Separation of photoredox products by local potential fields

Photodriven electron and energy transfer from a light-harvesting metallodendrimer

Intermolecular electron and energy transfer from a light-harvesting metallodendrimer [Ru[bpy(C-450)(4)](3)](2+), where bpy(C-450)(4) is a 2,2'-bipyridine derivative containing 4 coumarin-450 units connected together through aryl ether linkages, is observed in acetonitrile solutions at room temperature. The model complex [Ru(dmb)(3)](2+), where dmb is 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, is included for quantitative comparison. The excited states of both compounds are metal-to-ligand charge transfer in nature and participate in excited-state electron and triplet energy transfer processes. Quenching constants were determined from luminescence and time-resolved absorption experiments at constant ionic strength. [Ru[bpy(C-450)(4)](3)](2+) displays significantly slower quenching rates to molecular oxygen and methyl viologen relative to the other processes investigated. Triplet energy transfer from [Ru[bpy(C-450)(4)](3)](2+) to 9-methylanthracene is quantitatively indistinguishable from [Ru(dmb)(3)](2+) while reductive electron transfer from phenothiazine was slightly faster in the former. With the exception of dioxygen quenching, our results indicate that the current dendritic structure is ineffective in shielding the core from bimolecular electron and triplet energy transfer reactions. Electrochemical measurements of [Ru[bpy(C-450)(4)](3)](2+) reveal irreversible oxidative processes at potentials slightly negative to the Ru(III/II) potential that are assigned to oxidations in the dendritic structure. Excited-state oxidative electron-transfer reactions facilitate this process resulting in the reduction of ground-state Ru(III) to Ru(II) and the trapping of the methyl viologen radical cation (MV(*+)) when methyl viologen serves as the quencher. This process generates a minimum of 9 MV(*+)'s for every [Ru[bpy(C-450)(4)](3)](2+) molecule and disassembles the metallodendrimer, resulting in the production of a [Ru(dmb)(3)](2+)-like species and "free" C-450-like dyes.

A study of some polypyridylruthenium(II) complexes as DNA binders and photocleavage reagents

The nature of the binding of several ruthenium polypyridyl complexes containing 2,2'-bipyridine (bipy), 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine (DMB), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (DPP), 2,2',2"-terpyridine (terpy), 2,2'-biquinoline (biq), 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene (TAP) and 1,4,5,8,9,12-hexaazatriphenylene (HAT), with calf thymus DNA, poly[d(A-T)] and poly[d(G-C)] were studied by absorption and emission spectroscopy, DNA melting techniques, and emission lifetime measurements. In low ionic strength phosphate buffer, spectroscopic changes and DNA stabilization depended on the polypyridyl ligands present, and indicated binding that varied from substantially electrostatic to intercalative. Ru(bipy)2(HAT)2+ and Ru(phen)3(2+), which bind by partial intercalation, also show a strong preference for poly[d(A-T)]. The emission quantum yields for most complexes were increased in the presence of DNA. An exception was Ru(TAP)3(2+) which has a markedly reduced emission quantum yield and lifetime in the presence of poly[d(G-C)] or CT-DNA, due to photoredox interaction with quanines. Emission decays of the complexes generally showed multiexponential behaviour. The ability of the ruthenium complexes to sensitise DNA cleavage was determined using pBR322 plasmid DNA. Ru(TAP)3(2+) is the most efficient sensitiser while uncharged complexes and complexes with very short-lived excited states do not cleave DNA.