Adaptation of a color-opponent mechanism increases parafoveal sensitivity to luminance flicker

How We See Black and White: The Role of Midget Ganglion Cells

According to classical opponent color theory, hue sensations are mediated by spectrally opponent neurons that are excited by some wavelengths of light and inhibited by others, while black-and-white sensations are mediated by spectrally non-opponent neurons that respond with the same sign to all wavelengths. However, careful consideration of the morphology and physiology of spectrally opponent L vs. M midget retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the primate retina indicates that they are ideally suited to mediate black-and-white sensations and poorly suited to mediate color. Here we present a computational model that demonstrates how the cortex could use unsupervised learning to efficiently separate the signals from L vs. M midget RGCs into distinct signals for black and white based only correlation of activity over time. The model also reveals why it is unlikely that these same ganglion cells could simultaneously mediate our perception of red and green, and shows how, in theory, a separate small population of midget RGCs with input from S, M, and L cones would be ideally suited to mediating hue perception.

Flashed stimuli and the suppression of flicker response from long-wavelength-sensitive cones: integrating two separate approaches

The selective suppression of flicker response from LWS cones has been investigated with two approaches. One approach has emphasized the use of light-adaptation conditions, and the other has emphasized the use of dark-adaptation conditions. In both cases, stimuli are arranged to restrict or exceed the ability of adaptation processes to maintain an afferent flicker response, and long-wavelength stimuli are used to overload spectrally opponent processes. By integrating these two approaches, this study shows that diverse manifestations of flicker response suppression can be closely related mechanistically. For instance, the steep flicker TVI slopes that resulted from superimposing temporally modulated (100% contrast) test stimuli on flashed backgrounds corresponded to the disappearance of flicker that resulted from increasing the time-averaged illuminance of temporally modulated stimuli (contrast x < 100%) that were flashed alone in an otherwise dark field. For the stimulus parameters of this study, flicker response suppression was more evident for small (19' diameter) than for large (1 degree diameter) stimuli. However, flicker response suppression was elicited reliably for both sizes by adding a spatially coincident short-wavelength stimulus to the interstimulus interval between presentations of the long-wavelength stimuli. By showing that temporal contrast can be treated as an independent variable for an important set of test/background stimulus combinations, the results of this study make it possible to investigate the means by which changes of contrast gain help to maintain flicker response as assessed in a conventional flicker TVI paradigm. The reduced degree of suppression for relatively large stimuli probably is related to the increased action of spatially extensive contrast gain-control processes. These contrast gain-control processes might not act independently of spectrally opponent processes.

Suppressive rod-cone interactions: evidence for separate retinal (temporal) and extraretinal (spatial) mechanisms in achromatic vision

We investigated the influence of selective rod light and dark adaptation on cone-mediated sensitivity to monocular displays modulated sinusoidally in both spatial and temporal domains. Rod light adaptation (1) increased sensitivity to high spatial frequencies [> or = 8 cycles per degree (cpd)] flickered slowly (< or = 2 Hz), an effect that we refer to as grating suppressive rod-cone interaction (gSRCI); (2) increased sensitivity to low spatial frequencies (< or = 2 cpd) flickered rapidly (> or = 8 Hz), an effect that we refer to as flicker suppressive rod-cone interaction (fSRCI); and (3) had relatively little influence on intermediate temporal-spatial-frequency combinations. The magnitudes of both gSRCI and fSRCI increased as the retinal position of the test display was increasingly displaced parafoveally. In parafoveal retina, both forms of suppressive rod-cone interaction increased as the overall dimension of the test stimulus decreased. However, sensitivity to high spatial frequencies is equally well influenced by adaptation of the viewing and the contralateral eye, while the adapted state of the nonviewing eye negligibly influences sensitivity to rapid flicker. Moreover, gSRCI cannot be observed with a small (30-arcmin) grating restricted to the fovea, while fSRCI is a prominent effect with small foveal test stimuli. Collectively, these results and neurobiological evidence suggest that fSRCI reflects a mechanism restricted to distal retinal, while gSRCI involves extraretinal neural circuitry.

Nonmonotonic effects of test illuminance on flicker detection: a study of foveal light adaptation with annular surrounds

This study examined the detectability of flicker for small long-wavelength foveal test stimuli centered within larger long-wavelength surround stimuli. Flicker visibility was evaluated as a function of surround and test illuminance and as a function of test wavelength, of the time elapsed following test or surround onset, and of surround dimensions. Consistent with prior flicker threshold-versus-illuminance results [Vision Res. 26, 917 (1986)], flicker threshold decreased abruptly once the surround illuminance became sufficiently great. However, as test illuminance was increased above flicker threshold, flicker again vanished. Flicker reappeared at still higher test illuminances, as middle-wavelength-sensitive (M-) cone-mediated flicker threshold was exceeded. Meanwhile, the time required for the surround to render flicker visible increased at a rapidly accelerating rate with decreasing surround illuminance; it increased at a more sporadic rate with increasing test illuminance. At bright enough surround illuminances, flicker did not vanish with increasing test illuminance. These and other results are compatible with a framework derived from previous dark-adaptation data [Vision Res. 32, 1975 (1992)]. In that framework the test stimulus itself induces losses of flicker sensitivity by sufficiently perturbing retinal response during states or stages of adaptation that fail to cause spectrally antagonistic processes to redress that perturbation adequately. The relevant adaptation processes, which can require minutes, involve an adaptation pool that includes (and is affected by) the test stimulus.

Losses of flicker sensitivity during dark adaptation: effects of test size and wavelength

The losses of flicker sensitivity that occur during dark adaptation following extinction of a bleach depend greatly on the test stimuli that are used to measure those losses. Generally, the larger the test size is for a given test wavelength, the later is the loss of flicker sensitivity; for sufficiently large tests, losses become progressively more gradual. Similarly, the shorter the test wavelength is (between about 660 and 580 nm) for a given test size, the later is the loss of flicker sensitivity; for sufficiently short test wavelengths, losses become progressively more gradual. Although the pattern of flicker sensitivity loss as a function of test size is the same both foveally and parafoveally, foveal losses occur later and/or more gradually for a given test stimulus. The results suggest that losses of flicker sensitivity occur when spectrally antagonistic response(s) to the test are no longer adequate to maintain the flicker-response to that test. The results suggest also that the adequacy of such spectral antagonism depends on the local adaptation state of the retina, which becomes increasingly more light-adapted with increasingly large test size.

Brightness matching and flicker photometric data obtained over the full mesopic range

Three normal observers made visual matches from 0.03 to 100 td on a 10 degree central field at 445, 560 and 630 nm, using two different methods: heterochromatic flicker photometry and direct comparison brightness matching. In a relative sensitivity vs illuminance plot, the brightness matches underwent smooth changes, while the flicker curve exhibited a step-like transition around 1 td, between two separate branches. A reverse Purkinje shift was found on the high mesopic branch at 630 nm, possibly due to cone-cone interactions, and on the low mesopic branch at 445 nm, with questionable origin. At 630 nm and 0.03 td, both methods yielded matches that were not truly scotopic but might not have addressed the same mechanisms.

Rod and cone contribution to adaptation processes in cat retinal ganglion cells

Extracellular ganglion cell responses were recorded to investigate mechanisms of light adaptation. Monochromatic test spots (575 nm) were projected onto the receptive field center of off-center cells and superimposed on a steady blue-green Ganzfeld background (Schott Filter BG 28), the strength of which was increased in steps of 0.5 log units to adapt rods. Response vs. log intensity functions were determined over a range of 7 log units of test light irradiance at each background level. At higher adaptation levels response thresholds followed the typical Weber function. Surprisingly at lower adaptation levels the sensitivity of the cell increased by about 0.7 log units, most markedly in a range of 1 log unit of moderate light adaptation when the background was changed from dark to the dimmest detectable background (10(-5) lm/m2). In the dark-adapted state a small off-response of long latency (40-100 ms at 10(2) quanta.s-1.microns-2) is observed at low rod stimulating test light irradiances. A transition to a cone-dominated transient response of 2 to 5 ms duration occurred at high intensities (10(5) quanta.s-1.microns-2). At mesopic levels the two responses seem to cancel each other, rendering a delayed off-response that is probably the result of rod-cone interaction. As in psychophysics, saturation can be observed at very high background intensities (10(6) quanta.s-1 microns-2). These data suggest interactions between rods and cones that determine the sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells at low levels of adaptation for suprathreshold stimuli.

Losses of foveal flicker sensitivity during dark adaptation following extended bleaches

Flicker sensitivity to a small foveal test stimulus can decrease appreciably during the period of dark adaptation that follows extinction of a bleach. For 20 min diameter, long wavelength tests that followed 70% L cone bleaches of various wavelengths, 18 Hz flicker sensitivity decreased precipitously (i.e. within about 45 sec) by about 1.5-2.0 log units beginning at about 100-200 sec following extinction of the bleach. For short wavelength tests that followed long wavelength bleaches, the corresponding precipitous losses of flicker sensitivity were relatively small and early; flicker sensitivity decreased by about 0.6-1.0 log units beginning no later than 60 sec following extinction of the bleach. Whenever flicker sensitivity decreased precipitously, the losses of flicker sensitivity were followed by plateaus of M cone dominated flicker sensitivity. For combinations of test and bleaching wavelengths that did not cause flicker sensitivity to decrease precipitously, flicker sensitivity instead decreased gradually over a prolonged period of time, and incorporated a substantial L cone contribution. The precipitous suppression of flicker sensitivity found for certain combinations of bleaching and test wavelengths appears to depend on the action of a broadly tuned, red-green spectrally opponent process.

Spatial extent of rod-cone and cone-cone interactions for flicker detection

Over a large range of light adaptation levels, sensitivity to 25 Hz flicker improves as the light level of the background increases. Using small background discs and annular surrounds, this effect was shown to be mediated by the surround and not the average luminance of the test region, in agreement with recent reports. The effect is due to two types of lateral interaction: at mesopic light levels (from 0.1 to 1.0 td), cone-mediated flicker resolution is enhanced by the stimulation of surrounding rods; at photopic light levels (above 10 td), flicker sensitivity improves with light stimulation of adjacent cones. The spatial zone, or extent, over which the surround contributes to the flicker threshold was measured. The spatial area over which rods influence the cone 25 Hz flicker threshold is larger than the analogous spatial area of cone influence. In the parafovea, at 5 deg eccentricity, cone flicker sensitivity for a 20' spot is influenced by cones in a 1 deg diameter area centered on the spot; the corresponding area of rod influence is about 3 deg. In the fovea, flicker sensitivity for a 10' spot is influenced by cone stimulation in an area of about 20' diameter. Rods which affect foveal flicker sensitivity appear to occupy an annular zone with about a 2 deg outer diameter and 1 deg inner diameter, centered on the fovea.