Hexamethylmelamine as second-line therapy in platin-resistant ovarian cancer

Cytoreductive Surgery Followed by Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Perfusion in the Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Study

Aims and Background

The optimal salvage therapy for recurrent ovarian carcinoma has not been clearly established. Response to second-line chemotherapy is low, with a short median survival (8.8-15 months). We investigated the effect of an aggressive approach consisting of surgery followed by intraperitoneal drug delivery and local hyperthermia.

Patients and Methods

In a phase II clinical study, 27 patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian carcinoma were treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion. Median patient age was 53 years (range, 30-67) and mean follow-up was 17.4 months (range, 0.3-36.0). Patients had been surgically staged and heavily pretreated with cisplatin-based, taxol-based or taxol/platinum-containing regimens. Nineteen (70%) patients were cytoreduced to minimal residual disease <2.5 mm. The intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion was performed with the closed abdomen technique, using a preheated polysaline perfusate containing cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) + mitomycin C (3.3 mg/m2/L) through a heart-lung pump (mean flow of 700 mL/min) for 60 min in the hyperthermic phase (42.5 °C).

Results

Two-year overall survival was 55%. Median times to overall progression and local progression were 16 months and 21.8 months, respectively. Variables that affected the overall survival or time to progression were as follows: residual disease (P = 0.00025), patient age (P = 0.04), and lag time between diagnosis and cytoreductive surgery + intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (P = 0.04). Treatment-related morbidity, mortality and acute toxicity (grade II-III) rates were 11%, 4% and 11%, respectively. Eight (89%) of 9 patients had ascites resolution.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that cytoreductive surgery + intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is a well-tolerated, feasible and promising alternative in the management of selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but further randomized controlled studies are needed in order to confirm our findings.

Radiation therapy is a treatment to be considered for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer after chemotherapy

Aims and background

Radiation therapy provides a safe and effective alternative treatment option for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, although it has not been a treatment of choice. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of radiation therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer after chemotherapy according to the disease status.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 38 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with radiation therapy at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between January 1997 and December 2007. We analyzed their clinical characteristics and the outcome of radiation therapy.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were treated with radiation therapy. Their median age was 51.5 years. Most patients were FIGO stage III (27/38) with serous adenocarcinoma (26/38). All patients had received at least one regimen of platinum-based chemotherapy; 24 patients were sensitive to the first chemotherapy and the others were resistant. Lymph node and abdominopelvic wall were the most common sites of radiation therapy. The response rate was 65.0% (16 complete remissions and 10 partial remissions), and the median regression rate was 78.8% (range, −66.6 to 100.0). Median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (range, 1.0–66.6). In 28 patients who had a solitary relapsed site from the radiographic finding at the time of radiation therapy, it was 10.7 months (range, 1.8–66.6). Neither hematologic nor intestinal toxicity of grade 3–4 was observed. Prognostic factors were sensitivity to platinum and the site treated with radiation therapy.

Conclusions

Radiation therapy is a treatment that should be considered for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, especially in good responders to platinum or patients with solitary relapsed lesions.

Hexamethylmelamine as consolidation treatment for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with hexamethylmelamine (HMM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients treated at our hospital between January 1997 and November 2006 and in documented clinical complete response from advanced ovarian cancer following front-line platinum-based therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients treated with HMM were compared to the patients of matched counterpart without consolidation therapy. Of 102 patients enrolled, 49 were treated with HMM and 53 received no consolidation treatment. For patients with HMM and observed patients, the mean age were 54.6 and 55.6 yr; the distribution of stage was similar (P=0.977); the optimal surgery was performed in 36 (73.5%) and 44 (83%) (P=0.336); the recurrence rate were 27 (55.1%) and 33 (62.3%) (P=0.463); and the median progression-free survival were 38 months and 21 months for patients with HMM and observed patients (P=0.235). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the follow-up period. Although this study failed to show the significant survival benefit of consolidation therapy with HMM in patients with advanced EOC, we consider that our study can contribute data to investigate the effectiveness of consolidation therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Management of recurrent ovarian carcinoma: current status and future directions

The majority of patients who present with epithelial ovarian cancer respond well to the initial treatment, but will ultimately experience a recurrence of their disease. Chemotherapy can palliate symptoms of disease recurrence, and there is some evidence that it also can improve survival. Recurrent ovarian carcinoma is divided into two subsets of patients: those with platinum-sensitive disease and those with platinum-resistant disease. Management for these two groups has diverged in the last few years, as evidence accrues that the response to treatment and duration of treatment-free interval after completion of front-line therapy impacts the prognosis and the treatment choice for these patients. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for platinum combination re-treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive disease. Additionally, there are multiple single-agent trials evaluating novel agents for patients with platinum-resistant as well as platinum-sensitive disease. This review will discuss the role of chemotherapy in recurrent disease, describe the various agents used in this setting, and touch on the role of biologic agents in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status

Over recent decades, truly impressive progress has been made in the outcome associated with the pharmacological antineoplastic management of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Following initial surgery, the large majority of patients with this malignancy will receive a chemotherapy regimen that includes a platinum drug (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Currently, objective responses are observed in approximately 60-80% of patients treated in the front-line setting, with documented improvements in overall survival compared with prior non-platinum and taxane programmes. Unfortunately, despite the high response rate to initial chemotherapy, the majority of women with advanced disease will experience recurrence of the malignant process and be candidates for a variety of possible second-line therapeutic options. It is well recognized that ovarian cancer patients who are documented to experience an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy but where the disease recurs approximately 6 or more months following the completion of primary therapy, may have another clinically meaningful response (both objective and subjective) to a second platinum-based strategy. However, an optimal management approach in this setting remains to be defined. Furthermore, the malignant cell populations in all ovarian cancer patients who experience an initial relapse of the disease process will eventually be resistant to the platinum agents. In this setting, multiple drugs have been shown to be biologically active. Again, an optimal strategy to be employed in the platinum-resistant setting has yet to be demonstrated through the conduct of evidence-based trials. Reasonable goals of therapy in women with recurrent or resistant ovarian cancer are to improve overall survival, reduce the severity (and delay the occurrence) of symptoms and optimize overall quality of life.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: pharmacotherapy and novel therapeutics

Epithelial ovarian cancer will strike between 1 - 2% of women in developed countries and, unfortunately, it largely remains a lethal disease due to late-stage at diagnosis and the eventual development of chemotherapy resistance. Ovarian cancer is initially treated with surgical resection and chemotherapy (primarily platinum/taxane combinations) and remission can be attained for the majority of patients. Despite this, most women will recur and require multiple further therapies. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing treatment options, including surgery, traditional chemotherapy as well as upcoming novel and targeted therapies that may one day improve outcomes in this disease.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have previously received paclitaxel—ANZGOG 02-01

OBJECTIVE

To determine the response rate of weekly docetaxel in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with paclitaxel and at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this multi-center phase II trial, 37 patients with relapsed disease were enrolled and treated with weekly docetaxel at 35 mg/m for 5 out of 6 consecutive weeks. Two patient cohorts were considered, those who progressed or relapsed within 4 months (N=7) or at greater than 4 months (N=30) from the time of completing their last course of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Patients in both cohorts received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range; 1-4). In evaluable patients, the combined overall response rate, using both CA125 and RECIST response criteria was 18.9% (7/37; 95% CI; 10-34%). The combined overall progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI; 2.5-3.8), and the combined overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI; 8.2-16.4). Treatment was generally well tolerated with the only grade 4 toxicity being skin toxicity (3%). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and watery eyes (8%) with grade 3 neutropenia observed in only 5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and has activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel.

Long-term follow-up of a phase II trial of oral altretamine for consolidation of clinical complete remission in women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in the Southwest Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

This report provides follow-up progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival data for women who achieved clinical complete remission (cCR) from stage III ovarian cancer after first-line therapy and were treated with altretamine consolidation therapy.

METHODS

Patients who enrolled in the SWOG 9326 study from September 1993 to July 1997 were required to have documented cCR from stage III ovarian cancer following front-line platinum-based therapy. Treatment consisted of 6 months of oral altretamine at 260 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven of 112 enrolled patients were evaluable for efficacy. This report presents median 6.2-year follow-up, dating from study registration. Median PFS was 28 (95% CI: 19-43) months. Median PFS for patients with optimal disease was 45 (95% CI: 27-48) months and for patients with suboptimal disease was 17 (95% CI: 12-26) months. Twenty-six of 61 (43%) patients with optimally debulked lesions and 5 of 36 (14%) patients with suboptimally debulked lesions remained disease free. Median survival of patients with optimally debulked disease has not been reached; median survival of patients with suboptimally debulked disease was 39 (95% CI: 19-51) months. No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidation therapy with oral altretamine was generally well tolerated and associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival in the Phase II setting.

Management of peritoneal surface component of ovarian cancer

Primary surgery followed by systemic platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of management for ovarian cancer. However, the majority of patients have an advanced disease (stage III/IV) at the time of diagnosis rendering the optimal primary cytoreduction feasible in only a small percentage of cases. A large tumor bulk limits the success of subsequent antiblastic therapy. There are two alternatives to overcome this unfavorable situation: (1) employment of ultra-radical interventions such as peritonectomy procedures, to increase the optimal cytoreduction rate; or (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whether such strategies would have an influence on the final outcome of patients is an issue to be defined in further prospective randomized studies. For second-line therapies no consensus regarding treatment has emerged. When previous effective drug combinations fail, there is virtually no chance of inducing a significant response with second-line treatment. The combination of secondary CRS and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion constitutes a feasible and potential option for this subset of patients based on phase II studies. A randomized trial will be conducted to test the effectiveness of this strategy in patients with cisplatin-resistant disease. The indication for second-line treatment is macroscopic residual or relapse within 6 months after the completion of first line chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy for newly diagnosed and relapsed advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To review chemotherapy options for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed advanced ovarian cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature.

CONCLUSION

Primary chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer consisting of a platinum compound and a taxane is commonly associated with myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, and sensory/motor neuropathy. For recurrent disease, numerous chemotherapy agents are effective, including rechallenging the patient with a platinum and/or a taxane or using newer agents such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, and gemcitabine. In platinum-resistant disease, selection is based mainly on the toxicity profile, because palliation and quality of life are important.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses play a valuable role in ovarian cancer care by proactively meeting patient information needs.

An escalating dose finding study of liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine for the treatment of refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of liposomal doxorubicin (LD)-vinorelbine (V) in patients with refractory or resistant ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were eligible. Seven levels were studied [LD 25-V20 (three patients enrolled); LD 30-V20 (three); LD 35-V20 (three); LD 20-V25 (three); LD 25-V25 (three); LD 30-V25 (10); LD 35-V25 (five)]. LD was given on day 1, while V was given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Cohorts of three patients were enrolled at each level, and another three patients were planned, if one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was registered.

RESULTS

DLT was observed in four patients: two febrile neutropenia, one grade 4 thrombocytopenia and one grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) at level 7 (LD 35-V25). Thus, liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) was the MTD. The most frequent toxicity was neutropenia. Fifteen patients (50%) experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 10 (33.3%) grade 4 neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Mucositis and PPE were the most frequent toxicities, but in most cases were grade 1. Out of 29 assessable patients, six (20.7%; 95% confidence interval 10%-39%) experienced an objective response, with one complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory or resistant ovarian cancer, the recommended doses for the combination studied are liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) (day 1) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 8). Neutropenia is the most frequent toxicity, while non-hematological toxicity is mild. Substantial activity was recorded and a phase II study is justified.

Chemotherapeutic management of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review current treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Factors for treatment selection are discussed.

DATA SOURCES

Research articles and textbooks.

CONCLUSION

Research efforts continue to identify novel agents and/or combination therapies that can effect a cure or prolong survival. Several agents offer similar efficacy outcomes but vary in safety aspects and administration requirements.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Numerous clinical trials have defined the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. Oncology nurses can prepare patients to make treatment decisions; educate them about treatment-related side effects; and develop an ongoing relationship as patient advocates to ensure quality of life.

Second-line chemotherapy of epithelial ovarian cancer

Despite the high objective response rate of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer to front-line chemotherapy, the majority of women with this condition ultimately progress or recur after achieving an initial response and are potential candidates for a second-line treatment approach. A number of antineoplastic agents have demonstrated sufficient biological activity to be considered a rational treatment strategy in this clinical setting. In selecting an 'optimal' management approach for a particular patient the oncologist must consider a number of issues, including the toxicity of the available drugs, the side effects previously experienced by the individual, convenience, cost and patient choice.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a phase II study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the activity of oral Altretamine in women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who responded (PR or CR) to first line chemotherapy but relapsed within 6 months. The protocol was later amended to include patients with relapse within 12 months.

METHODS

A multicentric phase II trial. The patients had to have measurable disease. No more than one prior chemotherapy regiment was allowed. The patients were treated with 260 mg/m(2)/day of Altretamine in four divided doses for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The response was evaluated after every two courses.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible patients were treated with a median of 3 courses of Altretamine (range 1-12). Hematological toxicity was minimal. Gastrointestinal toxicity was common. Response evaluation was possible for 26 patients. Three patients (9.7% intent-to-treat) achieved a partial response. Eight patients had stable disease, and 15 patients had progressive disease after two treatment courses. The median time to progression was 10 weeks (range, 5-51 weeks). Medial survival was 34 weeks (range, 7-112+).

CONCLUSION

Altretamine should not be chosen as standard treatment in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. However, Altretamine represents a useful alternative in patients who prefer oral treatment or when socioeconomic considerations are an important issue.

Long term follow-up of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after Ad p53 gene replacement with SCH 58500

OBJECTIVE

We have previously reported the safety, efficient gene transfer, and favorable CA125 responses of individuals with recurrent ovarian cancer treated by p53 gene replacement with the adenoviral vector SCH 58500. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the long-term follow-up of these heavily pretreated patients subsequent to SCH 58500 dosing.

METHODS

Patients (n=36) were treated with either single-dose SCH 58500 in the phase I study or with multiple doses (MD) of SCH 58500 over multiple cycles in combination of platinum-based chemotherapy in the phase I/II portion of the study. Five patients were initially treated in the single-dose group and re-enrolled in the MD group. The MD group was evaluated both without the re-enrolled patients as MD1 (n=19), and as MD2 (n=24), which included them. Patients who were only treated on the single-dose arm were designated as SD (n=12). Most patients received additional chemotherapy at the discretion of their physicians on completion of the trial. The current analysis is a retrospective sequential cohort survival analysis.

RESULTS

The first patient was treated in March 1997 and the last patient completed SCH 58500 in September 1998. There was no difference in age at diagnosis, Karnofsky performance status, interval between diagnosis to SCH 58500, prior cycles or regimen of chemotherapy, platinum-free interval, percent platinum refractory patients, pretreatment CA125, or largest tumor volume between groups. Both MD groups had a slightly longer chemotherapy-free interval before SCH 58500 than the SD group. Median survival of individuals who received MD SCH 58500 with chemotherapy was 12-13.0 months, compared to only 5 months for those treated with SD SCH 58500. There are 10 long-term survivors more than 20 months after MD treatment for recurrent disease compared to only 2 long-term survivors after SD SCH 58500.

CONCLUSION

The 12- to 13.0-month median survival in a heavily pretreated population with recurrent ovarian cancer compares favorably to the 16-month median survival for individuals treated with paclitaxel at the time of initial recurrence of this disease and is more than double the 5-month survival seen with palliative radiotherapy or paclitaxel failure. These data suggest that further study of SCH58500 is clearly indicated.

A phase II trial of daily perillyl alcohol in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2E96

OBJECTIVE

This was a phase II study of perillyl alcohol in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the 6-month progression-free rate of perillyl alcohol as compared with historic controls. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the objective response rate, time to progression and survival, dropout rate, and number of cycles administered; define the qualitative nature of acute and chronic toxicities; and evaluate the effect of perillyl alcohol on triglycerides and total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol levels. Methods. Women who had received prior platinum-based therapy and had residual or recurrent disease were eligible. Perillyl alcohol was administered orally, four times daily, at a dose of 1200 mg/m(2). This was repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was experienced.

RESULTS

The 6-month progression-free rate was 17%. None of the patients achieved a complete or partial response. The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months. The median overall survival was 9.1 months. Compliance was greater than 90% but gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1-2 nausea, satiety, eructation in 70%) and fatigue (grade 1-2 in 40%) were common and limited the ability to escalate the dose from 1200 to 1500 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSION

Perillyl alcohol administered at this dose and formulation did not exhibit signs of extending the time-to-progression in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Effective palliative radiation therapy in advanced and recurrent ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review our experience using radiation therapy as a palliative treatment in ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty patients who received radiation therapy for ovarian carcinoma between 1983 and 1998 were reviewed. The indications for radiation therapy, radiation therapy techniques, details, tolerance, and response were recorded. A complete response required complete resolution of the patient's symptoms, radiographic findings, palpable mass, or CA-125 level. A partial response required at least 50% resolution of these parameters. The actuarial survival rates from initial diagnosis and from the completion of radiation therapy were calculated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 67 years (range 26 to 90 years). A median of one laparotomy was performed before irradiation. Zero to 20 cycles of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were delivered before irradiation (median = 6 cycles). The reasons for palliative treatment were: pain (n = 22), mass (n = 23), obstruction of ureter, rectum, esophagus, or stomach (n = 12), a positive second-look laparotomy (n = 9), ascites (n = 8), vaginal bleeding (n = 6), rectal bleeding (n = 1), lymphedema (n = 3), skin involvement (n = 1), or brain metastases with symptoms (n = 11). Some patients received treatment for more than one indication. Treatment was directed to the abdomen or pelvis in 64 patients, to the brain in 11, and to other sites in 5. The overall response rate was 73%. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced a complete response of their symptoms, palpable mass, and/or CA-125 level. Forty-five percent had a partial response. Only 11% suffered progressive disease during therapy that required discontinuation of the treatment. Sixteen percent had stable disease. The duration of the responses and stable disease lasted until death except in 10 patients who experienced recurrence of their symptoms between 1 and 21 months (median = 9 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates from diagnosis were 89%, 73%, 42%, and 33%, respectively. The survival rates calculated from the completion of radiotherapy were 39%, 27%, 13%, and 10%, respectively. Five percent of patients experienced Grade 3 diarrhea, vomiting, myelosuppression, or fatigue. Fourteen percent of patients experienced Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, 19% experienced Grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting, and 11% had Grade 1 or 2 myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of radiation therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma, the response, survival, and tolerance rates compare favorably to those reported for current second- and third-line chemotherapy regimens. Cooperative groups should consider evaluating prospectively the use of radiation therapy before nonplatinum and/or nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy in these patients.

A combination of platinum and tamoxifen in advanced ovarian cancer failing platinum-based chemotherapy: results of a Phase II study

The treatment of recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer has limited therapeutic potential. The clinical outcome of second-line therapy largely depends on the potential chemo-sensitivity of the tumor expressed during up-front chemotherapy, as well as on the treatment-free interval from the last course of cytotoxic therapy. However, the identification of agents such as tamoxifen (TAM) at nontoxic doses, able to act synergistically with standard chemotherapy, may be useful to overcome resistance. Fifty patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer following platinum (P)-based chemotherapy (28 platinum-resistant and 22 platinum-sensitive) entered a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of P re-challenge with the addition of TAM as a chemotherapy response modulator. The choice of the P compound (100 mg/m2 cisplatin or 400 mg/m2 carboplatin, q3 weeks) was made on the basis of the prior total cisplatin dose and the presence of neurotoxicity. TAM was administered at the doses of 80 mg/day for 30 days followed by 40 mg/day for the remaining period of treatment. Toxicity consisted mainly of mild to moderate nausea and vomiting (76%), peripheral neuropathy (43%), nephrotoxicity (4%), anemia (16%), leukopenia (58%) and thrombocytopenia (16%). The overall response to the P-TAM combination was 50% (complete response 30%; partial response 20%) with a median duration of 8.5 months (3-42). Sixty-four percent of the P-sensitive and 39% of the P-resistant patients responded (59% and 33%, respectively, for those bearing measurable disease). The overall median survival was 23 (3-48) and 19 months for the patients with measurable disease (20 months for the P-resistant group). This phase II trial confirmed the activity for a re-challenge employing a P compound and TAM in clinically defined P-resistant ovarian cancer patients. The mild toxicity profile and the relatively low cost of the treatment render further investigations on the P-TAM regimen worthwhile.

Hypersensitivity reactions and the utility of oral and intravenous desensitization in patients with gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to characterize hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies and to determine the utility of oral and intravenous desensitization.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with hypersensitivity reactions identified by direct physician query and by review of charts with ICD9 code E933.1 (Adverse Effect Anti-Neoplastic).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were identified: 27 with ovarian cancer, 4 with primary peritoneal cancer, and 1 with cervical cancer. Nine patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions during the primary regimen and 23 during chemotherapy for recurrent disease. Hypersensitivity occurred following an average of nine courses. Hypersensitivity occurred secondary to paclitaxel (10) carboplatin (16), cisplatin (4), bleomycin (1), and paclitaxel/carboplatin combination therapy (1). Patients had previously received the agent in 93.8% of carboplatin reactions, in 54.5% of paclitaxel reactions, and in all other agent reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions most commonly included flushing, dyspnea/bronchospasm, back pain, chest discomfort, pruritus, erythema, and nausea and occasionally included alterations in blood pressure or pulse rate. Reactions were successfully treated in 96.9% of patients by interrupting the infusion and administering steroids, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, nebulized beta-agonists, and/or pressors. Seventeen patients underwent desensitization, one to two agents, with 94% success. Nine of ten patients had successful iv desensitization, and 8/10 patients had successful oral desensitization. One failure on the oral regimen had previous successful iv desensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic agents do not necessarily require exclusion of a compound from the treatment regimen. Intravenous and oral desensitization protocols are useful for successful and safe administration of paclitaxel and platinum compounds in patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and topotecan in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma that recurred after or didn't respond to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable and assessable disease were randomized to receive either PLD 50 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour infusion every 4 weeks or topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified prospectively for platinum sensitivity and for the presence or absence of bulky disease.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients were treated (239 PLD and 235 topotecan). They comprised the intent-to-treat population. The overall progression-free survival rates were similar between the two arms (P =.095). The overall response rates for PLD and topotecan were 19.7% and 17.0%, respectively (P =.390). Median overall survival times were 60 weeks for PLD and 56.7 weeks for topotecan. Data analyzed in platinum-sensitive patients demonstrated a statistically significant benefit from PLD for progression-free survival (P =.037), with medians of 28.9 for PLD versus 23.3 weeks for topotecan. For overall survival, PLD was significantly superior to topotecan (P =.008), with a median of 108 weeks versus 71.1 weeks. The platinum-refractory subgroup demonstrated a nonstatistically significant survival trend in favor of topotecan (P =.455). Severe hematologic toxicity was more common with topotecan and was more likely to be associated with dosage modification, or growth factor or blood product utilization.

CONCLUSION

The comparable efficacy, favorable safety profile, and convenient dosing support the role of PLD as a valuable treatment option in this patient population.

Clinical evidence for topotecan-paclitaxel non--cross-resistance in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

A large, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of topotecan versus paclitaxel in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer showed that these two compounds have similar activity. In this study, a number of patients crossed over to the alternative drug as third-line therapy, ie, from paclitaxel to topotecan and vice versa. We therefore were able to assess the degree of non-cross-resistance between these two compounds.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had progressed after one platinum-based regimen were randomized to either topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/d) x 5 every 21 days (n = 112) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days (n = 114). A total of 110 patients received cross-over therapy with the alternative drug (61 topotecan, 49 paclitaxel) as third-line therapy.

RESULTS

Response rates to third-line cross-over therapy were 13.1% (8 of 61 topotecan) and 10.2% (5 of 49 paclitaxel; P =.638). Seven patients who responded to third-line topotecan and four patients who responded to paclitaxel had failed to respond to their second-line treatment. Median time to progression (from the start of third-line therapy) was 9 weeks in both groups, and median survival was 40 and 48 weeks for patients who were receiving topotecan or paclitaxel, respectively. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with topotecan (81.4% of patients) than with paclitaxel (22.9% of patients).

CONCLUSION

Topotecan and paclitaxel have similar activity as second-line therapies with regard to response rates and progression-free and overall survival. We demonstrated that the two drugs have a degree of non-cross-resistance. Thus, there is a good rationale for incorporating these drugs into future first-line regimens.

Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients' emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.

An open label evaluation of topotecan in patients with relapsed or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer - single institution experience in a developing country

Investigators in developing countries rarely get an opportunity to participate in clinical drug trials in oncology. We recently participated in two clinical trials involving the use of topotecan in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who had failed initial platinum based chemotherapy. It provided us an opportunity to gain experience with the use of a rather highly myelosuppressive drug and also enabled us to compare our data with those reported from the western countries. Thirty-nine patients with good performance status and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal functions were accrued. All patients had previously received at least one platin containing regimen of chemotherapy. The most common histologic sub type was serous adenocarcinoma. Almost half of the patients had platinum refractory disease. Mean number of cycles delivered was 7.5. Eleven patients (28%) achieved complete or partial remission. Time to progression was 4.6 months. Mean overall survival was 11.3 months. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and manageable. Performance status was the only variable predictive of response. Ability to obtain informed consent, data management, and availability of adequate radiologic and laboratory facilities were important limitations. Our results confirm the applicability of results obtained in the western countries to other patient groups and ability to conduct clinical trials in oncology in the developing countries.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Oral etoposide has been studied in numerous clinical trials for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. In different studies there has been a varied response rate, and it appears that the activity of this drug is dependent to a large part on the extent of prior therapy. On the basis of data from more than 270 patients in 9 different studies, the overall response rate is 20.4%. However, in the largest study performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG), in which 82 previously treated patients received oral etoposide, the response rate was 30.5%. The GOG study categorised patients who received oral etoposide according to their response to initial therapy: patients were deemed either platinum sensitive or platinum resistant. No patients had received more than one prior regimen at the time they were entered into the oral etoposide trial. In 41 platinum-resistant patients, the overall response rate was 26.8%, including a 7.3% clinical complete remission rate. In patients who were platinum sensitive, the overall response rate was 34.1%, with a 14.6% clinical complete remission rate. Toxicity was acceptable, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. This GOG study confirms the activity of oral etoposide as second-line therapy both for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients. Additional studies are in progress to determine how oral etoposide can be combined with paclitaxel and a platinum compound for use as initial therapy for previously untreated patients with advanced disease.

Second-line treatment of ovarian cancer

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are often diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Although clinical complete remissions are obtained in the majority of patients through a combination of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, relapse is common. A number of agents with diverse biologic mechanisms have been identified with activity in the setting of recurrent disease. Strategies for management of patients with recurrent disease, including classification, treatment goals, and therapeutic options will be reviewed.

Oxaliplatin or paclitaxel in patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynecology Group

PURPOSE

This was a multicentric, open, randomized, phase II study of single-agent paclitaxel and oxaliplatin to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin in a relapsing progressive ovarian cancer patient population and to analyze the safety profile and impact of both agents on quality of life, time to progression, and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to two arms: 41 received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours every 3 weeks, and 45 received oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) over 2 hours every 3 weeks. For inclusion, patients had to have a performance status of 0 to 2 and to have received at least one and no more than two prior cisplatin- and/or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens within the last 12 months.

RESULTS

Seven confirmed responses were observed in each arm, for an overall response rate in the total treated population of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 32%) in the paclitaxel arm and 16% (95% CI, 7% to 29%) in the oxaliplatin arm. Median time to progression was 14 weeks and 12 weeks, and overall survival was 37 weeks and 42 weeks in the paclitaxel and oxaliplatin arms, respectively. Among 63 patients with a 0- to 6-month progression-free, platinum-free interval, there were five objective responses with paclitaxel in 31 patients and two objective responses with oxaliplatin in 32 patients. Nine patients (22%) in the paclitaxel arm had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (National Cancer Institute of Canada [NCIC] Common Toxicity Criteria). Two patients (4%) experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia in the oxaliplatin arm. Maximum grade (grade 3) NCIC neurosensory toxicity was experienced by three patients (7%) in the paclitaxel arm and by four patients (9%) in the oxaliplatin arm.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is active with moderate toxicity in patients with cisplatin-/carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer.

Cost analysis of second-line therapies for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: reimbursement dilemmas for Medicare patients

Currently used options for salvage therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer include intravenously administered paclitaxel or topotecan and orally administered altretamine or etoposide. The response rates for these agents are similar (14-26%), whereas the type and incidence of adverse events differ. Under current legislation, Medicare will reimburse intravenous outpatient chemotherapy regimens only or oral regimens with a marketed intravenous formulation, despite that 89% of cancer patients prefer oral therapies. To compare the out-of-pocket costs and costs to the Medicare system, a cost minimization analysis of treatment with these agents was conducted using published phase II and phase III data. The total cost of treatment was $15,767 for paclitaxel, $18,635 for topotecan, $4477 for altretamine, and $5016 for etoposide. The out-of-pocket costs to the patient were $83, $37, $4477, and $6, respectively. Although a physician's first consideration in choosing a therapy is efficacy and toxicity, current Medicare reimbursement policies restrict patient options for cancer care. Because Medicare adopts managed care and health maintenance organizations into the management of patient care, cost effectiveness will likely become an important consideration in the treatment of cancer.

Topotecan: a new topoisomerase I inhibiting antineoplastic agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and safety aspects of topotecan, a new antineoplastic agent, and to assess its role in the treatment of cancer.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE database English language only, January 1990-March 1998; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals; published articles, books, and abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in humans with cancer, clinical case reports, open clinical trials, and controlled clinical studies. Efficacy studies were limited primarily to trials with at least 20 evaluable patients:

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data were extracted only from published reports. Data were obtained from studies in both articles and abstracts. Only articles written in English were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Topotecan is an effective second- or third-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer and is comparable to ifosfamide, liposomal doxorubicin, and paclitaxel. Activity in combination with other agents and as a first-line agent is yet to be determined. Limited data indicate activity in small-cell lung cancer, cancers of the breast and uterus, and in nonlymphocytic leukemia. The dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan is an effective second-line agent for patients with unresponsive or relapsed cancer of the ovary. It appears to be similar to other active agents in patients with this disease status. Its ultimate role in ovarian cancer and other neoplasms awaits additional evaluation in combination with other agents and as first-line therapy.

Long-term results from a phase II study of single agent paclitaxel (Taxol) in previously platinum treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer: the Nordic experience

BACKGROUND

Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992-1994 138 patients in total were enrolled of whom 136 received paclitaxel and were included in the toxicity and survival analysis, while 112 were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 28% with 16 patients achieving a CR (14%). The estimated median (range) time to progression was 4.1 (0.7-60.7) months. The projected four-year overall survival was 7%, with a median (range) of 9.6 (0.3-60.7) months. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that platinum resistance, and WHO performance status at baseline, independently correlated with survival at all three time points (median survival time 9.6, 18, and 24 months). Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and WHO performance status 0 had a median survival of 25.6 months compared to 7.0 months for the rest of the patients (P < or = 0.0001). No serious toxicity was registered.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel could safely be administered in an outpatient setting using this schedule. Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and a good performance status were most likely to survive. However, these patients are also most likely to respond to re-treatment with a platinum compound. With reference to the reasonably good tumor control and limited toxicity observed in this study, we conclude that paclitaxel single agent therapy is a viable option in the salvage situation, which in some patients can give long-lasting responses. However, although responses can be induced in a significant number of patients, the survival figures remain poor.

Treosulfan as an effective second-line therapy in ovarian cancer

Despite radical surgery and aggressive platinum-containing primary chemotherapy, the outcome of patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains extremely poor; most of them suffer from recurrent or progressive disease. These patients should be treated with an effective second-line therapy showing only few toxic side effects so as not to affect quality of life. From July 1992 to August 1996, 88 patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer have been treated with treosulfan, an alkylating agent, in our department. All of them could be evaluated for toxicity and 80 for response. There were 2 complete and 13 partial responses, giving an objective response rate of 19%. Among responding patients, median survival time was 41 months. Thirty-four percent of the patients had stable disease with median survival of 18 months. Thirty-eight (47%) nonresponding patients showed a survival time of only 5 months. In 48 women with progressive disease within 12 months after primary therapy, a response rate of 19% and stable disease in 31% could be achieved. Toxic side effects were rare and moderate in intensity. Life-threatening myelosuppression, emesis resistant to therapy, and alopecia were not observed. It can be concluded that tresosulfan is an effective drug in second-line therapy for patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer without affecting quality of life.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) in platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to critically examine the antitumor activity of altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, the Gynecologic Oncology Group initiated a Phase II trial of the agent administered in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Altretamine was administered at a dose of 260 mg/m2 orally for 14 days in a 28-day course. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable side effects prevented further therapy. A total of 36 patients (median age: 56.5) were treated on this trial, of whom 33 were evaluable for toxicity and 30 for response. All patients had previously received either cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel.

RESULTS

The major side effect was emesis (grade 3-4, 7/33, 21%). The objective response rate was 10% (one complete response, two partial responses).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that altretamine has limited activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Hexamethylmelamine as a single second-line agent in ovarian cancer: follow-up report and review of the literature

From December 1982 to December 1986, 52 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with single-agent HMM. Chemotherapy was given for a period of 1 year unless progression of disease or toxicity was noted. Survival was determined from the time of diagnosis to the date of death or September 30, 1992. The regimen was well tolerated with only one case of severe gastrointestinal toxicity. Nine patients were found to be clinically free of disease following completion of HMM treatment; they had initially responded to cisplatin-based therapy (i.e., potentially cisplatin-sensitive) and subsequently recurred. Four were found to have gross disease at the time of reassessment laparotomy. Three of these 9 patients are alive 81-92 months since diagnosis, having maintained disease-free intervals of up to 6 years. The median survival for the 9 patients without evidence of disease at the end of therapy was 75 months versus 9 months for the nonresponders. No patient who had progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (i.e., primary cisplatin-resistant) responded to second-line single-agent oral hexamethylmelamine. With a follow-up close to 10 years, our data show that hexamethylmelamine, with reasonable toxicity, can provide an extended, disease-free interval to a selected group of patients.

Experience with independent radiological review during a topotecan trial in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The results of phase II clinical trials are usually based on response of tumours to new oncolytic agents as evidenced by radiological imaging techniques. In this trial, all claimed responders were reviewed at a specially convened meeting by the peer group of study investigators and a radiologist, independent of the study institutions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred eleven patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who had previously been treated with a platinum based regimen and had subsequently relapsed and who had measurable disease were treated with topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/day i.v. on five consecutive days repeated every 21 days to assess efficacy and tolerability. Ninety-three were considered eligible for the study per protocol and lesions were assessed by either computerised tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). At the meeting, scans from all 24 (25.8%) claimed responders were reviewed, lesions remeasured by the radiologist and a group discussion led to a final response classification.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were found to be eligible for the study and 14 (15.2%) were confirmed as responders. Ten were rejected as responders, mainly because the lesion did not decrease in size by < or = 50%, but one patient failed to meet the entry criteria. Remeasurement of CT scans was more objective than US scans. Difficulties were encountered during review of some CT scan sequences because of non-uniform imaging parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent radiological review in conjunction with the peer review group in this trial enabled rigorous and consistent application of response criteria. This decreased the response rate from 25.8% to 15.2%, but this represents a more objective assessment. CT scanning is an objective technique for assessing response rates in phase II studies whereas US is subjective and dose not necessarily allow accurate lesion assessment on subsequent examinations, nor allows independent review at a later date. For these reasons it should not be used in such studies for accurate lesion assessment. Cross-sectional imaging techniques such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do allow accurate lesion assessment and independent review at a later date, but standard protocols need to be instituted, to allow consistency and a comparison to be made with subsequent studies using the same agent and a broad comparison to be made with other agents.

A phase II study of carboplatin and hexamethylmelamine as induction chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

27 patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stages IIc-IV were treated with carboplatin 7 x (glomerular filtration rate + 25) mg given intravenously on day 1 and hexamethylmelamine (HMM) 150 mg/m2 orally on days 2-15, every 28 days. 3 patients were not evaluable for response. Clinical response was seen in 17 patients (71%), with six (25%) complete and 11 (46%) partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 months and the median cancer-related survival was 21.3 months. 4 patients (15%) experienced grade 3 mental depression; none had peripheral neuropathy above grade 1. The haematological toxicity was moderate, none had grade 4 leucopenia, but 4 (15%) had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Carboplatin plus HMM had few side-effects and a high response rate with a survival comparable to other platinum-based combinations.

Altretamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cancer chemotherapy

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) is a cytotoxic antineoplastic agent which appears to require metabolic activation. Metabolic intermediates may act as alkylating agents; however, altretamine is not directly cross-resistant with classical alkylating agents. Objective response rates to orally administered altretamine as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer were 0 to 33%, with disease stabilisation in a further 8 to 78% of patients. Response rates appear to be higher in patients who have responded to previous alkylating agent or cisplatin-based therapy. There is some evidence that addition of altretamine to platinum-based combination regimens used for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer may improve long term survival, particularly in patients with limited residual disease. Although altretamine displays some activity in small cell lung cancer, it is unlikely to have any clinical role in the management of non-ovarian cancer. Altretamine appears to be relatively well tolerated, with gastrointestinal, neurological and haematological toxicities being the main dose-limiting adverse effects. However, assessment of accurate incidence rates for these effects is complicated by the use of altretamine with cisplatin. On the basis of the emerging body of clinical evidence, altretamine appears to have a limited role in the treatment of persistent or recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, primarily in patients who are potentially platinum sensitive yet intolerant of platinum analogues. Additionally, altretamine may be added to platinum-based regimens for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. At the doses currently recommended, altretamine offers a reasonably well tolerated regimen that can be administered orally and is suitable for use on an outpatient basis.

Recurrent ovarian cancer. Effective radiotherapeutic palliation after chemotherapy failure

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ovarian cancer after frontline chemotherapy is incurable; however, palliation of focal lesions often is needed to alleviate symptoms. Because published response rates to palliative irradiation (RT) among patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy are scarce, the authors attempted to define the palliative role of radiotherapy for symptomatic, localized ovarian cancer recurrences. Factors predicting a response to RT also were sought.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1993, 33 patients with ovarian cancer were irradiated at 47 sites with palliative intent after failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Sites irradiated included the pelvis (n = 33), abdomen (n = 5), chest (n = 4), brain (n = 3), and other (n = 2). Median RT dose was 35 Gy (range: 7.5-45 Gy). The median fraction size was 2.5 Gy (range, 1-5 Gy). To determine dose effectiveness, the biologic effective dose (BED) was calculated according to the following formula: BED = total dose (1 + fractional dose/alpha/beta) using an alpha/beta value of 10. The median BED10 was 44 (range, 9-72).

RESULTS

For the entire group, complete palliative response was 51% and overall palliative response was 79%. The median duration of palliation was 4 months, which reflected palliation until death in 90% of cases. The overall response rates by symptoms were: pulmonary symptom relief in 75%, vaginal bleeding control in 90%, rectal bleeding control in 85%, pain relief in 83%, and neurologic symptoms controlled in 50%. The likelihood of obtaining complete symptomatic response was significantly increased among those with high Karnofsky performance status (KPS > or = 70 vs. KPS < 70; 69% vs. 36%, P < 0.03) and among those who received a higher biologically effective dose of irradiation (BED10 > or = 44 vs. BED10 < 44; 68% vs 35%, P < 0.03). Complete palliative response rates were not influenced by histologic differentiation, the number of previously administered cisplatin regimens, or patient age. Treatment-related acute morbidities included diarrhea in 5 of 38 (13%) patients treated through abdominal or pelvic fields, and esophagitis in 2 of 5 treated through thoracic portals. Only one severe late morbidity (small bowel obstruction) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable palliation of patients with ovarian cancer that recurs after cisplatin-based chemotherapy can be achieved with local radiotherapy, especially among patients with high performance status. Biologically effective doses of at least 44 Gy10 (e.g., 3500 cGy/14 fractions = BED10 of 44) should be sought to maximize the probability of complete response. Such dose-fractionation schedules can be delivered expeditiously with acceptable tolerance. These results are comparable to the published experience of second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of focally symptomatic ovarian cancer recurrences.