Outcome of patients with unfavorable optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer treated with chemotherapy and whole abdominal radiation

Adjuvant intensity modulated whole-abdominal radiation therapy for high-risk patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stage III: final results of a prospective phase 2 study

Background

To assess late toxicity, quality of life and oncological outcome after consolidative whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) following cytoreductive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in high risk patients with advanced ovarian cancer FIGO stage III using IMRT (Intensity modulated radiation therapy).

Methods

The OVAR-IMRT-02 study is a multi-center single-arm phase-II-trial. Twenty patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer stage FIGO III with complete remission after chemotherapy were treated with intensity modulated WART. A total dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions was applied to the entire peritoneal cavity. Primary endpoint was treatment tolerability; secondary objectives were acute and chronic toxicities, quality of life, rates of therapy disruption/abortion, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

All patients completed treatment and 10/20 patients (50%) reached the final study follow-up of 36 months. Late side effects consisted of °1-°2 lower limb edema (44.5%), with one patient (5.6%) showing °3 edema. Three patients (16.7%) showed elevated gamma-Glutamyltransferase. There were no severe late side effects regarding renal or hepatic function or any gastrointestinal toxicity greater than °2. During WART, mean global health status decreased by 18.1 points (95%-CI: 7.1–29.0), but completely normalized after 6 months. The same trend was observed for the function scale scores. Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS was 74, 51 and 40%, respectively. 1-, 2- and 3-year OS was 89, 83 and 83%, respectively.

Conclusions

Intensity modulated WART after aggressive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute and late toxicity and minor impact on long-term quality of life. Together with the promising results for PFS and OS, intensity modulated WART could offer a new therapeutic option for consolidation treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Trial registration

The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01180504). Registered 12 August 2010 – retrospectively registered.

Adjuvant Intensity Modulated Whole-Abdominal Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Patients With Ovarian Cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage III): First Results of a Prospective Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

To assess treatment tolerance and toxicity rates of consolidative whole-abdominal radiation therapy (WART) following cytoreductive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in high-risk patients with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III) using intensity modulated radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The OVAR-IMRT-02 study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Twenty patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III) with complete remission after chemotherapy were treated with intensity modulated WART as a consolidation therapy. A total dose of 30 Gy in 20 fractions of 1.5 Gy was applied to the entire peritoneal cavity. The primary endpoint was treatment tolerability, defined as lack of any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 toxicity within 10 weeks after start of treatment; secondary objectives were acute and chronic toxicity, quality of life, rates of therapy disruption and abortion, and progression-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Intensity modulated WART resulted in excellent coverage of the whole peritoneal cavity, with effective sparing of all organs at risk. The primary analysis included all 20 enrolled patients, of whom 19 did not experience Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 4 toxicity. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Thus, the tolerability rate of intensity modulated WART was significantly higher than 70%. No gastrointestinal acute toxicities higher than grade 2 have been observed. During WART, mean global health status decreased by 18.1 points (95% confidence interval 7.1, 29.0). Six weeks after WART, global health status had already increased, with a mean score difference of 4.6 (95% confidence interval -11.1, 20.4) compared with baseline. Similar characteristics were observed for all function scale scores.

CONCLUSION

Intensity modulated WART after aggressive surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute toxicity and a treatment tolerability rate significantly higher than 70%. Together with our knowledge about clinical feasibility, meaning excellent coverage of the planning target volume and effective sparing of organs at risk, intensity modulated WART could offer a new therapeutic option for consolidation treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Different histologic types of epithelial ovarian cancer may represent different diseases with unique clinical and molecular characteristics. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary has been reported as having a worse prognosis than high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This article critically reviews the literature pertinent to the pathology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with ovarian CCC.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 01, 1977 and January 30, 2012 which reported on patients diagnosed with ovarian CCC. Given the rarity of this tumor, studies were not limited by design or number of reported patients.

RESULTS

Ovarian CCC tumors represent 5-25% of ovarian cancers. Its histologic diagnosis can be challenging, resulting often times in misclassification of these tumors. Ovarian CCC tends to present at earlier stages and has been associated with endometriosis, ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations. When compared to stage-matched controls, patients with early-stage ovarian CCCs may have a better prognosis than patients with high-grade serous tumors. For those with advanced stage disease, high-grade serous histology confers a better prognosis than ovarian CCC. Patients with Stage IC-IV have a relatively poor prognosis and efforts should center in discovery of more effective treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian CCC is a biologically distinct entity, different from high-grade serous EOC. Future studies should explore the role of targeted therapies in the management of ovarian CCC.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a report from the first Ovarian Clear Cell Symposium, June 24th, 2010

OBJECTIVES

Recent literature has highlighted histological types of ovarian carcinoma as distinct diseases, each with unique clinical and molecular features. Historically, the diagnosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) has been of concern to both patients and physicians due to reports that CCC is associated with a worse prognosis than the more common serous type of ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). This review discusses the unique features of ovarian CCC.

METHODS

In June of 2010, a group of researchers and clinicians convened in Vancouver to review and discuss the clinical, pathological, molecular, and treatment-related features of CCC.

RESULTS

CCC is the second most common type of ovarian epithelial cancer, representing 5-25% of ovarian carcinomas. It is characterised by its association with endometriosis, and frequent mutations of ARID1A and PIK3CA. Low-stage CCC appears to have a better outcome than stage matched HGSC, while the opposite is true for high-stage disease, suggesting that the current standard treatments applied to HGSC are ineffective for CCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian CCC is highly distinct from HGSC, and a clearer understanding of the basic biology of this disease is needed. Alternative therapies should be explored: irradiation and targeting disease-specific molecular markers should be examined in greater detail. Finally, novel approaches to clinical trial design are needed due to the smaller numbers of patients affected.

Intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: phase I study

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and toxicity of consolidative intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) after surgery and chemotherapy in high-risk patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIc were treated in a Phase I study with intensity-modulated WAR up to a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions as consolidation therapy after adjuvant carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy. Treatment was delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in a step-and-shoot technique (n = 3) or a helical tomotherapy technique (n = 7). The planning target volume included the entire peritoneal cavity and the pelvic and para-aortal node regions. Organs at risk were kidneys, liver, heart, vertebral bodies, and pelvic bones.

RESULTS

Intensity-modulated WAR resulted in an excellent coverage of the planning target volume and an effective sparing of the organs at risk. The treatment was well tolerated, and no severe Grade 4 acute side effects occurred. Common Toxicity Criteria Grade III toxicities were as follows: diarrhea (n = 1), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and leukopenia (n = 3). Radiotherapy could be completed by all the patients without any toxicity-related interruption. Median follow-up was 23 months, and 4 patients had tumor recurrence (intraperitoneal progression, n = 3; hepatic metastasis, n = 1). Small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions occurred in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this Phase I study showed for the first time, to our knowledge, the clinical feasibility of intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy, which could offer a new therapeutic option for consolidation treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma after adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subgroups of patients. We initiated a Phase II study to further evaluate the toxicity of this intensive multimodal treatment.

Adjuvant whole abdominal intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for high risk stage FIGO III patients with ovarian cancer (OVAR-IMRT-01) - Pilot trial of a phase I/II study: study protocol

Background

The prognosis for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer remains poor despite aggressive surgical resection and platinum-based chemotherapy. More than 60% of patients will develop recurrent disease, principally intraperitoneal, and die within 5 years. The use of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) as consolidation therapy would appear to be a logical strategy given its ability to sterilize small tumour volumes. Despite the clinically proven efficacy of whole abdominal irradiation, the use of radiotherapy in ovarian cancer has profoundly decreased mainly due to high treatment-related toxicity. Modern intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) could allow to spare kidneys, liver, and bone marrow while still adequately covering the peritoneal cavity with a homogenous dose.

Methods/Design

The OVAR-IMRT-01 study is a single center pilot trial of a phase I/II study. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer stage FIGO III (R1 or R2< 1 cm) after surgical resection and platinum-based chemotherapy will be treated with whole abdomen irradiation as consolidation therapy using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions. A total of 8 patients will be included in this trial. For treatment planning bone marrow, kidneys, liver, spinal cord, vertebral bodies and pelvic bones are defined as organs at risk. The planning target volume includes the entire peritoneal cavity plus pelvic and para-aortic node regions.

Discussion

The primary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of the feasibility of intensity-modulated WAI and the evaluation of the study protocol. Secondary endpoint is evaluation of the toxicity of intensity modulated WAI before continuing with the phase I/II study. The aim is to explore the potential of IMRT as a new method for WAI to decrease the dose to kidneys, liver, bone marrow while covering the peritoneal cavity with a homogenous dose, and to implement whole abdominal intensity-modulated radiotherapy into the adjuvant multimodal treatment concept of advanced ovarian cancer FIGO stage III.

Consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and morbidity of sequential cytoreductive surgery, carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, and consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy (APRT) in ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1998 and 2000, 29 patients with optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with carboplatin (135 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (area under the curve [AUC] of 6) followed by APRT in a prospective protocol. All patients were clinically, radiographically, and biochemically (CA-125) free of disease at the completion of chemotherapy. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was delivered using 6 MV anterior-posterior photon fields to encompass the peritoneal cavity. Median follow-up was 4 years.

RESULTS

Two patients experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity during APRT; 6 patients, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia; and 3 patients, Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 10 patients had Grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. All of the acute side effects resolved after treatment was completed, and there were no serious consequences such as sepsis or hemorrhage. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was abandoned prematurely in 3 patients. Late side effects were seen in 5 patients, including 1 small bowel obstruction, 2 symptomatic sacral insufficiency fractures, 1 case of severe dyspareunia, and 1 case of prolonged fatigue. All resolved with supportive management. The 4-year actuarial disease-free survival was 57%, and the overall survival was 92%. Eleven of 12 patients who relapsed received salvage chemotherapy, which was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominopelvic radiotherapy after optimal surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute and late side effects and does not limit subsequent salvage chemotherapy. Consolidative APRT warrants further investigation as a means of improving the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer.

GnRH analogues as an adjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Lowering gonadotropin levels with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in patients with ovarian cancer remains open to debate. The aim of this study was to assess the results of treatment in stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer patients who had surgery supplemented with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and GnRH analogues. Gonadotropin levels were monitored during treatment.

METHODS

The study group comprised 69 patients aged 27-70 years, stratified according to the type of treatment. The overall disease-free, 5-year survival rates and the frequency of remissions were analyzed. Hormonal tests [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)] were performed in 58 patients. Associations were checked between gonadotropin levels, clinical findings, and survival. The results were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were noted when chemotherapy was supplemented with GnRH analogues and/or radiotherapy. Administration of GnRH analogues resulted in significantly lower levels of LH than of FSH. Levels of FSH were significantly lower in patients surviving at least 5 years or in complete remission at the time of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy can produce favorable results in late-stage ovarian cancer, and GnRH analogues have an important role in treatment strategy.

Selective irradiation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma involving the vagina or rectum

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of selective irradiation in the management of recurrent or persistent ovarian carcinoma involving the vagina or rectum after initial surgery or surgery and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with recurrent or persistent vaginal and/or perirectal disease from ovarian carcinoma received selective irradiation and were evaluated for local control, survival, and quality of life. Seventy-nine percent had previously received various combinations of chemotherapy after initial surgery. At recurrence, 68% of the 28 patients were treated with external beam irradiation only, 7% with brachytherapy only, and 18% with both external beam irradiation and brachytherapy. In addition, 50% of the patients received various combinations of chemotherapy before or after radiotherapy and 3 patients received additional surgery.

RESULTS

Vaginal bleeding was controlled in all patients and a complete symptomatic response was achieved in 79% of the symptomatic patients. Survival after recurrence at 2 years was 57% for patients who had no liver or extra-abdominal metastasis at the time of radiotherapy (21 patients) and 0% for patients who had liver or extra-abdominal metastases (7 patients). Median survival of 5 patients with abdominal and pelvic disease and 16 patients with no extrapelvic disease at the time of recurrence was 2.16 (0.16-10.67) and 2.08 (0.58-27) years, respectively, after recurrence. Fifty percent of the 16 patients without extrapelvic disease had a complete response to radiotherapy (CR group) and the remaining had a partial response or stable disease (non-CR group). The 1-year survival after salvage irradiation in this same group was 100% in the CR group and 37.5% in the non-CR group (P < 0.0001). There are 4 long-term survivors in the CR group who are still alive in excess of 5 years after salvage radiotherapy. Thirty-five percent (5/14) of the patients with pelvic disease only recurred in the unirradiated upper abdomen.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation can be considered an effective treatment option for patients with vaginal and/or perirectal recurrences of ovarian carcinoma. It offers excellent palliation to patients with disseminated disease and may result in both local control and long-term survival in patients with nondisseminated disease. This location may represent a sanctuary site from chemotherapy. Pelvic irradiation alone may be effective salvage and the addition of brachytherapy may improve local control, particularly in patients with disease confined to the pelvis who undergo debulking or chemotherapy.

Integrating radiation therapy in the curative management of ovarian cancer: current issues and future directions

Although important advances in surgery, chemotherapy (CT), and radiation therapy (RT) have been made, overall survival for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) has not changed significantly. Despite its long history in the treatment of OC and its proven curative role in patients with microscopic or minimal residual disease, the proper role of RT in the management of OC is not clearly established. Although the use of primary adjuvant RT (whole abdominal irradiation) has declined in the last 15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in RT as part of a combined modality approach and as salvage therapy for patients with small-volume persistent disease after primary cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based CT. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of RT alone or combined with chemotherapy as primary adjuvant therapy or in the salvage setting. Current issues in the radiotherapeutic management are discussed along with ideas for future clinical research directions.

Treatment of early epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy and abdominopelvic radiotherapy: results of a prospective treatment protocol

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that the combination of adjuvant chemotherapy and abdominopelvic radiation (APRT) improves the outcome of patients with early ovarian cancer compared to treatment with APRT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1991 and 1994, 93 patients with Stage I to III, optimally cytoreduced, invasive, epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with sequential chemotherapy and APRT. Treatment was assigned using a prognostic classification that was derived from previous cohorts of patients. Low-risk patients (n = 9) received APRT alone, intermediate-risk patients (n = 66) received two courses of cisplatin followed by APRT, and high-risk patients (n = 18) received 6 courses of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide followed by APRT.

RESULTS

Disease recurred in 22 patients, and was confined to the pelvis or abdomen in 15. Nine patients died and the remainder were alive with disease after receiving salvage chemotherapy. The 3-year disease-free and overall survivals were 78% and 91%, respectively. The prognostic classification used to assign treatment was the only factor that predicted disease-free survival (83% and 59% at 3 years for low/intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively; p = 0.03). There was no detectable difference in outcome between the present series and an historical control group treated with APRT alone. Treatment was well tolerated and only 2 patients (2.5%) developed serious complications.

CONCLUSION

APRT is an effective adjuvant treatment for carefully selected patients with early ovarian cancer. The addition of chemotherapy as used in this study to APRT does not significantly improve outcome compared to APRT alone.

Consolidation radiotherapy after carboplatin-based chemotherapy in radically operated advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of additional radiotherapy after chemotherapy on the relapse-free and overall survival rates of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 1992 64 patients with radically operated ovarian cancers (4 stage IC, 2 stage II, 54 stage III, and 4 stage IV) were enrolled in a randomized study. Radical surgery comprised total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin IV 400 mg/m2, epirubicin IV 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and prednimustine orally 100 mg/m2 on days 3 to 7 at 1-month intervals. Thirty-two patients without residual disease were randomized to whole abdominal radiation (30 Gy, administered over 4 weeks). An additional 21.6 Gy were delivered to the pelvis and 12 Gy to the paraaortic region up to the diaphragm for total doses of 51.6 and 42 Gy, respectively. Cancer-related survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.

RESULTS

The relapse-free and overall survival rates of patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were significantly higher than those of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy only (68% vs 56% at 2 years and 49% vs 26% at 5 years, P = 0.013, and 87% vs 61% at 2 years and 59% vs 33% at 5 years, P = 0.029). The differences were most pronounced in patients with stage III disease (77% vs 54% at 2 years and 45% vs 19% at 5 years, P = 0. 0061, and 88% vs 58% at 2 years and 59% vs 26% at 5 years, P = 0. 012). Toxicities were acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Sequential combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with open-field abdominal radiotherapy is a promising adjuvant regimen for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

A randomized study of two doses of abdominopelvic radiation therapy for patients with optimally debulked Stage I, II, and III ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether an increased dose of abdominal radiation therapy results in improved disease control and survival in patients with early ovarian cancer.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Between 1981 and 1990, 125 patients with optimally debulked Stage I, II, and III ovarian cancer were entered into a prospective randomized clinical trial of abdominopelvic radiation therapy. Patients were stratified and randomized to either the control arm, treated with an abdominal dose of 22.5 Gy in 22 fractions, or the experimental arm of 27.5 Gy in 27 fractions. A pelvic boost dose of 22.5 Gy was used in both arms. There were 43 patients with Stage I tumors, 71 Stage II tumors, and 11 Stage III tumors. Nineteen patients had grade 1 histology, 77 grade 2, and 29 grade 3. Three patients had small-volume residual disease (<2 cm) in the pelvis alone and the remainder had no gross tumor following surgery. Median follow-up was 6.6 years (range 1.4-9.9).

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 83% in the low-dose arm and 72% in the high-dose arm (p = 0.3). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 74% and 67% in the low-dose and high-dose arms, respectively (p = 0.5). The difference in OS between the two arms was -11%, with 95% confidence intervals of -26% (favoring low-dose treatment) to 4% (in favor of high dose). The difference in DFS was -7% (95% confidence interval, -23 to 9%). Failure in the pelvis alone predominated (n = 15); six patients had abdominal and pelvic failure and seven patients failed in the abdomen alone. There were no differences in patterns of relapse, hematologic toxicity, or late complications between the two arms. Serious bowel toxicity was seen in three patients: two in the low-dose and one in the high-dose arm. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of treatment when adjusting for other prognostic variables. Ascites (p = 0.03, relative risk 2.05) was the only significant covariate in predicting disease-free survival, but was not prognostic for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in survival, tumor control, or toxicity between high-dose and low-dose abdominopelvic radiation therapy. High-dose abdominopelvic radiation therapy is unlikely to be associated with an increase in OS of more than 4% or DFS of more than 9%.

Ovarian cancer

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for cancer originating in the ovaries is based on 74 scientific articles, including 12 randomized studies, 18 prospective studies, and 36 retrospective studies. These studies involve 6,140 patients. Treatment for patients at early stages of ovarian cancer (stages I and II) is surgery. The value of adjuvant treatment, ie, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, is not demonstrated. Tumor volume is decisive to the success of radiotherapy. Microscopic or small macroscopic cancer residuals, remaining after surgery, may respond to radiotherapy, thereby promoting survival. The importance of radiotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer is controversial, and studies frequently show contradictory results. Two studies have shown the favorable role played by radiotherapy in consolidation treatment of patients if they become cancer-free at advanced stages. The role of radiotherapy in treating larger volumes of residual cancer has not been demonstrated, except for strictly palliative treatment.

Chemotherapy, early surgical reassessment, and hyperfractionated abdominal radiotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer: results of a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes and treatment toxicities in patients with optimal (< or = 1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma treated with three courses of cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, surgical reassessment (SRA), and hyperfractionated whole abdominal irradiation (WAI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two eligible patients entered this prospective Phase II study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Disease characteristics were as follows: age range, 32-76 years (median 58); Stage IIIA (n = 1, 2%), IIIB (n = 2, 5%), IIIC (n = 39, 93%); histology-serous papillary (n = 21, 50%); other (n = 21, 50%); Grade 1 (n = 1, 2%); 2 (n = 14, 33%); 3 (n = 27, 54%); residual disease after initial surgery (present: n = 23, 55%; absent: n = 19, 45%). Five patients progressed while on chemotherapy, could not be effectively cytoreduced, and were not eligible for WAI. Of the remaining 37 patients, 35 received WAI. Surgical reassessment was not performed in five patients.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients with known SRA status after chemotherapy, 21 (57%) were grossly positive, 4 (11%) were microscopically positive, and 12 (32%) were negative. Based on measurements recorded following initial laparotomy and surgical reassessment, progression during chemotherapy was noted in 40%, stage disease in 37%, and objective response in 23%. Toxicity during hyperfractionated WAI was limited and reversible. No patient beginning WAI failed to complete or required a significant treatment break. Following WAI, six patients underwent laparotomies for abdominal symptoms; five had recurrent disease. Five additional patients were managed conservatively for small bowel obstruction (SBO) or malabsorption, of whom three subsequently developed recurrence. Twenty-two patients having pelvic boosts were significantly more likely to require management for gastrointestinal morbidity (p = 0.0021). Considering all eligible patients, median disease-free and overall survivals were 18.5 and 39 months, respectively. Considering patients completing chemotherapy and WAI, median disease-free and overall survivals were 24 and 46 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

(a) Disease progression occurred within three cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in 40% of patients with optimal (< or = 1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma. (b) Following limited chemotherapy, hyper-fractionated WAI was acutely well tolerated. (c) Late radiation-related toxicity was observed in only three patients (8.6%) in the absence of recurrent disease. Late gastrointestinal morbidity was significantly associated with the administration of a pelvic radiotherapy (RT) boost. (d) Short duration chemotherapy followed by SRA and hyperfractionated WAI without a pelvic boost is a promising management option for patients with optimal Stage III ovarian cancer. A Phase III trial will be necessary to determine how this treatment strategy compares with chemotherapy or RT alone in this patient population.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the ovary

The initial management of carcinoma of the ovary is surgical. The need for further treatment is determined by a consideration of tumor stage, grade, and the presence of residual disease. Approximately one-third of patients are suitably managed by primary post-operative radiotherapy directed to the entire abdomen and pelvis with curative intent. Patients are mainly derived from stages I and II. Stage III patients are also included if the tumor is of low grade and there is no pelvic residuum. The dose which can be safely delivered to the upper abdomen is limited by normal tissue tolerance. Curative radiation is inappropriate for patients with upper abdominal disease and/or more than small volume residuum in the pelvis. These patients are best managed with chemotherapy. Suitably selected patients have a ten-year relapse-free survival of 68% following radiotherapy. Acute gastrointestinal symptoms are common during the treatment, but are usually amenable to symptomatic management. Long term morbidity is infrequent, and with modern techniques the incidence of treatment-related small bowel obstruction is around 5%. Radiotherapy to the abdomen and pelvis has also a potential role as consolidative treatment in patients with advanced disease, following a favourable response to chemotherapy.

Integrating radiation therapy into the management of ovarian cancer

Several studies during the last 15 years have elucidated the role of postoperative external beam radiation therapy as curative management of some subsets of patients with ovarian cancer. Despite this, the use of radiation therapy in patients with ovarian cancer has remained a controversial subject. Substantially improved cure rates have not been realized during the past decade despite the early promise of high response rates to cisplatin chemotherapy. Thus, it is important that all currently effective therapies be used for maximum therapeutic gain. This article will review the evidence that radiation therapy is curative in ovarian cancer and highlight the criteria, including stage and grade of disease and tumor residuum, by which patients suitable for such therapy are selected. The rationale for the use of whole abdominopelvic irradiation rather than pelvic or lower abdominal treatment will be discussed, as will the optimal radiation technique and its attendant morbidity. Limited data pertinent to the controversy over the use of radiation therapy versus chemotherapy in early disease, will be reviewed. The possible benefits of consolidation abdominopelvic radiation therapy after chemotherapy in highly selected patients with well-differentiated microscopic residual disease at second-look laparotomy or with no residual disease but high a risk for relapse will be considered.

Analysis of complications in patients treated with abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy for ovarian carcinoma

Between 1971 and 1985, 598 patients with ovarian carcinoma were treated with abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy. Acute complications included nausea and vomiting in 364 patients (61%) which were severe in 36, and diarrhea in 407 patients (68%), severe in 35. Leukopenia (less than 2.0 x 10(9) cells/liter) and thrombocytopenia (less than 100 x 10(9) cells/liter) occurred in 64 patients (11%) each. Treatment interruptions occurred in 136 patients (23%), and 62 patients (10%) did not complete treatment. In both situations the most common cause was myelosuppression. Late complications included chronic diarrhea in 85 patients (14%), transient hepatic enzyme elevation in 224 (44%), and symptomatic basal pneumonitis in 23 (4%). Serious late bowel complications were infrequent: 25 patients (4.2%) developed bowel obstruction and 16 required operation. Multivariate analysis was unable to determine any significant prognostic factors for bowel obstruction; however, the moving-strip technique of radiation therapy was associated with a significantly greater risk of developing chronic diarrhea, pneumonitis, and hepatic enzyme elevation than was the open beam technique. We conclude that abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy as used in these patients is associated with modest acute complications and a low risk of serious late toxicity.