Stimulation of prostaglandin D2 receptors on human platelets by analogs of prostacyclin

Biased signaling in platelet G-protein coupled receptors

Platelets are small megakaryocyte-derived, anucleate, disk-like structures that play an outsized role in human health and disease. Both a decrease in the number of platelets and a variety of platelet function disorders result in petechiae or bleeding that can be life threatening. Conversely, the inappropriate activation of platelets, within diseased blood vessels, remains the leading cause of death and morbidity by affecting heart attacks and stroke. The fine balance of the platelet state in healthy individuals is controlled by a number of receptor-mediated signaling pathways that allow the platelet to rapidly respond and maintain haemostasis. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are particularly important regulators of platelet function. Here we focus on the major platelet-expressed GPCRs and discuss the roles of downstream signaling pathways (e.g., different G-protein subtypes or β-arrestin) in regulating the different phases of the platelet activation. Further, we consider the potential for selectively targeting signaling pathways that may contribute to platelet responses in disease through development of biased agonists. Such selective targeting of GPCR-mediated signaling pathways by drugs, often referred to as biased signaling, holds promise in delivering therapeutic interventions that do not present significant side effects, especially in finely balanced physiological systems such as platelet activation in haemostasis.

Assessing the agonist profiles of the prostacyclin analogues treprostinil and naxaprostene, particularly their DP₁ activity

In this study, the inhibitory profiles of the prostacyclin analogues treprostinil and naxaprostene on several isolated smooth muscle preparations have been investigated. Treprostinil was an agonist for prostanoid DP1, EP2 and IP receptors, but not EP4 receptors; its DP1 potency was only 3-4 times less than PGD2 itself. Naxaprostene was much more selective for IP receptors and tended towards partial agonism. Treprostinil is a 13,14-dihydro analogue and the role of conformation around C12-15 in controlling agonist specificity is debated; the synthesis of new analogues is proposed and possible clinical usage discussed. In terms of selective prostanoid antagonists employed, BW-A868C/MK-0524 (DP1), ACA-23 (EP2) and GW-627368 (EP4) were found fit for purpose. However, the IP antagonist RO-1138452 was compromised by α1 and α2-adrenoceptor-mediated contractile activity on rat tail artery and anti-muscarinic activity on mouse trachea. There is a need for IP receptor antagonists with better selectivity and higher affinity.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXIII: classification of prostanoid receptors, updating 15 years of progress

It is now more than 15 years since the molecular structures of the major prostanoid receptors were elucidated. Since then, substantial progress has been achieved with respect to distribution and function, signal transduction mechanisms, and the design of agonists and antagonists (http://www.iuphar-db.org/DATABASE/FamilyIntroductionForward?familyId=58). This review systematically details these advances. More recent developments in prostanoid receptor research are included. The DP(2) receptor, also termed CRTH2, has little structural resemblance to DP(1) and other receptors described in the original prostanoid receptor classification. DP(2) receptors are more closely related to chemoattractant receptors. Prostanoid receptors have also been found to heterodimerize with other prostanoid receptor subtypes and nonprostanoids. This may extend signal transduction pathways and create new ligand recognition sites: prostacyclin/thromboxane A(2) heterodimeric receptors for 8-epi-prostaglandin E(2), wild-type/alternative (alt4) heterodimers for the prostaglandin FP receptor for bimatoprost and the prostamides. It is anticipated that the 15 years of research progress described herein will lead to novel therapeutic entities.

Prostaglandin DP receptors positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in embryonic bovine tracheal (EBTr) cells: pharmacological characterization using agonists and antagonists

Various prostaglandin agonists representing various classes of receptor subtypes were evaluated for their ability to stimulate adenylyl cyclase via the endogenous DP receptor in embryonic bovine tracheal (EBTr) cells. Two antagonists were used to block the agonist-induced cyclic AMP production. ZK118182 (EC50 = 16+/-4 nM), RS-93520 (EC50 = 23+/- 4 nM), SQ27986 (EC50 = 33+/-9 nM), ZK110841 (EC50 = 33+/-5 nM), BW245C (EC50 = 59+/-19 nM) and PGD2 (EC50=101+/-10 nM) (n = 4-70) were the most potent agonists. Whilst most compounds were full agonists (Emax = 100% relative to PGD2), BW245C was significantly more efficacious than PGD2 (Emax = 121+/-3%; P<0.001) and RS-93520 appeared to be a partial agonist (Emax = 64+/-9%; P<0.001). Agonists from the EP (e.g. enprostil; misoprostol; butaprost), FP (e.g. cloprostenol; fluprostenol; PHXA85), IP (iloprost; PGI2) and TP (U46619) prostanoid receptor classes were weak agonists or inactive in the EBTr cell assay system. The DP-receptor antagonist, BWA868C, showed a competitive antagonist profile with pA2 values of 8.00+/-0.02 and 8.14+/-0.13 in Schild analyses with two structurally different agonists, BW245C and ZK118182, respectively (n = 3). AH6809, another purported DP-receptor antagonist, weakly inhibited PGD2- and ZK 18182-induced cyclic AMP production (K(i)s = 808+/-193 nM and 782+/-178 nM, respectively). The current studies have characterized the DP receptor positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in EBTr cells using a wide range of agonist and antagonist prostaglandins. These data support the utility of the EBTr cell line as a useful tool for the evaluation of DP receptor agonists and antagonists and for profiling other classes of prostaglandins.