Treatment of systemic sclerosis in 1988

Manifestations of scleroderma pulmonary disease

Scleroderma is a multisystem disease of unknown cause characterized by synthesis and deposition of excessive extracellular matrix and vascular anti-GBM antibodies, leading to pulmonary hemorrhage and glomerulonephritis with rapidly progressive renal insufficiency. Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis and diagnosis and treatment have significantly improved our ability to recognize the syndrome, distinguish it from other similar disorders, and offer successful treatment. This article focuses on the pathogenetic features, clinical manifestations, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic principles of anti-GBM disease.

Esophageal manifestations of rheumatic disorders

This study was performed to review information on functional and anatomic esophageal manifestations in patients with rheumatic disorders and to outline their pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment in light of the current medical, endoscopic, and surgical advances. A MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between 1985 and 1995, reviews of the bibliographies of textbooks, and a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles formed the data sources, all combined with our own clinical experience. Primary research and review articles addressing the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and complications of esophageal disease occurring in a rheumatic context were selected, with emphasis on recently developed medical, endoscopic, and surgical methods for diagnosis and management. Study design and quality were assessed, with particular attention paid to methods and aims. Relevant data on frequency, clinical presentation, and relationship to underlying rheumatic disorder, prognosis, and clinical management were analyzed. Esophageal manifestations are common in patients with rheumatic diseases and range in nature and severity from functional myopathic or neuropathic esophageal dysmotility to extrinsic lumenal compression and esophageal mucosal damage from gastroesophageal acid reflux or opportunistic infection. The primary symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, chest pain, and bleeding may be directly related to the underlying rheumatic disease or may be the unwanted effects of therapy with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, or disease-modifying agents. Easily over-looked in the context of a multisystemic disease, these esophageal symptoms may be amenable to simple treatments, but frequently require a thorough assessment by modern, sophisticated diagnostic tools. In many instances, functional and structural involvement of the esophagus in patients with rheumatic disorders requires a high index of suspicion for an early diagnosis, correct assessment, intensive surveillance, and aggressive therapy to avoid end-organ damage and decline in quality of life. Significant recent advances in the understanding of esophageal pathophysiology, the development of diagnostic techniques, progress in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, and minimally invasive surgery allow early detection and effective long-term therapy for esophageal dysfunction associated with rheumatic diseases.

Classification of morphea (localized scleroderma)

OBJECTIVE

To classify and describe morphea (localized scleroderma).

DESIGN

A review of morphea and its subtypes is presented.

RESULTS

The current classification of morphea is incomplete and confusing. As knowledge of the spectrum of disease continues to evolve, the controversy and confusing nature of its multiple subtypes present a challenge for the physician who encounters a patient with this condition. Thus, we propose that morphea be classified into the following five groups: plaque, generalized, bullous, linear, and deep. This classification, based on clinical morphologic findings, will simplify the diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

CONCLUSION

Morphea represents a wide variety of clinical entities that seen to be on the opposite end of the scleroderma spectrum from systemic sclerosis. The cutaneous lesions eventually evolve from a sclerotic stage to a nonindurated stage, and residual hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation follows. The histologic pattern in patients with morphea is similar to that in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis. Although treatment is nonstandardized, hydroxychloroquine sulfate may be beneficial.

Outcome measurement in scleroderma clinical trials

Clinical trials in scleroderma were reviewed to assess the clinimetric properties of frequently used outcome measures. Twenty-seven controlled intervention studies were found in the English literature; nine demonstrated effective therapy. The outcome measures used included skin involvement, functional status, physical performance (grip strength, oral aperture), and internal organ involvement (pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiac). Very few outcome measures detected between- or within-group differences even when an active drug was compared with a placebo. Skin measures were found to yield statistical differences in seven studies, patient global assessment in three, and physician global assessments in four. Internal organ measures detected differences between groups only rarely; the pulmonary diffusing capacity was statistically different twice. Physical performance measures (eg, grip strength and oral aperture) never yielded statistical differences, and in only one of five trials did a functional assessment detect statistical differences. To show drug efficacy in future trials in scleroderma, better outcome measures need to be developed and a consensus obtained on which outcomes to use so that potentially effective therapies can be tested in a standardized fashion against a placebo or current therapy. Currently, because of a lack of clinimetric data on outcome measures, therapeutic inefficacy cannot be differentiated from a lack of sensitivity in the outcome measures used. In the future, outcome measures should be chosen on the basis of the adequacy of their reliability, construct, and content validity and be sensitive to change. Ideally, outcome measures also should have criterion validity, ie, show a strong association between the measure (such as a skin score) and an irrefutable gold standard (such as skin pathology).

Treatment of systemic sclerosis

Proper classification of patients into diffuse cutaneous and limited cutaneous subsets and the anticipation of complications are the keys to the management of subjects with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Patients with early diffuse disease and rapidly progressive skin thickening are at highest risk of developing serious disease of the internal organs (intestine, lung, heart, kidney) and should be considered for disease modifying treatment. The targets of the disease and sites of possible intervention are vascular endothelium (vasoprotective agents), mononuclear cell subsets (immunosuppressive agents), and fibroblasts (colchicine, D-penicillamine). A number of new agents with sound scientific rationale are currently undergoing therapeutic trials. Much can be done to improve the lifestyle of those with scleroderma. The most dramatic recent development is the ability to reverse kidney disease by the prompt use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and modern methods of renal dialysis and transplantation. Scleroderma is not a hopeless disease.

Effects of immunomodulating therapy in systemic sclerosis

We reviewed studies concerning immunomodulating therapy in systemic sclerosis. These comprise mostly uncontrolled trials and case reports. Some of these studies hint at a possible beneficial effect of antimetabolites (azathioprine, 5-fluoro-uracil and methotrexate), cyclosporine and interferon-gamma. However, to give a clearcut answer on the efficacy of these drugs in systemic sclerosis, controlled studies are urgently needed.