Cytoreductive surgery prior to interleukin-2-based therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nephrectomy is the surgical removal of all or part of a kidney. When the aim of nephrectomy is to reduce tumor burden in people with established metastatic disease, the procedure is called cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). CN is typically combined with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). SACT can be initiated before or immediately after the operation or deferred until radiological signs of disease progression. The benefits and harms of CN are controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone or watchful waiting in newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, two trial registries, and other gray literature sources up to 1 March 2024. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SACT and CN versus SACT alone or watchful waiting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were time to death from any cause and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, treatment response, treatment-related mortality, discontinuation due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search identified 10 records of four unique RCTs that informed two comparisons. In this abstract, we focus on the results for the two primary outcomes. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone Three RCTs informed this comparison. Due to the considerable heterogeneity when pooling across these studies, we decided to present the results of the prespecified subgroup analysis by type of systemic agent. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon immunotherapy versus interferon immunotherapy alone CN plus interferon immunotherapy compared with interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89; I²= 0%; 2 studies, 326 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Assuming 820 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive interferon immunotherapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 132 fewer all-cause deaths (237 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 people who receive CN plus interferon immunotherapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone We are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy compared with TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37; 1 study, 450 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Assuming 574 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive TKI therapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 38 more all-cause deaths (38 fewer to 115 more) per 1000 people who receive CN plus TKI therapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy One study evaluated CN followed by TKI therapy (immediate CN) versus three cycles of TKI therapy followed by CN (deferred CN). Immediate CN compared with deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.53; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assuming 620 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive deferred CN, the effect estimate corresponds to 173 more all-cause deaths (18 more to 294 more) per 1000 people who receive immediate CN. We found no evidence to assess quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CN plus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy versus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause. However, we are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus SACT in the form of TKI therapy versus SACT in the form of TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause. Immediate CN versus deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause. We found no quality of life data for any of these three comparisons. We also found no evidence to inform any other comparisons, in particular those involving newer immunotherapy agents (programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1]/programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] immune checkpoint inhibitors), which have become the backbone of SACT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There is an urgent need for RCTs that explore the role of CN in the context of contemporary forms of systemic immunotherapy.

HLA loss of heterozygosity-mediated discordant responses to immune checkpoint blockade in squamous cell lung cancer with renal metastasis

Despite the significant success of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer compared with chemotherapy, efficacy varies greatly across patients, and acquired resistance frequently occurs. In particular, during immunotherapy, the dynamic changes in molecular events have not been characterized. The authors report a case of squamous cell lung carcinoma with renal metastasis, treated with pembrolizumab, in which the primary tumor and rare renal metastases showed different responses. Using whole-exome sequencing, the authors found loss of heterogeneity in HLA genes in all tumors and high levels of intratumor heterogeneity in metastases. The increased levels of HLA loss led to therapy resistance during tumor evolution. In addition to tumor mutational burden and PD-L1, HLA loss of heterozygosity and intratumor heterogeneity should be taken into consideration during immunotherapy.

Treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future directions

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Over the past 12 years, medical treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has transitioned from a nonspecific immune approach (in the cytokine era), to targeted therapy against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and now to novel immunotherapy agents. Multiple agents-including molecules against vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and related receptors; inhibitors of other targets, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin and the MET and AXL tyrosine-protein kinase receptors; and an immune-checkpoint inhibitor-have been approved based on significant activity in patients with advanced RCC. Despite these advances, important questions remain regarding biomarkers of efficacy, patient selection, and the optimal combination and sequencing of agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize present management and future directions in the treatment of metastatic RCC. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:507-524. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Surgical Management of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach

The past decade has seen a rapid proliferation in the number and types of systemic therapies available for renal cell carcinoma. However, surgery remains an integral component of the therapeutic armamentarium for advanced and metastatic kidney cancer. Cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant cytokine-based immunotherapy (predominantly high-dose interleukin 2) has largely given way to systemic-targeted therapies. Metastasectomy also has a role in carefully selected patients. Additionally, neoadjuvant systemic therapy may increase the feasibility of resecting the primary tumor, which may be beneficial for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Several prospective trials examining the role of adjuvant therapy are underway. Lastly, the first immune checkpoint inhibitor was approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2015, providing a new treatment mechanism and new opportunities for combining systemic therapy with surgery. This review discusses current and historical literature regarding the surgical management of patients with advanced and mRCC and explores approaches for optimizing patient selection.

Surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been considered standard management for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for over a decade. This practice, based on evidence from the immunotherapy era, has now come into question with the dramatic shift in management of mRCC patients due to the development and approval of several targeted molecular therapies (TMT).

METHODS

A comprehensive English language literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed to identify articles and guidelines pertinent to CN in mRCC.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival for patients who underwent CN compared to those that did not; however, these studies suffer from heavy selection bias. Furthermore, the optimal timing of TMT, before or after surgery is not known. Pre-surgical TMT has the advantage of early treatment of metastases, downsizing of the primary, and may be an effective 'litmus test' for the selection of patients for CN based on response to TMT. The results of two ongoing phase III trials (CARMENA and SURTIME) will address much of the controversy on the role of CN and the timing of systemic therapy in the TMT era. In this review, we aim to present the evidence that lead to adoption of CN in the era of immunotherapies as well as the available data about the oncologic benefit of CN in patients with mRCC who receive TMT as their primary systemic therapy.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be an important role for CN in the era of TMT, mostly in patients with favorable risk and where a high percentage of tumor burden can be removed by cytoreductive surgery.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a review of the historical literature and its role in the era of targeted molecular therapy

Renal cell carcinoma presents with metastatic disease in approximately 30% cases. While surgical intervention remains the standard of care for organ confined disease, its role is limited in the management of metastatic disease. Over the last decade, cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to immunotherapy has demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival for appropriately selected patients. This review summarizes the evidence for the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in combination with immunotherapy and discusses its potential role in the current era of targeted molecular therapy.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis and a median survival time of only 6-12 months. However, the emergence of immunotherapies has rekindled interest in cytoreductive nephrectomy as a therapeutic option. Phase III randomized trials have demonstrated that cytoreductive nephrectomy significantly improves overall survival in selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon immunotherapy. While cytokine-based immunotherapy may be considered the standard systemic therapy, clinical studies are ongoing to develop molecular biomarkers and new therapies with improved efficacy and tolerability. With further advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis, behavior and molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma, cytoreductive nephrectomy, in combination with molecular targeted therapies, may become the new standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with small primary tumours treated with sunitinib or interferon-α

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with small primary tumours treated with immuno- or targeted therapy. To assess the efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC with unresected small primary tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three parallel single-arm prospective studies were conducted. Eligibility criteria were nearly identical for all trials and included: histopathologically confirmed RCC; metastatic measurable disease; size of primary tumour <5 cm; good or intermediate prognosis according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model; and no previous therapy. Study 1: Patients were treated with percutaneous cRFA under computed tomography guidance followed by interferon (IFN)-α, 9 MIU, s.c., three times per week. Study 2: Patients received cRFA followed by sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50 mg/day orally for 4 weeks, then 2 weeks off treatment. Study 3: Patients with unresected primary RCC received sunitinib alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, metastatic sites, primary tumour size) were similar in all three studies. Efficacy data for 114 evaluable patients showed an objective response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5, 10.5) for study 1, 28.9% (95% CI 15.2, 34) for study 2, and 31.6% (95% CI 20.3, 38.9) for study 3. The median (95% CI) PFS times were 9.1 (6.9, 10.2), 13.4 (9.8, 14.4) and 12.7 (11.3, 13.5) months for studies 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Objective response rate was significantly higher and PFS significantly longer in the sunitinib trials than in study 1 (P < 0.01 all differences); no differences were found between studies 2 and 3 (objective response rate, P = 0.1; PFS, P = 0.6). Study 1 met its primary endpoint, showing that PFS was significantly longer than the expected 5 months (P = 0.02). The median (95% CI) objective survival (OS) times were greater in study 2 (cRFA/sunitinib) and study 3 (sunitinib-alone) than in study 1 (IFN-α) at 27.2 (22.6, 31.8) and 22.5 (20.7, 24.3) vs 19.5 (16.3, 22.7) months, respectively. Differences were significant (study 1 vs 2, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; P = 0.003; study 1 vs study 3 HR = 0.6, P = 0.01). OS was significantly longer in the cRFA/sunitinib group compared with the sunitinib-alone group (HR = 0.71; P = 0.04). There were no unexpected toxicities of medical treatment or complications of cRFA.

CONCLUSIONS

cRFA is a safe and effective approach for select patients with metastatic RCC treated with immunotherapy. The cRFA technique did not improve PFS in patients treated with sunitinib; cRFA probably has impact on OS in these patients. This needs to be tested in a larger trial. Sunitinib was effective in patients with metastatic RCC with unresected small primary tumours.

Role of surgery in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) is a malignant disease without curative treatment. These patients are usually symptomatic and desperate for effective palliative treatment. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy are not effective in these patients. A multimodal approach consisting of cytoreductive nephrectomy, systemic therapy (which includes cytokines or targeted molecules), and metastasectomy have been shown to be useful in prolonging the survival and improving the quality of life in a select group of patients with metastatic renal cancer. Patients with oligometastatic disease, good performance status, and delayed presentation of the secondaries have better results following this integrated approach. Although there is some controversy regarding the order in which nephrectomy and systemic therapy are to be instituted, well-controlled studies like the South West Oncology Group and European organization research and treatment of cancer have shown that upfront nephrectomy gives better survival compared to neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by nephrectomy. This order is the standard presently. Of late, with better understanding of the genetic basis and the biology of the various subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, targeted molecular therapies have emerged as an equally effective alternative therapy to cytokines. Recent reports have proven that targeted therapy is more effective with comparable side effects. Metastasectomy in a subgroup of patients improves survival and quality of life specifically in those with lung secondaries and painful bone metastases.

Molecular diagnosis and therapy of kidney cancer

Kidney cancer is not a single disease; it is made up of a number of cancers that occur in the kidney, each having a different histology, following a different clinical course, responding differently to therapy, and caused by a different gene. Study of the genes underlying kidney cancer has revealed that it is fundamentally a metabolic disorder. Understanding the genetic basis of cancer of the kidney has significant implications for diagnosis and management of this disease. VHL is the gene for clear cell kidney cancer. The VHL protein forms a complex that targets the hypoxia-inducible factors for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Knowledge of this pathway provided the foundation for the development of novel therapeutic approaches now approved for treatment of this disease. MET is the gene for the hereditary form of type 1 papillary renal carcinoma and is mutated in a subset of sporadic type 1 papillary kidney cancers. Clinical trials are currently ongoing with agents targeting the tyrosine kinase domain of MET in sporadic and hereditary forms of papillary kidney cancer. BHD is the gene for the hereditary type of chromophobe kidney cancer. It is thought to be involved in energy and/or nutrient sensing through the AMPK and mTOR signaling pathways. Hereditary leiomyomatosis renal cell carcinoma, a hereditary form of type 2 papillary renal carcinoma, is caused by inactivation of a Krebs cycle enzyme due to mutation. Knowledge of these kidney cancer gene pathways has enabled new approaches in the management of this disease and has provided the foundation for the development of targeted therapeutics.

Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma

Cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to cytokine therapy has a well-established role in the treatment of appropriately selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recent use of novel molecular targeted agents in the management of metastatic RCC has challenged the current dogma of treatment with regards to the necessity, patient selection for and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy. Current evidence suggests that cytoreductive nephrectomy still plays an integral part in the multimodal paradigm of management for metastatic RCC. This review highlights the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy, and discusses controversial issues surrounding cytoreductive nephrectomy in the treatment of metastatic RCC, in the context of immunotherapy and also in the new era of targeted therapy. It also gives updates on the changing concepts of surgical approaches to cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic RCC.

The contemporary role of surgery in kidney cancer

The diagnosis and treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been the subject of major changes since the late 1980s. Initially, surgery was the only treatment available, but more recently, systemic therapies have been developed, and their introduction has modified some of the surgical indications for rcc. In addition, refinements in surgical technique and the introduction of minimally invasive approaches have revolutionized patient care and bear the promise of even more improvements to come. This paper provides an up-to-date overview of recent developments in the surgical treatment of RCC.

Pre-surgical targeted molecular therapy in renal cell carcinoma

Pre-surgical systemic therapy with targeted molecular agents is an attractive option as an approach to the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma. This treatment strategy offers a rational approach for selecting patients with metastatic disease who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy, but also allows access to treated tumour tissue to study the molecular mechanisms of response and resistance. In patients with locally advanced disease, this strategy offers the potential for improved resectability and timely delivery of systemic therapy to treat subclinical metastatic disease. Preliminary evidence indicates that the use of targeted therapies before nephrectomy is safe. Reliable therapy-specific prognostic biomarkers are needed for the optimal integration of aggressive surgical intervention and systemic therapy to maximize the oncological benefits for the patient.

Combination of radiofrequency ablation with antiangiogenic therapy for tumor ablation efficacy: study in mice

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine whether modulation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumor microvasculature by using the antiangiogenic drug sorafenib could increase the extent of radiofrequency (RF)-induced coagulation in an RCC animal tumor model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All investigations received animal care and utilization committee approval. RCC (human 786-0) was implanted subcutaneously into 27 nude mice. Sixteen mice were randomly assigned into one of three groups when tumors reached 12 mm in diameter: Six mice received 80 mg of sorafenib, a Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, per kilogram of body weight; five mice received 20 mg/kg sorafenib; and five mice received a control carrier vehicle alone. Antiangiogenic therapy was administered until a mean 1-mm reduction in tumor diameter was noted in one group. These 16 mice received a standard dose of RF ablation. Ablation size was visualized by using 2% triphenyltetrazolium chloride. An additional 11 tumors in mice treated with sorafenib alone were stained with CD31 to determine microvascular density (MVD). Resultant size of ablation was compared among groups; statistical significance was determined with analysis of variance. Differences in MVD were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Over the 9-day administration of sorafenib, mean tumor size in the control group reached 15.2 mm +/- 0.8 (standard deviation). Tumors in mice receiving 20 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg sorafenib measured 12.2 mm +/- 0.6 and 11.1 mm +/- 0.5, respectively (P < .05). RF-induced coagulation diameter was 8.5 mm +/- 0.4 and 11.1 mm +/- 0.3 in the 20 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg sorafenib groups, respectively, but was only 6.7 mm +/- 0.7 for animals that underwent RF ablation alone (P < .01). Likewise, significant decreases in MVD were noted in the sorafenib-treated animals (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of RCC in nude mice with the antiangiogenic agent sorafenib resulted in markedly decreased MVD and significantly larger zones of RF-induced coagulation necrosis.

Renal cell carcinoma presenting with paraneoplastic hypercalcemic coma: a case report and review of the literature

We report a case of a 62-year-old woman with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presenting with a hypercalcemia-induced coma. A laboratory evaluation indicated nonparathyroid-mediated hypercalcemia with an initial serum calcium level of 18.6 mg/dL. Our patient's parathyroid hormone (PTH)-related peptide level was undetectable. Initial imaging was negative, but PET scan identified a mass in the upper pole of the left kidney. Our patient underwent partial nephrectomy, and the mass was identified as RCC on final pathology. After surgery, her hypercalcemia resolved and PTH returned to normal limits. This case report describes a patient with RCC with the unusual presentation of hypercalcemic coma. We review the differential diagnosis of malignant hypercalcemia and the evaluation of hypercalcemia occurring with RCC. This case illustrates the need to carefully review and interpret all available data, especially when conventional testing in the work-up of hypercalcemia is unrevealing.

Interferon alpha 2b as medical selection for nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a consecutive study

OBJECTIVE

Up to 25% of the patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) will progress rapidly at metastatic sites and undergo needless surgery for an asymptomatic primary. We reversed the timing of surgery and immunotherapy and evaluated the role of initial IFN-alpha as selection for nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with mRCC and the primary in-situ received initial IFN-alpha for 8 weeks (2 weeks 5x3x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x6x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x9x10(6)IU/wk and 2 weeks 3x9x10(6)IU/wk). Patients with either partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD) underwent nephrectomy followed by IFN-alpha maintenance at 3x9x10(6)IU/wk. Patients were evaluated with regard to age, sex, metastatic sites, morbidity, response, nephrectomy rate, time to progression and survival.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received 2 months of preoperative IFN-alpha; 3 stopped during the 2 months period due to progressive disease (PD). Eight patients developed either a PR (n=3) or SD (n=5) at metastatic sites and underwent nephrectomy. Survival at 1 year is 50% (4/8 patients). Median progression-free survival was 6 months (3-17 months). Two of the 3 patients with PR developed a CR after 2 months maintenance following surgery. Eight patients with PD did not undergo surgery and had a median survival of 4 months (range 1-8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of progression at metastatic sites following IFN-alpha with the primary tumor in place may be used as selection for nephrectomy in patients with an intermediate prognosis. Currently, a randomized study is underway to assess the role of initial versus delayed nephrectomy in combination with IFN-alpha with regard to morbidity and survival.

Treatment of bone metastases and local recurrence from renal cell carcinoma with immunochemotherapy and radiation

Immunotherapies using interferons and/or interleukins are currently the treatment of choice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Bone metastases and non-resectable local recurrence are negative predictors for successful immunotherapy and signs of poor prognosis. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined immunochemotherapy (ICT) and radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastases or local recurrence from RCC in a prospective fashion. From September 1997 to September 1999, 20 patients with progressive RCC were treated with a combination of RT and ICT [s.c. interleukin-2a (IL-2), s.c. interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) and i.v. 5-fluorouracil]. RT started in week 2 of ICT. The radiation field was limited to the symptomatic bone metastases (15 patients) or the local recurrence (five patients). The total dosages of the RT ranged between 45 and 50 Gy, administered in fractions of from 1.8 to 2 Gy daily. In case of objective response or stable disease, the patients received up to two further ICT courses. All patients had good pain relief. Three out of 20 achieved complete remission, three had a partial remission, nine were stable and five patients had progressive disease under the combined treatment. Median survival was 21 months, mean survival 24 months (range: 5-59 months). The side effects of the combined treatment are in the same range as with ICT alone (World Health Organisation grade 2 and 3). Of 20 patients, 19 had their pain medication reduced after treatment. The combination of ICT and RT is feasible. There is remarkable pain relief. Our data suggest that the combination of immunochemotherapy and radiation therapy may induce a synergistic antitumor effect for the treatment of bone metastases or local recurrence from RCC compared to data from the literature for ICT or RT alone.

Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis

PURPOSE

Metastatic renal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advances in immunotherapy for this problem have rekindled interest in cytoreductive nephrectomy. We report a combined analysis of 2 prospective randomized trials that used an identical study protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 331 patients were randomized to 2 identical protocols comparing cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon alpha-2b vs interferon alpha-2b alone in patients with metastatic renal cancer, in whom the primary tumor was present and believed to be resectable. The primary end point for each trial was overall survival with a secondary end point of the response rate. Patients were stratified at pre-randomization by performance status (0 or 1), site of metastases (lung only vs other) and disease measurability. All results were analyzed by intent to treat criteria. Assuming a median survival of 1 year for interferon only, the Southwest Oncology Group trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in median survival duration and a 15% improvement in response rate with a power of 0.85. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer accrued an additional 80 patients in that study.

RESULTS

The combined analysis of these 2 trials yielded a median survival of 13.6 months for nephrectomy plus interferon vs 7.8 months for interferon alone. This difference represents a 31% decrease in the risk of death (p = 0.002). There was no evidence of a difference in the size of the treatment effect according to pre-randomization stratification factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive nephrectomy appears to improve significantly overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cancer treated with interferon immunotherapy independent of patient performance status, the site of metastases and the presence of measurable disease. Although it is highly statistically significant, the overall survival advantage is only 5.8 months for the entire group. These data emphasize the need to determine if this survival advantage can be further improved using more aggressive immunotherapy or other novel agents in the setting of cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) develop metastatic spread in approximately 33% of cases. The clinical management of patients with metastatic RCC is complicated by the lack of significant efficacy from available therapies. Common sites of metastases include the lung, liver, bone, brain, and adrenal gland, with case reports detailing the capacity of RCC to appear almost anywhere in the body. More than one organ system is often involved in the metastatic process. Metastases may be found at diagnosis or at some interval after nephrectomy. Approximately 20% to 50% of patients will eventually develop metastatic disease after nephrectomy. A shorter interval between nephrectomy and the development of metastases is associated with a poorer prognosis. Patients with metastatic RCC face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. Recent advances in biologic response modifier therapy have brought new hope to a small percentage of patients who respond to this therapy and rekindled interest in cytoreductive nephrectomy as an integral part of the management of these patients.

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Cytoreductive nephrectomy can be an important and effective component of a multidisciplinary treatment approach to metastatic renal cell carcinoma in carefully selected patients. The results of retrospective single institution series and randomized multicenter phase III trials suggest that removal of the primary tumor, even in the setting of metastatic disease, can significantly prolong survival and delay time to progression. It may also enhance the response to systemic therapy in the postoperative period. When employing initial cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of an overall treatment approach, careful patient selection is critical to success. A poor performance status (ECOG performance status less than 1), significant comorbidities that make surgical intervention high risk, or high-volume metastatic disease, and the presence of brain, liver, or bone metastases, or of atypical (sarcomatoid) histology have all been shown to be associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Patients exhibiting these clinical phenotypes should not be considered for initial cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of their treatment paradigm. Instead, they should receive some form of upfront systemic therapy (immunotherapy or novel therapy) and then be considered for delayed nephrectomy as part of a surgical consolidation approach after an interval of treatment if their disease kinetics demonstrate stable or regressing disease in response to systemic therapy. Patients who do not demonstrate these poor prognostic features should be considered for upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy as part of their overall treatment approach because of the potential it offers for palliation from local tumor symptoms, a delay in the time to disease progression, an improved response to systemic therapy, and improved overall survival.

The timing of immunotherapy and nephrectomy in multimodality treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Multimodality treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with immunotherapy and cytoreductive surgery is controversial. Especially the benefit of removing asymptomatic primary tumors in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer has been debated since several non-randomized, retrospective studies revealed an improved response to immunotherapy and prolonged survival following initial nephrectomy. Two recent randomized prospective trials both demonstrated a prolonged survival in those who were randomly assigned to undergo nephrectomy of the primary tumor prior to treatment with interferon alfa-2b than in those who were assigned to undergo treatment with interferon alfa-2b alone. In these trials the survival benefit was limited and strongly influenced by overall performance score. The timing of immunotherapy, either as neoadjuvant (prior to nephrectomy) or adjuvant treatment (following nephrectomy) in the multimodality approach of synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains controversial. Selection of patients, the possible mechanisms underlying the survival advantage of the combination of nephrectomy and immunotherapy, and the timing of the treatment modalities are discussed herein.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cancer

Recent randomized prospective trials have suggested that cytoreductive nephrectomy confers a survival advantage in patients with metastatic renal cancer who receive immunotherapy with interferon-alfa-2b. It appears that the patients most benefiting from this approach are those with good performance status, lung-only metastases, and adequate cardiac and pulmonary reserve. Nonrandomized trials have further suggested that this survival advantage may be extended in patients who receive more aggressive interleukin-2-based immunotherapy.

Phase II trial of subcutaneous interleukin-2, subcutaneous interferon-alpha, 5-fluorouracil and cis-retinoic acid in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: final results of cancer biotherapy research group 94-10

BACKGROUND

The treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer remains unsatisfactory despite encouraging results with biotherapy. Pilot studies from other investigators have suggested that combining cis-retinoic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN) may improve outcomes for such patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients had metastatic renal cell cancer, were in good medical condition, and had not been treated previously with more than two of the study agents. A 56-day treatment cycle consisted of: interferon-alpha 2a 3.0 mu/m2 s.c. Monday, Wednesday, and Friday weeks 1-8, interleukin-2 11 mu/m2 s.c. Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday of weeks 1-4, cis-retinoic acid 1 mg/kg p.o. daily weeks 1-8, and 5-FU 750 mg/m2 i.v. weekly during weeks 5-8. Patients were evaluated for tumor response every 8 weeks, and in the absence of tumor progression, patients could receive treatment for up to one year. Survival was determined from the first date of treatment.

RESULTS

The 58 renal cell carcinoma patients included 41 men and 17 women, with a median age of 57 years with a range of 28-85 who were enrolled between October 1994 and July 1997. Thirty-seven percent were asymptomatic when treatment was initiated. Sites of disease at study entry included 62% lung, 34% bone, 31% lymph node, 22% kidney, 16% liver and 10% adrenal. There were only three patients with significant tumor responses (one complete, two partial) for a response rate of 5% (0-11% 95% CI) based on intent-to-treat analysis, and 6% (0-12%, 95% CI) for the 53 patients who were evaluable for response. The response rate among evaluable nephrectomized patients who had received no prior radiation or systemic treatment was 3/25 (12%). The median failure-free survival was 2.8 months; median overall survival was 10.9 months. The 1-year survival rate was 50% and 2-year survival rate was 33%. The most frequent toxicities were fatigue-81% (26% grade 3 or 4), nausea/vomiting-59%, and leukopenia/neutropenia 57% (16% grade 3 or 4).

CONCLUSION

Despite a disappointing objective response rate, survival in these patients who were treated entirely as outpatients was similar to that seen in our earlier trials of inpatient, intermediate dose continuous infusion IL-2-based therapy.

The role of resection for patients with renal carcinoma

Metastatic renal cancer is responsive in some cases to immunotherapeutic agents. Indications for nephrectomy in the face of metastatic disease have traditionally included palliation of symptoms caused by the primary tumor, and nephrectomy combined with metastatectomy in patients with resectable metastases. Recent findings from a Southwest Oncology Group trial strongly suggest that cytoreductive nephrectomy, combined with immunotherapy, may also result in improved survival in patients with unresectable metastases.

Treatment of kidney cancer with autologous tumor cell vaccines of short-term cell lines derived from renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We established short-term cultures of autologous tumors from patients with renal carcinoma for use as active specific immunotherapy (i.e., autologous vaccine).

METHODS

Between 9/91 and 9/99 the cell biology laboratory of the Hoag Cancer Center received 69 kidney tumor samples that had been surgically excised, including 43 primary tumors and 26 metastatic lesions. Efforts were made to establish short-term tumor cell cultures to use as autologous tumor cell vaccines. Prior to treatment, patients underwent a baseline skin test for delayed tumor hypersensitivity (DTH) and then received s.c. injections of 10 million irradiated tumor cells that were given with various adjuvants weekly x3 and then monthly x5.

RESULTS

Cell lines were established for 55/69 patients (80%) including 36/43 (84%) from primary tumors and 19/26 (73%) from distant metastases. Vaccines were prepared for 41 patients; 27 were treated. At the time of this analysis, follow up data was available for 26 patients with a median follow up > 5 years. Treatment was well-tolerated. Of 10 patients who had no evident disease at the time of treatment, nine were alive 1-8 years later; 5/8 had conversion of their DTH test from negative to positive. For 16 patients with measurable metastatic disease at the time of treatment, there were no objective tumor responses; their median survival was 5.0 months. Among these 16 patients, only 1/8 DTH tests converted, but three had a positive baseline DTH test; one was previously treated with interleukin-2 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and two others were previously treated with autolymphocyte therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccine therapy with short-term cultures of autologous tumor cells is feasible, well-tolerated and associated with conversion of DTH and long-term survival in patients who are free of disease at the time treatment is initiated. However, significant anti-tumor responses were not seen in patients with measurable disease at the time vaccine treatment was initiated.

Should radical nephrectomy be performed in the face of surgically incurable disease?

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cancer remains controversial. Recent trials, like SWOG 8949 have suggested the usefulness of this approach at least in selected patients with good performance status and other favorable indicators. The timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy has also been controversial and remains so to this time.

Short-term tumor cell lines from renal cell carcinoma for use as autologous tumor cell vaccines in the treatment of kidney cancer

OBJECTIVE

We have tried to establish short-term cultures of autologous tumors from patients with renal cell carcinoma that could be used as active specific immunotherapy (i.e., autologous vaccine) in such patients after resection of primary kidney cancer, and/or for the treatment of metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Between 10/90 and 9/99 the cell biology laboratory of the Hoag Cancer Center received 69 kidney tumor samples that had been surgically excised, including 43 primary tumors and 26 metastatic lesions. Efforts were made to establish short-term tumor cell cultures, as defined by the growth of 10(8) cells; malignant nature and renal cell origin were confirmed by morphology and antigenic phenotyping. Variables associated with successful growth of short-term cell lines were examined.

RESULTS

Short-term cell lines were successfully established from 55/69 samples [80%] including 36/43 (84%) from primary tumors and 19/26 (73%) from metastatic lesions. The success rate for tumors harvested at Hoag Hospital was 40/50 (80%); the success rate for tumors obtained from other geographic areas was 15/19 (79%). Tumor cell lines were successfully established from metastatic lesions ranging in size from a 0.5 g vertebral lesion to a 22 g rib/lung chest wall metastasis, and from primary renal cell lesions ranging in size from 1.5 g to 39.7 g.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term cell lines can be established for most patients with primary or metastatic renal cell carcinoma making a pure autologous tumor-cell vaccine approach feasible. Vaccines have been prepared for 41 patients and a vaccine therapy trial is in progress.

Potential role of nephrectomy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

To examine the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent initial nephrectomy as a component of therapy, because the role of nephrectomy in the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC is uncertain.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 63 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with or without additional surgical procedures in the setting of metastatic RCC was performed. Pretreatment characteristics and the type of surgery were examined as predictors of outcome, and the type of systemic therapy received (if any) and overall survival were determined.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 59 years (range 39 to 79). Thirty-two patients had a single metastatic site, with the most common sites being the lung (n = 33), lymphatics (n = 32), and bone (n = 19). Seventeen patients (27%) also underwent vena cavotomy during surgery. Two patients died perioperatively. Thirty-nine (62%) patients underwent systemic therapy after surgery, and 6 patients (9.5%) were rendered free of disease and elected not to receive systemic treatment. The median survival was 17.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary renal surgery may be beneficial for selected patients with metastatic RCC, and most patients will be able to receive postoperative systemic therapy.

Renal cell carcinoma: should radical nephrectomy be performed in the presence of metastatic disease?

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is associated with an unfavorable prognosis and the treatment options are limited. Adjunctive radical nephrectomy, performed either before or after the administration of systemic immunotherapy, has been proposed as a means of improving outcome. The role of nephrectomy for patients with metastatic disease remains controversial. This article reviews the role of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the optimal timing for surgery relative to immunotherapy.

Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial of CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in combination with recombinant interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate in a multicenter randomized trial the antitumor activity of CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in combination with low-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2), compared with rIL-2 alone, after radical nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1994 and March 1997, 178 patients with resectable primary tumors were enrolled at 29 centers in the United States and Europe. Patients underwent total nephrectomy, recovered, and were randomized to receive either CD8(+) TILs (5 x 10(7) to 3 x 10(10) cells intravenously, day 1) plus rIL-2 (one to four cycles: 5 x 10(6) IU/m(2) by continuous infusion daily for 4 days per week for 4 weeks) (TIL/rIL-2 group) or placebo cell infusion plus rIL-2 (identical regimen) (rIL-2 control group). Primary tumor specimens were cultured at a central cell-processing center in serum-free medium containing rIL-2 to generate TILs.

RESULTS

Of 178 enrolled patients, 160 were randomized (TIL/rIL-2 group, n = 81; rIL-2 control group, n = 79). Twenty randomized patients received no treatment after nephrectomy because of surgical complications (four patients), operative mortality (two patients), or ineligibility for rIL-2 therapy (14 patients). Among 72 patients eligible for TIL/rIL-2 therapy, 33 (41%) received no TIL therapy because of an insufficient number of viable cells. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated objective response rates of 9.9% v 11.4% and 1-year survival rates of 55% v 47% in the TIL/rIL-2 and rIL-2 control groups, respectively. The study was terminated early for lack of efficacy as determined by the Data Safety Monitoring Board.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with CD8(+) TILs did not improve response rate or survival in patients treated with low-dose rIL-2 after nephrectomy.

Interleukin-2 based immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with the kidney in place

PURPOSE

We assessed morbidity, response and survival in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma treated with high dose intravenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy with the primary renal tumor in place.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with metastatic renal carcinoma and the primary kidney tumor in situ who were treated at the surgery branch of the National Cancer Institute. Of the patients 607 were treated with IL-2 based therapy. Patient age, sex, sites of extrarenal disease, morbidity, and response and survival rates were examined.

RESULTS

From 1986 to 1996, 51 patients with the majority of disease at extrarenal sites were treated with the primary tumor in place. Treatment involved IL-2 based regimens, reflecting the evolution of immunotherapy at the National Institutes of Health. When evaluating only extrarenal sites, response was complete in 1 and partial in 2 of the 51 cases (6%). No responses were noted in the primary renal tumor. Three patients with responses at extrarenal sites underwent nephrectomy. The duration of response in these 3 cases was greater than 88, 11 and 4 months, respectively. Median survival in all 51 patients was 13 months (range 1 to 86).

CONCLUSIONS

Select patients may be treated with IL-2 based immunotherapy with the primary renal tumors in place with morbidity. A randomized study is needed to assess the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Solitary metastasis of renal cell carcinoma to the contralateral adrenal gland 22 years after nephrectomy

A case of solitary metastasis to the contralateral adrenal 22 years after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is described. This case highlights the variable behavior of RCC, the tendency for adrenal metastasis, and the potential for prolonged survival after resection of late solitary metastases.

Efficacy of multimodality therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The integration of systemic biologic response modifier (BRM) therapy and surgery to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an evolving approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this form of multimodality therapy in patients with metastatic RCC.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 1996, 14 patients at our institution underwent initial BRM therapy followed by surgical resection of primary and metastatic RCC lesions. Patient records were reviewed to determine the response to BRM therapy, progression-free survival rate, and overall survival rate. The mean follow-up for the entire group was 43.5 months.

RESULTS

After BRM therapy, 9 patients manifested an objective response and 5 patients had stable disease. All patients were then rendered disease-free by surgical excision of residual or recurrent metastatic lesions and the primary tumor. The cancer-specific survival rate at 3 years was 81.5%. Currently, 7 patients are alive and disease-free (mean follow-up 41.4 months), 3 patients are alive with recurrent disease (mean survival 48.3 months), 3 patients died of metastatic disease (mean survival 27.9 months), and 1 patient died of an unrelated cause 54.4 months after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that adjunctive surgery after BRM therapy can extend the survival of selected patients with metastatic RCC. Aggressive surgical resection of stable or responding lesions after BRM therapy should be considered in the management of these patients.

Cytoreductive surgery before high dose interleukin-2 based therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We defined the outcome of a strategy using cytoreductive surgery before high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During an 11-year period, 195 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery as preparation for high dose IL-2 based therapy. The renal primary and locoregional metastatic disease that could be safely resected was removed.

RESULTS

Because of the large size 176 of 195 renal tumors (90%) were resected through transabdominal incision and in 45 patients (23%) a second additional significant procedure was performed. Five cases (2.6%) were unresectable and 2 (1%) perioperative deaths occurred. After surgery 121 of 195 patients (62%) were eligible for treatment with high dose IL-2 based protocols. Overall response rate to IL-2 based protocols was 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoreductive surgery can be performed safely in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although the impact of cytoreductive surgery on response to immunotherapy remains undefined, this combination of primary debulking and systemic IL-2 can result in durable complete tumor regression in some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Nephrectomy and vena caval thrombectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To report out experience with performing nephrectomy and vena caval thombectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 15 patients who underwent surgical excision of the primary tumor and a caval thrombus and treatment of concurrent metastases between 1989 and 1995. The sites of metastases included lungs (n = 8), bone (n = 3), bulky retroperitoneal or mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 2), liver (n = 1), and contralateral adrenal (n = 1). The level of caval involvement was suprahepatic in 3 cases, retrohepatic in 2 cases, and infrahepatic in 10 cases. Three patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0, 11 had a score of 1, and 1 had a score of 2. Median follow-up was 17 months.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 6.5 hours and median hospitalization was 10 days. Two patients required re-exploration for postoperative hemorrhage. There were no perioperative deaths. Four patients underwent surgery for resection of solitary metastases (1 lung, 2 spine, and 1 humerus); 2 of the 4 received adjuvant radiotherapy. Two patients received biologic therapy preoperatively, 3 received it both preoperatively and postoperatively, and 6 received it only postoperatively. The median time to initiation of postoperative biologic therapy was 48 days (range 25 to 110). Eleven patients are currently alive, 7 with no evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6 to 66) and 4 with stable metastases at 14 months (range 4 to 22). Ten of the 13 symptomatic patients had improved performance scores after surgery. Four patients have died from metastatic disease: 2 from rapid progression at 2 and 5 months after surgery and the other 2 at 17 and 42 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrectomy and vena caval thrombectomy can be safely performed in selected patients with metastatic disease. Furthermore, in patients receiving biologic therapy, nephrectomy may enable a better quality of life and prolonged survival.

Nephrectomy before interleukin-2 therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains challenging and controversial. There is some evidence of improved response to interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy in patients who undergo nephrectomy before systemic treatment. However, recent reports have suggested that surgery prior to immunotherapy may not be an efficient strategy, since many patients will not be able to receive systemic treatment after nephrectomy. We describe our criteria for determining which patients are candidates for nephrectomy before immunotherapy and present our series of patients treated with this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on our initial experience with IL-2 based immunotherapy we developed certain inclusion criteria for treatment with initial nephrectomy followed by systemic immunotherapy, including greater than 75% debulking of tumor burden possible, no central nervous system, bone or liver metastases, adequate pulmonary and cardiac function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In addition, patients in whom biopsies show other than predominantly clear cell type histology are excluded. From 1991 through 1996, 28 patients met these criteria and were treated with this approach. Patients were followed to determine the number receiving immunotherapy as well as overall response and survival rates.

RESULTS

Radical nephrectomy was performed in all patients. One patient died of respiratory failure from disease progression 1 month after nephrectomy. Another patient had poor pulmonary function and, therefore, was treated with an alternative cytokine therapy. The remaining 26 patients (93%) received at least 1 course of IL-2. Median interval between nephrectomy and initiation of immunotherapy was 1.5 months (range 1 to 3). Overall response rate was 39% with 5 complete (18%) and 6 partial (21%) responses. Actuarial median survival of the entire group was 20.5 months (range 1 to 66) from the initiation of treatment. Currently 13 patients are alive, including 8 who are disease and/or progression-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Using these strict criteria nephrectomy can be effectively performed before immunotherapy without compromising the likelihood that patients will receive systemic treatment. The activity of IL-2 in patients treated with this approach is encouraging and justifies its consideration in properly selected patients.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nephrectomy, interleukin-2 and cytokine-primed or CD8(+) selected tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from primary tumor

PURPOSE

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is a disease with a mean survival of 6 to 10 months. Interleukin-2 (IL-2), the only approved therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, is associated with a 14% response rate and durable remissions in some patients with high performance status. We performed a series of trials of IL-2 plus tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy and report the clinical results from 62 patients enrolled in these trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were eligible if they had metastatic renal cell carcinoma with the primary tumor in place and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were treated with cytokines before nephrectomy and preparation of cytokine primed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated for infusion into patients. Of 62 patients enrolled 55 were treated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2, and were evaluable for toxicity, response and survival.

RESULTS

There were no postoperative mortalities. Of the patients 7 (11%) could not undergo systemic therapy. No unexpected IL-2 related toxicities or significant toxicities related to cell infusion were noted. Overall 5 patients (9.1%) achieved a complete response and 14 (25.5%) achieved a partial response. The responses were durable with a median duration of 14 months (range 0.8+ to 64+). The actuarial survival was 65% at 1 year and 43% at 2 years from the time of nephrectomy, with an overall median survival for all patients of 22 months (range 2 to 70+). The median survival for the responding patients has not yet been reached (range 2 to 63+).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that immunotherapy with radical nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and IL-2 provides substantial clinical benefit in the majority of patients. Component cellular therapy with enriched cell fractions allows the administration of a more standardized cell product. The present results with nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2 are encouraging, and a randomized clinical trial of nephrectomy, CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, plus IL-2 versus nephrectomy and IL-2 alone is currently in progress.

Hypercalcemia in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: effect of nephrectomy and metabolic evaluation

PURPOSE

The role of nephrectomy in the management of hypercalcemia in metastatic renal carcinoma is not known. Hypercalcemia in patients with renal cell carcinoma frequently mimics primary hyperparathyroidism and has been attributed to tumor secretion of parathyroid hormone related protein. We determined the role of cytoreductive surgery in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hypercalcemia, identified factors that predict patient benefit from surgery, and evaluated the mechanisms of hypercalcemia in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 15 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hypercalcemia underwent metabolic and laboratory evaluation followed by nephrectomy. Post-operatively they were followed for changes in serum calcium levels. We selected 18 normocalcemic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and 4 normocalcemic patients without renal cancer to serve as control groups for survival and parathyroid hormone related protein expression.

RESULTS

A decrease in serum calcium corrected for albumin occurred in 9 of 11 patients at 1 to 4 weeks after nephrectomy and in 7 of 12 patients at 5 to 16 weeks after nephrectomy. Clinical evaluation supported a parathyroid hormone related protein mechanism of hypercalcemia in 5 of 8 patients. Two patients had evidence of local osteolytic hypercalcemia and 1 had prostaglandin mediated hypercalcemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrectomy temporarily ameliorated hypercalcemia in a subgroup of patients with metastatic renal cancer and hypercalcemia. Parathyroid hormone related protein expression was commonly found to be associated with hypercalcemia. Nonparathyroid hormone related protein mechanisms of hypercalcemia in renal carcinoma may be more common than previously thought.