A comparison of the nucleotide sequence homologies of three isolates of bean yellow mosaic virus and their relationship to other potyviruses

Bean yellow mosaic, clover yellow vein, and pea mosaic are distinct potyviruses: evidence from coat protein gene sequences and molecular hybridization involving the 3' non-coding regions

The sequences of the 3' 1019 nucleotides of the genome of an atypical strain of bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV-S) and of the 3' 1018 nucleotides of the clover yellow vein virus (CYVV-B) genome have been determined. These sequences contain the complete coding region of the viral coat protein followed by a 3' non-coding region of 173 and 178 nucleotides for BYMV-S and CYVV-B, respectively. When the deduced amino acid sequences of the coat protein coding regions were compared, a sequence identity of 77% was found between the two viruses, and optimal alignment of the 3' untranslated regions of BYMV-S and CYVV-B gave a 65% identity. However, the degree of homology of the amino acid sequences of coat proteins of BYMV-S with the published sequences for three other strains of BYMV ranged from 88% to 94%, while the sequence homology of the 3' untranslated regions between the four strains of BYMV ranged between 86% and 95%. Amplified DNA probes corresponding to the 3' non-coding regions of BYMV-S and CYVV-B showed strong hybridization only with the strains of their respective viruses and not with strains of other potyviruses, including pea mosaic virus (PMV). The relatively low sequence identities between the BYMV-S and CYVV-B coat proteins and their 3' non-coding regions, together with the hybridization results, indicate that BYMV, CYVV, and PMV are distinct potyviruses.

Potyviruses, chaos or order?

At first potyviruses were easily distinguished by biological and serological properties because only a few were known and information on their host ranges was limited. The first evidence of serological cross reaction between two of these viruses was reported in 1951 and was further corroborated for three obviously distinct members of the group in 1960. In 1968 attention was drawn to the fact that some legume and non-legume potyviruses have much wider host ranges than previously known and that within the potyvirus group there is as much biological variation within viruses and overlap between viruses as there is in serology. The concept of continuity within the group was soon supported by others and became known as the "continuum hypothesis." Results with highly sensitive serological methods using polyclonal antisera were conflicting, and nucleic acid hybridization techniques did not unambiguously discriminate between potyviruses. Recent results, obtained with antibodies directed toward epitopes located in the N-termini of the coat proteins of potyviruses, suggest that there are ways to more definitely group strains of one potyvirus and distinguish them from other potyviruses. However, there are exceptions to this rule, as in the case of bean yellow mosaic virus and clover yellow vein virus which are clearly distinct in host range, inclusion bodies, and migration velocity of coat protein, but which still react with antibodies to the N-terminal epitopes of one virus. So the question remains of whether coat-protein properties, especially the serological reactivity of N-termini, which do not alter overall virus integrity when lost, sufficiently represent the genome of a pathogenic virus entity as a single criterion for classification.

Identification and classification of potyviruses on the basis of coat protein sequence data and serology. Brief review

The identification and classification of potyviruses has been in a very unsatisfactory state due to the large size of the group, the apparent vast variation among the members and the lack satisfactory taxonomic parameters that will distinguish distinct viruses from strains. In the past, use of classical methods, such as host range and symptomatology, cross-protection, morphology of cytoplasmic inclusions and conventional serology, revealed a "continuum" implying that the "species" and "strain" concepts cannot be applied to potyviruses. In contrast nucleic acid and amino acid sequence data of coat proteins has clearly demonstrated that potyviruses can be divided into distinct members and strains. This sequence data in combination with information of the structure of the potyvirus particle has been used to develop simple techniques such as HPLC peptide profiling, serology (using polyclonal antibody probes obtained by cross-adsorption with core protein from trypsin treated particles) and cDNA hybridization. These findings, along with immunochemical analyses of overlapping synthetic peptides have established the molecular basis for potyvirus serology; explained many of the problems associated with the application of conventional serology; and provided a sound basis for the identification and classification of potyviruses. As a result, the virus/strain status of some potyviruses has been redefined, requiring a change in the potyvirus nomenclature. These new developments necessitate a re-evaluation of the earlier literature on symptomatology, cross-protection, cytoplasmic inclusion body morphology and serology.