1
|
McFadden WC, Walsh H, Richter F, Soudant C, Bryce CH, Hof PR, Fowkes M, Crary JF, McKenzie AT. Perfusion fixation in brain banking: a systematic review. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019; 7:146. [PMID: 31488214 PMCID: PMC6728946 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0799-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Perfusing fixatives through the cerebrovascular system is the gold standard approach in animals to prepare brain tissue for spatial biomolecular profiling, circuit tracing, and ultrastructural studies such as connectomics. Translating these discoveries to humans requires examination of postmortem autopsy brain tissue. Yet banked brain tissue is routinely prepared using immersion fixation, which is a significant barrier to optimal preservation of tissue architecture. The challenges involved in adopting perfusion fixation in brain banks and the extent to which it improves histology quality are not well defined. Methodology We searched four databases to identify studies that have performed perfusion fixation in human brain tissue and screened the references of the eligible studies to identify further studies. From the included studies, we extracted data about the methods that they used, as well as any data comparing perfusion fixation to immersion fixation. The protocol was preregistered at the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/cv3ys/. Results We screened 4489 abstracts, 214 full-text publications, and identified 35 studies that met our inclusion criteria, which collectively reported on the perfusion fixation of 558 human brains. We identified a wide variety of approaches to perfusion fixation, including perfusion fixation of the brain in situ and ex situ, perfusion fixation through different sets of blood vessels, and perfusion fixation with different washout solutions, fixatives, perfusion pressures, and postfixation tissue processing methods. Through a qualitative synthesis of data comparing the outcomes of perfusion and immersion fixation, we found moderate confidence evidence showing that perfusion fixation results in equal or greater subjective histology quality compared to immersion fixation of relatively large volumes of brain tissue, in an equal or shorter amount of time. Conclusions This manuscript serves as a resource for investigators interested in building upon the methods and results of previous research in designing their own perfusion fixation studies in human brains or other large animal brains. We also suggest several future research directions, such as comparing the in situ and ex situ approaches to perfusion fixation, studying the efficacy of different washout solutions, and elucidating the types of brain donors in which perfusion fixation is likely to result in higher fixation quality than immersion fixation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40478-019-0799-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hughes DF, Walker EM, Gignac PM, Martinez A, Negishi K, Lieb CS, Greenbaum E, Khan AM. Rescuing Perishable Neuroanatomical Information from a Threatened Biodiversity Hotspot: Remote Field Methods for Brain Tissue Preservation Validated by Cytoarchitectonic Analysis, Immunohistochemistry, and X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155824. [PMID: 27196138 PMCID: PMC4873048 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Biodiversity hotspots, which harbor more endemic species than elsewhere on Earth, are increasingly threatened. There is a need to accelerate collection efforts in these regions before threatened or endangered species become extinct. The diverse geographical, ecological, genetic, morphological, and behavioral data generated from the on-site collection of an individual specimen are useful for many scientific purposes. However, traditional methods for specimen preparation in the field do not permit researchers to retrieve neuroanatomical data, disregarding potentially useful data for increasing our understanding of brain diversity. These data have helped clarify brain evolution, deciphered relationships between structure and function, and revealed constraints and selective pressures that provide context about the evolution of complex behavior. Here, we report our field-testing of two commonly used laboratory-based techniques for brain preservation while on a collecting expedition in the Congo Basin and Albertine Rift, two poorly known regions associated with the Eastern Afromontane biodiversity hotspot. First, we found that transcardial perfusion fixation and long-term brain storage, conducted in remote field conditions with no access to cold storage laboratory equipment, had no observable impact on cytoarchitectural features of lizard brain tissue when compared to lizard brain tissue processed under laboratory conditions. Second, field-perfused brain tissue subjected to prolonged post-fixation remained readily compatible with subsequent immunohistochemical detection of neural antigens, with immunostaining that was comparable to that of laboratory-perfused brain tissue. Third, immersion-fixation of lizard brains, prepared under identical environmental conditions, was readily compatible with subsequent iodine-enhanced X-ray microcomputed tomography, which facilitated the non-destructive imaging of the intact brain within its skull. In summary, we have validated multiple approaches to preserving intact lizard brains in remote field conditions with limited access to supplies and a high degree of environmental exposure. This protocol should serve as a malleable framework for researchers attempting to rescue perishable and irreplaceable morphological and molecular data from regions of disappearing biodiversity. Our approach can be harnessed to extend the numbers of species being actively studied by the neuroscience community, by reducing some of the difficulty associated with acquiring brains of animal species that are not readily available in captivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F. Hughes
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Doctoral Program in Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ellen M. Walker
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Doctoral Program in Environmental Pathobiology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Paul M. Gignac
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Anais Martinez
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Doctoral Program in Environmental Pathobiology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kenichiro Negishi
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Masters Program in Biology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Carl S. Lieb
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Eli Greenbaum
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| | - Arshad M. Khan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- UTEP Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
- Border Biomedical Research Center, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|