptoms. Follow-up may be particularly important in patients with atrophic/ulcerative/erosive affections of the tongue, the gingiva, or the buccal mucosa. Much more research is required into the genetic and environmental aspects of lichen planus, into the premalignant potential, and into the possible associations with chronic liver, and other disorders. More clinical studies are required into the possible efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs such as pentoxifylline and thalidomide.

Effectiveness of a low dose of cyclosporine in the management of patients with oral erosive lichen planus

This study investigated the effectiveness of a low-dose cyclosporine rinse used in the treatment of oral erosive lichen planus. Fourteen patients with oral erosive lichen planus provided seven experimental sites treated with cyclosporine and seven control sites treated with a placebo. Participants rinsed with 5 ml (500 mg) of cyclosporine or 5 ml of a placebo for 5 minutes each day over a period of 4 weeks. Cyclosporine blood levels as well as complete blood cell counts with differential and serial multiple analysis were monitored throughout the study. Weekly quantitative measurements of lesion size and character (ulceration, erythema, and reticulation) were recorded with the use of an intraoral grid. Healing was defined as the transition from ulceration to erythema to reticulation or to complete resolution. Pain assessment with the use of a visual analogue scale and a questionnaire pertaining to any side effects of treatment were completed each week. At 4 weeks, a statistically significant difference was observed in lesion healing between the cyclosporine and placebo groups. All experimental sites demonstrated progressive healing with evidence of reduced erythema and ulceration, increased reticulation, and decreased pain scores. In contrast, control sites exhibited minimal change in lesion size or character, and patients reported unchanged or increased pain scores. No significant side effects were reported. Within the parameters of this investigation, topical cyclosporine proved to an effective alternative therapy to currently available medications used in the treatment of oral lichen planus.