Effects of EACA on thrombin generation as measured by the chromagen S2238

Synergistic Procoagulant Mechanism and Application of Kaolin-Zeolite Composite Hemostat for Effective Hemorrhage Control

Achieving timely and effective hemorrhage control is imperative for the survival of individuals with severe bleeding. Hemostatic materials, by enhancing the natural cell-based coagulation response, are essential tools in modern and military medical practice for controlling bleeding, especially in emergency and surgical settings. Here, we report a new type of composite hemostatic material with two different aluminosilicate-based components, kaolin and zeolite, which synergistically work together in different stages of the coagulation cascade reactions. Kaolin can effectively activate the clotting factor FXII in the early stage, and zeolite can accumulate and assemble FXa and FVa on its surface and thereafter lead to the formation of highly active thrombin in the later stage. The synergistic action mechanism between kaolin and zeolite significantly boosts the levels of FXIIa and FXa, and it also greatly enhances plateau thrombin activity. For practical application, a kaolin-modified zeolite gauze is fabricated, and it demonstrates excellent hemostatic effectiveness. Compared to the combat gauze currently used in front-line treatment, it reduces blood loss by 75% and shortens hemostasis time by 33% in a rabbit femoral artery injury model. In addition, this kaolin-zeolite gauze has no heat release problem and a nearly zero particle shedding rate, which greatly decreases the safety risk compared to current commercial inorganic-based hemostatic gauzes.

Epsilon aminocaproic acid reduces transfusion requirements in patients with thrombocytopenic hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) is an antifibrinolytic drug that has been used to control hemorrhage by stabilizing the thrombus. It has been used in thrombocytopenic patients largely on an empiric basis.

METHODS

Concerns regarding side effects have limited the use of this drug. The authors reviewed their experience with EACA at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from 1997 to 2003.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients with thrombocytopenic hemorrhage, 51 (66%) patients achieved a complete response and 13 (17%) patients achieved a partial response, resulting in a decrease in platelet and red blood cell transfusions. Adverse effects were manageable in this set of patients with severe underlying disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this experience, EACA may be a valuable adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with thrombocytopenic hemorrhage.

Role of epsilon amino caproic acid in the management of haemophilic patients with inhibitors

We managed bleeding crisis in 10 consecutive severe haemophilic patients with inhibitors (eight had an inhibitor level of >5 BU mL(-1)) mainly with the antifibrinolytic agent, i.e. epsilon amino caproic acid (EACA). EACA was used by local, oral or intravenous routes either in combination or separately. Five patients developed inhibitors postoperatively and among the remaining five, four had recurrent haemarthrosis or soft tissue bleeds and one patient presented with severe gastrointestinal bleeding without demonstrable lesion. In all the patients, addition of EACA to their management protocol resulted in stoppage and/or reduced frequency of bleeding. In six of 10 patients, the results were excellent; of these six patients, five developed inhibitors postoperatively. Although a reduction in the frequency of bleeding was observed in patients with haemarthrosis and soft tissue bleed, it was not spectacular and the patients required additional therapy. Hence the results could be described as poor. No patient needed to stop the medicine because of the side-effect of EACA. Symptoms like mild nausea and vertigo were seen as the side-effects of this medicine when high intravenous dosage was administered. EACA thus appears to be an excellent adjuvant therapy for haemophilic patients with inhibitors. Besides its well-recognized antifibrinolytic activity, EACA may have additional mechanisms of action in haemophilic patients with inhibitors. More extensive use of this cheap and safe product is warranted in haemophilic patients with inhibitors. If larger studies confirm this observation, then using antifibrinolytics will allow substantial reduction of FEIBA or activated prothrombin complex (APCC) usage in such patients without necessarily increasing the thrombotic complications or reduction of the clinical efficacy, when compared with higher dosage of FEIBA or APCC alone. This will lead to substantial financial savings in countries where up to 35% of severe haemophilia A patients develop inhibitors.