The timing of division in twin cell doublets

Actin polymerisation at the cytoplasmic face of eukaryotic nuclei

Background

There exists abundant molecular and ultra-structural evidence to suggest that cytoplasmic actin can physically interact with the nuclear envelope (NE) membrane system. However, this interaction has yet to be characterised in living interphase cells.

Results

Using a fluorescent conjugate of the actin binding drug cytochalasin D (CD-BODIPY) we provide evidence that polymerising actin accumulates in vicinity to the NE. In addition, both transiently expressed fluorescent actin and cytoplasmic micro-injection of fluorescent actin resulted in accumulation of actin at the NE-membrane. Consistent with the idea that the cytoplasmic phase of NE-membranes can support this novel pool of perinuclear actin polymerisation we show that isolated, intact, differentiated primary hepatocyte nuclei support actin polymerisation in vitro. Further this phenomenon was inhibited by treatments hindering steric access to outer-nuclear-membrane proteins (e.g. wheat germ agglutinin, anti-nesprin and anti-nucleoporin antibodies).

Conclusion

We conclude that actin polymerisation occurs around interphase nuclei of living cells at the cytoplasmic phase of NE-membranes.

Reversible changes in size of cell nuclei isolated from Amoeba proteus: Role of the cytoskeleton

Micrurgically isolated interphasal nuclei of Amoeba proteus, which preserve F-actin cytoskeletal shells on their surface, shrink after perfusion with imidazole buffer without ATP, and expand to about 200% of their cross-sectional area upon addition of pyrophosphate. These changes in size may be reproduced several times with the same nucleus. The shrunken nuclei are insensitive to the osmotic effects of sugars and distilled water, whereas the expanded ones react only to the distilled water, showing further swelling. The shrinking-expansion cycles are partially inhibited by cytochalasins. They are attributed to the state of actomyosin complex in the perinuclear cytoskeleton, which is supposed to be in the rigor state in the imidazole buffer without ATP, and to dissociate in the presence of pyrophosphate. Inflow of external medium to the nuclei during dissociation of the myosin from the perinuclear F-actin may be due to colloidal osmosis depending on other macromolecular components of the karyoplasm.Key words: Amoeba proteus, isolated nuclei, perinuclear cytoskeleton.

Peripheral nuclear matrix actin forms perinuclear shells

Perinuclear actin shells have been reported in a variety of organisms. The shells have been identified by staining perinuclear material with fluorescently-labelled phalloidin, but have not been localized to a specific subcellular compartment at the ultrastructural level. We show here that the shells of 3T3 cells lie in the peripheral nuclear matrix. Nuclear shells and matrix actin in other parts of the nucleus are not usually detected by immunohistochemical staining because they are inaccessible to antibodies or to phalloidin. Immunohistochemical detection of nuclear actin is only possible during its deposition at the end of mitosis, or in interphase nuclei that have been extracted with detergent, digested with nucleases and washed with high salt buffers.

F-actin forms transient perinuclear shells at the mitosis-interphase transition

Intermediate filaments and microtubules are known to be involved in establishing and maintaining nuclear shape. F-actin may also be involved in determining nuclear shape, since we have found it associated with reforming nuclei very briefly after cell division. We stained cells from vertebrate tissue cultures (3T3 and NRK-49F) and epidermal cells from an insect with rhodamine-phalloidin and Hoechst #33342 to localize F-actin in relation to the nucleus. We found that F-actin forms shells only around nuclei during reorganization in late mitosis and early interphase. We suggest that perinuclear F-actin shells may be generally present in eukaryotes, but that they are easily missed because of their delicacy and transience.

Preservation and contrast without osmication or section staining

Conventional treatment of tissues for sectioning and transmission electron microscopy uses aldehyde fixation and osmium tetroxide postfixation. Although the result is aesthetically pleasing, osmication destroys some cell components and reduces the chemical activity of others, such as reaction with antibodies and lectins. We have found that aldehyde fixation followed by uranyl acetate preserves and contrasts most structures and visualizes some that are not easily seen after osmication. Aldehyde/UA treated tissues have enough contrast to be observed without section staining while retaining some of the chemical activity that is lost through osmication. Sections of tissues with good preservation and contrast can be used for immunogold and lectin-gold labelling of at least some molecules.