Nephrogenic adenoma of the prostatic urethra involving the prostate gland: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of eight cases

Renal-type clear cell carcinoma of the prostate: A case report

Renal-type clear cell carcinoma of the prostate is a rare and novel tumor that has only been identified in recent years. The present study describes a lesion in the prostate of a 64-year-old male with a two-year history of urinary frequency, urgency and difficulty, who was admitted to the San Ai Tang Hospital for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and subsequently underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. In total, 12 g of tissue was resected, which demonstrated morphological and immunohistochemical similarities to clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Ultrasound inspection and computed tomography revealed prostate enlargement. Although no renal-enclosed mass was identified, metastatic lesions were revealed in the lungs, sternum and clavicles. In addition, right pleural thickening and a small amount of effusion in the pleural cavity were detected. Clear cell carcinoma was identified throughout the prostate, with surrounding regions of ordinary-type prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score, 4+4). The urinary bladder exhibited no dysplasia or neoplasia. It was therefore concluded that the tumor represented a primary renal-type clear cell carcinoma that had arisen in the prostate. To the best of our knowledge, this type of extra-renal tumor has only been reported in three other previous studies.

Successful minimally-invasive management of a case of giant prostatic hypertrophy associated with recurrent nephrogenic adenoma of the prostate

Background

Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is said to affect at least a third of men over 60. However, the literature contains fewer than 200 reports of prostates over 200g in mass - Giant Prostatic Hypertrophy (GPH). Nephrogenic adenomas are benign lesions of the urinary tract that are believed to represent the local proliferation of shed renal tubular cells implanting at sites of urothelial injury.

Case presentation

We present the first case in the literature of these two rare pathologies co-existing in the same patient and the successful management and 36-month follow-up of the patient’s symptoms with minimally invasive therapy, including the still-uncommon selective prostatic artery embolisation. We also briefly discuss the role of PAX2 in injured renal tissues and nephrogenic adenomas.

Conclusions

Symptomatic Giant Prostatic Hypertrophy (GPH) can be successfully managed with a combination of serial TURPs, 5 α-reductase inhibition and selective prostatic artery embolisation (SPAE).

Nephrogenic Adenoma of the Urinary Tract

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is an uncommon and intriguing lesion in the urinary tract. The pathogenesis of NA is not entirely clear. NA was considered to be a metaplastic process of the urothelium in response to chronic irritation of the urinary tract. However, recent evidence has shown that NA is not a metaplastic lesion but rather a proliferation of exfoliated and implanted renal epithelial cells in the urinary tract. Histologically, NAs exhibit, singly or in combination, tubules, small papillae, and microcystic structures lined by cells with little cytological atypia and focal hobnail changes. Solid formations and compressed spindled cells within a fibromyxoid background are rarely observed. Differential diagnosis includes, but is not limited to, malignant neoplasms occurring at the same sites, in particular urothelial carcinoma with deceptively bland morphology (with small tubules, microcystic and nested variants), prostatic adenocarcinoma, and clear cell adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies targeting members of the paired box gene family (PAX2 and/or PAX8) in NAs may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of urothelial lesions and prostatic adenocarcinoma. NAs are most likely to be confused with clear cell adenocarcinoma, especially in small biopsy specimens. This is confounded by both lesions being frequently positive for PAX2, PAX8, and CK7 and not infrequently positive for p504S (α-methylacyl-CoA-racemase, AMACR) by immunohistochemistry. Recognition of its characteristic morphological patterns and awareness of its unusual architectural and cytological features are important in making the diagnosis of NA and distinguishing this lesion from its mimickers.

S-100A1 is a reliable marker in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign lesion that may occur at any site of the genitourinary tract, usually in association with previous urothelial injuries. Although its pathogenesis is still debated, recent studies seem to confirm its derivation from renal tubular epithelium, rather than from a metaplastic process of urothelium. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma, particularly with lesions arising in the prostatic urethra. So far, immunohistochemical stains are often needed to make such a distinction, and several markers have been proposed, often with controversial results. S100A1 is a calcium binding protein that has been recently reported to be expressed in renal tubular cells and in a subset of renal cell neoplasms. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a recently identified prostate cancer marker, has also been found to be expressed in renal tubules and in some renal epithelial neoplasms. In this study, we investigated the expression of S100A1 and AMACR in 18 nephrogenic adenomas and in 100 prostatic adenocarcinomas. A strong and distinct cytoplasmic or nucleocytoplasmic staining of S100A1 was found in 17 out of 18 cases of nephrogenic adenoma (94%), but never in prostatic adenocarcinoma. In contrast, AMACR expression was detected in 14 of 18 nephrogenic adenomas (78%) and in 96 of 100 prostatic adenocarcinomas (96%). We conclude that (1) S100A1 is a specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker to differentiate nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma; (2) AMACR immunostaining does not seem to be a useful marker in distinguishing between these 2 lesions; (3) given that both S100A1 and AMACR have been reported to be expressed in renal tubular cells and in a subset of renal cell neoplasms, our findings confirm the histogenetic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubular epithelium.

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the bladder and urethra: cases diffusely mimicking nephrogenic adenoma

Although clear cell adenocarcinoma have been described focally mimicking nephrogenic adenoma, we have identified a subset of clear cell adenocarcinoma that diffusely resembles nephrogenic adenoma (nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinoma). Twelve classic clear cell adenocarcinomas of the bladder and urethra and 7 nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas were compared to 10 nephrogenic adenomas. Classic clear cell adenocarcinomas and nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas comprised 4 men and 15 women. The following features were seen in classic clear cell adenocarcinomas: nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas: predominantly solid pattern (7/12:0/7), marked nuclear pleomorphism (7/12:1/7), prominent nucleoli (5/12:1/7), clear cytoplasm in 50% or greater of tumor (7/12:0/7), and necrosis (8/12:3/7), although the necrosis in nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas was often focal and intraluminal. Both patterns of clear cell adenocarcinomas showed prominent hobnail features, although more pronounced in nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas. Muscularis propria invasion was seen in 5 of 9 classic clear cell adenocarcinomas and 6 of 6 nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinomas, where evaluable. Classic clear cell adenocarcinoma was associated with urothelial carcinoma (n = 2) and endometriosis (n = 1). The Ki-67 rate in clear cell adenocarcinomas ranged from 10% to 80% compared with 0% to 5% in nephrogenic adenoma. The following antibodies were not helpful in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinoma from nephrogenic adenoma: CD10, estrogen receptor, p63, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, and alpha-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase. PAX2 expression was more frequent in nephrogenic adenoma (89%) compared to both patterns of clear cell adenocarcinoma (29%-32%). The key features discriminating between nephrogenic adenoma-like clear cell adenocarcinoma and nephrogenic adenoma include occasional clear cells, more prominent pleomorphism especially hyperchromatic enlarged nuclei, and extensive muscular invasion. Presence of mitoses and a high rate of Ki-67 expression in lesions resembling nephrogenic adenoma require clinical correlation, close follow-up, and repeat biopsy with more extensive sampling.

Benign Diseases of the Bladder

Benign diseases of the bladder often present diagnostic challenges to practicing pathologists due to their diverse nature and ability to mimic a variety of epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms. Categories of benign bladder disease include infectious cystitis, noninfectious cystitis, reactive proliferative processes, and benign processes that secondarily involve the bladder. An understanding of the key clinical and morphologic features of these lesions and the useful ancillary techniques specific for these entities is critical to the correct diagnosis of these lesions. This article reviews the key features of these benign bladder diseases and highlights methods to distinguish these lesions from other benign and malignant processes involving the bladder.

Best practice in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: prostate carcinoma and its mimics in needle core biopsies

CONTEXT

The unrelenting challenge encountered when differentiating limited-volume prostate carcinoma and sometimes subtle variants from its many morphologic mimics has increased the use of ancillary immunohistochemistry in routine prostate needle biopsies. The availability of prostate cancer-associated and basal cell-associated markers has been an invaluable addition to diagnostic surgical pathology.

OBJECTIVE

To review commonly used immunohistochemical stains, including innovative combinations, for confirmation or differential diagnosis of prostate carcinoma, and to propose appropriately constructed panels using morphologic patterns in prostate needle biopsies.

DATA SOURCES

These best practices are based on our experience with routine and consultative case sign-outs and on a review of the published English-language literature from 1987 through 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Basal cell-associated markers p63, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin 34 beta E12, cytokeratin 5/6 or a cocktail containing p63 and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin 34 beta E12 or cytokeratin 5/6 and prostate carcinoma-specific marker alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A (coA) racemase alone or in combination are useful adjuncts in confirming prostatic carcinoma that either lacks diagnostic, qualitative or quantitative features or that has an unusual morphologic pattern (eg, atrophic, pseudohyperplastic) or is in the setting of prior treatment. The combination of alpha-methylacyl coA racemase positivity with negative staining for basal cell-associated markers supports a malignant diagnosis in the appropriate morphologic context. Dual chromogen basal cell- associated markers (p63 [nuclear] and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin 34 beta E12/cytokeratin 5/6 [cytoplasmic]) and alpha-methylacyl coA racemase in an antibody cocktail provide greater sensitivity for the basal cell layer, easing evaluation and minimizing loss of representation of the focal area interest because the staining is performed on one slide. In the posttreatment setting, pancytokeratin facilitates detection of subtle-treated cancer cells. Prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase markers are helpful in excluding secondary malignancies involving the prostate, such as urothelial carcinoma, and occasionally in excluding nonprostatic benign mimickers, such as nephrogenic adenoma, mesonephric gland hyperplasia, and Cowper glands. There is no role for ordering immunohistochemistry prospectively in all cases of prostatic needle biopsies.

Primary mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of prostate: report of 15 cases

Prostatic urothelial-type adenocarcinoma arises through a process of glandular metaplasia of the prostatic urethral urothelium and subsequent in situ adenocarcinoma sometimes associated with villous adenoma. These prostatic adenocarcinomas are analogous to nonurachal adenocarcinomas arising in the bladder from cystitis glandularis. Only 2 cases of urothelial-type adenocarcinoma from an institution other than our own have been previously described. The distinction between adenocarcinoma from another organ secondarily involving the prostate, usual adenocarcinoma of the prostate, and prostatic urothelial-type adenocarcinoma can present a significant diagnostic challenge and has significant therapeutic implications. Fifteen cases of prostatic urothelial-type adenocarcinoma were retrieved from the consult files of one of the authors. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 72 years (range 58 to 93 y). All men had negative colonoscopies, clinically excluding a colonic primary. Bladder primaries were ruled out clinically or pathologically in radical resection specimens. Follow-up was available on all men with a mean of 50.3 months (range 2 to 161 mo). All men presented with urinary obstruction symptoms with 3 (20%) also having mucusuria and 2 (13.3%) also having hematuria. Four men (26.7%) developed metastatic disease and 8 (53.3%) died of disease. In 8/15 (53%) cases, glandular metaplasia of the prostatic urethra and contiguous transition to adenocarcinoma were identified. Multiple histologic patterns were observed including dissection of the stroma by mucin pools 15/15 (100%), villous features 7/15 (47%), necrosis 2/15 (13.3%), signet ring cells 3/15 (20%), perineural invasion 1/15 (6.7%), focal squamous differentiation 1/15 (6.7%), and a granulomatous inflammatory response 1/15 (6.7%). Immunohistochemical stains were negative for prostate specific antigen, prostate specific acid phosphatase, CDX2, and beta-catenin in all cases. Stains were positive for high molecular weight cytokeratin in 12/12 cases (100%), and CK7 and CK20 in 10/12 cases (83.3%). Prostatic urothelial-type adenocarcinoma is a rare aggressive cancer arising in the prostate. The differential diagnosis includes conventional prostatic mucinous adenocarcinoma and secondary infiltration from a colonic or bladder adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry for prostate specific antigen, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and high molecular weight cytokeratin along with morphology can help rule out conventional prostate carcinoma. beta-catenin, CDX2, and clinical studies are needed to rule out colonic adenocarcinoma. As prostatic urothelial-type adenocarcinoma is entirely analogous to bladder adenocarcinoma in both, its morphology and immunophenotype, only clinical studies or in some cases pathologic examination of the cystoprostatectomy specimen can exclude infiltration from a primary bladder adenocarcinoma.

Nephrogenic adenoma of the ureter: case report

Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare metaplastic benign lesion of urothelium in response to genitourinary tract procedures, chronic infection, trauma, urinary calculi and immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation. It has been reported to occur throughout the urinary tract especially, in the urinary bladder. We report a case of nephrogenic adenoma arising from the lower end of the right ureter with clinical and radiological features suspicious of carcinoma.

Urothelial-Type adenocarcinoma of the prostate mimicking metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma arising in urinary bladder or prostatic urethra is uncommon. When they occur, the tumor can be mistaken for metastatic lesions, especially from the colon. Here we report the fifth case of a primary urothelial-type adenocarcinoma arising in the prostate which showed enteric differentiation. The patient was a 55 year-old male whose prostatic needle core biopsy showed a high grade adenocarcinoma which was initially thought to be metastatic colon cancer. A follow-up colonoscopy was unremarkable. Subsequent prostatectomy revealed a high grade adenocarcinoma which was positive for cytokeratins 7 and 20, carcinoembryonic antigen, CDX2, and high molecular weight cytokeratin, and negative for prostate specific antigen, prostate specific acid phosphatase and AMACR. A diagnosis of urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate was rendered. We review the literature regarding this entity, and discuss the differential diagnosis, emphasizing utility of immunohistochemistry in making the diagnosis. Finally, we speculate on the behavior of these rare tumors.

Nephrogenic adenoma: an update on an innocuous but troublesome entity

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is a rare benign lesion of the urothelial tract that is typically preceded by some form of genitourinary insult. The pathogenesis of NA is not entirely clear. Although generally presumed to be a metaplastic process of the urothelium, recent evidence suggests that NA may in fact be derived from detached renal tubular cells implanting along the urothelial tract in previously injured areas, at least in cases associated with a kidney transplant. On light microscopy, NA shows a variety of patterns, including tubulocystic, papillary, and much less frequently solid, that often coexist. Recognition of its characteristic patterns, and awareness of its unusual architectural and cytologic features, is key to making the diagnosis of NA and distinguishing this lesion from malignant neoplasms occurring at the same sites, in particular, clear cell carcinoma, nested or microcystic variants of urothelial carcinoma and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Although straightforward in most cases, the correct diagnosis may be difficult to make on limited tissue samples. A number of immunohistochemical markers have been studied in an attempt to characterize NA; however, to date there is no specific immunohistochemical profile to distinguish this lesion from its malignant mimickers, although PAX2, a new marker, may prove to be helpful in this regard. Clinicopathologic correlation with careful attention to morphology remains the pillar in establishing the correct diagnosis.

Nephrogenic Adenoma: Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Its Etiology and Differentiation From Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Context.—Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare benign lesion of the urinary tract. Owing to its strong association with a history of urinary tract irritation, nephrogenic adenoma was initially thought to originate from urothelial metaplasia; however, no solid proof of this association has been found. More recent investigation has pointed to a renal tubular cause. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic carcinoma, particularly when dealing with lesions from the prostatic urethra.

Objective.—To elucidate a possible histogenic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubules, and also to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic distinction between nephrogenic adenoma and prostate carcinoma.

Design.—Immunohistochemical studies were performed for P504S, prostate-specific antigen, CD10, p63, and epithelial membrane antigen on 9 cases of nephrogenic adenoma, 10 cases of normal renal parenchyma, and 10 cases of prostatic tissue, both benign and malignant.

Results.—Nephrogenic adenoma shares the same immunohistochemical profile as distal renal tubules: both are positive for P504S and epithelial membrane antigen and negative for p63, CD10, and prostate-specific antigen. Prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue was positive for P504S and prostate-specific antigen, and normal prostatic gland tissue was positive for prostate-specific antigen and negative for P504S; p63-stained basal cells in normal prostatic gland tissue but did not react with prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue. The CD10 inconsistently stained normal and neoplastic prostatic gland tissue. Epithelial membrane antigen stain was negative in prostatic carcinoma, with rare occasional reactivity in normal prostatic glands.

Conclusion.—These findings provide supporting evidence that nephrogenic adenoma is derived from distal renal tubules. Our results also demonstrated that the combination of P504S and prostate-specific antigen with epithelial membrane antigen is a valuable tool in distinguishing prostatic carcinoma from nephrogenic adenoma.

PAX2: a reliable marker for nephrogenic adenoma

Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare lesion of the urinary tract. The diagnosis usually is straightforward when characteristic microscopic and clinical findings are present, and the entity is familiar. However, misdiagnosis, in particular of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, may occur. Immunohistochemical stains often are needed to make such a distinction, but currently available markers offered only partial help. It recently was demonstrated that nephrogenic adenoma in renal transplant patients originated from the renal tubular epithelium. This newly proved, but long sought information may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma. In this study, we investigated the expression of a renal transcription factor, PAX2, in 39 nonrenal transplant-related nephrogenic adenomas, 100 adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland, and 47 urothelial carcinomas of the urinary tract. A strong and distinct nuclear staining of PAX2 was found in all 39 cases of nephrogenic adenoma (100%), but not in normal prostate tissue, normal urothelium, adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland, and invasive urothelial carcinomas. Focal CD10 was detected in six of 13 nephrogenic adenomas in the superficial papillary component and in normal prostate epithelium, normal urothelium, lymphocytes, adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, and urothelial carcinoma. There was no uroplakins detected in nephrogenic adenoma. Therefore, these findings are suggesting that nephrogenic adenoma in nonrenal transplant patients may also arise from the renal epithelium, as did the comparable lesions after transplantation. PAX2 is a specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker in identification and differential diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma.

Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play an important role in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate. Basal cell markers, such as the 34betaE12 antibody and antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 or p63, are very useful for demonstration of basal cells as their presence argues against a diagnosis of invasive prostatic carcinoma (PC). However, several benign mimickers of PC, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), nephrogenic adenoma, and mesonephric hyperplasia, can stain negatively with these markers, and thus, a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Although there are examples in the literature of high grade PC that stain focally with some of the basal cell markers, these cases are usually readily diagnosed based on H&E appearances and are unlikely to be confused with these benign mimickers. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive marker of PC (except for a few uncommon variants: atrophic, foamy gland, and pseudohyperplastic variants), and its detection by immunohistochemical staining in atypical prostatic lesions can be very useful in confirming an impression of adenocarcinoma. AMACR expression can also be identified in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostatic atrophy, AAH, and benign prostatic glands, and accordingly, a diagnosis of PC should not be based solely on a positive AMACR immunostain, especially when the luminal staining is weak and/or noncircumferential. The use of AMACR/basal cell antibody cocktails has been found to greatly facilitate the distinction between PC and its benign mimickers, especially when only limited tissue is available for staining. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) are both quite sensitive and fairly specific markers of PC (there are a few nonprostatic tumors that can express one or both), and are both very helpful in establishing or confirming the diagnosis of PC when the differential diagnosis includes other tumors that can involve the prostate such as urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. 34betaE12, p63, thrombomodulin, and uroplakin III are additional urothelial associated markers useful in this differential diagnosis. CDX2 and villin are useful markers to diagnostically separate colonic adenocarcinoma from PC. AMACR positivity and negative basal cell marker reactions are useful to confirm the presence of residual PC after hormonal or radiation therapy. Pan-cytokeratin, PSA, and PSAP can also highlight subtle infiltrates of PC with hormonal or radiation therapy effect. PSA and PSAP immunohistochemical stains are valuable in confirming metastatic carcinoma as being of prostatic origin and should always be utilized in the diagnostic evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin in males.

Expression of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in nephrogenic adenoma

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign lesion composed of small glandular structures that develops along the urothelium with uncertain pathogenesis. Some investigators believe that nephrogenic adenoma develops by a metaplastic process in response to injury to the urothelium, while others believe that it arises from detached renal tubules. Nephrogenic adenoma may be present in the prostatic urethra and morphologically mimic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR), a recently identified prostate cancer marker, is typically negative in normal urothelium and prostatic glands, and positive in distal convoluted renal tubules in addition to prostatic adenocarcinomas. Therefore, evaluation of AMACR expression in nephrogenic adenoma will have significance in the pathologic diagnosis and in understanding pathogenesis of this lesion. We studied 38 nephrogenic adenomas by clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical analyses for AMACR (P504S) and high molecular weight cytokeratin (34betaE12). Twenty-two of 38 nephrogenic adenomas (58%) demonstrated strong cytoplasmic positivity for AMACR, ranging from patchy, focal to diffuse staining. In addition, 16 of 26 (62%) nephrogenic adenomas were negative for 34betaE12. To our knowledge, this is one of the first report of a completely benign lesion, which can be found in the prostate, showing strong AMACR immunoreactivity. Our findings suggest using caution when interpreting positive AMACR immunostaining in prostatic specimens. These findings could be explained by possible renal tubular origin or renal differentiation, at least in a subset, of nephrogenic adenomas.

Expression of α-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (P504S) in Nephrogenic Adenoma: A Significant Immunohistochemical Pitfall Compounding the Differential Diagnosis With Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR, P504S) has recently been shown to be a useful marker for the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma and a potential aid in its distinction from its many mimics, one of which is the benign lesion, nephrogenic adenoma (NA). The goal of this study was to assess the expression of AMACR in NA by immunohistochemistry, as well as other potentially useful markers, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin clone 34betaE12, p63, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). AMACR was expressed in 4/4 NAs involving the prostatic urethra and underlying stroma, and in 3/16 NAs involving the bladder. The prostatic cases showed circumferential granular cytoplasmic AMACR expression of at least moderate intensity, in >75% of tubules in 3 cases and in <10% of tubules in the remaining case. The AMACR-positive cases in the bladder typically showed focal weak noncircumferential staining of the tubules and stronger staining of the cells lining the papillae. 34betaE12 staining was observed in 1/4 prostatic NAs and 4/16 bladder NAs, typically in a cytoplasmic pattern in a minority of cells. p63 and PSA were negative in all cases. Our data indicate that NA of the prostatic urethra commonly expresses AMACR and lacks basal cell-specific markers, making it not only a potential morphologic mimic of prostatic adenocarcinoma but also a significant immunohistochemical mimic as well. Awareness of NA as a significant pitfall in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma and careful examination of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections remains the key to the correct diagnosis, which can be supported by a negative PSA stain.

Benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma

The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, especially when present in small amounts, is often challenging. Before making a diagnosis of carcinoma, it is prudent for the pathologist to consider the various benign patterns and processes that can simulate prostatic adenocarcinoma. A useful method of classifying benign mimickers is in relationship to the major growth patterns depicted in the classical Gleason diagram. The four major patterns are small gland, large gland, fused gland and solid. Most mimickers fit within the small gland category and the most common ones giving rise to false-positive cancer diagnosis are atrophy, post-atrophic hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and seminal vesicle-type tissue. A number of other histoanatomic structures such as Cowper's gland, verumontanum mucosal glands, mesonephric glands and paraganglionic tissue may be confused with adenocarcinoma. Additionally, metaplastic and hyperplastic processes within the prostate may be confused with adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, inflammatory processes including granulomatous prostatitis, xanthogranulomatous prostatitis and malakoplakia may simulate high-grade adenocarcinoma. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis), a putative precursor of transition zone adenocarcinoma, has overlapping features with low-grade adenocarcinoma and may cause problems in differential diagnosis, especially in the needle biopsy setting. The pathologist's awareness of the vast array of benign mimickers is important in the systematic approach to the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Knowledge of these patterns on routine microscopy coupled with the prudent use of immunohistochemistry will lead to a correct diagnosis and avert a false-positive cancer interpretation.

Mesonephric remnants of the prostate: incidence and histologic spectrum

Mesonephric remnants in the prostate are an unusual mimic of adenocarcinoma with unknown incidence. This condition is considered benign, similar to its counterpart in the female genital tract, but there have only been six cases reported to date, so the histologic spectrum of this finding is uncertain. To determine the incidence and comparative histopathology of this finding, we reviewed all transurethral resections of the prostate obtained at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) in 1989 to identify cases of mesonephric remnants. Among 698 prostatic transurethral resection specimens, we identified 4 cases of mesonephric remnants (0.6% incidence), all in association with nodular hyperplasia. Patients ranged in age from 66 to 82 years (mean, 72 y) and had typical urinary obstructive symptoms; follow-up was obtained in these 4 cases. Four additional consultation cases and one needle biopsy case were also included in this study. Histologically, mesonephric remnants consisted of a proliferation of benign acini arranged in lobules or showing infiltrative growth between smooth muscle bundles without stromal desmoplasia. The acini were typically round or oval, varied in size and spacing, and lined by a single layer of low cuboidal cells with scant to moderate cytoplasm and inconspicuous small nucleoli. The cells of mesonephric remnants were not reactive with antibodies to prostate-specific antigen (eight of eight cases) or with prostatic acid phosphatase (seven of seven cases); high-molecular weight cytokeratin 34betaE12 was positive in the basal cells (six of eight cases). Our results indicate that mesonephric remnants are present in <1% of transurethral resections and are rarely identified in needle biopsies. The acini are lobular or infiltrative and may be architecturally mistaken for adenocarcinoma. This cytologically innocuous finding is probably underreported and interpreted as benign prostatic acini, but this is of no apparent clinical consequence. Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies to PSA and keratin 34BE12 are helpful in separating mesonephric remnants from adenocarcinoma, similar to the case of other benign mimics.

Renal-type clear cell carcinoma occurring in the prostate

Clear cell lesions of the urinary tract often present diagnostic challenges. We report a previously undescribed lesion in the prostate, occurring in a 73-year-old man who presented with hematuria and subsequently underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. A total of 24 g of tissue was removed, and in 4 of 17 blocks submitted a lesion morphologically and immunohistochemically similar to clear cell carcinoma of the kidney was noted. A thorough cystoscopic and full-body, radiologic workup was performed, but no renal tumor was discovered. Random cystoscopic biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra as well as bladder washings were benign. Subsequent needle biopsies of the prostate were also benign. The patient underwent a pelvic lymph node dissection with radical cystoprostatectomy and orthotopic Studer pouch diversion. There was organ-confined, ordinary-type prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason's 3 + 3) present bilaterally in the peripheral zone; no residual clear cell carcinoma was identified. All lymph nodes were negative, and the urinary bladder showed no dysplasia or neoplasia. We think this tumor represents a primary renal type of clear cell carcinoma arising in the prostate. To our knowledge, this type of tumor has not been previously reported to arise in an extrarenal location.

Nephrogenic adenoma of the prostatic urethra in a patient treated with ESWL for a lower ureteral stone

We present a case of prostatic urethral nephrogenic adenoma incidentally diagnosed in a patient treated with ESWL for ureteral stone disease, and we comment on this unusual urothelial lesion.

Derivation of nephrogenic adenomas from renal tubular cells in kidney-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Nephrogenic adenomas are benign, tumor-like lesions within the urothelial mucosa of the urinary tract that are not uncommon in renal-transplant recipients. We investigated the origin of nephrogenic adenomas in renal-transplant recipients.

METHODS

Tissue sections were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with the use of probes for the X and Y chromosomes, by immunohistochemical methods with the use of antibodies to renal tubular antigens, and by lectin histochemical methods. Forty-six nephrogenic adenomas from 29 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

All nephrogenic adenomas in 14 female recipients of transplants from male donors and 10 male recipients of transplants from female donors showed the same sex-chromosome status as the donor kidney, but not the same sex-chromosome status as the recipient's surrounding bladder tissue. The nephrogenic adenomas from all 6 female recipients of transplants from female donors showed female chromosomes, and those from the 16 male recipients of transplants from male donors showed male chromosomes. The presence of aquaporin 1, PAX2, and lectin-binding capacity for peanut agglutinin, Lotus tetragonolobus agglutinin, and Sophora japonica agglutinin in nephrogenic adenomas indicated an origin from renal tubular cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrogenic adenomas in renal-transplant recipients are derived from tubular cells of the renal transplants and are not metaplastic proliferations of the recipient's bladder urothelium.

Nephrogenic adenoma of the prostatic urethra: a mimicker of prostate adenocarcinoma

Nephrogenic adenoma, thought to be a benign metaplastic response of the urothelium to injury, can rarely affect the prostatic urethra. Extension of small tubules of nephrogenic adenoma into the underlying prostatic fibromuscular stroma can lead to the misdiagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in transurethral resection specimens and prostate biopsies. We reviewed 26 cases of nephrogenic adenoma involving the prostatic urethra, seen at The Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1990 to 1998, to evaluate the histologic features, which may better define this lesion. Immunohistochemical results were evaluated for cases where the lesion was present on deeper sections. Histologic patterns included the following: tubules in 96% (25 of 26), structures resembling vessels in 73% (19 of 26), cords and individual cells in 46% (12 of 26), papillary configurations in 19% (5 of 26), and signet ring cell-like tubules in 12% (3 of 26). Other features of nephrogenic adenoma, such as thyroidization, were identified in 38% (10 of 26), and peritubular sheaths were seen in 65% (17 of 26) of cases. Nucleoli were prominent in 54% (14 of 26), and no case had mitoses. In the region of nephrogenic adenoma, urothelium was noted in 69% (18 of 26); in 61% (11 of 18) it showed cuboidal metaplasia and 28% (5 of 18) showed squamous metaplasia. Extension of nephrogenic adenoma into muscle was observed in 77% (20 of 26) of cases, 75% (15 of 20) of which had identifiable urothelium overlying the lesion. Blue-tinged mucinous secretions were observed in 32% (8 of 25) of cases. Inflammation was found in all but one case. Nephrogenic adenomas were diffusely positive for 34betaE12 in 11% (1 of 9) of cases, focally positive in 44% (4 of 9), and negative in 44% (4 of 9). In 100% (9 of 9), cytokeratin 7 stains were positive. Focal prostate specific antigen and PSAP positivity were seen in 36% (4 of 11) and 50% (5 of 10) of nephrogenic adenoma cases, respectively. In conclusion, nephrogenic adenoma of the prostatic urethra can mimic prostate cancer because of: 1) the presence of tubules, cords, and signet ring-like tubules; 2) prominent nucleoli; 3) muscle involvement; 4) blue-tinged mucinous secretions; 5) focal prostate specific antigen and PSAP positivity; and 6) negative staining in some cases for 34betaE12. Features useful in the diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma include the following: 1) distinctive nephrogenic patterns, such as papillary and "vascular," 2) adjacent urothelium, 3) thyroidization, 4) peritubular sheaths, 5) associated inflammation, and 6) positivity for cytokeratin 7 and, in some cases, 34betaE12.

[Nephrogenic adenoma of the bladder: metaplasia or embryologic alteration?]

OBJECTIVES

To present a new case of nephrogenic adenoma of the bladder and to review the current concepts on the etiopathogenesis of this lesion.

CLINICAL CASE

Seventy years old female with repetitive haematuria who was diagnosed as having a nephrogenic adenoma of the bladder which was extirpated by cold biopsy forceps. No tumoral relapse was detected after 16 months of follow up.

DISCUSSION

In the light of the present knowledges, the origin of nephrogenic adenoma is a phenomenon of urothelial metaplasia due to a chronic irritative stimulus wich would lead a cellular proliferation with potentialities to originate mesonephric tissues and which starting point could be on not completely involutioned mesonephric cellular rests and/or on de-differentiated mature urothelial cells.

Atypical nephrogenic metaplasia of the urinary tract: a precursor lesion?

BACKGROUND

Nephrogenic metaplasia with cytologic atypia (atypical nephrogenic metaplasia) is occasionally encountered and its biologic potential is uncertain.

METHODS

The authors describe 18 cases of atypical nephrogenic metaplasia characterized by the presence of prominent cytologic atypia, including nuclear enlargement, nuclear hyperchromasia, and enlarged nucleoli. DNA ploidy analysis by digital image analysis and immunostaining for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (34betaE12), cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), p53, and MIB-1 were performed in 9 cases.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 62 years (median, 65 years; range, 39-84 years). The male-to-female ratio was 2.6:1. Two patients had a history of noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma. The typical clinical presentation was hematuria (8 patients) and voiding symptoms (5 patients). Cystoscopic findings were suspicious for neoplasm in 7 of 13 cases. The neoplastic cells were positive for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, cytokeratin 7, and EMA, and were usually negative for cytokeratin 20 and CEA. p53 nuclear accumulation and increased MIB-1 labeling index were seen in 4 cases. DNA ploidy analysis showed aneuploid pattern in 2 of 9 cases. The mean patient follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 0.5-10.6 years); 2 patients had recurrent nephrogenic metaplasia, and the remainder were alive without recurrence or urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical nephrogenic metaplasia is benign; it occasionally displays substantial cytologic abnormalities of no apparent clinical significance. Awareness of the spectrum of cytologic changes within this entity is critical to prevent overdiagnosis of cancer and avoid unnecessary treatment. There is no direct evidence that links atypical nephrogenic metaplasia to cancer.

Nephrogenic adenoma mimicking carcinoma: a potential pitfall in cytodiagnosis

Nephrogenic adenoma of the urinary bladder and urethra is an uncommon benign lesion of the urinary epithelium that can cytologically and histologically mimic malignancy. We report on the cytologic findings of a case of nephrogenic adenoma of the urethra that mimicked malignancy in an 84-yr-old woman. The differential diagnosis of this problematic lesion is discussed, and the literature describing the cytologic features is reviewed.

Cells in various benign and malignant conditions of the human prostate express different antigenic phenotypes

Prostatic epithelium basically consists of secretory-luminal, basal and endocrine-paracrine cells. Immunohistochemical procedures are frequently used for showing the cells reflecting different differentiations. In this study, 40 prostatic tissue specimens submitted to the Department of Pathology of Inönü University, Research Hospital, between 1991 and 1996 were examined. Half of the cases were diagnosed as cancer and the other half had various benign lesions. Of the cases 22.5% (n = 9) were needle biopsy material whereas the remainder, 47.5% (n = 19), were from prostatectomy and 30% (n = 12) were transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens. High molecular weight anti-cytokeratin antibodies (HMW anti-cytokeratin) stained basal cells both in all normal prostatic tissue and benign prostatic lesions, but in the majority of cancers (70%, n = 14) negative immunoreactivity was seen. Nevertheless, in some of the cancer cases (30%, n = 6) basal cell anti-cytokeratin staining was shown. Negative immunoreactivity with HMW anti-cytokeratin is important in distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions, whereas positive staining is not every time in favour of benign lesions. With the usage of prostate specific antigen (PSA) it was seen that all of the malignant and benign prostatic lesions stained positively. Basal cells in hyperplastic glands were not stained with this stain. Irregular, and in some areas, intense (PSA) immunoreactivity is present in precancerous and malignant lesions. Endocrine cells, which are represented with Chromogranin-A (Chr-A) immunoreactivity and reflecting neuroendocrine differentiation, are present in 75% (n = 15) of benign lesions and in 50% (n = 10) of cancer cases. It was thought that the lesser number of these cells in neoplastic lesions in comparison to the non-tumoral lesions is correlated with the disorder of mechanism that regulates the cell growth. Both in neoplastic and non-tumoral tissues the prostatic epithelial cells showed the three markers, namely HMW anti-cytokeratin, PSA, and Chr-A, which may reflect the multidirectional differentiation of these cells from a pluripotent origin.

Clear cell adenocarcinoma and nephrogenic adenoma of the urethra and urinary bladder: a histopathologic and immunohistochemical comparison

Because of histological similarities between nephrogenic adenomas and clear cell adenocarcinomas of the urinary tract, there is the potential for diagnostic confusion between these two entities. The histopathologic features of 13 nephrogenic adenomas and five clear cell adenocarcinomas of the urethra and urinary bladder are compared in this report, and detailed immunohistochemical staining profiles are provided for these tumors. Only 2 of the 13 nephrogenic adenomas contained clear cells, and these constituted less than 10% of the lesions. In contrast, four of the five clear cell adenocarcinomas contained prominent areas with clear cells. Nephrogenic adenomas generally showed only mild cytologic atypia, whereas four of the five clear cell adenocarcinomas showed severe atypia. A single mitotic figure was identified in only two of the nephrogenic adenomas, whereas the mitotic rate in the clear cell adenocarcinomas ranged from 2 to 14 per 10 high-power fields. None of the nephrogenic adenomas showed evidence of necrosis, but focal necrosis was noted in four of the five clear cell adenocarcinomas. In general, the nephrogenic adenomas and clear cell adenocarcinomas showed negative to weak staining with CK903 but strong staining with AE1, AE3, and Cam 5.2. Variable staining was observed with Brst-3 and antibodies to S-100, CEA (monoclonal and polyclonal), LeuM-1, and CA19.9. Nephrogenic adenomas and clear cell adenocarcinomas were all negative for prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and estrogen and progesterone receptors (except for two nephrogenic adenomas, which showed only focal weak staining for estrogen receptor). Neither bcl-2 nor c-erbB-2 staining was able to discriminate between the tumors. However, strong staining for p53 was noted in each clear cell adenocarcinoma and in none of the nephrogenic adenomas. MIB-1 positivity in nephrogenic adenomas ranged from 0 to 13 (average of 5.5) per 200 cells, whereas the positive range for clear cell adenocarcinomas was 33 to 70 (average of 47) per 200 cells. In summary, histopathologic features that favor clear cell adenocarcinoma over nephrogenic adenoma include a predominance of clear cells, severe cytological atypia, high mitotic rate, necrosis, high MIB-1 positivity, and strong staining for p53.

Prostate pathology case study seminar

Great strides have been made in the past decade in our understanding of the pathology of the prostate. Diagnostic criteria have been proposed, debated, and refined for a number of entities, including prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, basal cell proliferations, postatrophic hyperplasia, verumontanum mucosal gland hyperplasia, and numerous new variants of prostatic adenocarcinoma such as ductal adenocarcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. This report presents a series of case studies in prostate pathology which illustrate some of the contemporary issues which confront the pathologist and urologist.

Mucinous adenocarcinoma of urinary bladder type arising from the prostatic urethra. Distinction from mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate

We describe two cases of mucinous adenocarcinomas involving and confined to the prostate and originating from the prostatic urethra. These cases were identical to adenocarcinomas arising within the urinary bladder and differed from mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In both cases, an in situ adenocarcinoma component was identified in the overlying prostatic urethra. In one case the in situ adenocarcinoma arose in a villous adenoma of the urethra. Both cases contained lakes of mucin lined by tall columnar epithelium with varying degrees of cytologic atypia, and one case had mucin-positive signet cells. In contrast, mucinous adenocarcinomas of the prostate demonstrate tubules and cribriform glands floating within mucin; mucin-positive signet cells are rare. Both tumors were negative immunohistochemically for prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific acid phosphatase and positive for carcinoembryonic antigen. One case was treated by radical prostatectomy, and the patient was without evidence of disease with short follow-up. Following simple prostatectomy, the other patient did not undergo definitive therapy for several years, at which point the tumor had progressed locally to an advanced stage. In terms of therapy, the distinction between mucinous adenocarcinoma or urinary bladder-type arising in the prostate depicted within the current study and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate is significant.

Pre-neoplastic lesions of the prostate

Acinar carcinoma of the prostate is the third most frequently registered cancer and its incidence is expected to increase as life expectancy increases. Consequently, there have been attempts to introduce possible screening programmes for early detection of prostatic carcinoma. In this context the histopathologist has a role in that potential pre-neoplastic lesions have to be recognized. Two such pre-neoplastic lesions in the prostate are adenomatous hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. In this article the histological features of these lesions, their differential diagnosis and their pre-malignant potential are reviewed.

Vesical clear cell adenocarcinoma. V. Nephrogenic adenoma: a diagnostic problem

Following the diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma in a bladder lesion, which was later interpreted as early clear cell adenocarcinoma, the morphological and immunocytochemical features of these two lesions were reviewed to see if differences could be established for future diagnostic application. The architecture, extent, cell type, nuclear pleomorphism, presence of mitotic figures and glycogen content were recorded in 28 nephrogenic adenomas and the clear cell carcinoma. Similarly, the immunoreactivity for CAM 5.2, LP34, EMA and CEA of 10 nephrogenic adenomas and the clear cell carcinoma were compared. Proliferation rate in five nephrogenic adenomas and the carcinoma was assessed by antibody M1B1. Many of the features showed differences in degree or extent (clear cell change, nuclear pleomorphism, CAM 5.2 and CEA positivity). The only features distinct to clear cell carcinoma were the presence of solid islands, mitoses greater than 1/10 HPF (HPF area = 0.4 mm2) and M1B1 counts in excess of 29/200 in clear cell carcinoma (range 30/200-83/200). Only the high M1B1 count was present in the first biopsy of the clear cell carcinoma.