Suppressive effects of peripheral flicker on foveal bichromatic mixture thresholds

Extrafoveally applied flashing light affects contrast thresholds of achromatic and S-cone isolating, but not L-M cone modulated stimuli

Flashing light stimulation is often used to investigate the visual system. However, the magnitude of the effect of this stimulus on the various subcortical pathways is not well investigated. The signals of conscious vision are conveyed by the magnocellular, parvocellular and koniocellular pathways. Parvocellular and koniocellular pathways (or more precisely, the L-M opponent and S-cone isolating channels) can be accessed by isoluminant red-green (L-M) and S-cone isolating stimuli, respectively. The main goal of the present study was to explore how costimulation with strong white extrafoveal light flashes alters the perception of stimuli specific to these pathways. Eleven healthy volunteers with negative neurological and ophthalmological history were enrolled for the study. Isoluminance of L-M and S-cone isolating sine-wave gratings was set individually, using the minimum motion procedure. The contrast thresholds for these stimuli as well as for achromatic gratings were determined by an adaptive staircase procedure where subjects had to indicate the orientation (horizontal, oblique or vertical) of the gratings. Thresholds were then determined again while a strong white peripheral light flash was presented 50 ms before each trial. Peripheral light flashes significantly (p < 0.05) increased the contrast thresholds of the achromatic and S-cone isolating stimuli. The threshold elevation was especially marked in case of the achromatic stimuli. However, the contrast threshold for the L-M stimuli was not significantly influenced by the light flashes. We conclude that extrafoveally applied light flashes influence predominantly the perception of achromatic stimuli.

The contrast-response of the periphery effect

This report examines the effect of varying the contrast of a flickering remote surround on thresholds for flicker detection, and color detection in rapidly flickering red and green foveal test targets, presented on a steady white background. Flicker in the surround reduced flicker sensitivity for the foveal test stimuli and yielded a periphery effect (PE), whereas it had no effect on color sensitivity (no PE). The magnitude of the PE increased non-linearly as a function of increasing surround flicker contrast. Much of the increase took place at low contrasts (< 0.20) and half-saturation of the PE occurred at 0.16 and 0.29 contrast for the red and green targets, respectively.

The peripheral flicker effect: desensitization of the luminance pathway by static and modulated light

Previous studies have shown that luminance flicker, presented peripheral to a foveal test target, increases thresholds for target detection: the peripheral flicker (PF) effect. These studies have also shown that thresholds are elevated more for luminance targets, relative to chromatic targets. In the present study we examined the specificity of the PF effect on the luminance mechanism and assessed the contribution of modulated stray-light to the test field, as well as longer range spatial interactions. We found that the presence of a foveal luminance pedestal, as well as PF, caused a notch to appear in the spectral sensitivity function around 570 nm. This result confirms the hypothesis that the PF effect decreases the sensitivity of the luminance pathway. To assess the contribution of stray-light to the PF effect, we modulated a luminance pedestal without the presence of PF in order to simulate the stray-light effect in isolation. A decrease in sensitivity for wavelengths around 570 nm occurred with modulated stray-light, suggesting that modulated stray-light contributes substantially to this effect. We then minimized the modulated stray-light by phase-reversing a checkerboard pattern in the periphery. A significant, though smaller, threshold elevation to mid-spectrum stimuli was obtained, suggesting that long range spatial effects are also active in the PF effect. We conclude that the PF effect causes a desensitization of foveal luminance pathways via local and more long range spatial interactions. Our results are consistent with previous data which suggest that the PF effect is due to selective adaptation of cells in the magnocellular pathway (M-cells). Our data imply that local network adaptation may be a property of the magnocellular pathway.