Differential effect of a chemical algogen on two nociceptive thresholds

The role of contextual cues on counterirritation in the development process of analgesic tolerance to morphine

Tolerance to morphine analgesia was determined by daily exposing rats either to the same box or different boxes during repeated administration of formalin (2.5%, 0.4 mL/body, sc) and morphine (5 mg/kg, sc). The analgesic effect was determined daily for four consecutive days by exposing rats to either the same box or different boxes, and the process of tolerance development was assessed by a hot plate test (52.5 degrees C). The rats were divided into four groups: one group received formalin and morphine in the same context (Group FM-Same), one group in the different context (Group FM-Diff), one group received saline and morphine in the same context (Group SM-Same), two groups received formalin in the same or different contexts (Groups FS-Same or FS-Diff), and one group received saline in the same context (Group SS-Same). The response latency of Group SM-Same was decreased from Day 2 to a level similar to that of Group SS-Same on Day 4, while that of FM-Same decreased more slowly. The latency of Group FM-Diff maintained the level of Day 2 until Day 4, being significantly longer than that of FM-Same. In the Extinction Phase, all rats received formalin and saline injections in the same box they had been exposed to on Day 1. On the first day, hyperalgesia was evident in Group SM-Same alone. In the Re-test Phase, the rats underwent a second morphine injection, and showed recovery from tolerance. These results indicate that formalin-induced chronic stress pain reduces tolerance development to morphine, and the mutual influence of pain, counterirritation, between formalin and hot-plate, facilitates the effect of contextual cues by inhibiting an associative learning.

[Critical analysis of animal models of acute pain. II]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse models of acute pain in experimental animals.

DATA SOURCES

References were obtained from computerised bibliographic data banks (Medline and others) and the authors' personal documents.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The majority of tests permit only a measurement of threshold, whereas clinical pain is almost always prolonged. The relationships between tests of acute pain and motor activity are reviewed from a number of standpoints; in particular we consider the influence, which postural adjustments of the animal may exert on motor responses in the limbs and the significance of flexor and extensor reflexes. In analysing the problem of the sensitivity of tests, we raise the following questions: 1) what type(s) of fibres underlie the observed responses and might these be different depending on whether one is stimulating a healthy or an inflamed tissue; 2) what significance do measurements of "latency" have when a stimulus is increasing; 3) how valid are the methods of analysing the results? The influence of species and the genetic line used in tests and the specificity and predictivity of tests are considered. Finally, we review those factors, which may distort behavioural measurements in animals, notably--pharmacokinetics, interactions between heterotopic stimuli, environmental factors and related psychophysiological/psychological considerations (subjective "undesirable" phenomena, learning phenomena). We pay particular attention to related physiological functions (thermoregulation, vasomotricity, blood pressure). These considerations lead us to re-position nociception within a much larger homeostatic framework which in addition to pain, includes phenomena such as anxiety and vegetative functions. They also suggest that we should define an "effective stimulus" as one, which activates nociceptive nerve terminals after a physical stimulus, has passed through a "peripheral lens" which regulates its intensity for reasons, which are physical, albeit of biological origin. Finally they remind us that the "system of pain" forms part of a whole set of subsystems--sensory, motor, vegetative, emotional, motivational--which scientific method, being reductionist by nature, cannot study in its entirety. However one must consider results of nociceptive tests within this general context.

CONCLUSION

It is only by taking the approach described in this review, that fundamental and clinical research can interact usefully.

Transmission of chronic nociception by spinal neurons expressing the substance P receptor

Substance P receptor (SPR)-expressing spinal neurons were ablated with the selective cytotoxin substance P-saporin. Loss of these neurons resulted in a reduction of thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia associated with persistent neuropathic and inflammatory pain states. This loss appeared to be permanent. Responses to mildly painful stimuli and morphine analgesia were unaffected by this treatment. These results identify a target for treating persistent pain and suggest that the small population of SPR-expressing neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord plays a pivotal role in the generation and maintenance of chronic neuropathic and inflammatory pain.

Oxotremorine-induced modifications of the behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to formalin pain in male rats

In the present investigation, the antinociceptive effects of the muscarinic cholinergic agonist, oxotremorine, were evaluated in rats using the formalin test. In Expt. 1, two oxotremorine concentrations (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg) and two administration times (15 and 1 min before formalin injection) were chosen. All spontaneous and formalin-evoked behavioral responses were considered. In Expt. 2, only the higher concentration of oxotremorine (0.2 mg/kg) was administered 15 or 1 min before the formalin test. The animals were killed 15, 30 or 60 min after formalin treatment. Blood was collected from the trunk to determine corticosterone plasma levels. Some brain areas (hypothalamus, septum and periaqueductal gray matter) were dissected for determination of the beta-endorphin content. Oxotremorine induced a dose- and time-dependent reduction of all formalin-evoked responses: licking was decreased during both the first and second phases of the formalin test, flexing was decreased during the second phase by the higher concentration only and paw-jerk was decreased during the first phase by both concentrations. Rearing and line-crossing were significantly decreased by oxotremorine while exploratory activity was only partially reduced; self-grooming was increased. These effects on exploratory activity and self-grooming were abolished by formalin treatment. beta-endorphin content in the septum was increased by oxotremorine administered 15 min, but not 1 min, before formalin-treatment. beta-endorphin in the hypothalamus increased in all formalin-treated groups independently of oxotremorine administration. These results confirm, and extend to tonic pain, the analgesic effect exerted by oxotremorine on phasic responses. Because of the different effects on each formalin-induced response, they also indicate both spinal and supraspinal CNS sites of action.

A capsaicin-receptor antagonist, capsazepine, reduces inflammation-induced hyperalgesic responses in the rat: evidence for an endogenous capsaicin-like substance

In the present study, the presence of an endogenous capsaicin-like substance and the role of capsaicin receptors in nociception during inflammation were assessed using Fos immunohistochemistry and the paw-withdrawal test in rats. Intradermal injection of carrageenan in the hind-paw produced inflammation in the foot pad, increased the number of cells exhibiting Fos-like immunoreactivity in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, and decreased the paw-withdrawal latency. Intradermal injection of capsazepine, a capsaicin-receptor antagonist, significantly reduced the number of cells exhibiting Fos-like immunoreactivity, significantly increased the paw-withdrawal latency, but did not decrease inflammation induced by carrageenan injection. Intradermal injection of capsaicin or formalin also increased Fos-positive neurons. Capsaicin- or formalin-induced Fos expression was reduced in both cases by pretreatment of capsazepine, but to a much lesser extent for formalin. The capsazepine inhibition of carrageenan inflammation-induced hyperalgesic responses strongly suggests that an endogenous capsaicin-like substance is released in inflamed tissues and produces nociceptive neural impulses by acting on capsaicin receptors present on sensory neurons. Furthermore, our results indicate that capsaicin receptors take part only in generating nociceptive signals in sensory neurons, but not in activating the inflammation-promoting cells.

Effect of subcutaneous administration of the chemical algogen formalin, on 5-HT metabolism in the nucleus raphe magnus and the medullary dorsal horn: a voltammetric study in freely moving rats

The effect of subcutaneous administration of the chemical algogen formalin, on serotonin (5-HT) metabolism in the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and the medullary dorsal horn (MDH) has been investigated using in vivo 5-hydroxyindole electrochemical (peak '3') detection with treated, multi-carbon fiber electrodes and differential pulse, or normal pulse, voltammetry in freely moving rats. The subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of 50 microliters of 10% formalin in the left forepaw was followed, at the NRM level, by a significant increase in the voltammograms as compared to controls (50 microliters of saline 0.9% s.c. in left forepaw) for about 70 min after the injection, before a return to control values. At the MDH level, the formalin injection induced no significant effect on peak 3, as compared to controls, during the first 70 min. After that, the voltammograms significantly increased and remained above controls for up to 180 min. Thus, the time-courses of NRM and MDH effects appear markedly different. These findings suggest that, depending on the anatomical level (NRM or MDH) and/or the period of observation, one can measure differences in the time-course of the increase in 5-HT metabolism in the NRM-dorsal horn serotonergic system by tonic noxious stimuli, such as the formalin test.

Interactions between chemical and thermal cutaneous stimuli: inhibition (counterirritation) and integration

Methyl salicylate, a commonly used chemical counterirritant, was applied topically to the forearm to determine whether a nonpainful chemical irritation could inhibit the perception of another (weaker) chemical irritation. In the first experiment, sensations of irritation (burning and stinging) produced by a 10% solution of methyl salicylate were significantly attenuated when a 15% solution of the same chemical was applied to the opposite forearm. In the second experiment, neither the perception of warmth nor the heat pain threshold was affected by application of 10% or 15% methyl salicylate to a site 10 cm from the thermal stimulus. Inhibition did, however, occur in the opposite direction: Chemical irritation was reduced after the thermal stimulus reached a painful level. In the third experiment, a 15% solution of methyl salicylate was applied immediately adjacent to the thermal stimulus, with the result that ratings of warmth intensity increased rather than decreased, and perceived irritation was again attenuated following a painful heat stimulus. Overall, the results indicate that (1) chemical counterirritation can occur at nonpainful levels; (2) the resulting inhibition is confined to the nociceptive system; and (3) when the nociceptive and warmth system are activated together, the tendency is toward integration rather than inhibition.

Is spinal cord dorsolateral funiculus involved in hypoalgesia induced by counter-irritation?

Several previous studies have demonstrated that, depending upon the behavioral test used, counter-irritation (i.e. the pain-relieving effects of pain elicited from heterotopic body areas) can produce hypoalgesia. In the present study, behavioral responses were elicited in the rat by increasing calibrated pressure applied to a hindpaw (Randall-Selitto test; 'passive' stimulus) and were studied before and after a subcutaneous formalin injection ('active' stimulus). The vocalization threshold to the pressure was clearly increased after injection of the algogenic solution either in the forepaw or in the cheek. Using this vocalization threshold, the counter-irritation-produced hypoalgesia was generally unchanged by unilateral dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) lesions. Following bilateral DLF lesions, hypoalgesia was decreased when formalin was injected in the forepaw, but was unaffected when the algogen was injected in the cheek. The present results partly contrast with previous papers from our group, where it has been assumed that the DLF is mainly involved in the neural circuitry subserving diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), which have been considered as one possible neurophysiological basis for counter-irritation phenomena. They are discussed with reference to various hypotheses, including DNIC, as explanations for counter-irritation.