Kim HJ, Lee AK, Kim YG, Bu SC, Kim SH, Yang CH, Suh OK, Kim SG, Lee MG. Influence of 4-week and 8-week exercise training on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral azosemide in rats.
Life Sci 2002;
70:2299-319. [PMID:
12005188 DOI:
10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01516-3]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 expression was determined in the livers of control, 4-week exercised (4WE) and 8-week exercised (8WE) rats. Even though the 4-week and 8-week exercise training caused 53 and 25% increases, respectively, in total cytochrome P450 contents in the liver, exercise training did not cause any changes in the levels of P450 1A2 (which primarily metabolizes azosemide), 2E1 and 3A23 in the liver, as assessed by both Western and Northern blot analyses. Also, exercise training failed to alter the activity of NADPH-dependent cytochrome P450 reductase. The plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine were significantly (2 to 3 folds) higher in 4WE rats than in controls, presumably due to physical stress, but the catecholamine levels in 8 WE rats returned to control levels. After intravenous administration (10 mg/kg of azosemide), the amount of unchanged azosemide excreted in 8-h urine (Ae(Azo, 0-8 h)) was significantly greater (46% increase) in 4WE rats than that in control rats. This resulted in a significantly faster (82% increase) renal clearance of azosemide. However, the nonrenal clearances were not significantly different between control and 4WE rats. The significantly greater Ae(Azo, 0-8 h) in 4WE rats was mainly due to a significant increase in intrinsic active secretion of azosemide in renal tubules and not due to a decrease in the metabolism of azosemide. After oral administration (20 mg/kg), Ae(Azo, 0-8 h) was also significantly greater (264%) in 4WE rats and this again was due to a significant increase in intrinsic active renal secretion of azosemide and not due to an increase in gastrointestinal absorption. After both intravenous and oral administration, the 8-h urine output was not significantly different between control and 4WE rats although Ae(Azo, 0-8 h) increased significantly in 4WE rats. This could be due to the fact that the urine output reached a plateau at 10 mg/kg after intravenous administration and 20 mg/kg after oral administration of azosemide to rats and possibly due to increase in plasma antidiuretic hormone levels and aldosterone production in 4WE rats.
Collapse