Flicker adaptation shows evidence of many visual channels selectively sensitive to temporal frequency

Monocular and binocular mechanisms mediating flicker adaptation

Flicker adaptation reduces subsequent temporal contrast sensitivity. Recent studies show that this adaptation likely results from neural changes in the magnocellular visual pathway, but whether this adaptation occurs at a monocular or a binocular level, or both, is unclear. Here, two experiments address this question. The first experiment exploits the observation that flicker adaptation is stronger at higher than lower temporal frequencies. Observers' two eyes adapted to 3Hz flicker with an incremental pulse at 1/4 duty cycle, either in-phase or out-of-phase in the two eyes. At the binocular level, the flicker rate was 6Hz in the out-of-phase condition if the two eyes' pulse trains sum. Similar sensitivity reduction was found in both phase conditions, as expected for independent monocular adapting mechanisms. The second experiment tested for interocular transfer of adaptation between eyes. Results showed that (1) flicker adaptation was strongest with adapting and test fields in only the same eye, (2) adaptation can be partially transferred interocularly with adaptation in only the opposite eye, and (3) adaptation was weakened when both eyes were adapted simultaneously at different contrasts, compared to test-eye adaptation alone. Taken together, the findings are consistent with mechanisms of flicker adaptation at both the monocular and binocular level.

Spatial properties of flicker adaptation

Prolonged viewing of a flickering region reduces sensitivity to a subsequently flickered test patch of identical extent, but the spatial properties of this adaptation are unknown. What happens to the sensitivity to a smaller flickered test patch completely contained in, but inset from, the adapted region? We show that sensitivity to the inset test patch is only slightly affected by adaptation of the larger region. This suggests that neurons that respond to the edges of the smaller test patch are not adapted by the larger flickering region. We then show that an annulus adapter designed specifically to adapt only those edges only slightly reduces sensitivity, demonstrating that neurons that do not adapt to the flickered edges are also involved in detecting flicker. This gives further evidence that flicker detection depends on at least two mechanisms - one sensitive to flickering edges and one sensitive to local flicker, and shows that these mechanisms can operate in isolation.

Visual adjustments to temporal blur

After observers have adapted to an edge that is spatially blurred or sharpened, a focused edge appears too sharp or blurred, respectively. These adjustments to blur may play an important role in calibrating spatial sensitivity. We examined whether similar adjustments influence the perception of temporal edges, by measuring the appearance of a step change in the luminance of a uniform field after adapting to blurred or sharpened transitions. Stimuli were square-wave alternations (at 1 to 8 Hz) filtered by changing the slope of the amplitude spectrum. A two-alternative-forced-choice task was used to adjust the slope until it appeared as a step change, or until it matched the perceived transitions in a reference stimulus. Observers could accurately set the waveform to a square wave, but only at the slower alternation rates. However, these settings were strongly biased by prior adaptation to filtered stimuli, or when the stimuli were viewed within temporally filtered surrounds. Control experiments suggest that the latter induction effects result directly from the temporal blur and are not simply a consequence of brightness induction in the fields. These results suggest that adaptation and induction adjust visual coding so that images are focused not only in space but also in time.

The effect of disrupting the human magnocellular pathway on global motion perception

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of human magnocellular (M)-pathway disruption on global motion perception. Coherence thresholds for global motion direction discrimination in random dot patterns were determined at slow and moderate dot speeds: (1) after adaptation to full-field sinusoidal flicker or a steady gray field, and (2) on a red or a gray background. Adaptation to flicker and a red background increased motion coherence thresholds relative to the gray baseline conditions at both dot speeds. Physiological studies have shown that M cells in the retina and LGN are inhibited by red light and are a main contributor to flicker perception in monkeys. Therefore, our results suggest that interference with processing in the subcortical M pathway disrupts higher-level motion integration.

Velocity discrimination in scotopic vision

To characterize scotopic motion mechanisms, we examined how variation in average luminance affects the ability to discriminate velocity. Stimuli were drifting horizontal sine-wave gratings (0.25, 1.0 and 2.0 c/deg) viewed through a 2 mm artificial pupil and neutral density filters to produce mean adapting levels from 2.5 to -1.5 log photopic trolands. Drift temporal frequency varied from 0.5 to 36.0 Hz. Grating contrasts were either three or five times direction discrimination threshold contrasts at each adaptation level. Following 30 min adaptation, two drifting gratings were presented sequentially at the fovea. Subjects were asked to indicate which interval contained the faster moving stimulus. The Weber fraction for each base temporal frequency was determined using a staircase method. As previously reported, velocity discrimination performance was most acute at temporal frequencies of about 8.0 Hz and greater than 20.0 Hz (though there are individual differences), and fell off at both higher and lower temporal frequencies under photopic conditions. As adaptation level decreased, discrimination of high temporal frequencies in the central retina became increasingly worse, while discrimination of low temporal frequencies remained largely unaltered. The overall scotopic discrimination performance was best at about 3.0 Hz. These results can be explained by a motion mechanism comprising both low-pass and band-pass temporal filters whose peak and temporal cut-off shifts to lower temporal frequencies under scotopic conditions.

Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision

When studying human ability to perceive temporal changes in luminance it is customary to estimate either temporal impulse response shapes or temporal modulation transfer functions, the representation of the impulse response in the frequency domain. The advantages and limitations of previous methods are summarized. We then describe an approach based on use of an impulse response basis set that resolves some of those limitations. We next present psychophysical results for spatiotemporal signal detection in spatiotemporal noise, together with an economical model of performance. The model is based on accepted notions of psychophysical detection mechanisms and the filter basis set described in the first part of the paper. The best-fitting model requires only eight parameters, as opposed to the 198 parameters required to separately fit each psychometric function, and captures both qualitative and quantitative properties of the psychophysical data. Finally, the best-fitting model indicates that only two temporal filters are necessary to describe the performance of each of three subjects under the specific stimulus conditions employed here.

Suprathreshold temporal-frequency discrimination in the fovea and the periphery

To address the question of whether temporal-frequency information in the fovea and the periphery is processed in fundamentally different ways we measured temporal-frequency-discrimination thresholds for spatiotemporally narrow-band stimuli presented at suprathreshold contrast. Temporal-frequency-discrimination thresholds are similar (within a factor of 2) at the fovea and at 30 degrees in the periphery. We use a line-element approach and three spatiotemporally separable temporal mechanisms to model foveal and peripheral data with the same degree of fidelity. These findings suggest that not only are the front-end temporal mechanisms in the fovea and periphery likely to be similar but also the way in which their outputs are combined at more central sites is the same.

Two temporal channels or three? A re-evaluation

The initial filtering of the image by the human visual system involves only a small number of temporal filters. Several studies suggest there are in fact only two, but some suggest that a third filter, sensitive to high frequencies, exists, at least at low spatial frequencies. This conclusion is derived in part from the observation that temporal frequency discrimination performance is better at very high (30-40 Hz) than at medium (20 Hz) temporal frequencies. We show that this apparent improvement at high frequencies is not real but is an artifact of differences in the rate of perceptual fading as a function of temporal frequency. Using suprathreshold counterphase gratings and a stimulus duration of 1.5 sec we replicated the finding of an improvement at high frequencies at a low (0.5 c/deg) spatial frequency. But when duration was reduced to 300 msec, to minimize fading cues, this improvement disappeared. Similarly, at 4 c/deg, the improvement was present at 3 sec duration but absent at 1.5 sec or less. Direct evidence that this effect of duration reflects differences in the ability to use fading cues was obtained in an experiment in which naive subjects were instructed to discriminate on the basis of fading: at high temporal frequencies and long durations performance was as good or better than for subjects instructed to use frequency; at short durations performance on this task was poor. Thus, the claim that a third temporal channel exists may need to be re-evaluated.

Visual space-time interactions: effects of adapting to spatial frequencies on temporal sensitivity

To study how adaptation to spatial frequency patterns affects temporal sensitivity in vision, observers were selectively adapted for 4 min to either a high- or a low-spatial-frequency sinusoidal grating (12 and 2 cpd, respectively). Their sensitivities to modulation of a blurred patch at high or low temporal frequencies (12 Hz and 2 Hz, respectively) were measured, before and after the adaptation period, by using the yes/no task of signal detection theory. The data consistently indicated that spatial adaptation differentially affected the observers' sensitivities to temporal signals. Specifically, when the observers were adapted to low spatial frequencies, their sensitivity to low temporal frequencies was reduced; when they were adapted to high spatial frequencies, their sensitivity to high temporal frequencies was increased. These results have implications for the psychophysical measurements of temporal and spatial sensitivity, as well as for the issue of the separability of spatial and temporal properties of individual channels.

Flicker adaptation in the peripheral retina

With strict fixation, a flickering light spot smaller than 3 deg presented to the peripheral retina will rapidly appear to lose contrast and stop flickering within 35 s, before fading away completely. The time required for this adaptation to occur decreases with: decreasing depth of modulation (97-9%); decreasing stimulus diameter (2 deg-7 min arc); increasing retinal eccentricity (20-50 deg); and increasing flicker frequency (1-7 Hz). Interestingly, the effect does not depend upon the regularity of the flickering stimulus, and it occurs twice as fast for stimuli presented to the temporal retina as for stimuli presented to the nasal retina. When changes in retinal eccentricity are compensated for by taking into account the cortical magnification factor, the time needed for perceived flicker to disappear remains constant at all eccentricities. With dichoptic stimulation interocular transfer is about 35%, suggesting a cortical contribution to flicker adaptation. The results indicate that the visual system adapts rather easily to peripheral flickering stimuli. Similarities as well as differences to motion adaptation are discussed.

Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system

Measurements were made of spatial frequency, orientation and temporal frequency selectivity of the visual motion system. The results suggest: (1) There exists in the motion system mechanisms selective for spatial frequency. The preferred spatial frequency varies considerably and extends down to at least 0.06 c/deg. (2) At all spatial frequencies (from 0.1 to 10 c/deg) there exist detectors selective for orientation which vary in (directed) orientation tuning to encompass 360 degrees. (3) The bandwidth of both spatial frequency and orientation selectivity vary inversely with spatial frequency: the lower the spatial frequency, the broader the bandwidth. (4) There exist two classes of temporally tuned detectors, one lowpass (sustained) and one bandpass (transient), of preferred temporal frequency of 7-13 Hz (depending on spatial frequency).

Temporal frequency discrimination in human vision: evidence for an additional mechanism in the low spatial and high temporal frequency region

Temporal frequency discrimination at and above the detection threshold has been studied using gratings of low (0.2 c/deg) and medium (2 c/deg) spatial frequencies. At 2 c/deg the results of previous investigators are confirmed: The results being consistent with the existence of two broadly tuned and directionally selective temporal mechanisms (up to 32 Hz). For the lower spatial frequency an additional temporal frequency discrimination at threshold can be made between 4 and 32 Hz and enhanced temporal frequency discrimination at suprathreshold levels occurs above 24 Hz. One interpretation of this result is the existence of one or more additional temporal mechanisms with restricted spatial acuity responding to higher temporal frequencies.

Adaptation to apparent motion

A spot alternating between two positions can produce apparent motion (AM). Following prolonged inspection, the AM degenerates into flicker. This adaptation effect was found to depend on spacing and timing; the probability of seeing motion during a 30-sec inspection period declined linearly with log spatial separation (over a range from 0.1 to 1 deg), and with log alternation rate (over a range from 2 to 4.5 Hz). Cross-adaptation, in which subjects were adapted to one alternation rate and tested at another, showed that low alternation rates gave stronger motion signals than high rates did. Adaptation to real motion (RM) strongly suppressed AM, which suggests that AM must be stimulating the same neural pathways as RM. Flickering spots (i.e. in-phase flicker) produced less adaptation than did a spot alternating between two positions (i.e. counterphase flicker), so the adapting mechanism must be responding to relative temporal phase. Embedding the adapting spots in configurations of other spots, which altered the pattern of perceived adapting motion without altering the local retinal stimulation, minimized the adaption, so the adapting mechanism must be responding to the path of seen motion. Adaptation can be used to measure the strength of AM and shows that AM is strongest for small separations, low alternation rates and high luminance contrast.

Frequency dependence in scotopic flicker sensitivity

Sensitivity to rod-mediated (scotopic) flicker was parametrically studied in the parafoveal retina of human observers. Confirming prior studies, the present results show that sensitivity to scotopic flicker has many similarities to that at photopic levels. Specifically, our results show that the frequency response function for scotopic flicker is characterized by both low- and high-frequency cutoffs and that sensitivity to low frequencies is described by Weber's law. Overall, however, scotopic flicker sensitivity is characterized by higher increment thresholds and lower frequency tuning than photopic flicker. The influences of spatial factors and the prevailing level of illuminance on sensitivity is sufficiently different for relatively low (less than 3 Hz) and relatively high (greater than 5 Hz) temporal frequencies to suggest that they may be mediated by different channels. This possibility is also suggested by selective adaptation experiments. These show that adaptation to flicker frequencies of 3, 5, and 7 Hz have a similar influence on sensitivity to subsequent flicker which is different from the influence on 1 Hz flicker adaptation. Results are compared with prior evidence for channeling within both the scotopic and photopic visual systems.

Sensitivity to countermodulating gratings following spatiotemporal adaptation

Contrast sensitivities to countermodulating gratings were measured with a two-alternative temporal forced-choice procedure following adaptation to a static grating of the same spatial frequency, a homogeneous flickering field of the same temporal frequency, or a countermodulating grating of identical spatial and temporal frequencies. At high spatial frequencies, the temporal-frequency content of the adaptation was not critical, that is, a countermodulating adaptation grating was only slightly more effective at raising threshold than was a static adaptation grating. At low spatial frequencies, the sensitivity to countermodulating test gratings could not be reduced by either a high-contrast stimulus matching the test in the spatial domain only or by one matching the test in the temporal domain only. Adapting to a high-contrast stimulus matching the countermodulating test grating in both spatial- and temporal-frequency domains was effective at reducing test sensitivity for one observer but not for another.

Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection threshold

Two experiments examined the discriminability of moving gratings. Experiment 1 measured the difference between detection and discrimination thresholds for gratings of equal spatial frequency drifting in the same direction at different rates. It was found that, as Watson and Robson [Vision Res. 21, 1115-1122 (1981)] had found with counterphase modulated gratings, only very coarse discriminations could be made. The results suggest that just two labelled channels can account for the velocity discrimination of gratings at detection threshold. The second experiment investigated the discriminability of suprathreshold moving gratings. These results also support the idea that rate of movement is mediated by two broadly tuned channels.

Perceived flicker rate of suprathreshold stimuli: influences of spatial-frequency content and modulation amplitude

A number of experiments were conducted in which observers had to discriminate the apparent flicker rates of temporally modulated gratings and flickering homogeneous fields. When both intramodal- and cross-modal-matching procedures were used, apparent flicker rate was found to be consistently higher for countermodulating gratings than for homogeneous fields of the same temporal frequency. Also, the apparent flicker rate of countermodulating gratings tended to increase as spatial frequency increased. These effects are more pronounced at low rates of temporal modulation than at high rates and are not dependent on variations in the stimulus's apparent modulation amplitude.

Temporal selectivity of changing-size channels

Changing-size channels tuned to the oscillation frequency are excited by a stimulus square whose size oscillates at a fixed frequency. In the 0.25-16 Hz frequency band there are at least three kinds of changing-size channels tuned to different frequencies.

On the capacity of directionally selective mechanisms to encode different dimensions of moving stimuli

Direction-specific losses of contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal test gratings as a function of the contrast of a sinusoidal adapting grating were found to be similar to those measured previously with square-wave gratings. Furthermore, both relationships were similar to that between motion aftereffect duration and the contrast of sinusoidal adapting gratings, and all three sets of data can be fit by a single function. The function shows that the magnitude of direction-specific adaptation effects increases linearly with the logarithm of adapting contrast in the low contrast region, but is essentially independent of contrast once the contrast exceeds threshold by more than a factor of five-six. In addition, it was found that direction-specific losses of contrast sensitivity are restricted to limited ranges of spatial frequency.