Salvage chemotherapy for ovarian cancer recurrence: weekly cisplatin in combination with epirubicin or etoposide

Weekly cisplatin for the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer: A protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most leading causes of deaths in the Chinese women. The objective of this protocol is to perform a full-scale systematic review on the efficacy of weekly cisplatin (WC) for the treatment of patients with OC.

METHODS

Data sources will comprise of PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Opengrey, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. All relevant randomized controlled trials from searched databases will be identified from their inception to the present. A defined search strategy will be implemented along with eligibility criteria. Relevant data will be extracted according to the predefined data collection form. Methodologic quality will be assessed by using Cochrane risk of bias tool; and data pooled and meta-analysis will be conducted by using fixed-effects, or random-effects model with RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This proposed systematic review will evaluate the efficacy of WC for patients with OC.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study may summarize the latest evidence for the WC on OC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this study, because it will be based on published studies, and existing sources of literature. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42018120938.

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4-14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6-49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1-10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5-82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7-27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.

Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: How much is too much?

OBJECTIVE

End-of-life (EOL) medical care consumes 10-12% of national health care expenditures and 27% of Medicare dollars annually. Studies suggest that hospice services decrease EOL expenditures by 25-40%. The goal of this study was to compare the total cost of hospital-based resources utilized in ovarian cancer patients during their last 60 days of life for those enrolled in hospice versus those not on hospice.

METHODS

Study eligibility included patients who expired from ovarian cancer from 1999 to 2003. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as treatment, response and recurrence rates, histologic type, grade and stage. Billing records were analyzed for costs of inpatient and outpatients visits, including radiologic, laboratory and pharmacy charges. Total cost of hospital resources was compared between patients managed on hospice for >10 days (hospice group) versus <10 days (non-hospice group) using the following methods: Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Student's t tests. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients analyzed, 67 (79.8%) were in the non-hospice group and 17 (20.2%) were in the hospice group. Demographic, histologic and staging characteristics as well as platinum sensitivity were similar between the two groups before the last 60 days of life. Mean number of chemotherapy cycles before the study period was also similar (20.4 and 21.0, respectively). However, during the study period, the mean total cost per patient in the non-hospice group was dollar 59,319 versus dollar 15,164 in the hospice group (P = 0.0001). A significant difference in cost was noted for mean inpatient days (dollar 6584 vs. dollar 1629, P = 0.0007), radiology (dollar 6063 vs. dollar 2343, P = 0.003), laboratory (dollar 12,281 vs. dollar 2026, P = 0.0004) and pharmacy charges (dollar 13,650 vs. dollar 4465, P = 0.0017) as well as for treating physician per patient (dollar 112,707 vs. dollar 34,677, P = 0.04). Overall survival for the two groups was the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that there is a significant cost difference with no appreciable improvement in survival between ovarian cancer patients treated aggressively versus those enrolled in hospice at the EOL. These data suggest that earlier hospice enrollment is beneficial. Furthermore, cost variations between physicians and patients imply that education may be an important variable.

Gemcitabine in epithelial ovarian cancer treatment: current role and future perspectives

Newer agents and combinations are needed in order to improve current results in ovarian cancer treatment. Gemcitabine is a novel agent that has shown consistent activity as a single agent in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and a favorable toxicity profile. Because of its clinical and preclinical synergism with platinum analogs, gemcitabine has been combined with carboplatin as a convincing approach in the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Further combination of gemcitabine and other agents, including paclitaxel, is also feasible and has been actively studied in order to establish the role of gemcitabine in the management of treated and untreated ovarian cancer patients.

Randomised controlled trial comparing single agent paclitaxel vs epidoxorubicin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in early progression after platinum-based chemotherapy: an Italian Collaborative Study from the Mario Negri Institute, Milan, G.O.N.O. (Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest) group and I.O.R. (Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo) group

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of epidoxorubicin plus paclitaxel combination (ET) vs single agent paclitaxel (T), as second-line chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer patients in early progression within 12 months after platinum-based chemotherapy. From October 1994 up to June 1999, 234 patients from 34 Italian hospitals were randomised to receive: (A) epidoxorubicin (E) 80 mg m⁻² + paclitaxel (T) 175 mg m⁻² (3 h infusion), every 21 days for 4–6 cycles. (B) Paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² (3 h infusion) every 21 days for 4–6 cycles. Evaluable for survival analysis were 106 and 106 patients in ET and T arm, respectively. Platinum-based monochemotherapy was the first-line treatment in 43% patients, while polichemotherapy containing anthracyclines was the preferred first-line therapy in 22% patients. The median time from the end of first-line therapy to randomisation was 3 months. Treatment was completed in 87 and 85% of T and ET arm, respectively. Haematological toxicity was significantly more common in ET group (ECOG grade 3–4 neutropenia: 37.4% in ET vs 18.2% in T arm). Neuropathies were similar in both arms (sensory: ECOG grade 2–3: 12.1% in ET vs 14.7% in T arm, motor: 6.1% in ET vs 5.3% in T arm). Objective response was achieved in 37.4% of patients in ET group and in 46.9% of patients in T arm. At a median follow-up of time of 48 months, a total of 180 patients progressed and 163 patients died. Survival analysis showed no difference between ET and T (median time to progression: 6 months for both regimens, median survival: 12 and 14 months for ET and T, respectively; hazard ratio for mortality of ET vs T: 1.17 (95% CI 0.86–1.59; P=0.33). The ET regimen does not seem to be more effective than T in refractory advanced ovarian cancer patients in early progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Despite an acceptable response rate, the control of disease progression remains poor.

Randomized controlled trial of single-agent paclitaxel versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based regimens

PURPOSE

To assess the activity, efficacy, and tolerability of single-agent paclitaxel and a platinum-containing regimen in previously treated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who achieved complete remission with platinum-based regimens and whose disease recurred after a progression-free interval of more than 12 months were included in the study. Every 21 days, patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) over 3 hours or cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (CAP) IV.

RESULTS

Between June 1992 and May 1995, 97 consecutive patients with assessable or measurable disease were randomized to paclitaxel (n = 50) or CAP (n = 47). The median number of cycles on each arm was six. Toxicities included grade 3/4 leukopenia (4% for paclitaxel v 34% for CAP), grade 3/4 neutropenia (13% v 36%), grade 1/2 myalgia (19% v 4%), allergic reactions (15% v 2%), and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting (17% v 51%). Complete responses were achieved in 17% and 30% of patients receiving paclitaxel and CAP, respectively, and partial responses were achieved in 28% and 25%, respectively (P =.062). At a median follow-up time of 49 months, median progression-free intervals were 9 months for paclitaxel and 15.7 months for CAP (Cox analysis: hazards ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.97; P =.038); median overall survival times were 25.8 months for paclitaxel and 34.7 months for CAP (Cox analysis: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.98; P =.043).

CONCLUSION

Rechallenge with either single-agent paclitaxel or platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in this patient population. Preliminary results suggest that single-agent paclitaxel may not be as active as platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Larger randomized trials are needed.

Retreatment with dose-dense weekly cisplatin after previous cisplatin chemotherapy is not complicated by significant neuro-toxicity

Cisplatin induces a cumulative dose-dependent axonal sensory neuropathy. With a cumulative dose over 600 mg/m2, a significant percentage of patients will develop a moderate or severe neuropathy. We retreated patients with progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer after previous platinum-containing chemotherapy with weekly 50-70 mg/m2 cisplatin for six cycles. This group was prospectively followed for the development of neuropathy. Patients received six weekly cycles of either 50 or 70 mg/m2 cisplatin, combined with oral etoposide. Responding patients continued treatment with daily oral etoposide for nine months. Neurological toxicity was assessed with a sensory sum score, the sensory neuropathy common toxicity criteria (CTC) and quantitated sensory analysis of the vibration perception threshold (VPT). Neurological assessment was scheduled at baseline, after three cycles, at the end of cisplatin chemotherapy and at 3 monthly intervals until 1 year after the discontinuation of chemotherapy. The first evaluation carried out in the interval of 1-4 months after the end of weekly cisplatin therapy was taken as the principle evaluation for neurotoxicity because during this time interval the nadir of cisplatin neurotoxicity is to be expected. Of 89 patients evaluated for neurological toxicity, 80 patients were fully evaluable. Forty-nine had received prior cisplatin (median cumulative dosage 450 mg/m2); the others had received prior treatment with carboplatin. Cisplatin pretreated patients had slightly higher neuropathy scores at the start of weekly cisplatin. Almost all cisplatin pretreated patients received six cycles of cisplatin, 29 at 50 mg/m2 and 20 at 70 mg/m2 per cycle. Despite treatment up to an overall cumulative dose of 750-900 mg/m2 cisplatin, only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to neurotoxicity. One other patient developed a grade 3 neuropathy during follow-up. Only a marginal increase of neuropathic signs and symptoms were observed in all the other patients. In multiple regression analysis, the increase in VPT or the sensory sum score was not related to prior treatment (cisplatin or carboplatin). Patients with mild signs of neuropathy after prior treatment with cisplatin to a cumulative dose level of 400-450 mg/m2 can be retreated with weekly cisplatin to a cumulative dose of 420 mg/m2 (overall cumulative dose up to 800-900 mg/m2) with only a minimal risk of significant neurotoxicity.

Phase II study of vinorelbine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate on an intent-to-treat basis the activity and toxicity of single-agent vinorelbine (VRL) as second-line chemotherapy of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Platinum-resistant disease was defined as disease refractory to or relapsing within 12 months after finishing platinum-containing chemotherapy.

METHODS

VRL (30 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously as a bolus injection days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Initially, four courses of VRL were given. Patients with responding or stable disease received four more courses of VRL to a maximum of eight courses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 33 eligible patients were considered evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 21% (7/33) (95% CI: 7--35). Median time to progression was 3.1 months and median survival was 10.1 months. Toxicity was generally mild. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. CALGB grade III/IV infection was observed in 15/0% of patients. The most important nonhematologic toxicities were nausea and constipation. Grade III/IV nausea was observed in 6/0% and grade III/IV constipation in 3/3% of patients. Peripheral neurotoxicity was only a minor problem with no grade III/IV toxicity. No patients stopped treatment because of toxicity and no toxic death was reported.

CONCLUSION

VRL was generally well tolerated, but the activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer was only modest, although fully comparable to other second-line treatments. Further studies are required to define the role of VRL in combination chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients' emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.

Enhanced topoisomerase I activity and increased topoisomerase II alpha content in cisplatin-resistant cancer cell lines

Although the combined effects of cisplatin (CDDP) and DNA topoisomerase (Topo) inhibitors have been described in recent literature, little is known about the combined effects and their biological basis in CDDP-resistant cells. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the combined effect of CDDP and Topo inhibitors on CDDP-resistant cells as well as to investigate the biological factors involved in the sensitivity to these anti-cancer agents. We found synergistic actions between CDDP and SN-38 (a Topo I inhibitor) or VP-16 (a Topo II inhibitor) in KFr cells, a CDDP-resistant subline of the KF epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell line, but not in the parent KF cells. We subsequently assayed Topo protein levels and enzymatic activities in two sets of CDDP-sensitive and -resistant cell lines: KF and KFr, and HeLa and HeLa/CDDP. The levels of Topo I protein in the CDDP-resistant cells did not differ from those of their parent cell lines and were unaffected by exposure to CDDP. Topo I enzymatic activity, however, was 2- to 4-fold higher in the CDDP-resistant cell lines than in their respective parent cell lines. In contrast, higher levels of Topo II alpha protein were observed both before and after CDDP exposure in the CDDP-resistant cells than in their controls. However, no difference in Topo II catalytic activity was observed between the CDDP-resistant and -sensitive cells.

Moving the Frontiers of Cancer Chemotherapy for Solid Tumors by Changing the Scope of Drug Development

Our increasing knowledge on the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the growth of cancer cells and on the molecular basis of cancer has influenced the development of anticancer agents. The realization that new targets should be evaluated for anti-cancer drug treatment has a.o. led to the introduction of the taxoids and topoisomerase I inhibitors. Attacking the known targets in a more sophisticated way led to the development of drugs with increased target specificity like Tomudex and Gemcitabine. Finally, using old drugs more efficiently by using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic ananlysis hold a promise for the near future.

Response to second-line weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in ovarian cancer previously treated with a cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimen

Response to a second-line weekly cisplatin chemotherapy in ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens was analysed in a clinical series observed between 1984 and 1991. Women who achieved pathological complete response or pathological optimal partial remission after first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens were treated at recurrence or progression, occurring at least 4 months after first-line treatment, with second-line chemotherapy. A total of 72 women were included in the analysis. Second-line chemotherapy regimens were: cisplatin 1 mg/kg weekly for seven courses plus epirubicin 70 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks for three courses (28 subjects), cisplatin 1 mg/kg plus etoposide 90 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for a total of seven courses (11 subjects) and cisplatin 1 mg/kg weekly for nine courses plus carboplatin 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for three courses (33 subjects). Of the 72 women, 22 (31%, 14 clinical, 8 pathological) had a complete response and 28 (39%), a partial response (24 clinical, 4 pathological). The 24-month cumulative survival probability was 63% in women with complete response, 32% in those who had partial response, but all the 22 non-responders died within 24 months from diagnosis of recurrence (log rank test P < 0.05). The frequency of complete response and partial response increased with the interval between first diagnosis and recurrence: among the 33 women who had recurrent disease to < 18 months from first diagnosis, complete response or partial response was obtained in 20 (61%) subjects, this figure was 67% (14 out of 21 women) among subjects who had recurrent disease between 18 and < 36 months from first diagnosis and 89% (16/18) among those who had recurrence > or = 36 months. In comparison with women who had recurrence 4- < 18 months from first diagnosis, the OR of response was 1.3 (95% CI 0.4-4.1) for those who had recurrence between 18 and < 36 and 5.2 (95% CI 1.1-24.3) for those who had recurrence > or = 36 months from surgery (chi 1(2) trend p < 0.05). Survival rate after the end of second line chemotherapy for women who relapsed 4- < 18 months, 18- < 36 or 36 months or more after surgery were, respectively, 24, 20 and 67% (log rank test, P < 0.05). Age at first diagnosis, histology, stage, and grading of the disease at first diagnosis and site of recurrence were not associated with response to second-line therapy.

Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy

Epirubicin is the 4' epimer of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin, and has been used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Comparative and noncomparative clinical trials have demonstrated that regimens containing conventional doses of epirubicin achieved equivalent objective response rates and overall median survival as similar doxorubicin-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced and early breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, dose-intensive regimens of epirubicin have achieved high response rates in a number of malignancies including early and advanced breast cancer and lung cancer. The major acute dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines is myelosuppression. In vitro and clinical studies have shown that, at equimolar doses, epirubicin is less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. The lower haematological toxicity of epirubicin, as well as the recent introduction of supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, has allowed dose-intensification of epirubicin-containing regimens, which is particularly significant because of the definite dose-response relationship of anthracyclines. Cardiotoxicity, which is manifested clinically as irreversible congestive heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, is the most important chronic cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin has a lower propensity to produce cardiotoxic effects than doxorubicin, and its recommended maximum cumulative dose is almost double that of doxorubicin, thus allowing for more treatment cycles and/or higher doses of epirubicin. In summary, dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens, which are feasible due to its lower myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity, have produced high response rates in early breast cancer, a potentially curable malignancy, as well as advanced breast, and lung cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that improved response rates can improve quality of life in some clinical settings, but whether this leads to prolonged survival has not yet been determined. Recently implemented supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, prophylactic antimicrobials and peripheral blood stem cell support may help achieve other potential advantages of dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens such as reductions in morbidity and length of hospital admissions.

Second-line chemotherapy for recurrent carcinoma of the ovary

Despite relatively high response rates to chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma, most patients eventually will have progressive disease that will require additional therapy. Most efforts to study such second-line or "salvage" chemotherapy have been single-arm trials of small numbers of patients, which report widely variable response rates, relatively short response durations, and short survival times. Only recently have certain critical patient characteristics been recognized as important in determining appropriate therapy as follows: (1) the extent and volume of disease at recurrence and (2) the type and duration of response to prior chemotherapy. Patients with small-volume disease confined to the peritoneal cavity have a far better chance of achieving a response to second-line chemotherapy with subsequent prolonged survival than do those with bulky disease or disease outside the abdomen. Perhaps even more critical is the distinction between those patients whose neoplasm is still "clinically sensitive" to the platinum-containing compounds (initial response to platinum-based therapy and relapse more than 6 months after cessation of treatment) and those with "clinically resistant" disease (progression during or within 6 months of front-line platinum-based therapy). Those considered clinically sensitive to platinum-based therapy should be retreated with a platinum-containing regimen at the time of recurrence. Those with evidence for resistance should receive alternative treatment with one or more drugs capable of inducing responses in such patients. These drugs currently include: taxol, ifosfamide, and hexamethylmelamine.