Effect of myelocytic maturation of HL60 cells on replication of influenza and polioviruses

Cellular tropism of human enterovirus D species serotypes EV-94, EV-70, and EV-68 in vitro: implications for pathogenesis

Enterovirus 94 (EV-94) is an enterovirus serotype described recently which, together with EV-68 and EV-70, forms human enterovirus D species. This study investigates the seroprevalences of these three serotypes and their abilities to infect, replicate, and damage cell types considered to be essential for enterovirus-induced diseases. The cell types studied included human leukocyte cell lines, primary endothelial cells, and pancreatic islets. High prevalence of neutralizing antibodies against EV-68 and EV-94 was found in the Finnish population. The virus strains studied had wide leukocyte tropism. EV-94 and EV-68 were able to produce infectious progeny in leukocyte cell lines with monocytic, granulocytic, T-cell, or B-cell characteristics. EV-94 and EV-70 were capable of infecting primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells, whereas EV-68 had only marginal progeny production and did not induce cytopathic effects in these cells. Intriguingly, EV-94 was able to damage pancreatic islet β-cells, to infect, replicate, and cause necrosis in human pancreatic islets, and to induce proinflammatory and chemoattractive cytokine expression in endothelial cells. These results suggest that HEV-D viruses may be more prevalent than has been thought previously, and they provide in vitro evidence that EV-94 may be a potent pathogen and should be considered a potentially diabetogenic enterovirus type.

Susceptibility of human bone marrow cells and hematopoietic cell lines to coxsackievirus B3 infection

Viremia is commonly observed in association with enterovirus infections, and during this phase viruses can be transmitted to secondary target organs in the body. It is not known, however, whether blood cells play a role in the pathogenesis of enterovirus infection supporting virus replication. Our earlier work (T. Vuorinen, R. Vainionpää, H. Kettinen, and T. Hyypiä, Blood 84:823-829, 1994) demonstrated that coxsackievirus B3 is able to replicate in representatives of B- and T-cell lines but not in a monocytic cell line or peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating that virus replication may depend on the differentiation and maturation stages of the cells. Therefore, we have broaden our studies and analyzed the susceptibility of granulocyte-macrophage CFU and hematopoietic cell lines with various differentiation and maturation stages to coxsackievirus B3 infection. Virus replication was detected in B- and T-cell lines with no direct correlation to the maturation stage. Granulocyte-macrophage CFU were also able to support virus multiplication.

Role of poliovirus receptors in the spread of the infection

Although the poliovirus receptor (PVR) has been cloned, lack of knowledge of its precise tissue distribution makes assessment of its role in mediating poliomyelitis difficult. Our recent work demonstrated that PVR is expressed on human monocytes and that primary human blood cells can support PV replication. In the current work, we demonstrate that CD14-positive cells (monocytes) support PV replication but that only a minority (< 10%) of the cells become infected. In other preliminary studies, immunocytochemical analyses of human brain tissue demonstrated the presence of PVR in the olfactory bulb, a tissue thought to not support PV replication. Thus, it appears that some apparently "ectopic" sites of PVR expression may in fact be sites for PV replication, whereas other sites may indeed be restricted. The ability of monocytes to replicate PV may pertain to some unexplained phenomena in PV pathogenesis, such as the specific cell type carrying out the initial round of replication in the gut, sites of extraneural replication and transport of the virus into the CNS. Preliminary studies with monocytes from post-polio syndrome patients showed no difference in the levels of PVR relative to control monocytes. In other preliminary work, PVR was shown to be phosphorylated and its expression on monocytes increased by treatment with gamma-interferon. The normal function of PVR is likely to be involved in monocyte function during immune activation.

Isolation and characterization of HeLa cell lines blocked at different steps in the poliovirus life cycle

Cotransfection of poliovirus RNA and R1, a poliovirus subgenomic RNA containing a deletion of nearly all of the capsid region, resulted in surviving cells, in contrast to the complete cell death observed after transfection with viral RNA. Cells that survived the cotransfection grew into colonies, produced infectious poliovirus, and underwent cycles of cell lysis (crisis periods) where less than 1% of the cells survived, followed by periods of growth. Poliovirus evolved during the persistent infection as judged by changes in plaque size. After passage for 6 months, a stable line called SOFIA emerged that no longer produced infectious virus and did not contain viral proteins or viral RNA. Cells frozen in liquid N2 while still in crisis and recultured 4 months later (named SOFIA N2) were also stabilized. After infection with poliovirus, SOFIA N2 cells showed a delay in the development of cytopathic effect, viral production, and cellular death when compared with HeLa cells. In contrast, SOFIA cells did not develop cytopathic effect and produced 10,000 times less virus than SOFIA N2 or HeLa cells. Viral production was delayed in SOFIA and SOFIA N2 cells transfected with poliovirus RNA when compared with HeLa cells, suggesting the presence of an intracellular block to poliovirus replication. Analysis of the cellular receptor for poliovirus by virus binding, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and in situ rosette assays with an antireceptor monoclonal antibody showed that receptors were expressed in SOFIA N2 cells but not in SOFIA cells. Echovirus 6, an enterovirus which uses a different cellular receptor, formed small plaques on SOFIA cells. Vesicular stomatitis virus formed plaques of similar size on SOFIA and HeLa cells, suggesting that the intracellular block was specific for enteroviruses. Cotransfection of the subgenomic replicon R1 with poliovirion RNA therefore resulted in the selection of HeLa cell variants containing blocks to poliovirus replication at the level of receptor and within the cell.

Poliovirus infection of established human blood cell lines: relationship between the differentiation stage and susceptibility of cell killing

The replication of type 1 poliovirus in 13 established human blood cell lines differing in the differentiation stage and cell lineage was investigated. Three T (CCRF-CEM, CCRF-HSB-2, and Molt-3) and three B (Raji, CCRF-SB, and RPMI 8226) cell lines showed no cytopathic effects (CPE) or virus production. CPE associated with virus production were detected in the other seven cell lines: HL-60, ML-1, and KG-1 (granulocytic lineage), U-937 and THP-1 (monocytic lineage), K-562 (erythroid lineage), and Molt-4 (T cell lineage). These susceptible cell lines greatly differed in the speed at which the CPE progressed. The progression of CPE was faster in relatively well-differentiated cell lines such as HL-60 and U-937, independently of the multiplicity of infection, than in less differentiated cell lines such as K-562, KG-1, and THP-1. Thus, for the same lineage, the speed at which CPE progressed became proportionally higher with subsequent differentiation stages. In the K-562 cell culture, CPE were not observed until at least 5 days postinfection (p.i.), while more than 80% of HL-60 cells were killed within 3 days p.i. There were no significant differences between infected HL-60 and K-562 cells in the efficiency of infection determined at 8 hr p.i. by the indirect immunofluorescent technique, the rate of virus growth, or the amount of viral capsid protein synthesized. This indicated that there were similar viral replication cycles in the two cell lines. These observations suggest that the killing function of the virus is expressed more slowly in K-562 cells than in HL-60 cells.