Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with penicillamine

Penicillamine treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. A retrospective study

Out of 64 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 42 were treated with D-penicillamine (D-Pa) for more than 6 months and 22 for less than 6 months. The latter patients were excluded from the evaluation of the effect. The former patients were treated with doses of 600-1 250 mg daily for 6-41 months (mean 16.8). The clinical effect was retrospectively assessed as favourable in 24 patients, 12 did not respond and the effect could not be assessed in 6. The clinical assessment was supported by significant reductions of ESR and orosomucoid. Adverse reactions, although rarely serious, led to withdrawal of the drug in 25 (39%) of the 64 patients. It is concluded that D-Pa is a valuable drug in the treatment of severe RA.

Treatment of chronic haemophilic synovitis in humans with D-penicillamine

Chronic proliferative synovitis secondary to haemathroses is a major complication in patients with severe haemophilia. Current management strategies include prophylactic infusions of the missing coagulation factor, corticosteroids, synoviorthesis and/or synovectomy with variable degrees of benefit. In addition, patients with coagulation factor inhibitors are not amenable to the invasive therapeutic modalities. The gross and microscopic findings of the synovitis in haemophilic arthritis are remarkably similar to those seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although the pathophysiology of these two conditions are quite different. Haemophilic arthropathy, in the later stages, resembles degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease. Oral D-penicillamine, a drug effective in the proliferative synovitis of rheumatoid arthritis, was evaluated in 16 patients. Ten patients had an unequivocal response, while three had a reduction in palpable synovium and three had no response. Thus 81% of the patients had a beneficial response. Minor reversible drug side-effects occurred in two patients (proteinuria in one and a rash in the second). The results of this study suggest that D-penicillamine is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of haemophilic chronic synovitis.

Management of proteinuria secondary to penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

To determine if a policy of continuing penicillamine therapy in successfully treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the presence of persistent proteinuria, was associated or not with resolution of this adverse effect, a computer record of patients receiving penicillamine for rheumatoid arthritis was searched for patients with persistent proteinuria and the case notes of these patients reviewed. Eleven patients with persistent proteinuria were identified, eight of whom did not have nephrotic syndrome and were continued on penicillamine with close monitoring. In 5 patients proteinuria resolved after 16-21 months; 3 developed peripheral oedema (2) or worsening of pre-existing hypertension and proteinuria (1). In one of these the proteinuria subsequently resolved and one died of unknown cause. Of the 3 initially nephrotic patients, two had resolved at the time of the study. Persistent proteinuria in penicillamine-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis resolves with continued therapy in the absence of nephrotic syndrome but vigilance is required for the development of any complications.

The comparative efficacy and toxicity of second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Results of two metaanalyses

We performed 2 metaanalyses of placebo-controlled and comparative clinical trials to examine the relative efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX), injectable gold, D-penicillamine (DP), sulfasalazine (SSZ), auranofin (AUR), and antimalarial drugs, the second-line drugs most commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For the efficacy study, we applied a set of inclusion criteria and focused on trials which provided information on tender joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or grip strength. We found 66 clinical trials that contained 117 treatment groups of interest, and for each drug, we combined the treatment groups. For each outcome, results showed that AUR tended to be weaker than other second-line drugs. The results of the 3 outcome measures were synthesized into a composite measure of outcomes, and AUR was significantly weaker than MTX (P = 0.006), injectable gold (P less than 0.0001), DP (P less than 0.0001), and SSZ (P = 0.009) and was slightly, but not significantly, weaker than antimalarial agents (P = 0.11). We also found heterogeneity among antimalarial agents, in that patients treated with chloroquine did better than those treated with hydroxychloroquine. We found little difference in efficacy between MTX, injectable gold, DP, and SSZ. A power analysis showed that a trial should contain at least 170 patients per treatment group to successfully differentiate between more effective and less effective (e.g., AUR) second-line drugs. None of the reported interdrug comparative trials we reviewed were this large. For the toxicity study, our inclusion criteria captured RA trials which reported the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy because of drug toxicity and the total proportion who dropped out. We found 71 clinical trials that contained 129 treatment groups. The average proportion who dropped out and the average proportion who dropped out because of drug toxicity were computed for each drug. Overall, 30.2% of the patients in these trials dropped out; 50% of them did so because of drug toxicity. Injectable gold had higher toxicity rates (P less than 0.05) and higher total dropout rates (P less than 0.01) than any other drug; 30% of gold-treated patients dropped out because of side effects versus 15% of all trial patients. Antimalarial drugs and AUR had relatively low rates of toxicity; the rate for MTX was imprecise because of discrepancies between trials. Thus, of the commonly used second-line drugs, AUR is the weakest, and injectable gold is the most toxic. Agents introduced in the future will be compared with these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Cutaneous reactions to drugs used for rheumatologic disorders

Cutaneous reactions to medications probably represent the most common manifestation of drug reactions. The diversity of cutaneous eruptions produced by drugs provide a challenge in searching for the mechanisms producing the reaction. Many eruptions are due to a form of allergic hypersensitivity, while others may be idiosyncratic, due to a metabolic abnormality, or represent a cumulative phenomenon. This article discusses the diagnosis of drug-induced cutaneous reactions by reviewing specific drugs commonly used in rheumatologic therapy.

D-penicillamine-induced elastosis perforans serpiginosa in a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Report of a case and review of the literature

Elastosis perforans serpiginosa is a rare complication of D-penicillamine therapy. It has been reported to occur in Wilson's disease and cystinuria, usually after many years of high-dose therapy. We report a case of D-penicillamine-induced elastosis perforans serpiginosa with unique clinical features occurring in a 10-year-old child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis who received only 71 gm of the drug over 9 months. The case is also unusual because of the short course and low cumulative dose of drug received and because of the calcification of elastic fibers. The calcification of elastic fibers suggests that this case may represent an unusual variant of elastosis perforans serpiginosa or an overlap with pseudoxanthoma elasticum. All reported cases of D-penicillamine-induced elastosis perforans serpiginosa are reviewed, and histopathologic and electron microscopic findings are presented. The theoretic mechanisms of action of D-penicillamine on elastic tissue synthesis and morphology are discussed.

The natural course of gold and penicillamine nephropathy: a longterm study of 54 patients

To elucidate the natural course of gold and penicillamine nephropathy and to facilitate appropriate clinical management 54 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who developed proteinuria during treatment with intramuscular gold thiomalate (21) or oral D penicillamine (33) were studied in detail throughout the whole of their renal illnesses. Renal biopsy was performed and creatinine clearance and proteinuria were measured serially for a median period of 60 months (range 16-130 months) in the gold treated and 74 months (range 13-158 months) in the penicillamine treated patients. During gold (penicillamine) treatment 48% (43%), 71% (82%) and 86% (91%) of patients had presented with proteinuria by 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment. After stopping gold (penicillamine) treatment proteinuria reached a median maximum of 2.1 g/day (4.2 g/day) at 2 months (1 month) before resolving spontaneously so that by 6, 12 and 18 months 38% (36%), 62% (64%) and 76% (88%) of patients were free of proteinuria. The median initial and most recent creatinine clearances of the gold (penicillamine) treated patients were 77 ml/min (80 ml/min) and 59 ml/min (78 ml/min) respectively and no patients died from or needed treatment for chronic renal failure. HLA B8 and/or DR3 alloantigens were identified in 64% of the gold treated and 56% of the penicillamine treated patients. In the gold (penicillamine) treated patients renal biopsy revealed membranous glomerulonephritis (GN) in 72% (88%), an immune complex mesangial glomerulonephritis in 10% (6%), minimal change nephropathy in 10% (6%) and no significant glomerular abnormalities in 8% (0%). The study has demonstrated the close similarity between gold and penicillamine nephropathy. It has also demonstrated that some 75% of cases develop during the first year of treatment, the proteinuria resolves completely when treatment is withdrawn, progressive deterioration of renal function is most uncommon, corticosteroid therapy is unnecessary and several different types of glomerulonephritis are associated with gold and penicillamine treatment.

Temporal patterns of response to D-penicillamine, hydroxychloroquine, and placebo in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis patients

We calculated the time required for therapeutic benefit to become apparent following initiation of treatment with D-penicillamine (DP), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), or placebo (each administered concomitantly with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug) using data from a double-blind, randomized 12-month trial in 162 patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Using previously published criteria to classify the outcome, we found that 60% of the HCQ group, 46% of the DP group, and 39% of the placebo group responded favorably after 12 months of therapy. Data from examinations between the initial and final assessments were used to determine when the response first occurred. Approximately 50% of all patients who showed improvement at 12 months had already done so by 2 months. After 6 months, 96% of the DP group, 88% of the HCQ group, and 85% of the placebo group responders had met the criteria for response. The average time until response was attained was 105 days for the DP group, 129 days for the HCQ group, and 140 days for the placebo group. Our results indicate that a favorable response to these slow-acting antirheumatic drugs is unlikely if improvement has not occurred within the first 6 months of therapy.

Effects of piroxicam and D-penicillamine on T lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer cells and rheumatoid factor production in rheumatoid arthritis

The effects of piroxicam and D-penicillamine on T lymphocytes, NK cell activity and rheumatoid factor production as well as clinical parameters were studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The level of total rheumatoid factor fell during treatment with D-penicillamine (p less than 0.02) and there was a positive correlation (K greater than 0.50, p less than 0.05) between this fall in rheumatoid factor and the improvement of several clinical activity parameters. No significant change was observed in the level of rheumatoid factor during treatment with piroxicam. Natural killer cell activity decreased from 21.1 +/- 2.5 to 15.8 +/- 1.9 after treatment with piroxicam for 3 weeks (p less than 0.05) as compared with changes in the controls. No change in natural killer cell activity was seen after treatment with D-penicillamine. Moreover, no significant changes in the numbers of T4+ and T8+ lymphocytes nor in the numbers of HLA-DR positive T cells were seen in the two treatment groups. Both laboratory and clinical activity parameters improved during the treatment with D-penicillamine, while only subjective parameters improved during treatment with piroxicam.

Adverse effects profile of sulfhydryl compounds in man

Many of the adverse reactions produced by penicillamine and other compounds with an active sulfhydryl group form a distinctive pattern when viewed as a class. Alterations in taste perception, mucocutaneous lesions, proteinuria due to immune-complex membranous glomerulopathy, and pemphigus are adverse reactions that have been encountered with all of the compounds discussed herein. Hematologic reactions such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occur rarely and with variable frequency. The angiotension converting enzyme inhibitor captopril has an active sulfhydryl group. When it was first given in high doses to patients with severe hypertension, adverse effects similar in pattern to those just outlined were reported. With reduced doses and more careful patient selection, the more serious reactions are no longer found, but disturbances of taste perception, rash, and oral mucosal ulcers are still encountered.

Current concepts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The treatment of RA is complex and often frustrating. The pathologic process of RA is composed of acute inflammation, chronic immunologic phenomenon, and chronic connective tissue degradation. It is important to understand not only the pathophysiology of RA but also the mechanism of action of our therapeutic drugs so that treatment can be tailored to affect the important aspects of the process leading to end-organ damage. Despite the many drugs available, therapy is still unsatisfactory. Many drugs work in only certain patients. This could be secondary to variability in the disease state or to difference in drug metabolism. A better understanding of both disease and therapeutic agents may lead to better use of our present agents and development of new, more effective treatment modalities.

Short course of synacthen therapy as an adjunct in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

The effect of synthetic adrenocorticotrophic hormone (Synacthen), in conjunction with hydroxychloroquine, aurothioglucose, or penicillamine, was evaluated retrospectively in 21 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One mg of depo Synacthen was administered at increasing intervals of 4 to 14 days for a total period of 3 to 7 months. Fourteen patients with RA on either hydroxychloroquine or aurothioglucose and not on Synacthen, served as controls. Patients in the Synacthen group were, on the whole, sicker, as indicated by a lower functional capacity, higher mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and systemic and articular indices. Physicians' estimate of the patients condition after 1 - 2 months of therapy showed no improvement or deterioration in 10 out of 13 cases in the control group. Likewise, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased significantly more and seronegativity was achieved in more of the Synacthen-treated cases. Six to 8 months after the beginning of therapy (1 to 4 months after cessation of Synacthen) clinical improvement was comparable in both groups, although seroconversion was more common in patients who had received Synacthen (7 out of 10 as compared to 1 out of 7 respectively). It is suggested that Synacthen may be used safely in the early phase of selected RA patients, until the effect of second-line drugs is achieved.

Cholestatic jaundice associated with D-penicillamine therapy

Cholestatic jaundice is a rare complication of penicillamine therapy. We report here a 35-year-old patient who developed fever, a rash and cholestatic jaundice 16 days after commencing treatment with penicillamine for cystinuria. The jaundice subsided slowly after discontinuation of the drug and with prolonged therapy with prednisone. The literature on penicillamine-induced liver injury is reviewed.

Azathioprine versus D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with gold

Two hundred six patients were entered into a prospective controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) 1.25-1.5 mg/kg/day with D-penicillamine (DP) 10-12 mg/kg/day. One hundred thirty-four patients completed 24 weeks of therapy. Improvement in nearly all efficacy variables was seen in both groups. Patients taking DP demonstrated a greater rise in hemoglobin concentration and greater fall in erythrocyte sedimentation rate than patients receiving AZA; these were the only efficacy variables with a significant difference between the treatment groups. Fewer withdrawals for adverse reactions occurred among the patients receiving AZA, but the difference was not significant. Patients receiving AZA were withdrawn from the drug mainly for abnormal liver function test results, nausea and gastrointestinal upset, and leukopenia. The main reasons for withdrawal of patients receiving DP were nausea, rash and pruritus, thrombocytopenia, dysgeusia, and proteinuria.

Controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine and D-penicillamine singly and in combination in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

A 2-year, controlled, double-blind trial of D-penicillamine and hydroxychloroquine either alone or in combination was conducted on patients with progressive rheumatoid arthritis. The group given D-penicillamine alone improved most, but a linear fall-off in efficacy occurred. Surprisingly, the group receiving combination drug therapy did not fare as well as the group receiving D-penicillamine therapy. A subset of patients receiving hydroxychloroquine therapy had prolonged benefit. Toxicity, though not uncommon, was generally not severe.

Low-dose D-penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled, double-blind clinical trial

Two hundred twenty-five patients with active severe rheumatoid arthritis were admitted to a multiclinic, controlled, double-blind trial comparing the use of 500 mg D-penicillamine per day, 125 mg D-penicillamine per day, and placebo. One hundred seventy-one patients completed at least 30 weeks of therapy. The 500 mg D-penicillamine group demonstrated statistically significant improvement over the placebo group in grip strength, average circumference of swollen proximal interphalangeal joints, and patient assessment. While the trend was for greater improvement with the larger dose of D-penicillamine, there was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in duration of morning stiffness, walking time, physician's assessment, number of swollen joints, or scores for tender and swollen joints. The slight increase in efficacy of higher dose D-penicillamine was associated with increased toxicity.

The toxicity pattern of D-penicillamine therapy. A guide to its use in rheumatoid arthritis

One hundred and one patients with rheumatoid arthritis were followed prospectively to assess the efficacy and toxicity of therapy with D-penicillamine. After a mean total followup of 11.5 months (38 patients have completed 2 years of followup) there was a 70% overall improvement rate with 2 complete remissions. Sixty-one patients developed 84 separate toxic reactions, 36 of which required drug withdrawal. Skin rashes (27/84), proteinuria (15/84), low platelets (14/84), and taste abnormalities (10/84) were the most common side effects of therapy at a mean D-penicillamine dose of 463 mg/day. The majority of toxic reactions (85%) occurred in the first 6 months, but proteinuria and thrombocytopenia were more common in the 6 to 12 month treatment period. Previous gold toxicity was a risk factor for developing D-penicillamine toxicity (10/13). Our observations suggest that D-penicillamine related toxicity is a major problem even at 500 mg/day, but the drug can be used with an increased safety margin after 9 months of continuous therapy.

Maintenance dose of penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between a standard and a response-related flexible regimen

There is much individual variation in the response of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to penicillamine, some patients deriving benefit from very small doses. A dose of 750 mg daily is widely regarded as standard, and, while their RA commonly responds, many patients discontinue treatment because of adverse reactions to penicillamine. A more flexible prescribing policy might be more successful in the long term and was tested in 1 group of 20 patients, another receiving a 'standard' regimen, each beginning treatment at a low dose level. Of those who were given increases of dose only if response was poor 17 completed 1 year of treatment on an average maintenance dose of 308 mg daily, but only 11 of the other group on an average dose 613 mg daily. Proteinuria, which was found only in the latter group accounted for 6 withdrawals, all at doses of 625 mg daily or above. The reduction in rheumatoid activity appeared to be of about the same degree among the members of both groups who completed 12 months of treatment. Penicillamine should be given initially in a low dose and this should be raised only if there is lack of response after at least 4 weeks.

Difficulties in the use of D-penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The difficulties encountered in administering D-penicillamine to 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a six to 24 month period are recorded. Side-effects were frequent. Proteinuria occurred in 13 patients (33%) mainly in the fourth to the sixth month. Renal biopsies were performed in six patients and all showed light microscopy abnormalities. Electron microscopy performed in five patients revealed subepithelial deposits in all and in addition some had mesangial and subendothelial deposits. Seven patients (17.5%) developed eight episodes of thrombocytopaenia which was quickly reversed on cessation of treatment or reduction in dosage. On the positive side, there was significant improvement in most parameters of disease activity at six, 12 and 18 months compared to the pretreatment levels, but the results at two years were less impressive. Reduction in steroid dosage was considerable and was greater than half the mean pretreatment dose after two years but the absence of a control group makes the full significance of these uncertain. Patients on high and low dosage regimens were compared over a 12 month period of treatment. Although the differences were not statistically significant, withdrawals and side-effects were less frequent in the low dose group.

Resumption of treatment with penicillamine after proteinuria

Penicillamine has been successfully reintroduced and continued for a minimum of 13 months in 5 patients who developed proteinuria during the first course of the drug. The daily maintenance dose during the second course was 150--250 mg taken midway between 2 meals. Proteinuria did not recur; no significant excretion of fibrin degradation products occurred; complement, urea, creatinine, and serum albumin remained within normal limits. Urine microscopy showed no abnormality.

Penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis: adverse effects

The use of penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is limited by the incidence of adverse effects, some of which are potentially hazardous. However, adverse effects are dose-related and the advantages and disadvantages of different fixed and flexible dose regimes are discussed. The incidence of adverse effects is significantly greater in patients previously treated with gold who developed toxicity to that drug--no such increase being found in gold treated patients whose only reason for stopping gold was ineffectiveness. Rashes which develop after several months of treatment are variants of pemphigus and their various presentations are described. Fatal reactions, fortunately rare, are predominantly associated with aplasia of the bone marrow. Monthly haematological checks coupled with meticulous charting of the results may reveal trends as well as numerical changes and serve as an early warning of marrow damage.

The use of penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma

The use of penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and scheroderma is reviewed. Much of the worlds literature was collected including both open studies and control studies. Both types with over 1,300 patients in the open trials and as one would expect, a smaller group in the control trials, showed about 64 percent of the patients having good results. Side effects range from one quarter to one third of the treated patients. This seems to show penicillamine as an effective drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis though with a multiplicity of side effects. Its use in the treatment of scleroderma is still uncertain. Because of the rarity of the disease the number of patients treated has been small and the data is conflicting.